April 23, 2008

Clinton Goes After Obama's Strengths

Politico: Camp Claims She Has Surge In Fundraising, Lead Over Ill. Senator In Popular Votes

  • Play CBS Video Video Clinton In It To Win It

    By staying in the race Sen. Hillary Clinton argues she's the one who can beat John McCain, casting doubt on Sen. Barack Obama's claim he should be nominated based on his wins. Harry Smith reports.

  • Video Obama Attacked On All Sides

    As Sen. Hillary Clinton continues to hammer at Sen. Barack Obama, North Carolina Republicans have gone on the attack before the state's upcoming primary. Chip Reid reports.

  • Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y. celebrates her Pennsylvania primary victory in Philadelphia Tuesday April 22, 2008. Clinton is now claiming she has popular vote lead over Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill. and received a $10 million surge in donations after Pennsylvania win, writes <b>The Politico</b>.

    Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y. celebrates her Pennsylvania primary victory in Philadelphia Tuesday April 22, 2008. Clinton is now claiming she has popular vote lead over Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill. and received a $10 million surge in donations after Pennsylvania win, writes The Politico.  (AP)

  • Photo Essay Hillary Clinton

    A look at a life and career full of firsts.

  • Interactive The Money Race

    See the latest campaign finance tallies from Obama and McCain.

(The Politico)  This story was written by Kenneth P. Vogel.
Fresh off her big win in Pennsylvania, Hillary Clinton is attempting to re-write the presidential campaign narrative using a new two-pronged argument that goes after Barack Obama’s strengths.

The new Clinton strategy: Claim - somewhat implausibly - that she has received more popular votes than Obama while also boasting of her campaign’s newfound fundraising strength. The Clinton campaign claims to have brought in $10 million through its website in the 17 hours after the New York senator won Pennsylvania.

The two talking points - pushed by campaign aides to reporters in conference calls, impromptu gaggles on her campaign plane and by Clinton herself in a round of network interviews, a morning speech in Indianapolis and a call with donors - are intended primarily for the consumption of the superdelegates who will decide the nomination.

The argument is geared to undercut two of the main premises of Obama’s case about why he would be a more viable general election candidate against the presumptive Republican nominee, Arizona Sen. John McCain.

Obama often points out that he has won more states, pledged delegates and votes in nominating events sanctioned by the Democratic Party.

And Obama’s backers point to his record-shattering fundraising - at the end of March he’d raised $236 million for his campaign compared to $195 million for Clinton and $72 million for McCain - as evidence that he will be able to run a more formidable general election campaign.

Clinton’s claims about her popular vote lead is based on tallies kept by Real Clear Politics and other media that include the votes cast in the Democratic primaries in Michigan (where Obama wasn’t even on the ballot) and Florida.

The Democratic National Committee does not intend to do that, as it now stands, since the states held their primaries earlier than the party wanted. But post-Pennsylvania, Clinton and her backers are stepping up their calls for an agreement that would allow delegates from the two states to be seated at the national convention.

The Clinton campaign included top backers from Florida and Michigan - Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida and Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm - on its Wednesday conference call to make the case.

And Clinton herself used a midday speech in Indiana, which - along with North Carolina - votes May 6, to make the case.

“It’s a very close race, but if you count - as I count - the 2.3 million people who voted in Michigan and Florida, then we are going to build on that,” Clinton told a crowd gathered under a hot sun in an Indianapolis park. “We just have to get the Democratic party to give them the delegates that reflect their votes, but we’ll be working on that.”

Still, she said: “I’m very proud that, as of today, I have received more votes by the people who have voted than anybody else.” And she urged the crowd, which numbered in the hundreds, to contribute to her campaign, adding that Obama outspent her in Pennsylvania by as much as 3 ½ to 1.

“It’s a tremendous challenge to get the message out when you’re being outspent in that way,” she said, also calling on Obama to agree to debate her in Indiana.

After the rally, she told donors on a conference call: “we’ve been just runnin’ on fumes.”

She told the donors she, her husband and daughter had already made a combined 50 visits to Indiana, where she’s thought to stand a better chance than North Carolina.

“What we can’t match with media, we match with shoe leather,” she said. “We will keep doing that, but we’ve got to have the resources to keep our campaign winning.”

Her finance director, Jonathan Mantz, told the same donors that between 10 p.m. Tuesday and 2:35 p.m. Wednesdy, the campaign brought in $10 million, including contributions from 60,000 new donors.

“It is unbelievable what’s going on right now,” he said, detailing 17 fundraisers planned for the next month from Portland, Ore. to Detroit and Greensboro, N.C.

He urged donors who haven’t contributed the maximum $2,300 to the campaign to do so before the Federal Election Commission reporting period closes at the end of April. And Mantz urged those who had maxed out to recruit one other maximum donor before May.

“If we can do that,” he said, “we’re going to have enough resources to get our message out, to raise the millions necessary to be on par with Sen. Obama and do whatever it takes to be successful.”

By Kenneth P. Vogel
Copyright 2008 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by lordmi April 27, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
So, did she pay her bills AT LAST??
I do not trust Clintons a word

Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 April 25, 2008 10:02 PM EDT
Obama stands up and lies six times on national TV, falls like a cheap suit discussing the issues, outspent, outsmeared, outlied Bush/Cheney, promotes an anti-American agenda, swills in special interests money and lobbyists, lies about the vote, broke the dumba/s/s DNC rules in Florida and Michigan, and pins his little handy dandy racist card on his pocket tab flashing Racist! Racist! Racist!

I mean this man''s strengths are just AMAZING!
Reply to this comment
by truth-hurts April 25, 2008 8:51 PM EDT
Bitter Obama gives Hillary the finger

http://www.correntewire.com/stay_classy_0
Reply to this comment
by jockh April 25, 2008 3:37 PM EDT
Hillary lies again.

The Federal Election Commission has just reported that her campaign debt is $15 million and not $10 million as the Clinton camp reported because she failed to list her $5 million loan among the debts.

This means that even after her new surge of fundraising, she is still $5 million in debt; but Hillary is still smiling; why? Because she knows that her $110 million fortune is nice and safe. It%u2019s the ordinary person on the street who is tricked into losing money on a campaign that is doomed to fail.

Mitt Romney put $42 million of his own money into his campaign, why doesn%u2019t Hillary show she has complete confidence in her campaign and put in some of her own millions. Why? Because she knows it%u2019s a lost cause.

Those of you who are fooled into contributing to her campaign ask yourself why she LOANS her own money but wants you to GIVE your money?
Reply to this comment
by jockh April 25, 2008 3:35 PM EDT
Hillary Clinton has raised more then $189 million dollars for her campaign and yet is $10 million ($15 including her loan) in the hole. This goes to show why she is unfit to be President.
$15 million in debt and she claims to have passed the Steward of the Economy test.
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 April 25, 2008 10:48 AM EDT
THE STUPID BROAD THAT SHE IS DOESN''T THINK THAT PERHAPS IT WOULD BE TO HER BENEFIT TO PROJECT HER OWN STRENGTHS INSTEAD? OR IS THAT IT- GOING AFTER SOMEONE ELSE''S ? THIS ONLY MAKES HER LOOK EVEN MORE PATHETIC
Reply to this comment
by Jerrycnet April 25, 2008 1:09 AM EDT
Neither Obama or McCain can fix the ever deeper financial trouble America''s facing. But unfortunately I predict one of these will be the next president because America is still too macho to have a female president, even though HRC smarter, more thoughtful and sensible than either of the guys. So the dollar will sink more, prices of everything will rise more, taxes will be more, wage will rise less, and everybody get screwed except the very rich who makes money outsourcing globally.
Reply to this comment
by oaklynne April 24, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
If the superdelegates fall for Clinton''s latest preposterous reasoning then the Democratic party truly deserves to implode.
Reply to this comment
by blkpresident April 24, 2008 10:45 PM EDT
Hillary-Steinem ''08?

America can do better than this. Wonder who these broads would tap as Secretary of Defense, Jane Fonda?
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 April 24, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
Keep it up, Hillary. John McCain is smiling, as are all of the Republicans. John McCain doesn''t need to worry about raising a lot of cash. You are spending yours for him.
Reply to this comment
by ksh1022 April 24, 2008 10:12 PM EDT
All the Obama supporters can say is "Hillary lies". This is because they have no other argument as to why Obama should be our next president. News flash. Everyone lies at some point. Politicians probably lie more than most. Obama lies. He said that he never heard the hatred spewed by his minister Rev. Wright. Of course he did , he was a church member for 20 years. One visit to his church website tells you that his church is pro-black anti-white. Obama said he only took $125,000. from Rezko. Actaully it''s been proven that he has taken over $250,000. from Rezko. Obama has put his name on lesilation that others have put forth and then in interviews presents the legislation as his; "my bill". Obama is not change. He''s politics as usual. He says one thing and does another. He has no substancial legislation, no committee action that has made a difference to our country, he''s never been in a leadership position, he has only 2 years of experience in the US senate. He is articulate and gives a pretty speech but our country is in dire straits thanks to Bush and Co. I want someone who can fix this mess. Hillary is proven to get things done. She has a record to stand on. She is strong and tough and can hold her own. She is patriotic and capable.
Reply to this comment
by justbuzz1 April 24, 2008 10:08 PM EDT
oops my previous post was to the article that jy2008 posted.

As far as this article. Obama had to out spend the clinton machine, after all she''s got an ex-president campaigning for her, not to mention her 15 years of campaigning in PA previously..... I''m also positive that the controversies of Wright and Ayers along with the bittergate gaffe that might have contributed to her win of slightly more than 9%.
Reply to this comment
by justbuzz1 April 24, 2008 9:59 PM EDT
Great article! It shows that Obama has what it takes to be a good politician. Why would anyone think they could spin that article to show Obama in a bad light?
Reply to this comment
by mountainsky7 April 24, 2008 9:54 PM EDT
Yes, Hillary may have won the Michigan primary, BUT! look at the numbers. She ONLY had a 10-point lead over the 2nd place candidate of "uncommitted". My personal opinion: IF Hillary was really that popular in Michigan, don''t you think it would have been a commanding win, especially with no-one to run against her?
Reply to this comment
by mountainsky7 April 24, 2008 9:53 PM EDT
Yes, Hillary may have won the Michigan primary, BUT! look at the numbers. She ONLY had a 10-point lead over the 2nd place candidate of "uncommitted". My personal opinion: if Hillary was really that popular in Michigan, don''t you think it would have been a commanding win, with no-one to run against her?
Reply to this comment
by rights88 April 24, 2008 9:41 PM EDT
"Palmer ended up dropping out of the race instead of trying to argue that she had met the petition requirements. The other two candidates were ruled ineligible by Chicago election officials."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

so from jy2008''s article i can safely assume he is the only person that can follow the rules and get people to support him...thanks mate :) and if you actually read the whole thing it says that challenges like that are common there

and as for the clintons...ive lost more respect for them since this race began than through the entire Monica scandal...Bill is apparently a convulsive lier and hillary decided she would rather have the part self destruct rather than have Obama win...shes a great person huh?...at least let the GOP do what they are good at hill
Reply to this comment
by rights88 April 24, 2008 9:40 PM EDT
"Palmer ended up dropping out of the race instead of trying to argue that she had met the petition requirements. The other two candidates were ruled ineligible by Chicago election officials."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

so from jy2008''s article i can safely assume he is the only person that can follow the rules and get people to support him...thanks mate :) and if you actually read the whole thing it says that challenges like that are common there

and as for the clintons...ive lost more respect for them since this race began than through the entire Monica scandal...Bill is apparently a convulsive lier and hillary decided she would rather have the part self destruct rather than have Obama win...shes a great person huh?...at least let the GOP do what they are good at hill
Reply to this comment
by cbsespo April 24, 2008 9:33 PM EDT
The only thing falling faster than Hillary''s chances of beating Obama is the Clinton legacy.I think we all know they were good for a time. That time has passed.
Reply to this comment
by wolfi101 April 24, 2008 9:22 PM EDT
I''m so tired of reading about lies from the Clinton campaign. *Sigh*
Reply to this comment
by jy2008 April 24, 2008 8:20 PM EDT
Hahahahahahahahaahahaahhaahahahha
You have got to believe this.
So much to say. Let us lay it out one by one
http://www.newsweek.com/id/133557/page/4


said Davis, who was friendly with Palmer at the time.
"She went out and recruited Barack."
...................
She filed petitions to get on the ballot for the spring 1996 primary,
but Obama took steps to make sure voters wouldn''t get a chance to pick her.
...................


1. Is this so called NEW politics?
No one blames you if just say it is politics.
You call it new politics? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


2. Good, Bad, and Ugly
Someone tells you where treasure is.
It is fine you just take all and run away.
But instead you kill that poor person.
Wow, speechless
What a character


3. Gentleman
He is really a ''nice gentleman''
fight hard with Woman with SKILLs
You follower should be very proud. LOL


More coming.....

Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: