May 8, 2008

Long Campaign Threatens Bush Legacy

National Review Online: The President Has Become An Easy Target And Must Defend His Record

  • In 2004, President George W. Bush defended his record for months on the stump; now it has become almost second nature for all three candidates to denounce it daily, says <b>National Review Online</b>.

    In 2004, President George W. Bush defended his record for months on the stump; now it has become almost second nature for all three candidates to denounce it daily, says National Review Online.  (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

  • Play CBS Video Video Bush Riffs On Veep, Candidates

    "CBS News RAW": President Bush cracks a few jokes at the expense of Vice President Cheney and the candidates for his job at the White House Correspondents Association dinner in Washington, D.C.

  • Video Clinton: Economic Future

    Hillary Clinton calls on President Bush to declare energy independence to create jobs and prosperity for American workers.

  • Video Bush Endorses McCain

    After clinching the GOP nomination following wins in Texas and Ohio, Sen. John McCain was formally endorsed by President Bush at a White House ceremony. Chip Reid reports.

  • Interactive Bush Presidency

    The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.

  • Photo Essay Endorser-In-Chief

    President Bush backs Republican nominee-in-waiting John McCain.

(National Review Online)  This column was written by Victor Davis Hanson.
We are in one of the longest presidential campaigns in modern memory - and haven’t even started focusing on the general election.

It’s been enough to drive most of us mad, but if there’s one person in particular suffering the most, it may be President Bush.

It’s been noted here before that we have not had an election since 1952 in which an incumbent president or vice president was not running in at least partial defense of an existing administration’s record.

That means Bush is not just a lame duck but an easy target for all three current candidates - none of whom have any investment in the president’s legacy.

Consider that the last president in a similar position was Harry Truman. He left office with an approval rating in the 20s, and it took years before historians revised the standard negative and mostly unfair view of him.

When there is no incumbent in a long race, almost everything of the last four years becomes fair and uncontested game. In 2004, Bush defended his record for months on the stump; now it has become almost second nature for all three candidates to denounce it daily.

John McCain has distanced himself from Bush as much as he can, even as his Democratic opponents dub him John McBush - when they are not outdoing each other in their denunciation of the president.

Last week, I asked a fierce Bush critic what he thought were the current unemployment rate, the mortgage default rate, the latest economic growth figures, interest rates and the status of the stock market.

He blurted out the common campaign pessimism: “Recession! Worst since the Depression!”

Then he scoffed when I suggested that the answer was really a 5 percent joblessness rate in April that was lower than the March figure; 95 to 96 percent of mortgages not entering foreclosure in this year’s first quarter; .6 percent growth during the quarter (weak, but not recession level); historically low interest rates; and sky-high stock market prices.

There are serious problems - high fuel costs, rising food prices, staggering foreign debt, unfunded entitlements, and annual deficits. Yet a president or vice president running for office (and covered incessantly by the media) would at least make the argument that there is a lot of good news, and that the bad that offsets it could be shared by a lot of culpable parties, from the Congress to the way we, the public, have been doing business for the last 20 years.

Bush, like Truman, will have to leave his final assessment for posterity. But for a variety of historic reasons as well as his own self-interest, Bush should at least take his now-unpopular case to the people, with more press conferences, public addresses, stump speeches and one-on-one interviews.

Bush’s own legacy will be affected by who succeeds him. Ronald Reagan received great press after leaving office in part because a Republican followed him for four years - quite the opposite from the senior George Bush who was thrown out of office in 1992 and blamed for assorted sins the next eight years. Likewise, compare the image of Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, and Bill Clinton when a president from the opposite party followed each into office.

Second, public perceptions, such as ongoing consumer confidence or support for the war, can dramatically affect policy success or failure. Defending past decisions can sometimes improve their outcomes.

Third, it would elevate the arguments of all three candidates if someone could remind them that energy and food problems, foreign-policy crises, and economic woes usually involve bad and worse choices.

The American people are more interested in exactly how they are going to improve things, rather than hearing each hour how our collective problems are simply the fault of one man. Searing “Bush did it” into the public conscious won’t resolve our energy, economic, or foreign-policy challenges.

The truth is that America is providing unprecedented amounts of money to address the AIDS epidemic in Africa. Tax cuts brought in greater, not less total revenue. International trade agreements created more, not fewer, jobs. Security measures at home, and losses suffered by terrorists abroad, in part explain the absence of a second 9/11.

And drilling in ANWR and off the coasts and building more nuclear power plants, refineries, and clean coal plants - if the Congress would only approve - could provide a short-term mitigation of energy prices until we reach a new generation of clean-burning and renewable fuels.

George Bush could learn from “Give ‘em Hell, Harry.” A disliked Truman never went silent into the night, but defended his record until the very end - and was ultimately rewarded for it.

By Victor Davis Hanson
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online.



America's Premier Site for Conservative News, Analysis, and Opinion.

Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 87 Comments
by joyous88 May 11, 2008 8:12 PM EDT
repuiblicons are nazi''s
Reply to this comment
by obamaslady May 11, 2008 4:33 PM EDT
"A disliked Truman never went silent into the night, but defended his record until the very end - and was ultimately rewarded for it."

Well unlike Truman this SHRUB is guilty by his own design of mass murder; stripping our freedoms with his signature on bills that secured him, cheney and friends immunity; caused economic hardship due to his corporate interests; allowed environmental poisons to fill our earth, etc. His legacy will be exactly what he made it - the WORST of the WORST! History will NOT see the Evangelical he professes, but rather will view him as Satan''s Soul.
Reply to this comment
by cheekygal-2009 May 11, 2008 2:55 PM EDT
Boo, dammit, boo! Suffering through 8-long-years of trying to scare the American citizens and keep them scared has/had the Repugnantcans changing their depends hourly. Let''s clean up Washington and get some new blood in there. Certainly can''t be any worse than the past 8-years and MAYBE something will be done for ALL THE PEOPLE and not just the top 2 or 3 percent wealthiest Americans and business.
Reply to this comment
by omnibus66 May 11, 2008 12:18 PM EDT
What the f**k is this guy talking about? Legacy? He has no legacy, only a trail of destruction and disaster behind him.

253 days, 14 hours, and 40 minutes to go until this nation is returned to sanity.
Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 May 11, 2008 12:37 AM EDT
Anyone seen obamawhamma ? I hacve been looking under every rock for that snake.
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 May 10, 2008 9:33 PM EDT
republicons have become the new nazi party,

fascist, everyone
Reply to this comment
by tmarean May 10, 2008 6:50 PM EDT
stop futures trading in oil now.... rollback prices to april 1, 2008 trading will be fobidden till the economy recovers.. join together now to save America and the world as we know it....Timothy Marean
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 May 10, 2008 6:34 PM EDT
bush may very well be a common criminal,

only the presidency is protecting him from prison,

Legacy? What a joke
Reply to this comment
by fairandbal May 10, 2008 12:50 PM EDT
NRO here''s a lesson, listen well!

Bush has had 8 years to make his legacy! When you''re working with such an imbecile you can''t make up that much ground in 6 months!

He''s the WORST PRESIDENT EVER. And as i read your article, an adequate representation of the neo-con mindset. Hilarious!
Reply to this comment
by fairandbal May 10, 2008 12:45 PM EDT
Another utterly rediculous post by NRO. They think we''re fools.

BUSH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BUSH''s legacy!!! He''s considered THE worst president in all major polls for good reason. NRO, HE IS THAT BAD! Get over it!
Reply to this comment
See all 87 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (711 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: