WASHINGTON, April 24, 2008
Mankind's Close Call With Extinction
DNA Evidence Reveals How Humanity's Stone-Age Almost Went Way Of The Dodo
-
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive Genetic Journey Using DNA samples, the Genographic Project tries to map humanity's trip through the ages.
The number of early humans may have shrunk as low as 2,000 before numbers began to expand again in the early Stone Age, according to an analysis released Thursday.
"This study illustrates the extraordinary power of genetics to reveal insights into some of the key events in our species' history. Tiny bands of early humans, forced apart by harsh environmental conditions, coming back from the brink to reunite and populate the world. Truly an epic drama, written in our DNA," Spencer Wells, National Geographic Society explorer in residence, said in a statement.
Wells is director of the Genographic Project, launched in 2005 to study anthropology using genetics. The report was published in the American Journal of Human Genetics.
Previous studies using mitochondrial DNA - which is passed down through mothers - have traced modern humans to a single "mitochondrial Eve," who lived in Africa about 200,000 years ago.
The migrations of humans out of Africa to populate the rest of the world appear to have begun about 60,000 years ago, but little has been known about humans between Eve and that dispersal.
The new study looks at the mitochondrial DNA of the Khoi and San people in South Africa which appear to have diverged from other people between 90,000 and 150,000 years ago.
Quote
The researchers led by Doron Behar of Rambam Medical Center in Haifa, Israel and Saharon Rosset of IBM T.J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, New York, and Tel Aviv University concluded that humans separated into small populations prior to the stone age, when they came back together and began to increase in numbers and spread to other areas.Who would have thought that as recently as 70,000 years ago, extremes of climate had reduced our population to such small numbers that we were on the very edge of extinction?
Meave Leakey, PaleontologistEastern Africa experienced a series of severe droughts between 135,000 and 90,000 years ago and the researchers said this climatological shift may have contributed to the population changes, dividing into small, isolated groups which developed independently of one another.
Paleontologist Meave Leakey, a Genographic adviser, commented: "Who would have thought that as recently as 70,000 years ago, extremes of climate had reduced our population to such small numbers that we were on the very edge of extinction?"
Today more than 6.6 billion people inhabit the globe, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
The research was funded by the National Geographic Society, IBM, the Waitt Family Foundation, the Seaver Family Foundation, Family Tree DNA and Arizona Research Labs.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
More From SciTech
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 59 CommentsPosted by MaBa7 at 11:46 PM : Apr 25, 2008
Oooh, you missed a doozy of a ''conversation'' we had on another CBSNews board a few months back. One of the creationists admitted that Biblical literacy leads one inevitably to conclude that we''re all the progeny of an incestuous relationship between Eve and Cain. So God apparently thought incest was okay in the Garden of Eden, but no longer. Go figure - that God sounds pretty wacked to me.
Posted by talkingham at 03:34 PM : Apr 24, 2008
Well...I''m a bio-chemist and I can tell you with no uncertainty that you will find no "modelitis" or other forms of shoddy research giong on in my lab. In every field or discipline you will find both the best and worst of us. however, science is DEFINED as I stated previously, and any jaded sentiment yo uhave towards our method is not a result of what is to be taught, but the result of a few misguided souls masquerading as scientists.
Posted by rational_1
Must have been Ozzie and Harriet - the source of all that good old ''50''s morality that the bible thumpers miss so much!! (LOL)
Posted by rodbarker60 at 10:15 AM : Apr 25, 2008
Eight? Adama & Eve, Cain and Able, Laverne & Shirley (Cain & Able''s wives) but who are the other two? LOL
Posted by incog-nito at 11:05 PM : Apr 24, 2008
Hmmm, an interesting hypothesis. I propose an extension; the spaceship is made of wood and shaped like a gigantic boat and has pens for two of each kind of animal. I love doing creation science - you just say whatever pops into your mind and you don''t have to provide any evidence. Can I have tenure at the Institute for Creation Research now?
Let us continue your line of supposition, suppose that subsequent generations re-interpreted and twisted the original information, to fit more mundane agendas such as greed, and power-hunger, until it was so far from the truth as to be opposed to all empirical evidence, and those re-interpretations were accepted as the original truth, which of course by that time is empirically incorrect.
At that point, does not the re-interpreted information become irrelevant, useless, and serving of the opposite purpose of which it was originally intended?
Yeah, and now we are rapidly destroying the planet by TOO MANY being born!
Take a basic geology course and you WILL understand. Good luck.
The bones of perhaps 99% of any living things disappear within a few years of dying. There could have been masive populations then and they have all become dirt.. Humanity has a great capacity to adapt and survive.. I cannot see how anyone can deduce the population of thousands of years ago, there were no records to tell us and now no bones.. Tomorrow someone else well qualified, will come out and tell us that we were over populated back then or something... I object to having my well earned taxes spent on speculation like this which cant be proved one way or the other, surely there is more worth while things to be studying like destroying cancers..
Oh my gosh, dont tell me that global warming happened then..oh no dont tell me that we have gone through many cycles of this..
I am printing this with tongue in cheek and of course we have, many scientists have reported that we have gone through cycles of great climate change before, but the media wont print it as it is not popular for the global warmers of today and the money that will be made out of this scam..remember that Vikings used to be able to grow crops in Greenland, but cant now.
Personally I think the accounts of creation and the great flood are a means for a very advanced intelligence to relate important events to a very un-evolved audience, that being all of humanity at the time these early telling/writings took place.
But I also think that the evolution of all of the interwoven complex beings and their societies - both "animal" and "human" was no accident of nature.
Suppose for a moment that "God" "created" human life on earth via DNA manipulation and/or some other means that we haven''t learned of yet. Now to explain all of that to the slowly evolving results of this "creation" you would need some nursery-rhyme type simplicity when you set down to talk to them about it. My opinion (and it''s only that) is that this is kind of what happened. It''s perhaps why creationists and evolutionists can''t give up their core beliefs, they are both kind of right. In my opinion.
What if "human-ness" was introduced into one (or even several) relatively high-level animal species on earth via DNA manipulation. Could that not be explained by what we see around us? Just food for thought, I don''t have the answers but at least I know it.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 59 Comments