May 1, 2008

Obama Catches Clinton On Capitol Hill

Washington Post: Dem Rivals Have Equal Number Of Endorsements From Party's Senators, Representatives

  • Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama each have 97 endorsements from fellow Democrats on Capitol Hill.  (AP)

  • Timeline Democratic Campaign Trail

    Notable events in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

  • News Tools Campaign Calendar

    The latest list of primary and caucus dates as states continue jockeying for position.

From Our Partner:
(Washingtonpost.com)  This story was written by Jonathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray.


With endorsements coming in from California, Iowa and Indiana, Sen. Barack Obama yesterday pulled even with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in the race for support on Capitol Hill, as Democratic lawmakers shrugged off his recent struggles.

Obama (Ill.) received the backing of Rep. Baron P. Hill, a conservative from a critical district in southern Indiana; Rep. Bruce Braley, an Iowa freshman who grabbed a Republican seat in 2006; and Rep. Lois Capps, who has held her liberal Santa Barbara, Calif., seat for five full terms and whose son-in-law works for the Obama campaign.

A congressional contest that Clinton once dominated is now knotted at 97, and the senator from New York continues to lose ground with the one group that can still deliver her the nomination -- the party leaders and elected officials known as superdelegates. (See the full CBS News delegate count here.)

For the Clinton campaign, the reemergence of the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., soon after Obama's comments about "bitter" small-town voters, was supposed to be the moment when superdelegates decided Obama could not be elected president. Instead, he has won more superdelegate endorsements than Clinton in recent days, whittling her once-overwhelming lead down to about 20.

At an hour-long Obama campaign stop that focused on jobs and health care yesterday at a factory in Indianapolis, no voters asked about Wright. And the candidate told the workers that an Indiana win for him could end the long Democratic nomination fight.

"If we win Indiana, we've got this nomination," Obama said. "We will win the general election, then we can roll up our sleeves and start changing the country."

On Monday, Obama took the endorsement lead among his Democratic Senate colleagues when Sen. Jeff Bingaman (N.M.) announced his support. Obama then pulled even overall after four House nods in two days, with even some rural lawmakers in tough, Republican-leaning districts giving him the benefit of the doubt. Swing-district lawmakers said they are no longer as certain as they once were that Obama would be less divisive than Clinton and attract the support of independents and Republicans in November -- but between the two, he appears to still be the better option.

"I am pleased that Senator Obama clearly and unequivocally denounced Reverend Wright's remarks," Hill said in a statement yesterday. "Hoosiers don't feel that way about our country, I don't feel that way about our country and Senator Obama made it abundantly clear that he doesn't feel that way either."

For elected superdelegates such as Hill, taking a public stand holds considerable political risk. The National Republican Congressional Committee, which hopes to take Hill's always-contested seat in November, quickly attacked him for backing a candidate "who recently claimed that people 'cling' to their religion and the Second Amendment because they are 'bitter.' "

Rep. Zack Space (D-Ohio), who remains neutral, marveled that Hill -- who lost his seat in 2004 to Republican Michael E. Sodrel, won it back in 2006 and is likely to face a rematch with Sodrel in November -- came out for Obama. But he said he was even more amazed by Tuesday's endorsement of Obama by Rep. Ben Chandler (D-Ky.), whose district is likely to vote overwhelmingly for Clinton in the Kentucky Democratic primary May 20.

"That's courageous," he said.

Hill and other lawmakers made clear that Obama's recent efforts to put the "bitter" comments behind him and distance himself from his former pastor have satisfied them that he is the best candidate for the top of the Democratic ticket.

"Anybody who did not think Republicans would characterize either of our candidates somehow as deeply flawed has been living in another country, if not another planet," said Rep. Brad Miller (D-N.C.), who remains undecided but believes Obama will be the nominee.

Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.), an Obama supporter, said that at this point there are very few truly uncommitted lawmakers among the 92 who have not publicly endorsed, and he predicted that Obama would seal a majority of them by the final Democratic primaries on June 3.

Amid the positive signs for Obama was one worrisome development: a new television ad by Mississippi congressional candidate Travis Childers, a Democrat, that tries to create distance between Childers and his party's potential nominee. Childers's GOP opponent, Greg Davis, linked him to "liberal Barack Obama" in a previous ad that places Childers's face next to Wright's. The narrator says, "When Obama's pastor cursed America, blaming us for 9/11, Childers said nothing."

The new Childers ad denounces "lies and attacks linking me to politicians I don't know and have never even met." (You can read more about the ad and watch it here.)

Braley, the Iowa freshman, said he had already concluded that Obama holds "potential as a leading national figure" because of the "energy and enthusiasm" that he has generated among voters. But he said he was further reassured by the way Obama handled the Wright issue, which erupted again over the weekend.

"He made it very clear where he stands," Braley said.

Staff writer Perry Bacon Jr., traveling with Clinton, contributed to this report.


By Jonathan Weisman and Shailagh Murray
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Add a Comment See all 122 Comments
by May 2, 2008 10:25 PM EDT
Hillary cried on TV when things were tough in NH during the campaign. What is she going to do if there is a crisis at 3am, start blubbering like a baby. The last thing the U.S. needs is Hillary in the oval office getting emotional and showing weakness. If we are going to have a woman President we need our own iron lady who will never show emotion under pressure. America deserves a strong leader, not a cry baby !
Posted by RowdyTexas2 at 06:52 AM : May 02, 2008

You have obviously forgotten your earlier claim that Hillary would get busy and work her butt off to accomplish her come from behind quest for the DNP nomination. As you so fervently exclaimed, "like she has ALWAYS done." Her N.H. histrionics were already history. What on earth did she do to turn you off, or are your posts, as O. Henry said:
".. beautiful and simple, as truly great swindles are."

What will be your next gimcrack?
Reply to this comment
by ladymack10 May 2, 2008 12:50 PM EDT
TO ALL THE OBAMA SUPPORTERS:

Since the media is refusing to reveal/report the Paul vs Clinton fraud case in court right now, we need to create our own movement and flood every blog on CNN and every blogging website on the World Wide Web with information from the case regardless of what the topic is. For those that don''t know - Google Paul vs Clinton and hold on to your shirt with what you read!!

OBAMANACS UNITE!!! LET''S DO THIS!!
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds May 2, 2008 12:38 PM EDT
Who needs some political blogsite to add up the votes for them. I can add them up myself!

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 08:57 AM : May 02, 2008

Ahh yes, the magic numbers you get from the little voices in your head tell you Obama doesn''t have the lead in popular votes when even the Clinton camp acknowledges that he does. Perhaps you''d care to show your math to back this fantasy up being as you can''t find one website or polling entity, from the DNC on down that agrees with your voice in the head.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 2, 2008 12:11 PM EDT
OMG - When Senator Obama didn''''t denounce his former paster even though it would have been politically expedient, his opponents decry "He won''''t denounce Wright, he''''s anti-American". Then when his former paster betrays that loyalty and Senator Obama distances himself from Wright, he is "throw(ing) his family and friends under the bus for his own gain". Just can''''t win with the puny minded. Fuggin self richeous hypocrites with their faux sanctimony make me wanna puke.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by EddyNewHope at 01:46 AM : May 02, 2008

It makes me wanna puke to when Obama honkers ignore his tremendously large lying habits, and keep going goo goo ga ga oooooo ooooo, let''s all vote for Obama.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 2, 2008 11:57 AM EDT
Posted by SgtRDS at 01:37 AM : May 02, 2008

Who needs some political blogsite to add up the votes for them. I can add them up myself!

Obama hasn''t had the popular vote since Mississippi.

Feel free to go add them yourself instead of depending on someone else.
Reply to this comment
by agog2 May 2, 2008 5:15 AM EDT
Wake up Democratic Super delegates if you cast your vote for Obama. You will be casting your vote for John McCain in November. Not until the inner core of the major cities clean up (The Hood) get rid of the drugs, drive by shootings, gangs and pimps, but most of all make it safe for a young white couple to walk the street after dark in the black neighborhood, will a black man or black woman ever be elected as president of the United States of America. Yes a lot of white people are afraid of blacks, but that is only because of the deep prejudice of blacks that live in the inner core of our major cities. Hillary Clinton can beat John McCain in November, don%u2019t waste your vote on Obama.
Reply to this comment
by eddynewhope May 2, 2008 4:46 AM EDT
OMG - When Senator Obama didn''t denounce his former paster even though it would have been politically expedient, his opponents decry "He won''t denounce Wright, he''s anti-American". Then when his former paster betrays that loyalty and Senator Obama distances himself from Wright, he is "throw(ing) his family and friends under the bus for his own gain". Just can''t win with the puny minded. Fuggin self richeous hypocrites with their faux sanctimony make me wanna puke.
Reply to this comment
by kmccliment May 2, 2008 4:39 AM EDT
***********,

what kind of experience do you need to be president. a junior senator that likes to give speeches and throw his family and friends under the bus for his own gain dont cut it.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds May 2, 2008 4:37 AM EDT
Ahhh RowdyTexan - He has actually won more states, more delegates, and more of the popular vote. He also closed a 170 super delegate gap to less than 20. No one has won the race yet but considering that the race is based on delegate count, and that the count is 1,731 to 1,596, the odds of a Hillary Clinton victory are approaching mathematical impossibility.

Posted by EddyNewHope at 01:33 AM : May 02, 2008

I showed Rowdy to a link that has the official totals showing Barack has a nearly insurmountable lead in the popular vote in another thread of this blog, but she responded that she believes in the magic totals she keeps in her own head that say the official totals are wrong. It would seem that she''s gone so far around the bend that she''s hearing voices. A common problem in the Bush family to be sure, but rare in someone who claims to be a Democrat. personally I think it shows she''s an inbred GOP''er all the way and needs to come out of the closet as a McCain supporter like Hillary is.
Reply to this comment
by agog2 May 2, 2008 4:36 AM EDT
Wake up Democratic Super delegates if you cast your vote for Obama. You will be casting your vote for John McCain in November. Not until the inner core of the major cities clean up (The Hood) get rid of the drugs, drive by shootings, gangs and pimps, but most of all make it safe for a young white couple to walk the street after dark in the black neighborhood, will a black man or black woman ever be elected as president of the United States of America. Yes a lot of white people are afraid of blacks, but that is only because of the deep prejudice of blacks that live in the inner core of our major cities. Hillary Clinton can beat John McCain in November, don%u2019t waste your vote on Obama.
Reply to this comment
by eddynewhope May 2, 2008 4:33 AM EDT
Ahhh RowdyTexan - He has actually won more states, more delegates, and more of the popular vote. He also closed a 170 super delegate gap to less than 20. No one has won the race yet but considering that the race is based on delegate count, and that the count is 1,731 to 1,596, the odds of a Hillary Clinton victory are approaching mathematical impossibility.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds May 2, 2008 4:28 AM EDT
And HIllary still has a hefty superdelegate lead. And got 5 today.

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 11:56 PM : May 01, 2008

Her lead is shrinking rapidly as even her own camp acknowledges. And she didn''t gain any new super-delegates today, she merely revealed the names of some from New York that she''d had in her pocket for quite some time. Hardly the same thing.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 May 2, 2008 2:56 AM EDT
Pshaw, he hasn''t won anyting on Capitol Hill! How troll! There are still 65 Representatives, 17 Senators, and 132 DNC superdelegates not endorsing.

And HIllary still has a hefty superdelegate lead. And got 5 today.

Honk all you want to. He''s not won anything, he just likes to claim he has.
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 May 2, 2008 1:09 AM EDT
IF IT WASN''''T FOR THE '''' WRIGHT STORY'''' WHAT WOULD SHE HAVE? AGAIN, SHE IS SO DESPERATE TO GRASP AT SOMEONE ELSE''''S MISFORTUNEATE MISTAKE AND NOT ADMIT WHAT HERS ARE AND ALSO NOT MENTION WHAT SHE IS HONESTLY CAPABLE OF DOING FOR THE COUNTRY AS AN HONORABLE PERSON. SHE CLAIMS TO WANT TO HELP...BUT IS NOT RESPECTABLE OF OTHERS. BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM OBAMA SHOULD WIN. BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM, HOWEVER, NEITHER ARE QUALIFIED TO WIN.

Reply to this comment
by tawpdawg11 May 2, 2008 1:06 AM EDT
Perhaps the Democratic Superdelegates feel the same as I do....I''m not voting for ANYONE who is touted by Bill O''Reilly and Rush Limbaugh
Reply to this comment
by pepperwood2 May 2, 2008 12:54 AM EDT
A vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote to continue%u201D a long, self-destructive Democratic campaign, former national party Chairman Joe Andrew wrote in a letter designed to have an impact on the turbulent race nationally as well as in his home state of Indiana.

He urged Democrats to %u201Creject the old negative politics%u201D and unify behind Obama.

I was a Clinton supporter but have been much disappointed with this Negative polictics of Hillary''s. She claims to have 35 years experience in Washington and when I look at the polictics in Washington during this time. There is this constant bashing, blaming, It''s all about me agenda.

I realize that she has made a small fortune 110,000,000 dollars practicing her polictics of personal destruction. Little has been done for the People during this time of Bitter rhetoric.

It just gets worse every day. The attacks, the mocking, the behind the scenes scheming against Obama. The special conciderations the Judge gave her in the Peter Paul case. Its becoming evident that the Clinton campaign is biased and getting special considerations from the Judical & Media. It''s time to stop this policy of personal destruction and get back to doing the work of the American people. 35 years of negative polictics is not the answer. By Hillary''s own admission, "I''m just warming up" is not the direction I want to see Our Country & It''s Good People to continue to go. So Sad! Chairman Joe Andrew has it right.
Reply to this comment
by crewmember1 May 2, 2008 12:53 AM EDT
Yes, if only the Press would report the things that Hillary Clinton says and does in a scrutinizing manner, it might be more apparent that HRC is not really "climbing'' in the polls.

Hillary thinks it is good foreign policy to posture up with Iran and threaten to "obliterate" the whole country if she becomes President. This is highly objectionalbe as a world power to even suggest, let alone against the recitals of the Geneva Convention - maybe CLinton, like Bush does not choose to recognize the Geneva Convention?
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds May 1, 2008 11:40 PM EDT
He is making a joke. He thinks its funny you think she''''ll be nominated as well as be elected. You are running against the tide All signs show a obama nomination

Posted by alanrobisch2 at 08:37 PM : May 01, 2008

The point I was trying to make is that I never said Hillary would win. He put my name with someone else quote.
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch May 1, 2008 11:37 PM EDT
Where exactly did I say that?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by SgtRDS at 08:33 PM : May 01, 2008
+ report abuse
He is making a joke. He thinks its funny you think she''ll be nominated as well as be elected. You are running against the tide All signs show a obama nomination
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds May 1, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
Obama can''''t win the nomination and is losing. Hillary is winning. Now these party elites are giving it to him against the will of people.

Posted by John_Lai at 08:21 PM : May 01, 2008

He has won the most delegates, the most states and the popular vote. Hillary has no resonable chance of catching him. How exactly is that "losing"?
Reply to this comment
See all 122 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: