May 1, 2008 11:12 AM

Caught In The Crossfire

(CBS News)  Produced by Mary Noonan and Lourdes Aguiar

This episode previously aired on May 23, 2008. It was updated on Aug. 8, 2009.

On June 12, 2006, the people of Reno, Nev., were glued to their televisions following the brazen shooting of Family Court Judge Chuck Weller.

"My thoughts immediately turned towards Charla and her whereabouts," remembers Ann Mudd who, along with Christine Libert, desperately tried to reach her friend Charla Mack.

The two women were convinced Charla was in danger; their fears were confirmed when they later heard on the news she had been murdered.

What led to the shooting of Judge Weller and Charla's murder? Was there a connection between the two cases? Troy Roberts reports.

Successful Reno businessman Darren Mack married Charla in 1995. From the beginning, everyone says they had a chemistry that was undeniable.

"I think when you saw the two of them walk into a room, they were explosive together. Charla just fired him up. She was fire," explains writer Amanda Robb, who reported on the Mack case for Marie Claire magazine.

Darren is the oldest son of a wealthy Reno family; his parents owned one of the largest pawn shops in the city. When his father was killed in a 1986 plane crash, Darren became half owner of the business and, according to court records, was said to be worth almost $10 million.

But Darren had been married before. Darren and his ex-wife had two children together but the marriage collapsed. "He would not stop fighting with Debbie. She spent more than a quarter of a million dollars in legal fees just responding to him," Robb says. "And Charla was on his side at the time."

Darren had joint custody and for a while at least, he, Charla, and his kids seemed to be one big happy family. But Darren and Charla's clean-cut family image was a far cry from their private lives. "They became sort of a fixture on the strip club circuit in and around Reno," Robb explains. "It moved up into swinging."

Things changed after daughter Erika was born in 1997. Charla told Darren she was no longer interested in swinging.

And as the marriage began to crumble, letters and e-mails "48 Hours" obtained document an increasingly abusive relationship.

But it wasn't Charla who claimed to be the victim - it was Darren. "He kept a diary, in which he said she kicked him in the testicles, but missed, she scratched his car, she yelled at him on the phone. Oh, yes. She belittled him in front of his friends, went on, and on and on for six pages like this," Robb explains.

Darren's friend Michael Small says that despite his imposing stature, Darren lived in fear. He says a big part of Darren's desire to end the marriage was the alleged abuse. "It's a known fact that he carried a gun because he was worried she was gonna come kill him," he says.

But Charla was apparently looking over her shoulder, too. "He showed up at the house where she and Erika were and they had some kind of confrontation. And he had her by the neck and was trying to strangle her," Ann says.

In the end, it was Charla who filed for divorce, and Darren moved out. The couple fought constantly over Erika but fought even more over money, which Darren claimed was running out.

Judge Weller ordered Darren to pay Charla $10,000 a month until the divorce was settled. But Darren thought the ruling, and the judge, were unfair.

Just after 11 a.m. on June 12, 2006, bystanders in downtown Reno heard a loud bang echo off the buildings. Police shut down the city, while SWAT teams fanned out searching for what they believed was a sniper.

Listen to the 911 call

It turned out only one bullet was fired that morning, exploding through the window of Weller's office and spraying him and his assistant with shrapnel.

It was just minutes after the shooting when police got a break from a phone call. The caller, Darren's childhood friend Dan Osborne, had a disturbing story to tell: he had been at Darren's home that morning when Charla dropped off their daughter. He and Erika stayed upstairs while Darren spoke to Charla privately.

"Downstairs somehow Darren lured Charla into the garage," says Robb. "The daughter upstairs heard a dog yelping and told Darren's friend 'I think your dog is yelping.'"

After the frantic barking continued, Osborne told police he went to check on his dog. That's when he ran into Darren coming out of the garage. Osborne said Darren brushed past him with a weird look, his hand wrapped in a towel, and that he didn't say a word.

"Few moments later, the dog came in, covered in blood," says Detective Ron Chalmers.

Osborne put Erika in his car and started driving; minutes later, his cell phone rang. It was Darren. "And Darren says 'Meet me at Starbucks.' The friend, who is completely flipped out at this point, meets him at Starbucks with the little girl," Robb says.



© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 40 Comments
by p4s2p0 March 20, 2011 4:40 PM EDT
I don't see murder,rape going away anytime soon with these mack supporters around
Reply to this comment
by budrite January 3, 2010 12:01 AM EST
I would just like to congratulate Darran Mack on a great shot!!!!!
A $180,000 dollar shot to be exact!
Judge this M***** F*****!
Reply to this comment
by BiCoastal October 18, 2009 9:35 PM EDT
I'm an attorney. First saw this on Oct. 17 or 18. Unaware of it before that. One thing which blew me away was the huge state of denial displayed by Mack's girlfriend, who kept saying Mack killed his wife in "self - defense". Also, Mack's mention of a phantom gun and a phantom dumpster---mentioned not in in his first conversations with his lawyers, but later. I've represented numerous injured persons in civil litigation arising from battery (committed by security guards, body guards, bouncers, etc.) Never has the affirmative defense of self-defense (almost always pleaded routinely) been proven in my own professional experiences. The tell-tale signs of a doomed self-defense argument are that only one of the parties (the victim) has any injuries. Add to this a size disparity in favor of the alleged and uninjured self-defender (the de facto aggressor)AND a weapon (knife, in Mack's case), and you have all the earmarks known to experienced attorneys of an out and out attack/battery (here, murder)--no self defense. By the way, I don't practice family law or criminal defense. (Oh yeah, the fact that he pleaded guilty is a good indication that it wasn't self-defense, too.)
Reply to this comment
by Vic-H August 13, 2009 8:13 PM EDT
After watching the program, a question immediately came to my mind. If Darren Mack pre-planned the murder as it was claimed by the prosecutors, why on earth would he kill his wife in his own garage and leave the body there totally incriminating himself? It is not that I like the guy, nor what he did. But wouldn't anyone who plans something as serious as murder ahead of time, whould also think about getting rid of the body as part of the plan? I do believe he committed the crimes he is accused of, but that he acted in a state of rage and passion.
Reply to this comment
by p4s2p0 March 20, 2011 4:14 PM EDT
I really don't care why he didn't move the body, that would be like asking why killers don't remove the bullets or other evidence it's not like they are perfect or thinking rationally. For the self defense claim he makes why did he kill the judge after his wife and flee the country.
by csi-lover August 10, 2009 2:14 PM EDT
This Mack guy should have been fried in the electric chair. This type of mentality is so evil that he will meet his fate in jail or hell, which in my mind, are both the same. He kills his wife and almost kills Judge Weller, and then blames them for his actions? Wow! Psychopath or what? The person I feel sorry for the most, besides the family and Judge Weller, is the criminal judge who had to hear Mack rant after his sentencing. But this judge did the right thing by sentencing him to life in prison, noting that Mack showed no remorse, nor did he apologize for what he did to his wife and Judge Weller.

This Mack guy is something else.
Reply to this comment
by soupperG August 9, 2009 10:25 PM EDT
summarux,

You are exactly right. The media holds a lot on their shoulders for the direction of this country.

There is a most definate slanted media view perputrated by the government to make it seem as though the court's follow the laws and the Constitution and nothing is further from the truth.

The ones sworn to uphold them are the biggest violaters, and yes, they will censer me, I am sure.

Thanks
Greg

www.dadsaredisplaced.ws
Reply to this comment
by get_down August 9, 2009 8:40 AM EDT
After watching the TV and reading this article, it appeared that Mr. Darren Mack is a controller and manipulator - he likes to have control of the world around him and he also likes to manipulate
events and folks around him. I'm glad finally the legal system finds what's wrong with him - if he couldn't get his way - he's going to do something - including premeditated murder of both his
ex-wife Charla and attempted murder of family court judge Chuck Weller. Justice finally is served by putting him behind bars where he belongs!
Reply to this comment
by soupperG August 8, 2009 11:32 PM EDT
While I certainally don't condone what Mact did to his wife, I wish the shot at the judge would have been better. The judiciary is extremely corrupt and they pretty much do whatever it is they want without recourse. They do this because they have given themselves total immunity from the law.

I have delt with many judges and attorneys in family court matters and I must say, they should all be shot. They are very corrupt.
Reply to this comment
by nickatnoon August 10, 2009 1:14 AM EDT
soupper, you hit the nail on the head! The bar, which originates in the "City of London" has occult/satanic roots, and it's agenda is to keep the masses under their thumb, by protecting the CONtrollers. Then we have the media which portrays the court system as "fair" by airing schlock TV "programs" like Law and Order, etc. Anyone who hasn't been screwed by the court system has been living in a cave all their lives!
by p4s2p0 March 20, 2011 4:21 PM EDT
"I wish the shot at the judge would have been better" That is condoning it.
by hercule1122 August 8, 2009 11:17 PM EDT
The people surrounding Mack in this horrible tale were all like flotsam and jetsam. He is a complete idiot, spoiled, and I hope he will rot in jail. Crying about losing his wife when he murdered her...bizarre! And the new girl friend reminds me of the tin man- she needs a brain. I have great sympathy for Judge Weller and Charla's family, and wish them peace and a good life. Evil always exists in our world, but we can make a difference. Shalom.
Reply to this comment
by celestialsmo May 6, 2008 3:00 PM EDT
I was very disturbed while watching this show. I dont understand why in the world someone would go to such lengths to kill someone just because they have to have there own way! I see that Daryn was a VERY manipulative man that plotted this musrder because he wasnt getting what he wanted! In my opinion Daryn got wind of his wife wanting to leave him so he fabricated stories of her abuse towards him to make himself look better and to play the victim. To me Daryn is a spoiled little brat that acts like a 2 year old when he doesnt get what he wants in life! If he was the victim and killing her was self defense then why would he throw away the gun if it at all had her finger prints on it again all set up by Daryn himself to look like a victim that hes not, and to manipulate his son into thinking his story was true WAKE up and face reality!What is really scary is the new girlfriend standing by his side. why would you be that dumb and not protect yourself and your own children, bot she must have some issues with herself to believe that man! and of course his creepy best friend hes just as crazy and maybe we should start making sure he doesnt do the same to his ex-wife as Daryn did to his wife because he surely believes that Daryns crazy actions were justifid. At least we can say that justice has been served and hopefully he will never get out of his cell!!!
Reply to this comment
by Ty2011 September 9, 2009 8:20 AM EDT
If he'd played if off as his patriotic duty to free us from tyranny instead of trying to save his own skin he'd probably have been called insane and at the same time held up as a hero to anarchists!
See all 40 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
48 Hours New iPad app A perfect companion to TV's most popular true-crime series.
48 Hours on Facebook