June 26, 2009 5:14 PM

New Clinton Supporter Is A Potent Symbol

By
Scott Conroy
(The Politico)  This story was written by Ben Smith and David Paul Kuhn.

North Carolina Governor Mike Easley's endorsement of Senator Hillary Clinton today offers her a potent symbolic and electoral boost in the biggest state left to vote.

Easley is a meaningful ally in the culture war she's waging against Senator Barack Obama, as she seeks to cast him as a hopelessly unelectable liberal elitist and to persuade the Democratic Party leaders who will decide the nomination - the "superdelegates" - to choose her instead.

"It's an incredibly strong endorsement because Easley is popular among the blue collar 'Bubba' voters who are Democrats," said David "Mudcat" Saunders, a Democratic consultant who advised former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards and former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner on winning rural voters.

Easley had endorsed Edwards for president, but again became a heavily sought superdelegate once Edwards bowed out of the race.

"He's clean in the culture. Easley's wrecked the Charlotte Motor Speedway doing 150 miles per hour, and Bubba likes that," said Saunders, referring to NASCAR fan Easley's 2003 race car crash. "He's a hunter. He's a strong Second Amendment guy. He gives her great cultural validation in the state of North Carolina."

Clinton aides were jubilant.

"Huge deal," Clinton's North Carolina director, Ace Smith, told Politico.

Smith, sticking with the campaign's official line, said that if Clinton could keep the margin within 15 percentage points - she currently trails Obama by 12 percent in an average of polls  - she'd have won a victory.

But other Clinton backers were more optimistic, saying Clinton had a shot at the definition of victory she set for Obama in Pennsylvania: Victory.

"The governor clearly feels she can now pull this out," said a prominent Clinton supporter. "He's not doing it to be embarrassed in his own state. Governors don't endorse for number two."

Easley doesn't bring the kind of field organization or financial base that Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell gave Clinton's Pennsylvania campaign, but he does carry a popular name and a symbolic validation of her central argument: That she, better than Obama, connects with the working-class white people who are traditional swing voters.

Easley, 58, the lone survivor of a class of Southern Democratic governors elected between 1998 and 2000, has managed to thrive by figuring out how to win reelection in a region where the national Democratic party is typically a burden to statewide elected officials.

Wary of the stigma carried by the national party, he skipped the party convention in 2000 and 2004. He's term-limited this year after serving two terms.

Easley has looked to popular culture for clues to help him connect to the average voter. In the past, his pollster has asked respondents whether they watch the popular animated Fox series, "King of the Hill." Easley, it turns out, is a fan of the main character Hank Hill, a small-town Texas propane salesman who likes guns and NASCAR. The governor has made the show's audience his lodestar.

With or without Easley, Obama has the demographic equivalent of a home-field advantage in North Carolina. More than a third of the primary electorate is expected to be African-American, a group Obama is winning by an unmatchable 90-plus percent. To win the state, Clinton needs the support of about three quarters of its white voters - a group on average more educated and more liberal than Democrats in the only part of the country where her margins approached that, the Deep South.

Clinton backers hope the new high-profile of Obama's controversial pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, has changed the dynamic of the contest and strengthened her hand.

Obama was scheduled to tour the state Monday and Tuesday, holding massive rallies in its college towns.

"The total focus is on turning out as bg an Obama vote as we can and hoping it's enough to win," said Ed Turlington, a former state Democratic Party chairman who backs Obama.

Obama has also been outspending Clinton in North Carolina, as elsewhere. Smith estimated that the Illinois senator has a three-to-one edge in television advertising in the state. And so the campaigns are engaged in the ritual sparring over the meaning of victory.

"A win is one more vote than the other candidate," said Turlington.

"If we can take it to anything lower than double digits, it's been an incredible accomplishment for us here," said Tom Hendrickson, another former state party chairman, who backs Clinton.

Recent polling has shown the gap between the two candidates narrowing - with the movement among the same moderate voters to whom Easley has his strongest appeal.

"Her numbers went up in the same demographic she controlled in Pennsylvania to win - which is white male, specifically blue collar white males," said Dean Debnam, president of North Carolina-based Public Policy Polling, which found Monday that Clinton had cut Obama's lead from 25 percentage points to 12. "Obama had been pulling closer to her in the white vote, and she had regained that strongly in the past week."

Debnam said Easley's endorsement was an enormous boon, especially among moderate whites. "I don't think there could be a more perfect candidate for that demographic," he said. Clinton's other asset with the "Bubba" vote, her husband, has also been working the state hard, continuing what's become his specialty: Speeches to working-class white audiences in small media markets.

"He's going into counties where he can land an airplane and she cannot, because she's in too big a plane," said David Parker, a Statesville lawyer and uncommitted superdelegate.

Whatever Easley's electoral virtues, though, his endorsement also carries a clear message for an even more important audience-the superdelegates.

"The message of Easley's endorsement to superdelegates around the country is that she is the most electable Democrat in November," said Robert Zimmerman, a New York superdelegate who backs Clinton.

Avi Zenilman, Richard T. Cullen and David Mark contributed to this report.
By Ben Smith and David Paul Kuhn

The Politico
  • Scott Conroy

    Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

Add a Comment See all 134 Comments
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 2:40 AM EDT
That is why it is very important for Obama to win the popular vote along with the State''''''''s Delegates to EVEN the playing field. There''''''''s no doubt that it had been planned for years that Hillary was going to be the presidential candidate. This year was her time, to go about the country on her coronation tour, to be showcased. While the real underdog has been mocked, ridiculed, and attacked by both Hillary & McCain for the simple reason that they & the superdelegates do not want to see Obama in the Whitehouse. That''''s the Inconvenient Truth.

Posted by pepperwood2 at 12:54 PM : Apr 30, 2008


It is very important for Obama supporters to STOP saying they will support the Dem candidate no matter who it is--THAT gives Hillary an edge--since she still gets most of the support of Obama''s people but hers say they will support none but her or McCain. By stating total Dem loyalty--the Obama supporters are hamstringing the electability of their own candidate--wise up or you will be your own worst enemy.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 2:36 AM EDT
So now HRC does not have to testify in the campaign fraud case against Bill that also implicates her--until AFTER the November elections? So says the judge who appears to not want the story about Hillary and this fraud to taint her bid for the Presidency. But why not? We don''''''''''''''''t need another Clinton impeachment when we find out what a lying fraud who stole money that she really is (they''''''''''''''''ve got VIDEO and the tape of her voice --Hilterly supporters!!)

Is this like Rezko? Nope--Rezko involved Obama''''''''''''''''s association with a questionable person. This involved HRC and Bill''''''''''''''''s questionable actions (and potentially illegal actions) with a questionable person. Big difference.

Obama''''''''''''''''s could harm his campaign, Hillary''''''''''''''''s could land her before a Grand jury and like DeLay--facing jail time now the judge steps in and says everyone EXCEPT Hillary, can testify now-but Hillary gets to wait until after the election is over--wonder why? The judge also told one of the lawyers of Hillary/Bill to say Hi to a buddy of his who worked for that firm. Nice and cosy eh?

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/breaking-news-hilla
ry
-clinton.
php

What does a civil case have to do with fraud? Hillary lied on a deposition about the same issue that got her campaign mgr (David Rosen) indicted. and she is caught on tape helping to plan a fundraiser that would limit the donation to her to 25K--but it was for 250K--10X the amount. If proven--then that is fraud-- LMAO

Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 May 1, 2008 12:53 AM EDT
Hillary still has one big plus: most Obama supporters would still vote for her, even if she cheats to win. THIS little fact means she can do what she likes and still at least get their votes. Obama on the other hand, is shown to lose her crowd. If electability is the issue--Obama supporters hurt him every time they say they will vote for Hillary no matter what.

If the contest is 50/50 then if Obama supporters will still support Hillary but more of hers won''''t support Obama--and either can get the Independents--who would lose? Obama supporters don''''t see the game.

In the final analysis, the superdelegates will go with the best risk, if HRC can pull the Independents, it COULD be her. Obama''''s supporters and their loyalty to the Dem party are being used against him and them. Funny how so many can''''t see that.
Reply to this comment
by liar-clinton April 30, 2008 4:39 PM EDT
Barack Obama just added his second new superdelegate of the day, and it''s particularly noteworthy on two counts.

Baron Hill is a congressman in Indiana, which votes Tuesday. And in his endorsement statement, he specifically cites Obama''s repudiation on Tuesday of his former pastor.

"His comments regarding statements made by Reverend Wright showed me another aspect of Senator Obama%u2019s leadership -- a strength of character and commitment to our nation that transcends the personal," Hill said in a statement provided by the Obama campaign. "One of the tests of a true leader is his ability and willingness to come to a new conclusion based on new events. Senator Obama did just that yesterday."
Reply to this comment
by blkpresident April 30, 2008 4:09 PM EDT
Hillary-Steinem ''08?

America can do better than this. Foreign policy cannot be shaped from a cake mixing bowl in the White House kitchen. Terrorist don''t play softball or powder-puff football either. Vote smart Indiana and North Carolina.
Reply to this comment
by pepperwood2 April 30, 2008 3:54 PM EDT
Help... Bill O''Reilly, Hillary & McCain are playing us for Fools and we''re losing.

Many of us, & I or one, just look at the math. Sure Obama has the edge but you wonder why it is that Hillary is always implying that his victories don''t hold a candle to hers.

It comes down to, what winning over the Superdelegates, as she has been scheming behind the scenes. Unfair as it is, Obama has always been behind in the Superdelegates. He still is!

She was livid When superdelegate Richardson endorsed Obama as he is also a minority Hispanic, so to speak. That could influence the other Superdelegates in going for Obama. Hillary has been counting on playing this trump card.

That is why it is very important for Obama to win the popular vote along with the State''''s Delegates to EVEN the playing field. There''''s no doubt that it had been planned for years that Hillary was going to be the presidential candidate. This year was her time, to go about the country on her coronation tour, to be showcased. While the real underdog has been mocked, ridiculed, and attacked by both Hillary & McCain for the simple reason that they & the superdelegates do not want to see Obama in the Whitehouse. That''s the Inconvenient Truth.
Reply to this comment
by liar-clinton April 30, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
In the landmark civil fraud case against Bill Clinton in Los Angeles, where the former President is charged with defrauding a Hollywood dot com millionaire to help Hillary Clinton obtain more than $1.2 million from him for her 2000 Senate campaign, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled on Friday, April 25 that Hillary Clinton would not be required to testify in a sworn deposition as a material witness in the case until AFTER the November election!

While Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Al Gore, Ed Rendell, Barbara Streisand, Cher, Stan Lee, Brad Pitt, Mike Wallace, Larry King et al may be called to testify and be deposed starting in May, Hillary alone has been protected from explaining her role in her husband%u2019s fraud charges.

In an astonishing ruling by the Judge, Hillary Clinton may NOT be deposed about her role in the illegal solicitation and cover up of the largest contribution made to her Senate campaign until after the presidential election.

This is the same contribution Hillary denied knowing about or receiving when Lloyd Grove of the Washington Post asked her specifically about it and her relationship with the donor, Peter Paul, in August 2000.

Equally surprising as the ruling was the judge%u2019s request to Hillary defense lawyer David Kendall to %u201Csay hello to his ( Judge Munoz%u201D) friend Bill, also a partner in Kendall%u2019s law firm%u201D
Reply to this comment
by blkpresident April 30, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
Jane Fonda, Hillary Clinton, Patty Hearst, Hillary Clinton...
Reply to this comment
by popstom1 April 30, 2008 3:18 PM EDT
thats cool I like Clinton Big Oil hate''s her
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 April 30, 2008 3:16 PM EDT
HEY POPS. IM FOR MCCAIN 2008
Reply to this comment
See all 134 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook