April 29, 2008
Obama Presidency Would Be A Step Backward
National Review Online: Candidate's Dangerous Policies Are Straight Out Of 1930s And 1960s
-
Although Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill. has presented himself as the candidate of “change”, the cold fact is that everything he says about domestic policy and foreign policy is straight out of the our unsuccessful history, says National Review Online. (AP)
-
Play CBS Video Video Obama's Recurring Problem Barack Obama is distancing himself once again from comments made by his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Political analyst Joe Trippi talks with Harry Smith about Wright's impact on the campaign.
-
Video Dem Fight Wages On The fight between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination may be taking a toll on voters. Thalia Assuras reports.
-
Video Obama, Clinton Reps Speak Out In the midst of an ongoing Democratic race, Howard Wolfson, Communications Director for the Clinton campaign, and Barack Obama's Chief Strategist David Axelrod speak with Bob Schieffer.
-
Photo Essay Barack Obama A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.
-
Timeline Democratic Campaign Trail Notable events in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.
Many years ago, a great hitter named Paul Waner was nearing the end of his long career. He entered a ballgame with 2,999 hits - one hit away from the 3,000-hit landmark - which so many hitters want to reach, but which relatively few actually do reach.
Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner’s 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top.
The official scorer reversed himself and called it an error. Later Paul Waner got a clean hit for number 3,000.
What reminded me of this is the great fervor that many seem to feel over the prospect of the first black president of the United States.
No doubt it is only a matter of time before there is a black president, just as it was only a matter of time before Paul Waner got his 3,000th hit. The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark is reached.
Paul Waner had too much pride to accept a scratch hit. Choosing a president of the United States is a lot more momentous than a baseball record. We the voters need to have far more concern about who we put in that office that holds the destiny of a nation and of generations yet unborn.
There is no reason why someone as arrogant, foolishly clever, and ultimately dangerous as Barack Obama should become president - especially not at a time when the threat of international terrorists with nuclear weapons looms over 300 million Americans.
Many people seem to regard elections as occasions for venting emotions, like cheering for your favorite team or choosing a homecoming queen.
The three leading candidates for their party’s nomination are being discussed in terms of their demographics - race, sex, and age - as if that is what the job is about.
One of the painful aspects of studying great catastrophes of the past is discovering how many times people were preoccupied with trivialities when they were teetering on the edge of doom. The demographics of the presidency are far less important than the momentous weight of responsibility that office carries.
Just the power to nominate federal judges to trial courts and appellate courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, can have an enormous impact for decades to come. There is no point feeling outraged by things done by federal judges, if you vote on the basis of emotion for those who appoint them.
Barack Obama has already indicated that he wants judges who make social policy instead of just applying the law. He has already tried to stop young violent criminals from being tried as adults.
Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things - using the mantra of “change” endlessly - the cold fact is that virtually everything has says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.
Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive, and subsidizing those who are not - all this is a re-run of the 1960s.
We paid a terrible price for such 1960s notions in the years that followed, in the form of soaring crime rates, double-digit inflation, and double-digit unemployment. During the 1960s, ghettoes across the countries were ravaged by riots from which many have not fully recovered to this day.
The violence and destruction were concentrated not where there was the greatest poverty or injustice but where there were the most liberal politicians, promoting grievances, and hamstringing the police.
Internationally, the approach that Senator Obama proposes - including the media magic of meetings between heads of state - was tried during the 1930s. That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history.
Everything seems new to those too young to remember the old and too ignorant of history to have heard about it.
By Thomas Sowell
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online.

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 8
- next
See all 141 CommentsTruth is, I can think of many other African Americans who are better suited to be President. Obama is naive, passive, wimpy, and inexperienced. These are the LAST qualities that we need in a President after 8 yrs of Bush!
Right now, Hillary is our only chance at beating McCain AND our only chance at turning this country around!
http://savagepolitics.com/?p=317
I saw this today, and HAD to share it with everyone. It is just a brilliantly researched and written list of inconsistencies with several of Obama''s stories. I think it should be done for ALL three candidates, but I guess this is a good way to start at finally looking at the candidates with some honesty.
http://savagepolitics.com/?p=317
Why can''t the democrats ever nominate a decent candidate? First it was Kerry and now Obama. I thought it was impossible to pick a worse candidate than John Kerry and now they come up with Obama. Give me a break! I''m really considering swithing over and becoming a republican because the democrats are so blind anymore.
A black candidate would be wonderful if he/she was the right black candidate but color has absolutely no reflection of a person''s character or their agenda.
All I can say is HILLARY IS THE BEST CANDIDATE!
The milk toast, lily livered rights can dish it out
but cant take it back.
?? A little teasing from the Reverend Wright
& they run to the corner ??
This man is supposed to be scary ?
How white do U want Obama to be ?
President..never did.
*************************
Teetering on the edge of Doom??????? Could you try a beat the drums of scare-tactics any louder. So Mr. Sowell thinks that health care, jobs, the economy, our reputation in the world, how we treat our allies, are "trivialities???" Is this the most blantant right-wing goofiness that you have ever heard.
Do you need some more, myshiba??
Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner%u2019s 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top.
What reminded me of this is the great fervor that many seem to feel over the prospect of the first black president of the United States.
*****************************************************
Please be specific regarding your criticisms. Thank you.
------
Posted by myshiba at 06:30 PM : Apr 30, 2008
+ report
************************************
The above example of a rhetorical simile is the most ridiculous, far-fetched, nonsenical, fantasy, that I have ever seen. It is so sweetly American, you know baseball and apple pie, and the honest fellow that gave up a hit, that it almost makes you want to throw up. Huge numbers of Obama supporters are white, could care less if he is the first black president, but support him for just the reasons this knuckle-head is knocking him. We think he is the one to make America safer, unlike Bush who has put us at more risk. The stretch between baseball and Obama would probably be laughed out of a fresman English class, let alone from a supposed seasoned journalist. Pitiful
* * **
Please be specific regarding your criticisms. Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by myshiba at 06:30 PM : Apr 30, 2008
+ report
************************************
There is no reason why someone as arrogant, foolishly clever, and ultimately dangerous as Barack Obama should become president - especially not at a time when the threat of international terrorists with nuclear weapons looms over 300 million Americans.
************************************************
The above paragraph is nothing by lies, exaggerations, and innuendos. Not one word of truth in it. It is posed as a thoughtful comment from a concerned American, when in reality is it nothing but a partisan twisting of seemingly innocent words into the worst form of scare-mongering and right-wing propaganda.
He has inspired all races, backgrounds and religions of people to unite for the good of this country. His campaign is offering a fellowship to students and graduates this summer to learn how to be community organizers. He has impacted this country locally and at the community level in ways that the other clowns could and will not and he has not been elected yet.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 8
- next
See all 141 Comments