Apr 28, 2008

Obama Team Remains Unshaken

Politico: Despite Adversity, Campaign Showing No Signs Of Internal Upheaval

  • Play CBS Video Video Eye To Eye: Obama's War Room

    "Only On The Web": Katie Couric gets a behind-the-scenes look at the nerve center of Barack Obama's campaign and meets the people hard at work to help him win the U.S. presidency.

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

(The Politico)  This story was written by Carrie Budoff Brown.

After Sen. Barack Obama’s third major primary loss and endless media coverage dedicated to dissecting the apparent weaknesses of his candidacy, one of the most striking elements of his campaign this week was what’s missing: any hint of internal upheaval.

At Obama headquarters in Chicago, hundreds of miles removed from the Beltway bubble, advisers held steadfast in their adherence to The Plan, a blueprint devised 15 months ago by the same inner circle that runs the campaign today, supported by the candidate and carried out by a tight-knit staff.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s operation could not be more dissimilar. Her campaign, ensconced in a Washington suburb, has experienced two major staff shakeups fueled by high-level staff rivalries, shifting strategies and an unusual degree of finger-pointing.

The contrast raises the question: How has the Obama campaign managed to maintain an island of comparative calm?

A winning record undoubtedly aids the cohesion, Obama advisers and unaffiliated Democratic strategists said, but so do other key dynamics: a candidate intolerant of infighting, a clear line of authority and a healthy distance from the city they want to take over.

The Obama campaign reminds some observers of George W. Bush, circa 2000, who presided over a loyal, linear and leakless operation in Austin, Texas, while Al Gore stumbled through multiple makeovers first in Washington, D.C., and later in Nashville, Tenn.

“In a parallel universe kind of sense, there are real similarities” between Obama and Bush, said Jim Jordan, a Democratic consultant who left the top post in Sen. John Kerry’s 2004 presidential campaign amid a shakeup.

“Intense loyalty to and belief in the candidate,” Jordan said, citing the similarities. “Simple, clear lines of authority with real discipline among the staff and consultants. Deep, talented teams. Maybe most importantly, candidates who trust their campaign, who understand what they’re doing, who deliver as well as demand loyalty, who intuitively relate to and handle their campaigns with just the right touch.”

There are certainly disagreements and strains - Obama advisers acknowledge as much, without admitting the details - but rule No. 1 is no fratricidal behavior, which includes unauthorized disclosures to the media. Obama himself on Friday acknowledged the need for the campaign to continually “fine-tune itself.”

But on the whole, the rival Democratic campaigns are a study in contrasts.

Clinton tapped the ranks of Sen. Charles Schumer, a hard-driving New York Democrat, for a press shop that can be as aggressive and unforgiving as the one favored by their former boss. Obama drew from the slightly more sedate worlds of Kerry, former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and former Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.).

Strategist Mark Penn, a veteran of the toughest White House battles of the 1990s, was deeply unpopular and a divisive presence within the Clinton campaign. Obama strategist David Axelrod is the anti-Penn. In the midst of Penn’s demotion earlier this month, one Obama aide in Chicago remarked to his colleagues about the low-key and well-liked Axelrod: “Do you know how lucky we are that he is our Mark Penn?”

Unlike Clinton’s team, the Obama campaign did not start with pre-existing rivalries. Axelrod and campaign manager David Plouffe were business partners, while Plouffe and Robert Gibbs, the communications director, share season tickets to the Washington Nationals. The staff, many of whom left family and lives behind to work in Chicago, have only each other to rely on in a place far from home.

“We would go to a basketball or baseball game together if we weren’t doing this right now,” Gibbs said. “We are all both friends and colleagues, and I think that is important. We feel we are a cohesive type of unit, not a group of individuals.”

Continued



By Carrie Budoff Brown
Copyright 2008 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Add a Comment See all 50 Comments
by libra127 April 29, 2008 6:08 PM EDT
blackspirit3 - Problem with your arguement is did Hillarys Pastor preech about abusing a 7 year old.

Posted by obama8years at 01:24 PM : Apr 29, 2008

The man in question has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with Hillary or Bill Clinton. He is a pastor from Clinton, NY - hence he has occasionally been referred to as "Clinton''s former pastor".

It helps to look for evidence before you believe something.
Reply to this comment
by libra127 April 29, 2008 6:05 PM EDT
If that''s trully what you believe, then you are not a very attentive person,

Posted by tru_america1 at 08:05 AM : Apr 29, 2008

No, I just don''t believe everything I read like you do. I look for hard evidence before I believe something.
Reply to this comment
by libh8er April 29, 2008 5:27 PM EDT
The band that played as the Titanic sank was also ''unshakable''.....just not unsinkable. The nam is done. Better get used to saying President McCain. :)
Reply to this comment
by obama8years April 29, 2008 4:24 PM EDT
blackspirit3 - Problem with your arguement is did Hillarys Pastor preech about abusing a 7 year old. You have to come up with something better than that.
OBAMA is Toast.
Reply to this comment
by obama8years April 29, 2008 4:20 PM EDT
The only thing that will save Obama is if he comes out and tells the truth admit he was dupped and to repudiate all connections to radicalism, ISM, Wright, Farakahn, Ayers. His wife needs to come out and do the same. Obama better be wrapping himself in the american flag if he wants to be president.
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 April 29, 2008 3:24 PM EDT
TWO "DUMMI-CRATS" WITH TOO MUCH BAGGAGE -NO AMOUNT OF DENIAL WILL ERASE -COME ELECTION TIME. TOO LITTLE -TOO LATE. MCCAIN 2008
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 April 29, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
Obama Team Remains Unshaken....... that''s not true at all. He is worried about what his Rev friend is saying and with good reason. I for one would never vote for Obama anyway so the more the Rev talks the better.
Reply to this comment
by dante805 April 29, 2008 12:45 PM EDT
Shaken not stirred; Obama is cooked. He should have thrown Wright under the bus months ago like he did his grandma. Some of his best work:

Small Town Americans are bitter and cling to Guns or Religion. They are anti-immigrant, anti-free trade. Given at San Francisco fund raiser

%u201CTypical White People%u201D quote

More Blacks are in Prison today than in college

Abortions are better than being %u201CPunished" with a baby

Mis-statements on the number of casualties in IRAQ

Never attended a White Church (even though he and Michelle preach diversity)

His flat declaration that lobbyists %u201Cwon''t work in my White House%u201D changed after it turned out his own written plan says they could, with some restrictions.

Told a story of how his Kenyan father and his Kansan mother fell in love because of the tumult of Selma, but he was born in 1961, four years before the confrontation at Selma took place. When asked later, Mr. Obama clarified himself, saying: ''I meant the whole civil rights movement.''

Obama exaggerated the death toll of the tornado in Greensburg, Kansas, saying 10,000 people died %u2013 he was only off by 9,988. He was trying to tie the deaths to the lack of National Guard heavy equipment because of Iraq %u2013 also incorrect.
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 April 29, 2008 12:12 PM EDT
A PERSON SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHOICES THEY MAKE ABOUT THEIR LIFE ( & INSURANCE)FOR EXAMPLE- AND IF IT IS MORE COSTLY ISN''T IT STILL BETTER THAN A GOVERNMENT TELLING YOU WHAT YOU NEED? ( CLINTON & OBAMA WANTS SOCIALISM- GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED HEALTH CARE & NOT ASSIST IN LOWER GAS PRICES FOR A BUSY SEASON- but Clinton said she would make up the difference in revenue by imposing a "windfall profits tax" on oil companies. SUCH BS-!!)
SELF PRESERVATION AND INDEPENDANCE IS WHAT THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON- MORE AND MORE PEOPLE THESE DAYS WANT TO BE TAKEN CARE OF BY THE GOVERNMENT- GROW UP!
Reply to this comment
by metroduck75 April 29, 2008 11:26 AM EDT
if anyone can start a NEW Labor Party, it''s the Clintons.

Hillary is well known by her 1st name. I truly think that the Elites in the DEM Party need her more than she needs them.

If Lincon could start a new Republican party back then, Hillary can certainly pull off a Victory in new Labor Party, due to her powerful coliation.

If 3 names are all on the Ballots, I will definitely vote for her.

Forget the Party line, Hillary''''08!!!
Reply to this comment
by abbe91 April 29, 2008 11:21 AM EDT
"That negro freshman senators campaign is just a fairy tail.
Posted by tracy0morgan at 05:27 PM : Apr 28, 2008"

Remove your KKK suit, maybe you will be able to spell a bit better. Or was it a fantasy on his anatomy when you mentioned a "fairy tail" ?
Reply to this comment
by metroduck75 April 29, 2008 10:46 AM EDT
Back in 1972, McGovern won the slightly more "pledge delegates" in DEM primaries.... BUT lost in the Landslide in the G.E. (he only won 1 state), due to the poor coliation that he put together.

Of course, most "young voters" don''t know that.

So now, young voters are pushing for Obama to be nominated, thinking he is the 2nd coming.

If the Elites in the DEM Party are Stupid enough to annoint Obama, I would totally encourage Sen. Clinton to break from DEM Party and starts a NEW Labor Party.

After all, if anyone has the ability to start a New Labor Party, it''s the Clintons.

Her Coliations include down-to-earth Middle Class families, most Moderate Democrats, some republican women, and all Independences are sick of Republican party and Elites in DEM party.

I will totally vote for her, if 3 names appear on the Ballots.

Forget the Party line, Go Hillary''''08!!
Reply to this comment
by gaiaschild-2009 April 29, 2008 5:37 AM EDT
Obama''s campaign is beautifully managed and professionally adept as well as supported by many small contributors who believe in the candidate. This organization, like any similar organization, reflects the character of the executive and demonstrates not only executive skill but also the ability to inspire and engage.

The quality of outreach and responsiveness also reflects the candidate. Donors get thank-you post cards. The campaign knows when and how to follow up. Invitations to participate are mellow and inviting. There''s a blend of really hard work with a sense of relaxation and friendliness. There''s no hard sell, no pressure, no defensiveness, and it''s not really a quid pro quo atmosphere.

Would be really nice to have that spirit in the White House.

Reply to this comment
by libra127 April 29, 2008 4:56 AM EDT
hillary only wants more fame and riches for herself;

Posted by dbaker97 at 12:09 AM : Apr 29, 2008

This is SO not true. She has worked her whole life trying to help people have a better life. She cares deeply about this country and its people. She will work incredibly hard to bring her plans and ideas to fruition. She is certainly not in this for fame or money, she''s had more than enough of both.
Reply to this comment
by pensacola88 April 29, 2008 4:42 AM EDT
Reverend Wright is not anyone to fear. His associations are not people to fear. Reverend Wright is a colorful man and is very intelligent. He is not a racist, as his listeners may fear.

I don''t cringe, in fact, I am intrigued!! The political mileage for stating a fact is often lost in the layer of the listener''s fear. The stregnth of fear is often stronger than fact with many listeners.

If listeners just stopped and listened, they may find Reverend Wright a source of liberation from fear.

If Obama just hangs on and keeps his pastor at his side, he will prevail and win!! This is a golden opportunity to learn how leaders charm the most oppressed and victimized people in our population and empower them to rise above their personal struggles and hardships.
Reply to this comment
by onceagirl April 29, 2008 3:36 AM EDT
Senator Obama, if you examine his past, may have faults but his virtues outweigh his shortcomings. I truly believe that he wants to be a part of American history as the man who started us back to where we really revered our constitution. Call it elitism if you must, but I say good for him. What''s wrong with having ideals that encompass all of us, supporters and detractors alike? It is our current system that pits neighbor against neighbor. It is our current system that allows the rich to trample on our constitution, disobey the ten commandments with impunity....something is rotten in Denmark.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds April 29, 2008 3:22 AM EDT

That is because he is running a clean campaign and all these folks will be able to sleep at night. Unfortunately, voters seem to respond to the slime, so he may lose. It was pretty apparant the last couple of elections that the slime-ball wins.

Posted by kansas1946 at 12:13 AM : Apr 29, 2008

"No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."

Henry Mencken

Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 April 29, 2008 3:13 AM EDT
After Sen. Barack Obama%u2019s third major primary loss and endless media coverage dedicated to dissecting the apparent weaknesses of his candidacy, one of the most striking elements of his campaign this week was what%u2019s missing: any hint of internal upheaval.
***************************************

That is because he is running a clean campaign and all these folks will be able to sleep at night. Unfortunately, voters seem to respond to the slime, so he may lose. It was pretty apparant the last couple of elections that the slime-ball wins.
Reply to this comment
by April 29, 2008 3:09 AM EDT
it should be easy to see the difference in the two campaigns; hillary''s campaign is all for HER, obama''s campaign is for US. hillary only wants more fame and riches for herself; obama wants change for the good of all.
Reply to this comment
by truthyness April 29, 2008 2:21 AM EDT
There IS medication for people who think

they are under attack all the time.
Reply to this comment
See all 50 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: