April 29, 2008
Obama's Risky Denunciation Of Rev. Wright
Analysis: CBSNews.com's Vaughn Ververs Says Harsh Words For Ex-Pastor May Help Obama, But Challenges Await
-
Play CBS Video Video Obama Blasts Rev. Wright "CBS News RAW": Sen. Barack Obama says that he finds Rev. Jeremiah Wright's comments appalling and contradictory to his core values.
-
Photo Essay Barack Obama A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
After days of largely ignoring the media blitz his former pastor has waged, Barack Obama reversed course and denounced the Rev. Jeremiah Wright in the strongest and most direct terms yet on Tuesday. It was a decision that may help him reclaim some of the initiative in a tight presidential primary contest, but it is not without risks.
The decision to specifically address Wright’s controversial statements came after the campaign maintained for days that Obama had said all he had to say on the subject - a sign that there has been growing concern that the controversy was damaging his candidacy. The result was not just a denunciation of Wright’s comments, but of the man who attracted Obama into the Trinity United Church of Christ, married him and baptized his children.
The turning point was Wright’s combative appearance in Washington yesterday at the national press club, where he stood by the comments he has claimed were taken out of context in press accounts over the past months. Wright maintained that the U.S. government was capable of acts of horror such as spreading AIDS through the black community, accused the government of committing terrorism abroad and called criticisms of such remarks an attack on the “black church.”
“I am outraged by the comments that were made and saddened by the spectacle that we saw yesterday,” Obama said in a last-minute press conference today. The candidate said that after watching Wright’s appearance from Monday, “what became clear to me was that he was presenting a world view that contradicts what I am and what I stand for."
Hitting on most of the major points in specific terms, Obama said “there are no excuses” for such comments. “They offended me. They rightly offend all Americans and they should be denounced."
In his much-heralded address on race relations after Wright’s earlier comments began gaining wide circulation last month, Obama pointedly denounced the comments but not the man. That position changed today. Calling Wright’s appearance Monday a “performance,” Obama went further, saying his remarks “were not only divisive and destructive, but I believe that they end up giving comfort to those who prey on hate.”
With potentially pivotal contests looming in North Carolina and Indiana, the focus of the Democratic contest has been on Obama’s political weaknesses. For weeks, questions revolved around pressure on Hillary Clinton to drop out of the race. But after her sizable win in Pennsylvania, the pressure has shifted to Obama to demonstrate he can deliver a knock-out punch.
He needs to show not only that he can attract the kind of blue-collar, “Reagan Democrat” vote that has kept Clinton afloat in the race but also demonstrate to those all-important superdelegates who will decide the nomination that he has what it takes to win in November. Part of that is proving that he can handle the kind of crisis that Wright has become for his campaign.
In taking such an aggressive stand Obama may succeed in publicly distancing himself from the spectacle that the Rev. Wright has become, but his newfound outrage raises some further questions. In his Philadelphia address, Obama stood by his friend. “As imperfect as he may be,” he said of Wright a month ago, “he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. … I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.”
In today’s press conference, Obama said he sought in his earlier speech to “provide a context and to lift up some of the contradictions and complexities of race in America,” but that he found Wright’s comments Monday to be a “bunch of rants that that aren’t grounded in truth.” But many of Wright’s “rants” were simply a confirmation of many of the statements which had stirred up controversy in the first place.
Despite his appropriate outrage over Wright’s performances of late, Obama’s claim that his longtime pastor is exhibiting new behavior is certain to come under scrutiny. “The person I saw yesterday was not the person that I met 20 years ago,” Obama insisted today. That comment, and any suggestion that the relationship between the two men was never as close as portrayed, are questionable.
Some of Wright’s remarks that sparked this mess were made over five years ago, specifically his oft-played comment that the nation’s “chickens” were “coming home to roost,” which he made shortly after 9/11. Obama has indicated Wright was instrumental in attracting him to the church he joined and has said he titled his book, “The Audacity of Hope,” after one of Wright’s sermons. That 20-year relationship will not be easily broken as a result of one afternoon press conference.
“What I think particularly angered me,” Obama said of Wright on Monday, “was his suggestion somehow that my previous denunciation of his remarks were somehow political posturing."
In a New York Times profile of the Obama-Wright relationship in April 2007, Wright himself predicted such a split based on the controversial remarks that were already under some scrutiny. “If Barack gets past the primary, he might have to publicly distance himself from me,” Wright told the paper over a year ago. “I said it to Barack personally, and he said yeah, that might have to happen.”
Whether Obama’s strong words of denunciation today were sincere or “political posturing” will be decided by the remaining Democratic primary voters, the party’s superdelegates and, perhaps, the national electorate. But it’s not a discussion that is likely to disappear entirely from the public’s consciousness.
By Vaughn Ververs
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
More From Politics
Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 31
- next
See all 608 Comments--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by vmcneal2 at 12:50 PM : May 01, 2008
Because she has the capabity to be an even better president than Bill because of her experience. Bill had no national experience when he entered the White House. And she is running for the same office.
Why shouldn''t she point out that Obama lied about Rev. Wright. He bald faced lied, that''s the whole point of bringing up Rev. Wright.
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RField9 at 12:07 AM : May 01, 2008
You''re right and Bill and Hillary are two of the biggest ones.
don''''t want a president who chooses to surround himself with people like Bill Ayers, Rezko and Rev. Wright.
It doesn''''t say much about his ability to judge character.
And before you jump all over this, saying look at who Hillary has trusted, make a note that Obama said the same thing about Hillary. He said we don''''t want a president who isn''''t a good judge of character.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by smiley676 at 11:08 AM : May 01, 2008
When Bill Clinton was running for President the first time he reach out to Louis Farrakhan for help with black voters. When Bill Clinton was in hot water over the M.L. BJ scandal he reach out to Rev. Wright for spiritual guidence. I guess it''s ok seek help from so called "racist" if you need their help.
It doesn''t say much about his ability to judge character.
And before you jump all over this, saying look at who Hillary has trusted, make a note that Obama said the same thing about Hillary. He said we don''t want a president who isn''t a good judge of character.
Make no mistake, I am a black too, but it is so unofortunate that we are our own enemies.
in the belly of a great white!
Awwwww.....too bad, b-easy.
Would you take your family to listen to Jeremiah Wright''s tirades every Sunday? Would you give 10% of your income to support Jeremiah Wright?
Obama has shown incredibly bad judgement over 20 long years. Why would his judgement as president be any better?
But she could still be a material witness and be required to testify about what she knew concerning alleged illegal campaign fundraising.
The California Court of Appeals (Second Appellate District) upheld a California Superior Court ruling that the New York senator and leading Democratic candidate for president could avoid the lawsuit because of a state law that protects public figures from FRIVILOUS LAWSUITS."
Is this like Rezko? Nope--Rezko involved Obama''''s association with a questionable person. This involved HRC and Bill''''s questionable actions (and potentially illegal actions) with a questionable person. Big difference.
Obama''''s could harm his campaign, Hillary''''s could land her before a Grand jury and like DeLay--facing jail time: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/tal
k/2008/04/breaking-news-hillary-clinton.
php
If the contest is 50/50 then if Obama supporters will still support Hillary but more of hers won''''t support Obama--and either can get the Independents--who would lose? Obama supporters don''''t see the game.
In the final analysis, the superdelegates will go with the best risk, if HRC can pull the Independents, it COULD be her. Obama''''s supporters and their loyalty to the Dem party are being used against him and them. Funny how so many can''''t see that.
This country is already in deep trouble, if obama becomes president i believe we are finished as a country and will belong to the Muslim countries.
obama can;t throw michelle under the bus, she won''t let him and besides she has balls he doesn''t.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 31
- next
See all 608 Comments