February 11, 2009 3:00 PM

Georgia Executes First Inmate In 7 Months

(CBS/AP)  A Georgia man has become the first inmate put to death since the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of executions by lethal injection.

Convicted killer William Earl Lynd was pronounced dead at 7:51 p.m., a state prisons official says.

Lynd, 53, was convicted of kidnapping and shooting to death his 26-year-old girlfriend two days before Christmas in 1988.

The Supreme Court rejected a request for a stay of execution for Lynd, Tuesday, clearing the way for the landmark execution.

Lynd became the first death row inmate executed since the Supreme Court upheld the current lethal injection method last month, ending a de facto moratorium on capital punishment in the United States. The last execution took place on Sept. 25.

The Supreme Court ruled last month in a Kentucky case that the state's method of executing inmates with a three-drug cocktail did not violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Roughly three dozen states, including Georgia, use a similar method.

Fourteen other executions are scheduled in the next six months across America. But as CBS News correspondent Mark Strassmann reports, more states are reconsidering capital punishment, and reaching very different conclusions.

Wrongful convictions are one reason why lawmakers in five states are seriously debating repealing capital punishment. But five other states have moved in a very different direction -- passing laws that expanded death row to execute people convicted of a crime other than murder.

Lynd has already selected his final meal: two pepper jack barbecue burgers with crisp onions; two baked potatoes with sour cream, bacon and cheese; and a strawberry milkshake.

Death penalty opponents planned vigils around Georgia on Tuesday.

"In light of the many well-documented problems with our death penalty system, it is disturbing that Georgia is rushing to lead the country in resuming the death penalty machinery," said Laura Moye, chairwoman of Georgians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty.

Lynd, now 53, was sentenced to die for kidnapping and shooting his live-in girlfriend, Ginger Moore, 26, in south Georgia in 1988, after the two consumed Valium, marijuana and alcohol. Prosecutors said she suffered a slow, agonizing death, regaining consciousness twice after being shot in the head.

The five-member Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles on Monday rejected Lynd's clemency appeal without comment.

Texas conducted the nation's last execution, putting Michael Richard to death on Sept. 25, 2007, the same day the Supreme Court agreed to consider the Kentucky case, brought by two prisoners who claimed the lethal injection method violated the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

On Monday, a Texas judge set an Aug. 5 lethal injection date for Jose Medellin, 33, for his participation in the gang rape and strangulation deaths of two teenage girls when they stumbled upon a gang initiation rite 15 years ago in Houston.

The death sentence for the Mexican-born Medellin set off an international dispute and a U.S. Supreme Court rebuke of the White House after the high court in March refused to hear his appeal, saying President Bush overstepped his authority by ordering Texas to reopen his case and the cases of 50 other Mexican nationals condemned for murders in the U.S.

In Mississippi, the state Supreme Court scheduled a May 21 execution for Earl Wesley Berry, convicted of kidnapping Mary Bounds from the parking lot of the First Baptist Church in Houston on Nov. 29, 1987. He beat her viciously then dumped her body in the woods.

Attorney General Jim Hood had requested that Berry be executed Monday, his 49th birthday. However, the court set the date for later this month after rejecting arguments from Berry's lawyers that he should be spared because he is mentally disabled and that the method of lethal injection is unconstitutional.

The U.S. Supreme Court had blocked Berry's last scheduled execution on Oct. 30, 2007, to consider the Kentucky case.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 133 Comments
by obamawhama May 7, 2008 9:41 PM EDT
which may I add,, indicates that these people are not after ''justice'' but more on protecting criminals.
Reply to this comment
by obamawhama May 7, 2008 9:40 PM EDT
This execution was NOT DELAYED because there were any doubts that he commited the crime..it was prolonged by dubious tactics by bleeding heart liberals such as ''cruel and unusual punishment'' loopholes..
Reply to this comment
by hippychicky-2009 May 7, 2008 5:25 PM EDT
More often than not", "Most of the time"....
Common were talking about the taking of a human life here, whats the *** hurry! I''''m not that happy in the first place that my state is in the killing business to begin with. I sure as hell don''''t want them circumventing the system just so they can McDonaldize the process by taking away somebodies constitutional rights. I cant understand why my countryman are so damned bloodthirsty, so ready to off somebody they dont even know. Canada has little to no violent crime and no capital punishment either. England the same. What the hell is wrong with us!

Posted by chefjohn4

I can see where you are coming from. But, I don''t think we should do away with capital punishment. But that punishment should be reserved for specific crimes.
It would depend on the nature of the crime for me whether or not I would want to see someone punished or not. (put to death)
Personally this guy to me seemed like there might have been a reasonable doubt, because of the drugs involved in the crime. Then sentence him to hard labor for life. But don''t make me pay for it.
Now, crimes againest children, the elderly,and MR/MI people should hold swifter and harsher punishments.
There are no excuses for those such crimes.
Reply to this comment
by chefjohn4 May 7, 2008 5:08 PM EDT
"More often than not", "Most of the time"....
Common were talking about the taking of a human life here, whats the *** hurry! I''m not that happy in the first place that my state is in the killing business to begin with. I sure as hell don''t want them circumventing the system just so they can McDonaldize the process by taking away somebodies constitutional rights. I cant understand why my countryman are so damned bloodthirsty, so ready to off somebody they dont even know. Canada has little to no violent crime and no capital punishment either. England the same. What the hell is wrong with us!
Reply to this comment
by mexinvasion May 7, 2008 4:54 PM EDT
Too bad we had to feed the dog for so many years before euthanizing him.
Reply to this comment
by hippychicky-2009 May 7, 2008 4:47 PM EDT
hippychicky- So we just trash the whole appeal process system and line the suckers up and what...shoot em. Hey would''''nt it be cheaper just to put them all in a room and drop gas in through the ceiling. Then we could burn em in an oven and just throw there ashes to the wind. Seig Hiel Baby!!!!

Posted by chefjohn4

Thats right I am a nazi now...lol. You just have no idea how funny that remark is.
No I am not saying ditch the appeals system, but cap it for goodness sake. More often than not the people who end up in prison are guilty, there is a much larger percent of guilty than not.
Reply to this comment
by hippychicky-2009 May 7, 2008 4:45 PM EDT
$60 billion a year goes to fund our jail systems. Thats impressive.
Reply to this comment
by chefjohn4 May 7, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
hippychicky- So we just trash the whole appeal process system and line the suckers up and what...shoot em. Hey would''nt it be cheaper just to put them all in a room and drop gas in through the ceiling. Then we could burn em in an oven and just throw there ashes to the wind. Seig Hiel Baby!!!!
Reply to this comment
by hippychicky-2009 May 7, 2008 4:31 PM EDT
"Lynd, 53, was convicted of kidnapping and shooting to death his 26-year-old girlfriend two days before Christmas in 1988."

That right there is the real problem, who do you think kept him clothed and fed all those years, who do you think payed for appeal after appeal...ding ding ding...the American Taxpayers.
I worked in the 6th largest jail in the nation. There is no such thing as criminal rehabilitation.
If the person is found guilty without a reasonable doubt, there punishment should be swift.
I would rather my tax money go to bettering the education system, the homeless, people with disabilities, or veterans.
Reply to this comment
by chefjohn4 May 7, 2008 3:34 PM EDT
"Iwould insist on DNA evidence"
minnick8 11:43AM : May 07, 2008

You would insist? And if they said no?
Face it inocent people have been executed in this country, and we cant bring them back. We can however not institute a permenent punishment through an imperfect system.
Reply to this comment
See all 133 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook