Innocent Man Free After 26 Years In Prison
Alton Logan Freed On Bond After Being Granted A New Trial In Someone Else's Crime
-
Photo
Alton Logan (CBS)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
26-Year-Secret
Bob Simon reports on two lawyers who, bound by the client-attorney privilege, kept the secret that their client had committed a murder while an innocent man went to jail for the crime.
-
News Tools
60 Minutes
Email AlertSign up for our 60 Minutes email alert.
Alton Logan's family took up a collection in the lobby of the Cook County Criminal Courthouse and quickly came up with the $1,000 they needed to post bond.
A dozen friends and family broke into applause as Logan, 54, exited the building. He tearfully said it felt "great" to be free before he was whisked away in a black SUV.
Logan's younger brother, Eugene Logan, was adamant that he would be freed after his retrial.
"Nobody deserves to be locked away for 26 years for something they didn't do," said Logan, 48, of Portland, Ore. "It's a blessing today that my brother's been released. He's not been exonerated yet, but we're going back to court, and it will happen."
As reported on CBS News' 60 Minutes in March, two attorneys recently revealed that their former client, Andrew Wilson, admitted to committing the crime that has sent Logan to prison, but attorney-client privilege had kept them from coming forward.
Wilson's death last year allowed the attorneys to unseal an affidavit stating that Logan was not responsible for the fatal shooting of security guard Lloyd Wickliffe at a McDonald's restaurant in January 1982.
Dale Coventry, one of the attorneys who signed the affidavit, said Friday night that he hopes prosecutors will acknowledge they went in the wrong direction with the case.
"Poor Mr. Logan was locked up all these years for something he didn't do and that's unfortunate that it worked out the way it did," Coventry said. "I wish (the release) had happened a lot sooner, but unfortunately there was no way to do anything."
The other attorney, W. Jamie Kunz, said he's hopeful for Logan's permanent release.
"At the time the judge was ruling on the new trial, I got a tear in my eye," Kunz said Friday evening. "And after the judge set bond, and I looked at the defense table and saw Alton Logan in tears, I cried too."
Logan told 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon that during the first five or six years of his sentence he was "consumed" by anger. "Then I come to the realization that 'Why be angry over something you can't control?'"
"See, I never stopped giving up hope. I've always believed that one day is gone-somebody's gonna come forth and tell the truth. But I didn’t know when," Logan told Simon.
It would be up to Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan's office to prosecute the case because of a conflict of interest for the Cook County State's Attorney's office. Madigan's spokeswoman, Robyn Ziegler, said no decision had been made about a retrial.
"We will carefully review all the evidence in the case and then decide the appropriate next step," she said.
Logan's uncle, Arthur Gordon, 70, of Milwaukee, waited outside the jail, saying he knew his nephew was innocent.
"I knew he didn't do that because I had been talking to him over the years," Gordon said. "He kept his spirit. He said, 'Uncle I have to stay up. I can't go down. I can't go down."'
Logan's family planned to take him for a steak and lobster dinner on his first night of freedom.
"I'm going to turn him on to life," Eugene Logan said. "That's what we're going to do. We're going to live it together."
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 112 CommentsOn Bond? Facing yet another trial for something he clearly did not do? This is a case of "double jeopardy", an unconstitutional perversion of law.
Here we see yet another clear example of how the Rev. Wright was correct, this man, shown to be not guilty, is still not a free man, a clear example of how once the system incarcerates a "Black" man, they are so very reluctant to simply free him once his innocence is proven, searching for any possible stretch of reason and law to keep this man behind bars.
If you can show another case exactly the same but where a white man was treated differently, you can make an argument. Without it, you''re reducing this man''s pain for your own political/social agenda.
Imagine if he had been sentenced to death. He''d be dead now for something he didn''t do.
Given the obvious weakness and incorrectness of the evidence in the case, it is less likely that a "white" man would have even been convicted in such a case. Every statistical study available shows that the American justice system is much more likely to convict a "Black" man on flimsy, even false evidence, and once convicted, will be given a longer sentence than any "white" in the same circumstance. There are so many examples of this, from Reuben "Hurricane" Carter, to the young man in Georgia sentenced to ten years for an act of consensual eroticism, who has to fight for his freedom even though the law regarding his sentence was changed.
I personally know two people who did time in a California prison for pot possession, both, complete non smokers, were framed by a cop tossing three joints into their car. These types of injustice are far less likely to be visited upon "White" people.
The Bush administration, as another example, has clearly violated several laws, including treason, and conspiracy to violate laws as agreed to by the Geneva Convention on torture, yet the perpetrators remain uncharged.
Also, the implications of the "Jena 6" where "Black" people involved in altercations with "White" racists, were given entirely disproportionate sentences for their part in the actions, and the "White" people, including the one with the shotgun at the convenience store, weren''t even charged.
Excellent post. I wonder when people will get a clue. I remember too well how many disgusting people came on here and suggested that threatening hang nooses were protected freedoms of speech. I get so disgusted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by excoachken at 03:53 AM
Most cops and DAs have few scruples with manipulating the evidence. They have a little philosophy that goes like this: If you aren''t guilty this time, you still are guilty for something unknown.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by singingrick at 01:40 AM : Apr 19, 2008
+ report abuse
You are quite right, especially in the "NEW" South! LOL
BTW, where the White Women at!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by blazercoach1 at 01:32 AM : Apr 19, 2008
+ report abuse
Man if you BELIEVE what you just posted then you are either awlful young or have your head in the sand. Now IF you were my age, if you''d faced off against those Terrorist in White Sheets, you''d KNOW different. Sieg Heil Grand Wizard.
Even if they are caught on camera. As far as spending 26 years in prison as an innocent man means nothing to the upper class because both white and black lower class are trash.
Another reason that the way we do business legally here in the USA is hypocritical ... How can these two feel good about what they have done? 26 years is a long time to allow an innocent man to sit in prison ...
These two should have to pay him and pay the state for his incarceration ...
PITIFUL !!!!
Our Nation promotes Human Rights around the globe and it is frequently a "legal" matter.
These two poor excuses for human beings let a man languish in prison for what??? An "honor" code??? That''s not honor, that''s criminal.
However, it does point out one thing: That lawyers have no conscience and "justice" is lost.
I like your point. Our country is becoming more and more divided by economics than race. In a way, it is a good thing because it is a step forward toward anti-prejudice. On the other hand, it is an incredible sad commentary of arrogance and system manipulation.
How many times have you been at a gas station, and seen some youngster or woman driving an expensive ($50k plus) car, and know in your heart that they didn''t earn the money for the car but are born into a rich family or married wealthy.
Watch their arrogance as they put $50, 60 or 70 dollars into their car. They are proud and look down at someone else putting $40 of gas into a Nissan.
--------------------------------------------
I agree. When I read the original story a week or so ago it even said the 2 lawyers knew during Mr. Logan''s trial!! No wonder average people hate lawyers. If it were other than a lawyer that did something like this you can be sure there would be a lawyer somewhere who would right now be dreaming up a way to sue you.
Skip "getting his life back", these lawyers should be made to buy him a new one.
wouldn''t a good human being forget the honor code and just get another profession other than lawyer.
probably easier said than done.
but a man''s best years and probably a third of his life if not more was lost so that the lawyer could protect his right to practice law. i hope the lawyer enjoyed all the money he made until his hide was safe and he could shed a tear at the trial to show what a nice caring human being he has been all along.
Posted by actornaught at 10:30 AM : Apr 19, 2008
...because they are more interested in convictions than justice.
DNC Statement 4-18-08
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by fabrat1 at 11:10 AM : Apr 19, 2008
If your daughter get to ACTUALLY join the ranks of people who are OFFICERS of the COURT, she''ll understand. The back bone of our society it the system. Attorneys who are to give a defendent a proper defense MUST have all the details. For then to get all the details the defendant or anyone who has retained the person to represent them MUST feel they can tell that person ALL there is to know. Can''t you folks SEE that IF it wasn''t for the privilage those Attorneys NEVER know the truth... they do NOT get that info and thus the injustice is NEVER corrected. What reason would the guilty man have had to tell the Attorney if he though, even for a minute, that the Attorney would tell someone else?? THINK!! People THINK!! To act like the Attorney would have had the info without this PROTECTION is not smart at all. THEY DO NOT!! HE''s STILL in JAIL. We need to look at the OTHER side of this thing... why did the STATE fail to get the right person should be our focus.
DNC Statement 4-18-08
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hawksprings at 11:01 AM : Apr 19, 2008
+ report abuse
You have FASCISM really bad don''t you? I mean YOU need to create a little hate for your Hate Target so bad you would use this poor man''s situation to do it. ALL for the "Party" huh??? Sieg Heil Bush!! Come on get the hood and sheet out...that''s what you''ve wanted all along anyway... Now let those stupid red necks hear ya!! SIEG HEIL GRAND WIZARD
Apparently not.
I can''t imagine losing 26 years of my life because the system is "broken".
This is not the president''s fault. Our judicial system lacks the necessary imagination to find a way to address these situations and maintain "necessary" attorney-client privileges. Even with respect to the 5th Amendment''s self incrimination clause, it seems hard to believe that the lawyers couldn''t find a way to propose this man''s innocence.
We all dutiful placed our right paw over our heart.
As children and a class this was daily.
Why we said it was citizenship in verse
Was it to teach us that we are better
Than other nations.
What did those words mean
I had no idea.
I sure do now.
I grew up believing those words,
As I sit here I want say I am appalled.
I truly am.
I know the pledge by heart
It is painfut recite
Why because America
Has Chahged for the worse.
I try to see her goodness.
As a adult I face the with tears
I ask what happened
I really don''t know
I am a legally blind lady
And do wonder her fate
What happened to
We the people,by the people
And for the people.
The America of the
constution
A citizen I am
Peace of chirt America
written by Barbara Ann
The system sucks. I hope, once the case is resolved and he is fully acquitted, he is able to sew Illinois for hundreds of millions.
Ye raised her
To know right from Wrong
Ye raised her to do the right thing
And now she will learn a skill
Ye can only hope ye did yer best
Will yer girl step to thr plate
And go to bat and not stike out
To right the wrongs
Remember who she is and the gifts
Her loving parents- ye gave her
Her name and the values
As she meets the world
know she can make a difference
in a cold,greedy world.
As you and her talk about the future
As a family
Let her know ye trully love her
Life is too short, my own mother
used to tell me.
Ye know it is.
Study she will do.
Tell her there is good.
The lesson I learnt as a child
I am no better than the next person
A good lesson
Love from a hillbilly
fabrat1 I wrote this to ye.Forgive my poor command of english..I am legally blind..if ye want to copy the Dear Mum letter for yer girl, my best to her.
Vince said that man at the centre of this story need to sue and win/get millions..
Maybe you should stick to playing dungeons and dragons and leave the adult conversations to the grownups. Or, find a poetry(?) site where your talents would be appreciated.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 112 Comments