CHICAGO, April 22, 2008

Shock Over Chicago Student Gun Deaths

In This School Year Alone, 24 Students Were Killed, Leaving City Rattled To The Core

  • Play CBS Video Video Chicago Murders Skyrocket

    Angry parents decry lack of action after 13 students were shot in one weekend in Chicago. The wave of gun violence is stirring issues of class and race, reports Cynthia Bowers.

  • Chicago youth mourn for a friend killed in the surge of gun violence there. Photo

    Chicago youth mourn for a friend killed in the surge of gun violence there.  (CBS)

  • Interactive Guns In America

    State-by-state gun laws and death rates, maps of recent school and workplace shootings and facts on who's at risk.

  • Interactive FBI Crime Statistics

    Explore the latest information on U.S. crime, from acts of violence to property damage.

(CBS)  Public school students in Chicago aren't as worried about making the grade as they are about making it home alive, CBS News correspondent Cynthia Bowers reports.
"You can't go nowhere without being shot," said Juston Gant. "It's crazy."

Since September, 24 students have been murdered, most of them shot.

The dead amount to a classroom of kids. Among them, 10-year-old Arthur Jones, who was on his way to buy candy when he got caught in gang crossfire. As did 15-year-old Miguel Pedro, who went out for ice cream and never came back.

Last school year 34 students were killed. That's 58 deaths over what amounts to a 17-month period. And that makes an average of one child getting murdered every eight days.

In a city where handguns are already banned, Stop The Violence rallies have had little impact and the mayor's calls for stricter gun laws have fallen on deaf ears.

"Why is America turning its back on its children when it comes to gun violence?" said Chicago Mayor Richard Daley. "It's that simple."

Ron and Annette Holt blame the apathy on the majority of people assuming this will never happen to their kids, because most of the victims are poor and black.

"Reporters always say 'gang-related.' I'm so sick of hearing that word, 'gang-related.' Say the perpetrator was gang-related, not the person shot," said Annette Holt, who lost her 16-year-old son. "The person shot was a good child."

Like their son Blair, the only child of a police officer and fire captain planning to go to college to study business and music.

His future was cut short last May when a teenage gunman looking for a rival gang member opened fire on a crowded city bus.

"Nothing's ever the same," Holt said.

"Part of you dies?" Bowers asked.

"Oh my God, a big part. It's like you die with your child," she said.

These days the only thing that keeps them going is their mission to let Americans know every child deserves to be safe.

Blair's father, Ron Holt, said: "This affects every culture, everyone - black, white - no matter where it happens. Gun violence is gun violence."

It's not just about guns, many say. It's more about poverty, lack of education and absentee parents who've lost control of their children.

"Your duties are to take care of your child, know what your child is doing and make sure he's heading in the right direction," said Willie Williams, who also lost a 17-year-old son.

Until then, these kids remain potential targets believing no amount of police protection can truly keep them safe.


© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News

Add a Comment See all 128 Comments
by jaw11787 April 22, 2008 8:33 PM PDT
Shocked? Who is shocked? Here is a real fast way to get "UN-shocked": when the people doing the shooting are first arrested, interview their FATHER and see what he has to say about where his killer child went wrong....yes, you''re right; I am being sarcastic. These people have no fathers in their lives. BINGO! And there is your answer. The cultural shift toward single women having babies is beginning to reap what has been sewn. Now do you see? Now, does Oprah see? You need a man in a child''s life. This cultural shift is too much: ignorant, drop-out women/babies are having babies without a clue or a dollar to their name. But, hey, far be it from me to critize our diverse culture. Get ready for the government grant to study the problem. Dopes...they are all dopes.
Reply to this comment
by scaredbygov April 22, 2008 9:10 PM PDT
oh here we go, the mayor says we need more laws on guns. and yet handguns are already banned. so why doesn''t he ENFORCE the ones he has got instead of just passing more that still wont take the guns out of the gangbangers nor solve the lets kill em mentality,, get a family for support, and hold the shooters accountable. thanks
Reply to this comment
by okcnfrcr April 22, 2008 9:42 PM PDT
it''s time for the law enforcement community and minority communities to band together to fight the gang mentality with extreme enforcement action. You can blanket the target areas with patrols of different types and Field Interview and arrest any and all lawbreakers. This can be done by getting community leaders to ride along and experience the lawlessness in the neighborhoods. It is time to stand up to the gangs together, but it would be interesting to see if the minority leaders would stick their reputations out to help in this endeavor. The NAACP and Hispanic Centers can advance their respective constituents'' positions in the community by getting rid of the problem makers. Police do it every day they step in their units for people they don''t know. Let''s see if community leaders have the guts to ride that line in the ocmmunity.
Reply to this comment
by cyberus-2009 April 22, 2008 9:43 PM PDT
----
oh here we go, the mayor says we need more laws on guns. and yet handguns are already banned. so why doesn''''t he ENFORCE the ones he has got instead of just passing more that still wont take the guns out of the gangbangers nor solve the lets kill em mentality,, get a family for support, and hold the shooters accountable. thanks

Posted by scaredbygov
----

Its no different than drinking/driving laws .. lowering the blood alcohol level didn''t reduce deaths or accidents because the people that are going to get drunk and drive are going to do so whether the BA level is .08 or .18 ... the lower BA level does what banning more guns does .. create criminals out of otherwise law abiding people.
Reply to this comment
by okcnfrcr April 22, 2008 9:49 PM PDT
I will tell you that I worked several gun shows in OKC where it was proven that Chicago based Gangbangers were coming into OKlA and buying their firearms off of the floor from citizens, buying laser sites and ammo to take back to Chicago. This was part of the EL Ruken? gang and arrest was made in Missouri and received a federal conviction. This was just a couple of gun shows that they were caught. It was deteremined that the buys were being made across the country and the law was being skirted by buying from " Stupid" or "Unscrupulous" gun sellers who were selling to anyone who had cash. I for one took a stand at the gun shows against obvious Gangbangers, skinheads and questionable "Straw" purchases, where a clean person was used to buy a firearm for a convicted felon. I wouldn''t let them in the show or they had my personal escort while in there. Call it profiling or whatever, I call it " Bad people don''t buy in a show I''m responsible to help protect" and the community around it.
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 April 22, 2008 9:52 PM PDT
they need a strong snitch law:

Someone can call the police, tell them where an illegal/improperly stored gun can be found.

If the police find the gun as stated, they charge the gun owner $800 and take the gun (no other action is taken). The snitch gets paid ~$500 for the information, but is able (somehow) to keep his/her identity secret (even from the police).

This way inner city grandmothers can snitch out their gang-member grandsons without fear of being hurt, of losing their grandsons.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 22, 2008 11:15 PM PDT
The WAR ON DRUGS is a WAR ON AMERICA.
Prohibition kills. Always has, always will!
www.leap.cc

"When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns."
Reply to this comment
by middleman8 April 23, 2008 12:15 AM PDT
Living in the U S always on guard

afraid to walk in your own backyard

volunteer for a combat zone

its safer there than your streets back home
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 April 23, 2008 4:15 AM PDT
Babies having babies. Teenage black girls can''t wait to get pregnant & have a baby. Why have kids if you can''t afford to raise them? Why make life more difficult for yourself than it already is?

The "father" of the baby disappears after the girl gets pregnant. Baby grows up to be just another thug/gangster spreading mayhem & misery.

Birth control, people. I know it''s a crazy idea but think about. Have all the s e x you want. But protect yourself, girls. Figure out how to use a condom, gents. Can you say "birth control"?

Most inner city public school systems are awful with a capital "A". Being mayor of a Northeastern city is a thankless job. A long list of very old poblems. No money.

You can ban handguns til the cows come home. Won''t stop gun violence in the city. Most of the people that are shooting these kids are gang members. They don''t care if they live or die.

People who take the time to register a gun & do everything legally are not the ones you need to worry about. How many NRA members are in prison for murder?

People making t-shirts when these kids die. "God needed another angel." Uh huh. No point in blaming the police or politicians. But they do. Look at yourselves. You raised these kids.

It''s not the KKK or skinheads killing black people. It''s young black men killing other young black men over the drug trade & gang issues. And anyone else who is caught in the crossfire.
Reply to this comment
by usmcvn2 April 23, 2008 4:42 AM PDT
Lets all go out tonight and light candles!! Lighting
candles will fix everything.
Reply to this comment
by hunterdon6 April 23, 2008 5:55 AM PDT
Chicago has one of the toughest gun control laws in the county. Yet their murder rate by guns is high. It all boils down to that the bad guys will always have the guns and the honest citizen cannot have one to defend themselves, making it easy for the criminal. If the city of Chicago can rid themselves of gangs and drugs, they would probably see their murder rate drop. But it is so easy for the city to put the blame on guns, and do nothing about the real problem. Gun control laws do not work.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o April 23, 2008 6:00 AM PDT
the lower BA level does what banning more guns does .. create criminals out of otherwise law abiding people.

Posted by cyberus at 09:43 PM : Apr 22, 2008

Exactly!!
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 April 23, 2008 6:22 AM PDT
"Lets all go out tonight and light candles!! Lighting
candles will fix everything.
Posted by usmcvn2 at 04:42 AM : Apr 23, 2008"

And debating about gun control is not fixing the problem either. Face it, there has been more concern recently (politicial, media, everything) about stopping the violence in Baghdad than stopping the violence in Chicago. As long as everyone is apathetic, it will not improve.
Reply to this comment
by ahrats April 23, 2008 6:28 AM PDT
The problem is not guns it''s gangs.Chicago has had a history of gang violence since the 1920''s. Here is one city I do not wish to visit, I might get shot. It''s against our freedoms to prohibit gangs from exisitng but if the gang promotes violence then they should be bannned and just being a member of said gang should lead to your arrest, accessory to murder. Remember guns do not kill it''s the person who pulls the trigger that kills. This is domestic terrorism and gang members should be treated as terrorist.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug April 23, 2008 6:50 AM PDT

Posted by Keithle1 at 04:15 AM


Great post.
Sadly, no one is listening to you.
Reply to this comment
by whatisit21 April 23, 2008 6:58 AM PDT
Being a member of a gang should be punished by death no matter if they ever committed a crime or not. Parents of gang members should also be put to death if they don''t turn their offspring in for belonging to a gang. Americans are soft on crime because they like the drama and it makes for good movies.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 23, 2008 7:19 AM PDT
Anyone remember Al Capone?
Today there are millions of little Al Capone-like thugs running around fighting turf wars and shooting at each other all while making billions of dollars from selling illegal drugs on the black market.
Drug prohibition just like alcohol prohibition causes much more crime and violence.
Blaming guns will never solve the problem and will only place responsibility on inanimate objects rather than the dangerous criminals!
Killers prefer defenseless victims.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 23, 2008 8:05 AM PDT
Stereotypes, falsehoods, insults, and broad generalizations.
That''s all the gun-hating extremists seem to rely on to support their gun banning agenda.
You can blame guns, or knives, or any other tool you want, it will never address the real causes of why some people are choosing to harm themselves and others.
And remember,
criminals love defenseless victims!
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 23, 2008 8:14 AM PDT
"Outlaw guns and only OUTLAWS will have guns."
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 April 23, 2008 8:17 AM PDT
whatisit21,

That''s the first thing - put people to death? You do know many kids have no solution but to join a gang. Nobody is coming with open arms to help them in a good way. I do a lot of volunteer work and there is a boy who was forced to be in a gang or else he would have been the victim of the gang. He didn''t want to do it. He was on 13 at the time. His parents could care less about the death penalty as they were already killing themselves with drugs. Who outside of the bad influences were there to help him? Teenagers are NOTORIOUS for making bad decisions and without guidance that is what many do. There are a few of us who are trying to help, but I see often a lot of people making comments on message boards that are helping nobody.

Offering the death penalty is not prevention. Something has to happen before you can offer the death penalty (the child joins a gang, the child kills somebody, etc.). IT IS TIME THAT WE WORK ON PREVENTION. Children are growing up in circumstances that we would find unsuitable for dogs. Yet, nobody does anything UNTIL the kid does something wrong!!!!
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo April 23, 2008 8:58 AM PDT
"Why is America turning its back on its children when it comes to gun violence?" said Chicago Mayor Richard Daley.

America is not turning its back on its children - Chicago is.

Chicago needs to fix their family value, education system and get a handle on their gang violence problem which stems from the other two and stop trying to represent a state problem into some nationwide gun issue.

Guns are readily available in other states yet those other states (DC aside) don''t have Chicago''s symptoms.

"It''s that simple."
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 9:11 AM PDT
Australia''s 1996 gun ban has proven that gun bans don''t work...

The arguments of pro-gun advocates have been proven again in Australia: Less guns, more crime. These reasons have been explained over and over again to lawmakers, only to be thrown aside during times of national mourning for political correctness. The governments of the Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and dozens of other countries have violated countless rights of their people. To them, it was merely a convenient response to tragedy. The result of these restrictions is more killings, more rapes and more crimes.

Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 April 23, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
payasyougo,

It''s that simple because it is stupid.

This is not a Chicago problem. This is a problem in most cities. This also has gotten worse due to Bush''s tax cuts. While the rich person can now buy a third yacht the tax cuts that made it possible are meaning that many cities are having to cut back on police officers.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 23, 2008 9:32 AM PDT
We need to send Bill Cosby to Chicago immediately!
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
"It''''s that simple." Posted by payasyougo

Its not really that simple. But you are absolutely dead on with the solution.
The US has continued to ignore innercity problems for ages. Education in these areas is substandard, poverty is an endless cycle and jail time doesn''t seem to have any affect as recidivism is around 60%(?). Many decent hard working people live in these areas and are given little opportunity to make a better life for their children. It has created decades of anti-social behavior.
Banning guns creates an environment controlled by criminals. I don''t own a gun and don''t have a desire to but you can bet if I found myself having to fear for the life of my child I would be livid if I was told I couldn''t protect myself.
Reply to this comment
by isabel36-2009 April 23, 2008 9:43 AM PDT
I agree with the Holts.

"Gang related'' shuld exclude or distinguish the victim apart from the gang. And, YES - we do have too many absentee parents or those who refuse to accept their responsibility as parents.
Reply to this comment
by beehive21-2009 April 23, 2008 10:21 AM PDT
We are witnessing the aftermath of 70 % of the children growing up w/o fathers.The back male has chosen to impregnate anything that moves and now,look at the results when kids have no Dad to grow up with.The gun ban makes it easier for the punks to bully ,you.The people of Chicago have allowed this to happen, and should do something ,start by knocking the *** out of the gangsters.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 23, 2008 10:25 AM PDT
Politicians are constantly surrounded by armed bodyguards yet they claim good citizens can''t be trusted with guns.
When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns!
Criminals love it when they have an entire city full of defenseless victims.
A-HUMAN-RIGHT.com
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
Everything is Bush''s fault. And if its not Bush''s fault- its still Bush''s fault. Its always Bush''s fault. Its been Bush''s fault before Bush was a Bush. Honestly, I don''t know if it is Bush''s fault but it sure feels good to blame him for everything. It always makes me feel better.
Reply to this comment
by usmcvn2 April 23, 2008 10:34 AM PDT
Its Bush''s fault!
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
Aha- its in writing. I now have proof that its Bush''s fault!
Reply to this comment
by sblake63 April 23, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
I lived in Chicago the 1st 25 years of my life. I have seen how some of them interact with each other there. Moral values are all but gone for some families there. They blame the government and the so called rich for their run down areas and Guns for their never ending crime wave. They expect somebody to come in and save the day for them while holding onto the worn out tired motto "to each his own" and don%u2019t dare challenge anyone%u2019s beliefs or personal choices because that would %u201Coffend%u201D somebody.
Well I got news for you, sometimes people never make life changing decisions until somebody OFFENDS them.

Then we have churches like that of Mr. Obama''s arise who don%u2019t DARE preach about "sin", but instead convince the poor that their problems are caused by the rich and Washington %u2013 That is no church of God, that has become a place of whining and belly aching instead of a house of worship%u2026 And they wonder why there%u2019s blood running in the streets %u2013 Oh Please !

Chicago - You toss GOD out of your day to day lives, you think the answer to every problem is new laws and taxes and gun laws. How about this? Take you and kids to a BIBLE teaching church (if there are any left in that town LOL).. And put into PRACTICE what they teach you.... and watch the violence drop to almost zero there.

But let me guess... It''s Bush''s fault right. Oh get over it! Spend some time with your kids and they wont be cruising the street blowing people''s heads off.
Reply to this comment
by usmcvn2 April 23, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
Yep, it is. LOL
Reply to this comment
by usmcvn2 April 23, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
Al & Jessie never show up for black on black crime.
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 10:52 AM PDT
Its Bush''s fault!
You might have a bit of an anger problem sbllake63.
My kids don''t even own guns. And they won''t leave me alone. They want to call me all the time and come home to visit on Mothers Day- I just can''t believe that those educated, good productive citizens still want to have a relationship with their Mommy! I thought my job was over but nooooo they won''t leave me alone!!! Truly it can''t be because I love them and tell them and raised them well enough to let them go.
Get over yourself Mr. 25 years in Chicago- that alone does not make you an expert. You really need to look at how long this problem has existed. It does create anti-social behavior. That isn''t fixed overnight.
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
Or by gooing to church.
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 10:54 AM PDT
Did I say gooing... oops- going. By gooing is kind of fun.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 23, 2008 10:55 AM PDT
COPS SAY LEGALIZE MARIJUANA!
After nearly four decades of fueling the U.S. policy of a war on drugs with over a trillion tax dollars and 37 million arrests for nonviolent drug offenses, our confined population has quadrupled making building prisons the fastest growing industry in the United States. More than 2.2 million of our citizens are currently incarcerated and every year we arrest an additional 1.9 million more guaranteeing those prisons will be bursting at their seams. Every year we choose to continue this war will cost U.S. taxpayers another 69 billion dollars. Despite all the lives we have destroyed and all the money so ill spent, today illicit drugs are cheaper, more potent, and far easier to get than they were 35 years ago at the beginning of the war on drugs. Meanwhile, people continue dying in our streets while drug barons and terrorists continue to grow richer than ever before. We would suggest that this scenario must be the very definition of a failed public policy. This madness must cease!
www.LEAP.cc
Reply to this comment
by usmcvn2 April 23, 2008 10:57 AM PDT
Its a white conspiracy! (Bush fault)
Reply to this comment
by usmcvn2 April 23, 2008 11:01 AM PDT
(Bush fault) s/be (Bush''s fault)


Sory, I grwe up and was edjmacated in Detroit.
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
Sory, I grwe up and was edjmacated in Detroit.Posted by usmcvn2




LOL- I was homeshcooled in ilinoy. Nope I wnet to publik shcool but I lernt alott
Reply to this comment
by talkingham April 23, 2008 11:12 AM PDT
What was the racial breakdown on the killings? Just curious since the story didn''t bother to provide it. In my home town there is so much black on black murder that''s it''s unbelieveable. Can''t they find any other way to settle their petty arguments, most which evidently revolve around gang drugs and women.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 23, 2008 11:17 AM PDT
jumkey and USbrit,
Guns are already ILLEGAL in Chicago!
Of course, criminals prefer defenseless victims.
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 11:17 AM PDT
More guns really do make the streets safer don''''t they? Posted by USBrit

banning guns makes innocent people fear for their lives- and it leaves an imbalance. Criminals will buy guns whether they are banned or not. It would seem that law abiding people would be less likely to do so.
Reply to this comment
by usmcvn2 April 23, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
I''m now in an area where the illegal population in
really taxing our local school distict. Lack of taxes, 2-3 familys living in single family homes. Maybe if we could send the 20 million illegals back to where they came from there would be more jobs for the "intercity" youth. (After school of course) Or even the kids around here, Fox Lake area.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 23, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
"When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns."
How can such a simple concept be so hard for some people to understand?
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
In the UKThis is what happens to law abiding citizens who decide to break the law...
%u201CIn 1999 Tony Martin, a 55-year-old Norfolk farmer living alone in a shabby farmhouse, awakened to the sound of breaking glass as two burglars, both with long criminal records, burst into his home. He had been robbed six times before, and his village, like 70 percent of rural English communities, had no police presence. He sneaked downstairs with a shotgun and shot at the intruders. Martin received life in prison for killing one burglar, 10 years for wounding the second, and a year for having an unregistered shotgun. The wounded burglar, having served 18 months of a three-year sentence, is now free and has been granted 5,000 of legal assistance to sue Martin.%u201D
Reply to this comment
by usbrit-2009 April 23, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
Dan and Missy - I''m not talking about banning guns - I gave up on that ideal about 85 threads and 18 months ago. I''m simply pointing out that where guns have traditionally been controlled, crime is way lower than it is in this country.

BTW Missy I once found a site that showed a 40% drop in Australia''s crime rate after their law was established. I''ll repost the reference when I find it again.
Reply to this comment
by missy_pithy April 23, 2008 11:25 AM PDT
C/mon your stats are old...


"The Home Office figures - which exclude crimes involving air weapons - show the number of deaths and injuries caused by gun attacks in England and Wales soared from 864 in 1998-99 to 3,821 in 2005-06. That means that more than 10 people are injured or killed in a gun attack every day...."
Reply to this comment
by usbrit-2009 April 23, 2008 11:26 AM PDT
In the UKThis is what happens to law abiding citizens who decide to break the law...
%u201CIn 1999 Tony Martin, a 55-year-old Norfolk farmer living alone in a shabby farmhouse, awakened to the sound of breaking glass as two burglars, both with long criminal records, burst into his home. He had been robbed six times before, and his village, like 70 percent of rural English communities, had no police presence. He sneaked downstairs with a shotgun and shot at the intruders. Martin received life in prison for killing one burglar, 10 years for wounding the second, and a year for having an unregistered shotgun. The wounded burglar, having served 18 months of a three-year sentence, is now free and has been granted 5,000 of legal assistance to sue Martin.%u201D

Posted by MISSY_PITHY

If you bothered to find the whole story rather than the NRA''s edited highlights you''d find that the criminal was a) unarmed, b) safely chased out of the house by the farmer and c) shot in the back while running away. How would that scenario play out in this country? (and by this country I don''t mean Florida or Texas).
Reply to this comment
See all 128 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs