May 7, 2008
The Democratic Race Is Over
The New Republic: But Obama's Support Has Narrowed Dangerously--And He'll Need To Make Changes To Beat McCain
-
Photo
US Senator of Illinois Barack Obama, left and US Senator of Arizona John McCain. (AP)
-
Photo Essay
Barack Obama
A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
-
Photo Essay
John McCain
Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?
The Democratic primary is over. Hillary Clinton might still run in West Virginia and Kentucky, which she'll win handily, but by failing to win Indiana decisively and by losing North Carolina decisively, she lost the argument for her own candidacy. She can't surpass Barack Obama's delegate or popular vote count. The question is no longer who will be the Democratic nominee, but whether Obama can defeat Republican John McCain in November. And the answer to that is still unclear.
During the last two months, Obama has faltered as a candidate. He has seen his political base narrow rather than widen, and some of his strengths turn into weaknesses. Of course, he has had to deal with the scandal surrounding Reverend Jeremiah Wright, but even so, he needs to remedy certain flaws in his political approach if he wants to defeat McCain in the fall. Here is a brief list:
The Base: As the primaries have proceeded, he has become more dependent on strong, almost unanimous, support from African American and young voters. For instance, he lost the California primary in February, but he still beat Clinton by a whopping 55 to 35 percent among white men. In North Carolina, where the white Democratic electorate is liberal and tolerant (only five percent of the primary electorate voted against Obama because of race, compared to over 11 percent in Pennsylvania and Ohio), Obama could still win only 36 percent of white voters. In the fall, when African Americans will only make up about 23 percent of North Carolina's electorate, he would have to win 38 percent of all whites to carry the state.
Ideology: In the Iowa Caucus, Obama defeated Clinton among "moderate" voters by 33 to 31 percent and barely lost "conservatives" by 22 to 21 percent. He was perceived as a middle-of-the-road candidate or, even better, as standing above ideology. But he increasingly is seen as the "liberal" or even "very liberal" candidate. In Indiana, he bested Clinton among liberals 55 to 45 percent but lost moderates by 53 to 46 percent and conservatives by 65 to 35 percent. He can't carry that political image into the fall and hope to defeat McCain. In most of the swing states that he would need to win, liberals occupy a much smaller niche than they in the Democratic primary. Moderates are the key. They make up 45 percent of the electorate in Virginia and 43 percent in Colorado--two states that the Obama campaign thinks it could win.
Forcefulness: In the 2004 election, voters repeatedly expressed their preference for a "strong leader," but Obama has yet to establish himself in this respect. He is regularly judged more "honest and trustworthy" than Clinton, but those qualities have proved less important to choosing a president. In Indiana, voters thought Clinton more qualified to be commander in chief by 54 to 43 percent. Nine percent of Obama voters acknowledged that Clinton was "more qualified to be commander in chief." In North Carolina, eleven percent of Obama voters preferred Clinton. Obama appears to be somewhat effete, which will, unless remedied, cause him difficulty against McCain in the fall, particularly among white males.
Policy priorities: Obama based his campaign against Clinton on his vote against the Iraq war and on a promise to change "Washington." But the public's priorities have changed. In New Hampshire, 31 percent thought the war the most important issue. In Indiana, only 18 percent of voters thought that. Still, Obama seems far more comfortable talking about the war and government reform. In his stirring speech, he stumbled when he started talking about jobs being shipped overseas. He has to be able to drive home his differences with McCain on the economy if he wants to broaden his political base.
Values and religiosity: Obama initially held his own among voters who attend church regularly. In New Hampshire, he bested Clinton by 37 to 32 percent among weekly churchgoers--and he didn't have to include religious African Americans in the total. But Obama has increasingly lost this vote and gained adherents among the non-religious. In Indiana, he lost to Clinton among weekly and occasional churchgoers but defeated her among those who never attend church. That can hurt him in the fall in states Obama wants to win. In Virginia, for instance, weekly and occasional churchgoers made up 83 percent of the general electorate in 2004. The challenge for Obama will be to reach out to religious voters without reminding voters of his ties to Reverend Wright.
Can Obama turn it around? As he showed last fall and winter, when he suddenly regained his footing as the Iowa primary approached, Obama is capable of refocusing his energies. And now--with Clinton clearly out of contention--he will have a chance to do so.
By John B. Judis
If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion and analysis.
| If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion, and criticism. |




- 1
- 2
- next
See all 66 CommentsRidiculous
Keeting 5 connection, possibly close to getting alzheimers, Pastor Hagee ( McCains Rev. Wright ), his temper, his marrying for money ( if it''s good for Kerry it''s good for McCain ), his voting record, his embrace of Bush who tried to destroy him. His advanced age. His misstatements. His comments about Vietnamese. That''s just a start.
I predict both men will "deplore" the "sudden" nasty tone this campaign may acquire come fall. . .
I don''''t know if Clinton is done but McBush and the GOP sure are. So many new voters have registered and participated on the democrats side that I think McBush will be SWEPT in November.
Oh, and I''''d like to personally thank that great American, Rush Limbaugh, for his contribution in this growing tsunami via OPERATION BACKFIRE.
Perhaps a new moniker is in order, El Rushbo. How about LANDSLIDE LIMBAUGH! Its PERFECT! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Single-handedly turns the general election into a LANDSLIDE! Good ol LANDSLIDE LIMBAUGH.
Thank you sir......with all that talent lent to you by GAWD-D it is now clear EXACTLY where God stands.
Remember, it is not over until the fat lady sings and Clinton has not done that yet.
You''ll never win with Obama...but that''s what you get for allowing the most liberal youth vote...that''s why republicans lost control to the Neocons.
Obama''s dead meat..don''t say we didn''t warn you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TawpDawg11 at 06:12 PM : May 07, 2008
+ report abuse
Nope. Obama bailed on the true blue, solid core Dems, in favor of the fickle "youth vote" and a small black voter percentages...
Obama''s going down in NOvember..and I''m a former Democrat disgusted at my party for counting out Michigan and Florida.
good luck with that..you''re going to need all the help you can get.
Old White and Crazy, ya can''t beat that!
Bullsh-t !!!
It is the Republican Party that will need to make (huge) changes to beat Democrats. Eight years of Republican dogma have screwed US.
Historically, we (the US economy and individually) have demonstrably done better, economically, under Democratic leadership - a simple fact.
Then, again, it is not about parites beating parties ... it''s about us/US, about leading ... leading a nation.
M
AMERICA IS FED UP WITH REPIGS!
START WAR CRIMES TRIALS NOW!
AMERICA STAND UP OR SHUT UP!
CBS owes us more than what they are giving us here.
Assuming she is gone, the Libertarian vote is in play. Will either Obama or McCain reach out to try to get it? Probably not and that is unfortunate....
yet he hasen''t said how ? In fact he copies plans detailed out by other people. Has he ever had one original idea ? Putting your trust in someone who is taking advantage of the current atmosphere in the country is folley and proof positive for a disaster.
As a white democrat should he win the nomination I will be voting republican.
Posted by davidlar2 at 11:55 AM : May 08, 2008
Why would Libertarians vote for a socialist? Obama is seriously to the left and doesn''t strike me as at all appealing to Libertarians.
--------
Posted by ranger1948
Precisely....Excellent point...
.
As hussein said: "I could no more disown reverend wright than I could disown my ... grandmother."
Many Democrats simply do not want the party to make the same mistake twice by nominating another Kerry-like shallow, arrogant, platitude-spouting, gas-bag - who is so mentally deficient from extensive drug use he even has to plagiarize his hollow platitudes!.
hussein is clearly an outrageously unacceptable candidate for any elected office or position of responsibility in America.
One thing is certain: millions of Dems will leave the party if Tony Rezko''s sleazy-deal partner is nominated. Until that horrible event occurs, responsible Dems like Hillary will fight to save what was once a great political party from a take-over by the "God Da''mn America" ultra left wing.
/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by cbsespo at 01:47 PM : May 08, 2008
Exactly who are the "enlightened"
Who are the Enlightened ones? Check out the unemployment rates of Democratic-Socialist countries of Western and Eastern Europe compared to North America over the last two decades. Also check out the Socialist based countries Health Care system compared to the United States. I will let you do the research on the unemployment rates and health care and form your own conclusion if we should follow Obama path.
PERIOD. LETS ALL SUPPORT THE BEST CANDIDATE NOW, SHALL WE.
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------
Posted by cbsespo at 01:47 PM : May 08, 2008
Exactly who are the "enlightened"
Posted by mbcsmith at 03:27 PM : May 08, 2008
Final election results just in:
Voting for Barack Obama 295,000,000 enlightened
Voting for McBush 2 not enlightened
--------
Posted by ranger1948
Precisely....Excellent point...
Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 01:14 PM : May 08, 2008
We call you guys when its safe to get out from under your bed.
Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 01:16 PM : May 08, 2008
Aint nothin Cool about you, Joe.
PERIOD. LETS ALL SUPPORT THE BEST CANDIDATE NOW, SHALL WE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by JACK3213 at 04:55 PM : May 08, 2008
*** The best candidate is John Edwards! Juan Amnesty McCain is NEVER the best candidate! Why would anyone in their right mind vote for Juan Amnesty mCcBush?
When asked Senator Obama how he felt... He said that he had 2 young daughters and if they every made a mistake he would not want them to have to be ''Punished''.?? Does that mean he is choosing to kill innocent children including his own grandchildren??
When will this all end with him.??
Not pro Hillary..
Not pro McCain..
Not pro Obama..
They offer no change just same old politics.
Posted by oly_joe at 11:07 PM : May 08, 2008
What is getting ready to happen this November will DWARF 2006 results. CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON
Due to the extended race for the Democratic nomination, MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of new voters have registered and participated on the democrats side. Once the nom is settled, they will come together in a perfect storm that will set America back on a sane course. McBush may not win a single state. Who would vote for more of the Mcsame we"ve been put through?
Oh, and I''''''''d like to personally thank that great American, Rush Limbaugh, for his contribution in this growing tsunami via OPERATION BACKFIRE.
Perhaps a new moniker is in order, El Rushbo. How about LANDSLIDE LIMBAUGH! Its PERFECT! HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Single-handedly turns the general election into a ROUT! Good ol LANDSLIDE LIMBAUGH. Remember to be careful what you wish for, LANDSLIDE.
Thank you sir......with all that talent lent to you by GAWD-D it is now clear EXACTLY where God stands.
Dear God: Thank you for giving us LANDSLIDE LIMBAUGH. Amen.
LANDSLIDE LIMBAUGH...........................~
Short-sighted, simple-minded, arrogant, pompous OAF!
It''''s just like the Republicans to try to "fix" an election, they crow about democracy but they aren''''t really interested in it, everything''''s gotta be rigged, everything''''s gotta be corrupt, the news has to be managed propaganda, the generals have to lie to the people, the courts have to be stacked, the crowds have to be hand-picked shills, the phones have to be bugged, the experts have to be paid cronies, the oversight committees have to be toothless, the regulatory agencies must be understaffed and lack jurisdiction. The Republicans have a veneer of democratic openness, but it''''s all a fascist illusion. It''''s like the Republican "open market" which requires no federal intervention because it''''s self regulating - HA ! Rush Limbaugh is a pig, and that''''s unjust to pigs. All Republicans everywhere must be swept out - swept out into political oblivion where they belong.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 66 Comments