April 22, 2008 6:00 PM

Mom's Diet May Influence Baby's Gender

(WebMD)  In addition to being the most important meal of the day, breakfast may help determine your unborn baby's sex.

In a newly reported study, women who ate breakfast cereal gave birth to more boys, while those who skipped breakfast had more girls.

Women who ate more total calories also delivered more boys, even though the overall male-to-female birth ratio among the study participants was close to 50/50.

The early findings in no way prove that what a woman does or doesn't eat prior to conception influences her baby's sex.

But they do hint at a sex-selection bias among humans similar to that seen in other animals, favoring male births among well-fed mothers and female births among mothers who are less well nourished.

They may also help explain a subtle decline in the proportion of male births in industrialized countries like the U.S., researcher Fiona Mathews, PhD, tells WebMD.

"It is true that there is an obesity epidemic, but there is also an increase in dieting and very unstable dietary habits among young women," she says. "And more people are skipping breakfast. Our data suggest that these things may play a role in the small but noticeable decline in male births."

Fewer Calories, Fewer Boys

The study involved 740 newly pregnant British women who had not given birth before and who did not know the sex of their fetuses. All the women were white, non-obese, and had no medical problems.

The women completed detailed food-frequency questionnaires during the first pregnancy exam and well into their pregnancy, and they were asked to keep a detailed food journal for a week around the time of their fourth month of pregnancy.

They were also asked to recall their dietary habits in the year prior to conceiving.

Using this data, the researchers determined that women who ate the most calories around the time of conception delivered more boys, with 56% giving birth to male babies, compared with 45% of women who ate the fewest calories prior to conceiving.

Of those who reported eating breakfast cereal every day, 59% gave birth to boys compared with 43% of women who reported rarely or never eating cereal for breakfast, says Mathews.

In addition to consuming more calories prior to conception, women who gave birth to boys were also more likely to have eaten higher-quality diets with a wider range of nutrients, including potassium.

If nutrition does affect fetal sex selection, Mathews says it is not clear whether it is calories or nutrients that makes the difference.

What the mothers ate during pregnancy did not seem to influence the sex of their babies.

"The mothers who had boys took in about 300 milligrams more of potassium and about 180 more calories a day than the mothers of girls," she says.

"That is the equivalent of a large banana."

The Importance of Breakfast

So should a woman who wants her next child to be a girl skip breakfast and limit calories?

Absolutely not, says American Dietetic Association spokeswoman and registered dietitian Elisa Zied.

Breakfast foods, especially breakfast cereals, are among the best dietary sources of folic acid , a nutrient that is critical during conception and early pregnancy for preventing birth defects.

"Whole-grain cereals are loaded with folic acid, and so are oranges and orange juice," she says. "If you skip breakfast, you could easily not get enough."

She adds that eating a balanced diet prior to conception and during pregnancy is one of the best things a woman can do to ensure a healthy pregnancy.

"That means eating regular, frequent meals, eating plenty of fruits and vegetables and foods rich in folic acid and other nutrients and avoiding alcohol," she says.
By Salynn Boyles
Reviewed by Louise Chang
©2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved

© 2008 WebMD, LLC.. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 32 Comments
by zjsmorris August 24, 2011 7:01 PM EDT
While it's true that the male sperm determines a baby's gender, there are things women can do to influence which sperm fertilizes her egg. There are differences in the "boy" and "girl" sperm that can be affected by diet, sex position, and ovulation time. See this informative website for more info.

<a href="http://influencebabysgender.blogspot.com/" target="_top">Influence your Baby's Gender</a>
Reply to this comment
by zjsmorris August 24, 2011 7:02 PM EDT
The website is http://influencebabysgender.blogspot.com
by ge556 April 25, 2008 4:04 PM EDT
First stages of scientific study should not be reported as fact.

Posted by nfomastr at 09:33 PM : Apr 24, 2008

Looks to me like it was reported as a study. What did they say that you object to, and how should they have said it?
Reply to this comment
by drinuk April 25, 2008 10:20 AM EDT
I make no apology for changing the subject as I find it both amazing, cynical and very suspicious that not only this TV channel but all of them are not informing mothers of the current situation regarding vaccines. Senators Obama, Clinton and McCain have called for serious independent research into MMR, all believing that there could be a link to Autism. The figures show and I quote McCain that it is becoming an epidemic and that as many as 1 child in every 100 now has the disease. Please go to www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk for information. The silence by the media will come to be seen as both unforgivable and wicked. Parents, please go find the information because it is not being provided by either your government or those you rely upon to keep you informed.
Reply to this comment
by nfomastr April 25, 2008 12:33 AM EDT
That''''s a very important part of science. You observe what happens, then you hypothesize about it, then you test your hypothesis, and eventually, if all goes well, you have a theory. All that''''s in this report is the initial observed facts. That doesn''''t make it invalid, or unscientific; it''''s just the first step.

Posted by ge556 at 08:39 PM : Apr 24, 2008

Yes, I am well aware that this is the first step. However, this is being reported to the general population as if it is a proven fact. It was on my local news and is popping up on birth boards all over the Internet. That''s what makes it faulty science. It has not been scientifically tested, nor has it been replicated.

I accept that a mother''s diet may alter the acidity of her reproductive system and that may affect which chromosome is delivered to an egg. I admitted that in my original post. But this article didn''t mention this because the study didn''t address it.

First stages of scientific study should not be reported as fact.
Reply to this comment
by ge556 April 24, 2008 11:39 PM EDT

How scientific was this study? Those numbers could be chalked up to coincidence if they can''''t tell me HOW the mom''''s diet is affecting the gender conceived. There are other ways you are supposed to be able to affect the *** of your baby (positions, time of conception, etc.), so unless all of that was equal with the couples involved, I don''''t know if I''''m buying the results of this &quot;study&quot;. It was just a survey type deal that just asked for diet info. Where''''s the science behind these claims?

osted by nfomastr at 11:36 PM : Apr 23, 2008

That''s a very important part of science. You observe what happens, then you hypothesize about it, then you test your hypothesis, and eventually, if all goes well, you have a theory. All that''s in this report is the initial observed facts. That doesn''t make it invalid, or unscientific; it''s just the first step.

All you people who say, &quot;I know how X and Y chromosomes work, this is nonsense!&quot; or &quot;The father determines the s.e.x of the baby&quot; need to open your minds a bit. Yes, most of you are correct, but there can be more to the story. Science is the process of learning more and more.
Reply to this comment
by dalesmith64 April 24, 2008 10:52 PM EDT
CBS = (take your pick):
Cabal influencing Baby''s ***
Calumny about Baby''s ***
Camarilla influencing Baby''s ***
Camorra influencing Baby''s ***
Canards about Baby''s ***
Charlatans influencing Babys'' ***
Colligation for Babys'' ***

Reply to this comment
by bonb413 April 24, 2008 11:55 AM EDT
This is not new; 25 to 30 years ago, a research/ professional was a guest on Phil Donohue and said the same thing. A high potassium/low calcium diet greatly increases the odds of a male and the opposite is true to yield a female if/when a pregnancy occurs. When it came time to begin our family, I followed that &quot;rule&quot; and the diet worked; is that science or luck?
Reply to this comment
by nfomastr April 24, 2008 2:36 AM EDT
I wonder if higher potassium and calcium levels in mom''s system alters her reproductive tract to inhibit the ability of little swimmers carrying the X chromosome to fertilize an egg because since it is actually dad who determines the *** of the baby, like others, I''m not seeing the connection.

How scientific was this study? Those numbers could be chalked up to coincidence if they can''t tell me HOW the mom''s diet is affecting the gender conceived. There are other ways you are supposed to be able to affect the *** of your baby (positions, time of conception, etc.), so unless all of that was equal with the couples involved, I don''t know if I''m buying the results of this &quot;study&quot;. It was just a survey type deal that just asked for diet info. Where''s the science behind these claims?

CBS: F- for reporting this as if it were news.

Reply to this comment
by haoli25 April 24, 2008 2:32 AM EDT
I wonder how many of the women who ate breakfast had more regular bowel movements? And if so, does that mean that women who had more regular bowel movements (due to the increased fiber in their diet) gave birth to more boys?
Posted by emma253

Apparently Barbara Bush had a bowel movement and raised it to adulthood.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 April 23, 2008 11:00 PM EDT
Poppycock! CBS, you lose credibility when you publish these pop-studies.
Reply to this comment
See all 32 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook