Afghanistan Backs Pakistani Militant Talks
Coalition Government Says It Will Consider Negotiating With Terror Groups Despite Criticism From U.S.
-
Pakistani officials have reportedly met with representatives of warlord Baitullah Mehsud, who is believed to be linked to the Taliban and al Qaeda. (CBS)
-
Fast Facts Pakistan Learn about the people, economy and history.
Pakistan’s new coalition government, which came to office in February after defeating supporters of President Pervez Musharraf, publicly said it would consider negotiating with militants linked to al Qaeda and the Taliban, to end more than five years of fighting between government troops and militants in a remote region along the Pakistan-Afghan border.
That statement from the new government was quickly followed by reports of Pakistani officials meeting with representatives of Baitullah Mehsud, the most notorious militant commander, widely believed to be linked to the Taliban and al Qaeda.
The new government’s announcement prompted anxieties among some Western officials including those from the U.S., who considered the offer of negotiation with militants as a dangerous concession to hardline groups which could potentially embolden them further.
The criticism of the proposed negotiations was driven by concerns surrounding an earlier peace agreement between the Pakistani government and the militants in 2006 in the remote Waziristan region.
The militants used the space given to them by the 2006 agreement to re-arm and re-organize themselves before returning to fight some of the 120,000 Pakistani military troops deployed along the Pak-Afghan border.
“Afghanistan supports any measure that leads to the restoration of security and stability, provided such a step does not cause the expansion of further terrorism into Afghanistan” said the Afghan foreign ministry in a statement on Saturday, referring to Pakistan’s talks with the militants.
A senior western diplomat in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital, speaking to CBS News on condition of anonymity, said on Saturday that the Afghan statement - while highlighting the security interest of Afghanistan - provided what seemed to be a semi-endorsement of Pakistan’s initiative.
“Rather than blindly opposing Pakistan, the Afghans seem to be accepting Pakistan’s position. This is a step forward, maybe even a significant step” he said. The diplomat said the Afghan statement could help Pakistan soften opposition to its negotiations with militants from critics such as the United States.
Afghanistan supports any measure that leads to the restoration of security and stability, provided such a step does not cause the expansion of further terrorism into Afghanistan.
Afghanistan foreign ministry statementLocations across Pakistan have been targeted in an increasing number of suicide and armed attacks believed by local intelligence officials to have been carried out under orders from Mehsud.
These attacks intensified after Musharraf ordered the military to storm a Taliban-style mosque in the center of Islamabad last summer, after clerics from the mosque began issuing "fatwa" (or religious decrees) proscribing what they considered "improper behavior" that clashed with Islamic norms. Such behavior included running shops selling CDs with music, and a group of Chinese women who ran an Islamabad massage center, which the clerics alleged was a cover-up for prostitution.
By Farhan Bokhari
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- Democrats and liberals are a bunch of whiny crybabies who know how to do nothing but bash the US. How well do you think you''d fare (especially you fat unemployed soccer moms) in a Muslim country? Muslims are a violent people and must be dealt with as such.
- Reply to this comment
- Taylor - stop whining about gas prices and try losing weight you obese piece of inbreeding redneck *** - maybe that way you could fit your fat a** and oversized fat cheney belly into something smaller than a Hummer
- Reply to this comment
- Now, everyone must fear "Che" Mehsud. Since unknown people reportedly widely assume him to be al Qaeda or Taliban...let''s put it the litmus test---Did the US and ISI fly him out of AFghanistan with other al Qaeda and Talibani fighters with the collapse of the Taliban Regime?
- Reply to this comment
- It is good that the Pakistani Army is there along the Afghanistani border to help facilitate the movement of drugs...Americans can''t do it all...
- Reply to this comment
- RandyNason , yeah we got ALL their oil. Yeah thats it. That''''s why got so much over here and the prices are coming down every week. Yeah thats the ticket. P.S, you''''re an idiot.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by taylor2124 at 05:13 PM : May 03, 2008
+ report abuse
Well sparky IF he''s an Idiot so is McSame...that''s EXACTLY what the Senator said just the other day... We''re fighting in Iraq for OIL my friend... the fact that it hasn''t gone down hurts THE Nation as a whole, but sure doesn''t harm the GOP''s biggest contributor... BIG OIL now does it. Sieg Heil Bush - Reply to this comment
- Bush & Co must be wringing their collective hands in fear. "Pakistan and Afghanistan are going to screw up the whole New world order gig!"
- Reply to this comment
- RandyNason , yeah we got ALL their oil. Yeah thats it. That''s why got so much over here and the prices are coming down every week. Yeah thats the ticket. P.S, you''re an idiot.
- Reply to this comment
- Who are the real terrorists? As far as the Middle East countries are concerned, white, Christian capitalists are. What in the hel* are we doing over there, anyway? Oh, yeah... spreading freedom and democracy... and "drilling" for oil.
- Reply to this comment
- Jesus joined the Taliban????
Goodness!!! - Reply to this comment
Ex-NBA ref Tim Donaghy 



