April 28, 2008
GOP Plans $500,000 Hit On Obama, Dems
Politico: Strategic Advertising Will Link The Senator's Vulnerabilities To Congressional Hopefuls
-
Play CBS Video
Video
GOP Ads Target Obama
Barack Obama is set to play hardball as he responds to GOP ads questioning his patriotism and rival candidate Hillary Clinton's invitations to another public debate. Jim Axelrod reports.
-
Video
Obama's Recurring Problem
Barack Obama is distancing himself once again from comments made by his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Political analyst Joe Trippi talks with Harry Smith about Wright's impact on the campaign.
-
Video
Obama, Clinton Reps Speak Out
In the midst of an ongoing Democratic race, Howard Wolfson, Communications Director for the Clinton campaign, and Barack Obama's Chief Strategist David Axelrod speak with Bob Schieffer.
-
Photo
Approximately $500,000 of advertising has been purchased so far by the GOP to link Democratic congressional hopefuls to Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill. Republicans bet Obama will be a heavy burden on down-ballot Democrats, says The Politico. (CBS)
-
Photo Essay
Barack Obama
A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
For months, GOP operatives spoke with dread of the prospects of running against Barack Obama in the fall. But after weeks of controversies over his former pastor, his views of blue-collar voters and even the sincerity of his patriotism, Republicans now are ready to place a $500,000 bet that Obama will be a heavy burden on down-ballot Democrats.
That’s the approximate amount of advertising purchased so far by the National Republican Congressional Committee and GOP allies to link Democratic congressional hopefuls in Mississippi and Louisiana to their party’s potential presidential nominee.
Whereas Obama once seemed an almost cultlike figure who transcended race and class, the narrative that has emerged from his campaign’s recent trials has given Republicans hope that the Illinois senator can be tagged as an elitist with the same effectiveness with which Michael Dukakis and John F. Kerry were so labeled.
The elitist story line has provided Republicans with press release fodder against freshman Democratic House members and statewide elected officials in roughly two dozen states.
Republican-leaning districts could be particularly fertile ground for Obama-focused attacks, GOP officials say. “I think he’s the weaker candidate, and I’ve thought that for over a year now,” NRCC Chairman Tom Cole (Okla.) said at a briefing on Monday. “He’s very inexperienced. He is by any definition liberal and to the left of Hillary Clinton, and he will give us plenty of ideological divisions to work with.”
Besides the two special congressional elections in Mississippi and Louisiana next month, Republicans believe they can also exploit Obama’s vulnerabilities in House battlegrounds where he has struggled to win over key demographic groups. Those areas include three culturally conservative seats in Pennsylvania, where Obama lost badly in last week’s primary, and three Cuban-American districts in Florida that Democrats are seriously contesting for the first time.
In the Deep South, Republicans think making an explicit connection to Obama will allow them to hold on to districts where Democrats have gained traction by recruiting culturally conservative candidates who have distanced themselves from the national party.
“If they voted up here the way they were running, believe me, they could come here and join the [conservative] Republican Study Committee in good standing,” Cole said.
In Mississippi and Louisiana, where Democratic challengers Travis Childers and Don Cazayoux are seen as having real chances to win historically scarlet-red congressional seats, Democratic officials say the GOP is grasping at straws.
“The NRCC and its GOP allies are desperate to distract voters from their extremely flawed candidates,” said Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Communications Director Jennifer Crider.
But those concerns aren’t deterring a collection of groups from testing the waters with anti-Obama ads in Mississippi and Louisiana. The NRCC, the conservative advocacy group Freedom’s Watch and the campaign of Mississippi candidate Greg Davis combined have put up about $500,000 in advertising explicitly connecting Cazayoux and Childers to Obama.
The NRCC is up with a new spot in Mississippi’s 1st District in which Childers is flanked by Kerry and Obama. The ad refers to Obama’s ranking by National Journal as having “the most liberal voting record in the U.S. Senate.”
Davis’ newly released ad invokes Obama’s controversial former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, arguing that Childers should have spoken out against Wright’s divisive rhetoric but instead “said nothing.”
“Travis Childers. He took Obama’s endorsement over our conservative values,” a narrator in the ad goes on to say.
Both Democrats have distanced themselves from Obama, arguing that the races hinge more on local issues than on the national landscape.
But Cole argued that if Republicans can pull off twin victories in the special elections, the advertising connecting the candidates to Obama will have played a key role in closing what were once Democratic leads.
Both polling and actual election results have shown the Democratic candidates ahead in the two races. In Mississippi, Childers nearly picked up Sen. Roger Wicker’s former House seat in the first round of special election balloting but missed an outright victory by several hundred votes. He faces Davis in a runoff next month.
In Louisiana, Cazayoux’s campaign has released two internal polls showing him with a lead over his Republican opponent, former state Rep. Woody Jenkins. The NRCC’s internal polling has shown similar numbers, and the committee just commissioned a new poll to see if the Obama connection has made an impact.
At the briefing, Cole cited internal committee polling from earlier this month that showed Arizona Sen. John McCain leading Obama 65 percent to 30 percent in a head-to-head matchup in Mississippi’s 1st District. In Louisiana, the committee has polling that shows only 37 percent of districtwide voters view Obama favorably, while 50 percent view him unfavorably.
Republicans also run a risk in playing the Obama card so early. If Democrats are able to pick up one of the special election seats in these highly conservative districts, it may indicate that a cookie-cutter approach connecting Obama to congressional candidates might not work as well as advertised.
“When they do the guilt by association, it’s particularly egregious. It’s kind of goofy,” said Democratic pollster John Anzalone, who is handling polling for both Childers and Cazayoux.
The overt use of Obama as a bogeyman also runs the risk, particularly in the South, of creating racial connotations that could backfire. McCain and the Republican National Committee last week denounced an ad from the state GOP attacking Democratic gubernatorial candidates Beverly Perdue and Richard Moore for their ties to Obama.
“No one underestimates the power of race in the Deep South, but at the same time, I think they’re barking up the wrong tree,” said Anzalone. “They think they have a great opportunity by pulling the race card here, but I think they’ve really gotten off message.” Anzalone said his numbers show Cazayoux holding his support among white voters despite the Obama ads.
Democrats point to the Obama ads as a potentially risky move in these Southern districts that have a significant share of African-American voters.
“That’s a pretty daring move when the district is 30 percent African-American,” said one Democratic operative. “What they’re clearly trying to do is depress the white turnout.”
Still, Obama’s weakness among blue-collar, working-class voters has not gone unnoticed by members of Congress who may have to share a ballot with him.
Many freshman Democrats who represent culturally conservative districts, including Reps. Christopher P. Carney (D-Pa.), Jason Altmire (D-Pa.), Brad Ellsworth (D-Ind.) and Heath Shuler (D-N.C.), have stayed on the sidelines so far in the primary season.
Carney and Altmire are facing highly competitive reelection bids themselves - and last week’s presidential primary results could give them new cause for concern. Obama lost every county in Carney’s northeastern Pennsylvania district by double-digit margins - including the district’s Scranton-area base, by nearly 50 points.
Obama also performed particularly poorly in Altmire’s district, losing two key exurban Pittsburh counties within his district - Beaver and Lawrence - with 30 percent of the vote or less.
Four days before the primary, House GOP leader John A. Boehner appeared at a press conference with Altmire’s Republican opponent and called on the Democratic freshman to apologize for Obama’s remarks about small towns in Pennsylvania. “It’s time for Barack Obama to apologize to voters here in Pennsylvania and across the Midwest,” said Boehner. “And it’s time for his supporters in Congress to defend their constituents and denounce Obama’s patronizing rhetoric.”
“If I’m John McCain, I think I can win in Pennsylvania,” said Cole. “[Democratic freshmen] are worried they’ll finally have to run with someone whose positions are at odds with what they believe.”
In Florida, Republicans believe that Obama’s comments that seem to advocate a more normalized relationship with Cuba will benefit Republicans in three heavily Cuban-American districts in South Florida who are facing contested reelection bids.
DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen (Md.) has been campaigning in South Florida this week with three Democratic recruits running against Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.).
By Josh Kraushaar
Copyright 2008 POLITICO





MCCain will not even support a G.I. bill for our warriors ?? We need another candidate for the GOP to run this fall. Who could it be ???
Posted by ttinsly at 05:03 PM : Apr 29, 2008
Hey! The WWF has a lot more credibility then FOX Noise. Then again so does Snow white, Goldilocks, Hansel and Gretel and the Three Pigs.
***********************************
H e l l, just send the money to Hillary''s campaign. She needs the money and you can thank her for damaging Obama. And to even suggest that Barack Obama is an "elite" is the funniest think I have ever heard in my life.
They have done a splendid job with foreign policy and the economy so let''s let the fascist mainstream media continue it''s toll on the the American people and those of the world.
Posted by kansas1946 at 06:20 PM : Apr 29, 2008
You mean they already haven''t? I mean she''s been campaigning so hard for McCain I just assumed she was already on the GOP payroll.
--- Five Hundred Thousand Dollars --- !!!
ewwwww.... sounds scary... lol
what are they going to do with that ... buy a classified ad in a local paper ? LOL...
$500,000 ! rofl
The RNC is spending $500,000 because they don''t have any more money to spend.
Posted by themagic07 at 11:03 AM : Apr 30, 2008
You don''t smear another Dem and then in the same breadth claim to be a Dem - besides don''t all this ***** remind you somewhat of Barnabas ?? The speech and delusion is Wright''s and Wright''s alone - unless you''ve seen Obama act on it ever, stop with the misplaced BS - This is not Obama''s cross to bear - he''s only Human like you and i. Cheers!
Whats $500,000 to a Republican....pocket change.
Let the fireworks begin.
On June 5th, 2007, Senator Barack Obama spoke before 8,000 people gathered in
Hampton University%u2019s Convocation Center. Most of them were pastors and ministers
attending a conference there.
He was there to speak on mostly post Katrina issues and to criticize the Bush
administration%u2019s efforts during that natural disaster. Obama tried his catch
phrase of the moment, saying that a %u201Cquiet riot%u201D might be occurring in America
and he affirmed that he felt that America was a racist nation, that the reaction
to Katrina had just %u201Cpulled back the screen%u201D on America%u2019s racism. Obama also
used rhetoric heavily doused with religious symbolism.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/03/16/contrary-claims-obama
-very-close-racist-preacher-wright
If the contest is 50/50 then if Obama supporters will still support Hillary but more of hers won''''t support Obama--and either can get the Independents--who would lose? Obama supporters don''''t see the game.
In the final analysis, the superdelegates will go with the best risk, if HRC can pull the Independents, it COULD be her. Obama''''s supporters and their loyalty to the Dem party are being used against him and them. Funny how so many can''''t see that.
Is this like Rezko? Nope--Rezko involved Obama''s association with a questionable person. This involved HRC and Bill''s questionable actions (and potentially illegal actions) with a questionable person. Big difference.
Obama''s could harm his campaign, Hillary''s could land her before a Grand jury and like DeLay--facing jail time now the judge steps in and says everyone EXCEPT Hillary, can testify now-but Hillary gets to wait until after the election is over--wonder why? The judge also told one of the lawyers of Hillary/Bill to say Hi to a buddy of his who worked for that firm. Nice and cosy eh?
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/breaking-news-hilla
ry-clinton.php
What does a civil case have to do with fraud? Hillary lied on a deposition about the same issue that got her campaign mgr (David Rosen) indicted. and she is caught on tape helping to plan a fundraiser that would limit the donation to her to 25K--but it was for 250K--10X the amount. If proven--then that is fraud-- LMAO
-
by ksh1022
May 2, 2008 2:32 AM PDT
- See stupid Obama supporters? The repub. want the far left liberal inexperienced senator with racist ties. Their media people won''t even have to work hard to send Obama packing. So lets see if my Democratic party will be equally stupid and select Obama. Remember Dukakis, Mondale, Kerry?
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 25 Comments