COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo., April 24, 2008

Hoaxer's Phone Linked To Sect Abuse Calls

Missing Colo. Woman Claimed Multiple Personalities; Charged With Making False Abuse Reports

  • Rozita Swinton, 33, of Colorado Springs, was arrested April 16 and later released on a misdemeanor charge of false reporting in a February case in Colorado Springs with no known ties to the raid in west Texas.

    Rozita Swinton, 33, of Colorado Springs, was arrested April 16 and later released on a misdemeanor charge of false reporting in a February case in Colorado Springs with no known ties to the raid in west Texas.  (KEYE)

  • Play CBS Video Video Texas AG Defends Polygamy Raid

    As women from a raided polygamist sect claim civil rights violations, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott tells Harry Smith authorities were right to remove children from danger.

  • Video Polygamy Kids In Foster Care

    Over 100 children removed from a polygamist compound in Texas have been placed in foster care. The sect claims its rights are being violated. Randall Pinkston reports.

  • Video FLDS Kids Sent To Foster Homes

    The first of over 400 children removed from a Texas polygamist sect have been sent to foster care facilities, as legal proceedings against the sect continues. Randall Pinkston reports.

  • Photo Essay Separation Anxiety

    Some mothers in polygamist sect separated from children as part of abuse investigation.

  • Photo Essay Polygamist Compound Raid

    Secret calls from alleged abuse victim lead to raid of religious sect's compound.

(CBS/AP)  Texas Department of Public Safety spokeswoman Tela Mange on Wednesday said only that the Texas Rangers' investigation is continuing.

The calls that triggered the raid were made by someone using the name named Sarah Barlow, according to Long.

Flora Jessop, executive director of the Child Protection Project, a Phoenix-based organization that helps girls and women leaving the polygamous culture, said she has recorded nearly 40 hours of conversations with someone who said her name was Laura. "She claimed to be the twin sister of Sarah, who made the initial call in Texas," said Jessop, a former member of the FLDS church.

The caller got most of the details of the sect right, from specifics of the religion and culture, to the of homes in Hildale, Utah, and Colorado City, Ariz., where she said she was being held, Jessop said. She added, however, that other things she said made her suspicious, such as calling her parents "Mom" and "Dad" instead of "Mother" and "Father," as FLDS members do.

Texas' child welfare agency says its investigation into the ranch, including interviews with children, has found evidence of abuse. They allege that the sect encourages adolescent girls to marry older men and have children, and that boys are groomed to become future perpetrators. Sect members deny the allegations.

Documents related to Swinton's arrest had been sealed by a judge at the request of Texas authorities. The arrest warrant affidavit was released Wednesday after The Associated Press filed a motion to unseal the records Monday.


Timeline Of Events

  • June 2005: Swinton is arrested in Castle Rock, Colo., after she contacts an adoption center and authorities, claiming to be a 16-year-old named Jessica who was suicidal after giving birth, Castle Rock police say. She later pleads guilty to false reporting and receives a deferred sentence.
  • September 2006: A counselor at Rampart High School in Colorado Springs tells police a student identified as "April" called her and claimed she was sexually abused by her father and uncle. Similar calls were made by an "April" to a safe house for domestic abuse survivors in Washington state. The calls were later connected to Swinton, according to the Colorado Springs police document released Wednesday.
  • Oct. 21, 2007: A "Dana Anderson" begins a series of calls to a Colorado Springs safe house. Anderson reports she is in her teens and, at various times, claims she is being abused by a pastor at a prominent church and by her father. A counselor at the safe house, Jennifer Pierce, continued communication with Anderson over several weeks, eventually helping police conclude that Anderson is Swinton, the affidavit says.
  • Oct. 23, 2007: Through Pierce, Colorado Springs police Detective. Terry Thrumston speaks to Anderson on a three-way call. Thrumston speaks to the woman several times over the next week. He connects phone numbers used by the woman to numbers used to file five reports of abuse in Longmont, Colo., and two reports in Pueblo, Colo. - all from earlier that year.
  • Feb. 26, 2008: Colorado Springs officers receive a call from a girl who claims to be 4 years old and is locked in her basement. Officers conduct a door-to-door search for the girl but do not find her. During the search, they are contacted by Pierce, who says she knows whom they are looking for.
  • March 4: Pierce meets with police and explains that "Dana Anderson" has continued to call her. Pierce tells police that Anderson said she had another personality named "Rozita." Anderson has also been calling from a new number that police match to the Feb. 26 call to 911 and to calls made to a crisis hot line in Texas.
  • March 29: A series of phone calls begins to the crisis hot line in Texas. A woman who identifies herself as 16-year-old Sarah Barlow says she is being physically and sexually abused at the Yearning for Zion Ranch.
  • April 3: Texas authorities raid the Yearning for Zion Ranch. They take more than 400 children into custody.
  • April 13-14: Texas Rangers call Colorado Springs police as part of their investigation. A ranger reports two numbers with Colorado Springs area codes. One of them - "possibly related to the reporting party" - matches the number used to call 911 on Feb. 26 and used to call Pierce.
  • April 16: Colorado Springs police arrest Swinton and search her residence in connection to the Feb. 26 call. Two Texas Rangers observe the arrest but return to Texas without making an arrest. Authorities in Texas later call Swinton a "person of interest."
  • April 23: An arrest warrant affidavit is released, stating that Swinton used a telephone number that was later used to report alleged abuse at the polygamist retreat. It isn't clear whether
    authorities suspect Swinton made the calls that triggered the raid of the compound.

    © MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Add a Comment See all 89 Comments
    by mercyme884 April 25, 2008 7:40 PM EDT
    So what do you all think? A LIE IS A LIE IS A LIE. The State of Texas had no right to invade th homes of these people. The State of Texas had no right to seize these innocent children and wreak this havoc in their precious lives.Maybe that female judge has another agenda, maybe she does desire a little girl to bring up her own way. Knowing that these children are raised to be loving obedient children could be just what she is looking for.I believe it was all lies from beginning to end. The civil rights of these people were violated, I hope they sue the devil out of the state of Texas and make enough to put all these children through college.
    Reply to this comment
    by cpaide April 25, 2008 6:20 PM EDT
    and i recommend the following good and honest study for more information on the filthy violent nature of this KLK:

    No More Secrets : Violence in Lesbian Relationships
    http://www.amazon.com/No-

    More-Secrets-Violence-Relationships/dp
    /0
    415929466/
    "This study of abuse in lesbian relationships looks you in the eye and dares you to turn away. Far from being a prurient study of a fringe group of violent lesbians, this book demands that the queer community at large--afraid of straight disdain --recognize its accountability. No More Secrets illustrates that despite what many lesbian feminists believe, acts of violence are not committed solely by men."
    Reply to this comment
    by cpaide April 25, 2008 2:25 PM EDT
    Rosita Swinton is a founding member of the KLK (krazy lesbians kult), which conspired to provide a false police report that resulted in the raid on the Texas Mormons.

    The objective of the KLK (whose members include the Texas social workers and judge on the case) is to obtain the humble, white Mormon children and adopt them out to infertile lesbian couples, and that is happening right now.

    Once these kids are in the hands of the KLK, they''re told there is no such thing as too early for ***. Whenever the head lesbian tells them to go ''marry'' an old lesbian, that''s who they''re given to. They''re groomed to be pedophile fodder. Information presented shows that they''re given to be concubines (not wives - lesbians can''t have wives) at puberty or before, and have un-natural $ex while still children themselves.
    Reply to this comment
    by wlmrtpatriot April 25, 2008 1:20 AM EDT
    I believe Rosita Swinton knew exactly what she was doing. She should be held accountable for her actions.
    Reply to this comment
    by watcher269-2009 April 25, 2008 1:15 AM EDT
    The Sect leader must have contributed to the Democratic Party this year - Thus the Raid! Should have donated to the GOP -
    Reply to this comment
    by newsterl April 24, 2008 11:44 PM EDT
    anything they find on a valid search warrent is still valid.
    Posted by SusanHelit

    Not so fast, when the search warrent specifies WHAT and where they can look, they can''t violate that and still use what they find, cases are thrown out all the time for stuff like that- it''s illegal search and seizure.
    Reply to this comment
    by jankebenz April 24, 2008 9:14 PM EDT
    With lying,stealing,killing,cheating,drugs,immorality,ect, ect, becoming so common now, is it any wonder that the US is coming apart at the seams? Hundreds of inocent kids losing their families and security because of a lying loony, who gets of with a misdemeaner charge, somethings wrong here.
    Reply to this comment
    by truthalways April 24, 2008 8:13 PM EDT
    they found a bed, make up a story with it like they want, they took a 23 yr old , insisted she was under 18, even when she told them so...there are lots of make stories...of course they will find so called-new evidence after their hoax call..coz they did not find no vicim 16 yr old girl...they will make up the evidence, just not to look stupid,after the hoax call....
    Reply to this comment
    by truthalways April 24, 2008 8:01 PM EDT
    CPS will not protect the true abuse kids but will help the state to raid your homes, military style...they said they has warrant for the crooked guy, but they did not arrest him...but they took all the kids away and punish all the parents...just like they kill all the Waco kids cox their parents supposedly had too many guns...

    the state will do anything to proove they are right...willl search your home without a search warrant , then make up stories and so-called evidence against you....they have evidence, lots of stories and accusation but no one has been arrested!!!

    whatever...this another attempt of the government to infringe on your parental rights...go to support the parentalrights.org before they make laws to take away all your parental rights...if it is not too late...
    Reply to this comment
    by jehovahwtnss April 24, 2008 7:55 PM EDT
    kittykatty2 and Zendigity, I''m with you here. ccdsswrkr08 seems to be a typical "holier than thou" bureaucrat who is quite willing to oppress the innocent along with guilty just because the system says you should, and yet at the same time ignores the rampant abuse within the types of organisation for which she works.
    Reply to this comment
    by jehovahwtnss April 24, 2008 7:15 PM EDT
    Hey McVet, it seems to me that the ones following less than liberal practices are the Texas authorities, so I don''t know why you are shouting Seig Heil at the posters criticising these practices. However, please don''t get the idea that I think the Texas CPS were wrong in the YFZ case, as there seems to be a lot of anecdotal evidence of religious brainwashing at that compound
    Reply to this comment
    by kittykatty2 April 24, 2008 5:07 PM EDT

    One of the guys had a warrent out for his arrest, the other one was a known *** offender for sexually abusing minors. They were reported to have guns. Who knows what someone with a gun would do when faced with losing their children.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Posted by ccdsswrkr08 at 11:31 AM : Apr 24, 2008
    + report abuse
    __________________________________________
    ccdssworker you are either very very stupid or very very full of s*h*i*t. Zendigity...you are wasting your time. This person is the kind you should be very very afraid of .
    Reply to this comment
    by susanhelit April 24, 2008 5:04 PM EDT
    Even if the calls were a hoax, that doesn''t change a single thing about what the police saw once they got there. If a police officer gets a call that someone is being held and murdered in your basement, they go in to search, find your meth lab - guess what - you''re going to jail for that meth lab. This has gone all the way to the Supreme Court in the past, and so long as the police didn''t do the hoax, anything they find on a valid search warrent is still valid.
    Reply to this comment
    by newsterl April 24, 2008 4:59 PM EDT
    Seems to me this whole case should be thrown out of court just like it is when the cops illegally search your car and find drugs but had no cause to search it in the first place.
    A bogus call equals no just cause, that''s too bad but that''s how it is- otherwise your neighbor can report anything they like via prank call and have your house raided and if the cops happened to find something illegal then what.
    Reply to this comment
    by zendigity April 24, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
    ccdsswrkr08 - Again, you keep applying the extreme to the common in order to justify the government''s abuse of power.
    If kids are being abused then yeah, obviously it''s better to move them into another environment; but that isn''t what this is about; this is about the government manufacturing evidence to support what they believed was the right "moral" decision; this is about the government attempting to justify their incompetence through media propaganda in order to deflect focus away from exposing the truth; most of all though, this is about the people that DIDN''T do anything wrong but were still forcefully separated from THEIR CHILDREN because someone else MIGHT have.
    Reply to this comment
    by alexma50085 April 24, 2008 3:44 PM EDT
    This is a blantent abuse of government power. Just because you THINK something is happening doesn''t mean that it is going on. How can anyone ethical remove a child from their home, because they THINK there is abuse going on? And if there was some sort of abuse going on in this compound, I sure that it wasn''t happening to ALL 400 children. Government abuse, plain and simple.
    Reply to this comment
    by ccdsswrkr08 April 24, 2008 3:37 PM EDT
    Zendigity,

    What do you think the future would have been like for the little girls who''s parents were marrying them off to significantly older men and telling them that it was OK if that man hurts them if someone hadn''t stepped in?
    The future of these children was not damaged by the government, it was damaged when their parents refused to protect them.
    What you''re saying is equivelent to blaming the cop that arrested someone for a serious crime for what ever happens to that person in prison. I''m not comparing foster care to prison because that''s not what it is supposed to be. It''s supposed to be a safe alternative for children who''s family cannot or will not take care of them or have abused them. I can''t vouch for the foster care system in Texas cause (again) I don''t live there, but there has to be an alternative to leaving children in abusive homes.
    Reply to this comment
    by charliegirlg April 24, 2008 3:33 PM EDT
    In the pictures, you see women, girls and a few men. Where are the little boys?
    Reply to this comment
    by zendigity April 24, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
    ccdsswrkr08 - the majority of the kids taken were NOT in ANY immediate danger.

    They are now though...placed in the culture shock of a foster care system that will expose them to much greater chances of being abused; oh and to make matters worse, how about a media blitz announcing to the whole world that these kids have grown up with a "perverse understanding" of se*...Gee, what do you think the futures of these children really hold?
    Reply to this comment
    by ccdsswrkr08 April 24, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
    Again you''''re generalizing the fringe as though it were the common.
    Neglect charges are often assigned to any parent convicted of drug possession regardless of whether the children are actually being negleted; this is done in order to inflate statistics.
    Please stop with the propaganda...

    Posted by zendigity at 12:14 PM : Apr 24, 2008

    I''ll stop when you stop. Show me the law that says CPS is allowed to remove a child from the home SIMPLY because their is drug use going on. It has to be shown that the drug use is specifically imparing the parents ability to take care of the child for that case to be accepted. Unfortunatly (again at least where I come from) this happens to be the case on many occasions. I can''t speak for the rest of the country cause I don''t live there.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 89 Comments
  • Exclusive Webshow

    Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

    • MOST POPULAR
    Discussed
    1. House Passes Landmark Health Care Bill

      (478 recent comments)

    Latest News
    News in Pictures
    Scroll Left Scroll Right
    Connect with CBS News

    Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: