LEXINGTON, Ky., April 19, 2008

Bully Tries To Poison Student With Peanuts

A Kentucky Eighth-Grader Faces Charges Of Wanton Endangerment For Attacking Classmate

  • Photo

     (CBS)

  • Interactive Food Allergies

    Learn more about the most common food allergens and their symptoms.

(AP)  An eighth-grader was charged with wanton endangerment after allegedly putting crumbled peanut butter cookies in the lunchbox of another student with a severe allergy to peanuts.

The allergic student, also an eighth-grader, did not eat the cookies and did not suffer a reaction.

Fayette County public schools spokeswoman Lisa Deffendall said the incident occurred Thursday on the Morton Middle School running track, where students had gone to eat lunch and enjoy the warm weather.

As the students neared the end of their lunchtime, a student was seen putting the crumbled cookies in the allergic student's lunchbox, she said.

It was well known the other student suffered from severe peanut allergies, Deffendall said. There was no known history of problems between the two 13-year-old students, she said.

After an investigation, the student was arrested on a felony wanton endangerment charge and has been removed from the school, Deffendall said.

A person is charged with felony, or first-degree, wanton endangerment when someone is suspected of engaging in conduct that causes the danger of death or physical injury to another person, according to state legal statutes.

The student will face charges in the juvenile criminal justice system.

Deffendall could not comment on specific administrative action taken against the student, but said an expulsion comes only after a decision by the school board.

Letters went home Friday to parents of Morton students notifying them of the incident.

There is no districtwide policy regarding peanut or other food allergies, Deffendall said. Schools that have students with food allergies tailor policies to protect them. Some schools have separate "peanut-free" tables. Because a number of Morton students have known peanut and sesame seed allergies, families have been asked not to send those foods to school.

For those allergic to peanuts, even trace amounts of peanut oil can cause severe reactions and even death. Symptoms can include hives, welts and swelling that can restrict airways. Earlier this month, it was reported that a 13-year-old boy died in Australia at a school camp due to an allergic reaction to peanuts.


© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 58 Comments
by haoli25 April 19, 2008 7:42 PM PDT
And they say Kids today are not creative.
Reply to this comment
by grammawhamma April 19, 2008 7:54 PM PDT
What a little Bass ***!!
Reply to this comment
by grammawhamma April 19, 2008 7:55 PM PDT
LOL...found new censored word. T-u.r D.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 19, 2008 8:12 PM PDT
Good God Allmighty Gramma I say that bas***** knew he is wrong..Ye don''t ever give a food that the other pupil can'' have..never..was that kid try to kill his school mate..When I was a pupil we could not give another food from our tray/lunch box..There was a kid who did beg and steal food off a tray...teacher made him sit at teaters'' table..that boy was on a diet for health reasons..Dennis was staot for 10..Where was the lunch room teacher..We had them in my day..
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 April 19, 2008 8:29 PM PDT
Try it as an adult.
Reply to this comment
by ontheleft April 19, 2008 8:43 PM PDT
There''s been a breakdown in morals in this country ever since Bush took office. When the president is a lying thieving bully is it any surprise that kids turn out the same way?

So we see once again, it''s Bush''s fault.
Reply to this comment
by magoo2u1 April 19, 2008 8:59 PM PDT
The thing that gets me is there were no known issues between the two kids. So this guy decided to harm the student just because he could. That indicates a deeper, mean aspect to this kid''s personality that will require more than just punishment to resolve. This kid has a future in the anti-gay, pro-religion propaganda machine in the US each election cycle. Maybe he could be put to use in public education as an administrator.......
Reply to this comment
by swwils April 19, 2008 9:27 PM PDT
What is wrong with a regular fist fight.Nowadays you can''t square off,and settle your business its either a gang fight,a gun or knife fight or something like this.Most of these punks are brain dead,and belong incarcerated.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 April 19, 2008 10:14 PM PDT
This kid has a future in the anti-gay, pro-religion propaganda machine in the US each election cycle. Maybe he could be put to use in public education as an administrator.......

Posted by magoo2u1
---------------------

Please do not spout empty conjecture.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 19, 2008 11:18 PM PDT
wHAT HAPPENED TO ADULTS..YE KNOW GROWN UPS..That was a minor..the adults called the bloody cops.. In my day it was handled and that was it..Sure it was wrong of the boy to have put a food in a lunch box not his and knowing that could have made the other boy sick..What we have yellow belly adults. Why did the boy bully a sp deit kid..By sending him to ghildren''s jail he learns to be more of a bully..
Times have changed..yer right about bush baby..
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 20, 2008 12:00 AM PDT
Some women have to work
It is to put food on the table,pay rent.pay the bills.
The man walked. What is she to do..hit the streets with her children. No sir she must work..
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 April 20, 2008 12:19 AM PDT
"What is wrong with a regular fist fight.Nowadays you can''''t square off,and settle your business its either a gang fight,a gun or knife fight or something like this.Most of these punks are brain dead,and belong incarcerated." Posted by swwils

What is wrong is that it is exactly the same thing.
The idea that there was a time when fistfights "settled" anything is a dream. If you lost such a fight, the rest of your peers would treat you as most other animals treat their weaker members.

If someone assaults me, my goal is to make that person incapable of ever doing it again. Unless he is dead, the conflict is not over, because they will return with friends, weapons, or both, so I make sure that won''t happen, if I have only my fists and other extremities, that only drags out the process, requiring more work than necessary.

But in this story the person attempting to poison the other appears to be not a conflict, but a cowardly prank played by a sadistic kid, probably to impress his friends. Take such people, no matter the age, away from human contact, until they figure out what is right and wrong.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 April 20, 2008 12:28 AM PDT
"This country started going downhill when mom was no longer home to take care of the kids after school. She was busy working to pay for that big fat house and super sized SUV." Posted by MyOpinion1

You are almost correct in your assessment, but apparently don''t realize that a long time ago, prices rose to the point where both parents need to work to provide just the basic necessities of life, never mind luxuries.

SUV? No. Most work two jobs just to pay the costs of survival, rent, or mortgage, school, medicine, telecommunication, power. There are many who work two jobs, but cannot afford anything other than a used car. Those working two jobs who can afford a SUV probably cannot fill the tank in one shot anymore.
Reply to this comment
by julynn5 April 20, 2008 12:28 AM PDT
My son has extreme allergies to chemicals in many perfumes and body sprays people wear. He is exposed everyday to these chemicals, which causes him to be short of breath almost constantly, and has had pneumonia and anaphylactic shock from these exposures. Whether it be peanuts or perfume...even adults aren''t smart enough to understand the dangers of their own actions by wearing chemicals that trigger life threatening asthma and other health issues in children and adults. Anyone that wears perfumes [which consist of undisclosed chemicals] in public is just as guilty as the "bully"...especially if they have read this and now know they too COULD harm others. Please try to use fragrance free products and if you have to smell like something, use essential oils. For the sake of the children who want to breathe freely when in public and at school!
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 20, 2008 1:42 AM PDT
Dear Lady''I hear ye..I hate it as well. I HAVE TO USE FRAGRANCE FREE ITEMS on my skin plus I live with a person with COPD..my friend will go out and it is awfull..do they really have wear all that ..and the smoke..I am legally blind..I have asked a smoker to butt that cigerette..She got pissed and said *who the hell are ye to tell me I can''t smoke I am outdoors.* I wanted to have clean air as I don''t smoke. I never asked a smoker to not ssmoke. after that lady dresses me down.In our apt it is banned. I am 53..I was rasied to think of others..They get pissed they are told they can''t smoke in the car with minors..
Reply to this comment
by daverobertz April 20, 2008 2:29 AM PDT
Anyone that thinks this kid is going to stop being evil is naive... he''s just starting.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade.Rivers April 20, 2008 5:07 AM PDT
Part 1:

Once again we see the mentality of the mob, raising it''s nasty head. "We find that boy to be a guilty little bast*rd, so evil that even the worms should not even eat him." Yet the boy has had no trial, no chance to defend himself, and no guilt has been assessed. What has been assessed up to this point, is that something happened in which this boy took a crumbled peanut cup and put it in a another boys lunch box. Whether the boy knew that the other boy had a peanut allergy was not established by the article, and whether the boy was actually capable of understanding the consequences of his actions was never established either.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade.Rivers April 20, 2008 5:09 AM PDT
Part 2

I recall a child that went to school, when I was in school, he was much younger than me, but his behaviors were to say the least disturbing. I spoke at length about this boy to my mother, who knew the grandmother of the boy. I seems that hen the boy was a small child, he was terrible abused by his parents. He was looked in a closet in the dark, and beat unmercifully for even making noises. By the time this abused was discovered, the boy was five years old, and there was much damage done. I recall him beating his head to a blood pulp on the bus seat or window, and many other things that he done, in order that he might get just a wee bit of attention. While he was of an age several years over 5, he did not reflect that in his actions. He was a terrible distraction to the other students who rode on the bus, and so I decided to sit with him on the bus, and see what I might accomplish at helping alleviate the situation. I started helping him with his homework on the way home from school, and reading to him on the way to school.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade.Rivers April 20, 2008 5:10 AM PDT
Part 3

It wasn''t long before he began to be less of a menace, and more inquisitive, and attentive. Over the several years I rode the bus, I watched as that boy became more and more stable. Though I am sure it was not just from my attention. By the time I graduated and was out of school, the boy was no longer a problem, and was doing well in school. Some years later this young man came up to me, and thanked for taking the time I did, and said that my efforts had turned his life around. Today that man has a family, and owns his own business, and is a productive member of society.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade.Rivers April 20, 2008 5:12 AM PDT
I ask you all, what happened to the adage,"Never judge a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes." We here don''t know the circumstances, behind what happened, we only have a sensationalized story, that tells little. For anyone to make a decision of guilt or innocence is disgusting, to say the least. Even more disturbing, it is a reflection of the society we live in, and the mentality that anyone charged with a crime is guilty until proven innocent. We as a society deserve no more mercy and understanding than we are willing to give others. Until we step back, and realize just how far off track we have gone, there is little hope that things will become either more fair, or that there will be equal rights for everyone under the law.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 April 20, 2008 5:59 AM PDT
"Whether the boy knew that the other boy had a peanut allergy was not established by the article,..." Posted by renrivers

"It was well known the other student suffered from severe peanut allergies, Deffendall said. There was no known history of problems between the two 13-year-old students, she said."

It can, I suppose, be debated whether "well known" extends to the offender, but the article seems to imply that the offender should have known, otherwise, why should he specifically choose that particular addition to the almost victim''s lunch?

It would be an extraordinary coincidence that out of the millions of substances that humans can be allergic to, that he just happened to choose the right one to cause distress.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o April 20, 2008 6:02 AM PDT
Umm,renrivers,, what part of this statement that you do not understand from the article? Which clearly states,,,,"It was well known the other student suffered from severe peanut allergies", Deffendall said.

Just wondering.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o April 20, 2008 6:06 AM PDT
You beat me to it brianbwb,,,LOL great minds I guess
Reply to this comment
by kraftykraut April 20, 2008 6:14 AM PDT
renrivers, I remember that boy that you rode the bus with. How does you sitting next to the boy once to try to calm him down equate to him being an outstanding citizen that he is now?

In case you''re wondering people, I was never on a bus with a disturbed student as I am sure renrivers never was on a regular bus..... maybe a short bus though.
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o April 20, 2008 6:38 AM PDT
Well renrivers, after reading parts 2,and 3,, I must say that you should be commended, for your actions in helping that little boy. It''s shame that more people don''t think like you did back then,, or today as far as that goes. In fact it''s even harder to find caring people now-a-days, esp. in this Me ME world!

Thanks for caring.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade.Rivers April 20, 2008 7:30 AM PDT
It would be an extraordinary coincidence that out of the millions of substances that humans can be allergic to, that he just happened to choose the right one to cause distress.

Posted by brianbwb

Hello Brian good to see you on again, always like to read what you have to say. Your point is well taken, but men and women have been convicted of crimes over "extraordinary coincidence," that some time later proved to be no more than that, and after these men and women had been incarcerated for years. Because of this fact alone, I stand by my belief that any man or women charged with a crime is innocent until proven guilty. My question to you would be, how can we as citizens ever hope to receive a fair trial, if the jury has already decided guilt?
Reply to this comment
by Renegade.Rivers April 20, 2008 7:45 AM PDT
In case you''''re wondering people, I was never on a bus with a disturbed student as I am sure renrivers never was on a regular bus..... maybe a short bus though.

Posted by kraftykraut

Your surety is no doubt blinded by your stupidity, but just for the record, I road a school bus for 12 years to school almost ever day. I after all was raised on a farm, here in Illinois, where almost all children ride a school bus. Also, this was not a once effort this effort was over a long period of time, and because of the experience, along with my wife, we later became a foster parents. We raised some of the children up to the time they graduated from high school, and the went out on their own either to college, or to the work force. To this day, there are several who call, and ask us for advice, and just to tell us that they still remember and love us.

We only gave it up because my health became to bad for us to do it. It was a rewarding experience, and to me that is what life is all about, learning, and sharing, and making things better by making lives better.
Reply to this comment
by jasmine731 April 20, 2008 8:52 AM PDT
It''s sad that we live in a society where people blatantly want to hurt other people. I''m sure the kid who put the peanut butter cookies in the other kids lunch knew that that kid had an allergy to peanuts; otherwise, why would he have done that? I watched on the news that bullying has become a very serious problem. The other problem is, it doesn''t seem to have any end in sight to it anytime soon unless something drastic happens to affect life as we know it on this earth.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 April 20, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
"...if the jury has already decided guilt?" Posted by renrivers

One of the most obvious drawbacks of the jury system is that people come to serve with all of their biases in tow. Many people have indeed been wrongly convicted due to jury bias, and this problem can never be solved. This is one reason why I posit that capital cases should not be left in the hands of a jury, we have seen prosecutors lobby for a jury on merely "racial" criterion, as it is well known that such cases stand a chance of being decided along such idiotic considerations, rather than the truth.

In this case, however, it was a juvenile, who can only be charged with juvenile crimes, especially since the victim foiled the plan by not eating the crumbs.

Also, as far a stretch as it sounds, it is understandably hard to raise a child with a sense of morality when there appears to be none outside the home, from the bully, to the cops, and all the way to the president.

It is indeed a "jungle" out there, perhaps raising a child with hard core "no mercy" survival skills is more appropriate in these modern times.
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 April 20, 2008 10:33 AM PDT
Oh but they do go on the word of another child. At least here in Texas they do. My son has a disability and of course he''s picked on. I know first hand how mean kids can be. I have taught my son that he is to never hurt anyone and he''s a kind and gentle kid but i also taught him that he''s just as good as the next kid and he doesn''t have to just let kids pick on him. He has learned several way of dealing with bullies that don''t involve physical harm. I will have to sy though his principal isn''t too crazy about me. I have no problem putting her on the spot and demanding answers when there is a problem. My son was stabbed on the arm with a fork.He had 4 puncture wounds and was sent to the school nurse. When you assault someone with anything that does harm it''s considered a weaopn so this could have been considered assualt with a deadly weapon. However, the school never called me and I had to hear the story 4 hours later from my son. I called the school that very day and guess what the principal told me???? I asked what she had done to the student that had done this to my son and she said..... Umm I don''t remember right off hand I would have to go pull his file. It had only been 4 hours I told her and that I didn''t believe that she didn''t remember. Untill I made a big fuss about it nothing was done to that student at all! Schools claim to care and they claim they don''t allow bullies but none of it''s true. Thank God this kid saw what happened and did the right thing.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 April 20, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
Schools claim to care and they claim they don''''t allow bullies but none of it''''s true. Thank God this kid saw what happened and did the right thing.
Posted by fabrat1 at 10:33 AM : Apr 20, 2008
Schools today don''t care. They don''t care about the safety and well-being of a child. All they care about is keeping up the govt checks by maintaining a good level on the no child left behind. To that end they will expell children that has trouble in certain areas or poor skills. Either that or send them to the in-district school for the challanged/problem students.
As for the educational quality, ask your child about the history he has been taught versus what you learned. You will find many dissimilarities.
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 April 20, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
Yeah you''re right this no child left behind is a bunch of bull. It sounds good but for a child with a disability they know it''s no help. My daughter is very smart and is in all advanced classes at the high school. I always made really good grade in school and college so I thought helping her would be a breeze but boy was I wrong. You''re right nothing is the same. The kids of this generation aren''t taught the same things we were. Everything has changed, it''s so hard to keep up with.
Reply to this comment
by kittykatty2 April 20, 2008 10:58 AM PDT
brianbwb...you sound like an adult version of the kid described in this article. Totally self absorbed and anti-social. I hope you don''t take your superior attitude on the streets as I can see it creating much havoc.
Reply to this comment
by amateurradio April 20, 2008 11:58 AM PDT
This story mirrors a episode of "Law and Order". One can only imagine that it is a copy-cat event from that show. As for the child who did this - I suppose that I might entertain the idea that they did not realize the seriousness of the event (though I think that argument fails in final analysis), but certainly it is a clear attempt to seriously injure or kill.

Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 April 20, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
This kid is only 13 I think trying him for attempted murder is a little harsh. Not that I condone what he did but there are better ways of dealing with it.
Reply to this comment
by excoachken April 20, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
What the kid did was stupid and dangerous, but he is just a typically moronic middle school student. Unless you''ve been trapped in a classroom with 25 of them at one time, be careful not to judged too quickly. they are in the most difficult time of their lives, in terms of trying to find out who and what they are, and are prone to really stupid things along the way.
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 April 20, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
The other kids didn''t die that''s the point. We can "what if" if you want to but the kid didn''t die, he''s just fine. There are a lot better way to deal with this that will have a far better impact than trying him for attempted murder.
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 April 20, 2008 2:22 PM PDT
The beating of that young girl was just awful. I think those kids were like 15 or 16 maybe and I have heard they''re trying them as an adult. They caused physical harm and did so on purpose and they don''t even feel bad about it. I have seen many many kids getting in real trouble lately and yeah you would think that the kids would pay attention and understand that if you do something wrong then there''s a chance you will have to pay the cost.
Reply to this comment
by voidmaster-2009 April 20, 2008 2:27 PM PDT
Actually, the kid should be remanded to some kind of rehab program designed to %u201Ccure%u201D bullies. It%u2019s the parents that ought to be prosecuted for RAISING a bully. Not only should that be a criminal offense, it should be at least as serious as attempted murder.

The bullying mindset is responsible for a significant percentage of what is wrong with American society and bullies are 100 percent responsible for tragedies like Columbine. The old stand-by excuse of %u201CI was just playing%u2026%u201D should be taken as a confession.
Reply to this comment
by rohink-2009 April 20, 2008 2:52 PM PDT
julynn5, you were joking right?
Reply to this comment
by grammawhamma April 20, 2008 3:36 PM PDT
Where is Dr Phil when you need him?!? (just kidding)
Reply to this comment
by threynolds2 April 20, 2008 4:07 PM PDT
I don''t remember problems like this when I was in school (1975 high school graduate). However, I DO remember saying the pledge of allegiance every morning, being able to pray before ballgames and getting paddled for mis-behaving (didn''t do that again!)
Reply to this comment
by Netterz April 20, 2008 5:07 PM PDT
Kids live in this mindset, that nothing will ever happen to them, no matter what they do. Can act ignorant, disrespectful, mean, stupid, be a bully, inflict great harm on others, and nothing will happen. Why? Because thy are told frm the day they enter daycare, school, what ever, that anything other than a smile, and a time out, is considered child abuse. I have heard children scream at there parents in public that they can not be told no, or hey will hit themselves and call the police and yell child abuse. I know of many HS kids who have done it, just to get out of being grounded, so they can go to a game, or do something they want to do. Parents are cornered by there children, and told by the law, they arent allowed to spank, or discilpine there kids, so..welcome to the new American Felons....at any age under 18..
Reply to this comment
by peacedreamer-2009 April 20, 2008 5:41 PM PDT
A teenager who intentionally exposes someone to something that can kill him/her is not a bully, he is a sociopath. Even if he thought he was being funny or doing a prank, at 13 he''s old enough to understand death and the consequences of poisoning someone. This bully needs some kind of treatment program.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 20, 2008 6:25 PM PDT
I called my aunt and asked about what I was like when I lived with family when I was small..I still ''member her words..Barbara what happened ye were such a sweet little girl. I READ HER THE ROIT ACT..She died in hospital..I did not have the chandh to SAY SORRY..What happened was I was shoved from foster home to foster home..I was pissed with the family..I had every right to be..I later met my Dad in 98.I love that man..They dumbed me. Where did I learnt to be a bully a teacher asked when I was in school I said this the foster homes and that was true. I was barred from school as years ago us who are handicapped was not allowed there.. 10 I went to school. I WAS NOT TAUGHT HOW TO DEAL WITH THE SEEING WORLD AND THEY THE LEGALLY BLIND WORLD. Yes I acted out..I knew no better. I had large print books til a boy whined* How come Barbara has sp book*. The next day them were removed, The law said I had to atten class. I could not keep up .
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 April 20, 2008 6:49 PM PDT
I never said what if the kid had died I was commenting to that statement. Yes this is very serious and I know all too well how being bullied can change a person''s entire life.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 20, 2008 6:56 PM PDT
I hated the foster homes growing up as the abuse in them..I am 74 grad..I have seen changes in America that started in the 60s..I ''member Mr Walker telling the teachers they can''t tonch a child..They surely had no idea how to educate,make mind a blind kid in a sighted school and the same in foster homes. I was bullied and I bullied back. It back fired. I do thank the teackers that helped me..Years ago it was better. Not so much for me..Today they are bloody lazy. We learnt to read using D i c k Jane and Spot readers. Took penmenship. grammar math spelling am poor in,we had recess.. I think this nation is gonna be sorry in its way the schools are going, that bush is the blame..I think about it and am sad.
I was 15 when I told my school bus mates to shut up..A black kid of 10 boarded the bus..HE BECAME MY SEAT MATE.I saw a child. He was beated by the driver the only reason skin colour.Yes children are mean and so adults..I was call the N word for caring and I am white.
Reply to this comment
by fabrat1 April 20, 2008 7:16 PM PDT
I meant that we could "what if" because someone stated "what if the kid had died." And we could "what if" this thing to death but it won''t change the facts. I just believe that trying a 13 year old for attempted murder isn''t the best way to deal with this. As a parent of a disabled child I know what it does to a kid to be bullied, but even if it were my kid i still wouldn''t want them to try the child for attempted murder.
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 20, 2008 7:36 PM PDT
WHERE DID THIS STUDENT GET AN IDEA TO POISOM..I was taught not to take food/drink unopened.those I DON''T know I am glad as people we are talking about this..I never give anything that to another to put in their body..
Are ye on a sp deit.
We went to a food bank and they were giving out a juice that Vince can''t have due to his meds..I told the lady that is barrrd..She got pissed..I said his doctor said no..Vince is 55.
If we have compapy over I asked are there foods ye can''t for health reasons..
We may go out and we know what we can/can''t have.
Alot of the probrlems are bad parenting..i *SEE* it every where. Children bossing their care takers.. I am appalled. The leave to beaver days ended years ago..I learnt No and no meant just that . The govt is the blame..That is I never wanted children of my own. The law is the reason. they run wild..THEY KNOW MUM/DAD CAN''T TRAIN THEM THEM THE WAY MOSE OF US WERE. I was used for the money foster parents got,they taught me noting,,I lived in fear.
Reply to this comment
by sandzz-2009 April 20, 2008 7:42 PM PDT
"This kid is only 13 I think trying him for attempted murder is a little harsh. Not that I condone what he did but there are better ways of dealing with it.

Posted by fabrat1 at 01:09 PM : Apr 20, 2008"

Learn to read, the charge is wanton endangerment, not attempted murder. The two are vastly different charges.
Reply to this comment
See all 58 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs