Innocent Man Free After 26 Years In Prison
Alton Logan Freed On Bond After Being Granted A New Trial In Someone Else's Crime
-
Alton Logan (CBS)
-
Play CBS Video Video 26-Year-Secret Bob Simon reports on two lawyers who, bound by the client-attorney privilege, kept the secret that their client had committed a murder while an innocent man went to jail for the crime.
-
News Tools 60 Minutes
Email AlertSign up for our 60 Minutes email alert.
Alton Logan's family took up a collection in the lobby of the Cook County Criminal Courthouse and quickly came up with the $1,000 they needed to post bond.
A dozen friends and family broke into applause as Logan, 54, exited the building. He tearfully said it felt "great" to be free before he was whisked away in a black SUV.
Logan's younger brother, Eugene Logan, was adamant that he would be freed after his retrial.
"Nobody deserves to be locked away for 26 years for something they didn't do," said Logan, 48, of Portland, Ore. "It's a blessing today that my brother's been released. He's not been exonerated yet, but we're going back to court, and it will happen."
As reported on CBS News' 60 Minutes in March, two attorneys recently revealed that their former client, Andrew Wilson, admitted to committing the crime that has sent Logan to prison, but attorney-client privilege had kept them from coming forward.
Wilson's death last year allowed the attorneys to unseal an affidavit stating that Logan was not responsible for the fatal shooting of security guard Lloyd Wickliffe at a McDonald's restaurant in January 1982.
Dale Coventry, one of the attorneys who signed the affidavit, said Friday night that he hopes prosecutors will acknowledge they went in the wrong direction with the case.
"Poor Mr. Logan was locked up all these years for something he didn't do and that's unfortunate that it worked out the way it did," Coventry said. "I wish (the release) had happened a lot sooner, but unfortunately there was no way to do anything."
The other attorney, W. Jamie Kunz, said he's hopeful for Logan's permanent release.
"At the time the judge was ruling on the new trial, I got a tear in my eye," Kunz said Friday evening. "And after the judge set bond, and I looked at the defense table and saw Alton Logan in tears, I cried too."
Logan told 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon that during the first five or six years of his sentence he was "consumed" by anger. "Then I come to the realization that 'Why be angry over something you can't control?'"
"See, I never stopped giving up hope. I've always believed that one day is gone-somebody's gonna come forth and tell the truth. But I didn’t know when," Logan told Simon.
It would be up to Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan's office to prosecute the case because of a conflict of interest for the Cook County State's Attorney's office. Madigan's spokeswoman, Robyn Ziegler, said no decision had been made about a retrial.
"We will carefully review all the evidence in the case and then decide the appropriate next step," she said.
Logan's uncle, Arthur Gordon, 70, of Milwaukee, waited outside the jail, saying he knew his nephew was innocent.
"I knew he didn't do that because I had been talking to him over the years," Gordon said. "He kept his spirit. He said, 'Uncle I have to stay up. I can't go down. I can't go down."'
Logan's family planned to take him for a steak and lobster dinner on his first night of freedom.
"I'm going to turn him on to life," Eugene Logan said. "That's what we're going to do. We're going to live it together."
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- What about cases that have no DNA, and no evidence to put the person at the scene, no dna no fingerprints no camera no nothing. There is no justice in this system, my brother received a life for a crime that he did not do, he has been gone for 11 years left when his son was 4 and now he is 15 years old. They can't go back and get his years back that he has missed from his son and family. As far as i am concerned i have no faith in the system..Back 11 years ago durning my brothers trial we sat in court and saw the victim that was murdered wife while on stand pick out another man in the audience not 1,2 but 3 times then they asked her is that the man who shoot and killed your husband and she said yes, keep in mind my brother was on the other side of his lawyers and they let her come back the next day and pick out my brother after the proceutors went and held his hand up over my brothers head and said to the victims wife you said that you picked the wrong man yesterday because you was afraid for u and your family, what was she afraid of they had moved back to Pakistan....That is why I have the faith in the system, that just want to close a case that fits the description of a BM 5'8 to 5'9 and 160 to 180 pounds..
carlaaikins@att.net - Reply to this comment
- "Any Prosecutor who knowingly sends an innocent man to jail, should be charged with a felony and disbarred..
Posted by Quetzal0666 at 10:12 AM : Apr 21, 2008"
It is an already well established rule of ethics that any lawyer, no matter who she is representing, not put on any evidence or witness that she knows is false. Moreover, if the attorney did put on evidence that she later discovers is false, the rule burdens her with a duty to take reasonable remedial measures such as notifying the relevant panel.
The problem in this case is that the prosecutor did not know that this guy was innocent.
To the posters that claim that the state will in no way be held accountable, you are wrong. This man, will no doubt, receive fair compensation in the amount of a couple of million for the deprivation of liberty and lost opportunity that the state has caused him. This compensation, undoubtedly, will allow this guy to sit at home and never work a day in his life. So, how is the state not being held accountable?
Moreover, holding the state accountable does nothing more than stretch the already overextended public purse. Who else do you think will pay this man if not the taxpayer. Maybe the insurance company if the state is insured against these risks but for the most part, it will be the tax payers bankrolling this compensation plan. - Reply to this comment
- I pleaded guilty to a 1 count of Lew & lascivious Excibition under 16 in March 18 2004. Was deported separated from my children and wife, and destroyed. In February 2008 I lost my parental rights to my 6 years old Phoenix Villamizar in a Miami Juvenile Court. Caused by Lt Firefigther Eduardo Gomez of Fire Rescue No-3,of Miami. I was given as part of the discovery a document"Arrest/Affidavit" written by arresting Police officer Steven Machado(4455.Machado made another false report to DCF.Have me lost my son Phoenix Villamizar in family Court and convicted of L&L charges made by Lt, Gomes4s apt, managers.ARREST/AFFIDAVITT was hidden by the State Attorneys Office from my defense lawyers It re-appeared while waiting deportation.I lost my civil rights after Judge Jerald Klein "Baker Acted" due charges made by Gomes4s apt managers. Gomes4s pay back for I having filed a complaint with Fire Chief William Bryson of Rescue N0-3, against Gomez for breaking Fire Codes where I lived with my family in a Gomez4s relatives apt.Gomez and Detective Sergio Dietz,Records Cleck Helen Heyward illegally accessed over 17 criminal police records(of other people)that Gomez used in a Federal Housing suit to win a case.It is not uncommon for an innocent person to spend years in jail for false acusations made by police officers and Fireman in Miami.I would have spend years in jail just like Mr. Alton Logan.I have over 100 pages of evidence against Gomez and the Florida State Attorneys Office.
- Reply to this comment
- Gerardo Villamizar,pleaded guilty to a 1 count of Lew & lascivious Excibition under 16 in March 18 2004. Was deported to Venezuela, separated from my children and wife, and life destroyed. In February 2008 I lost my parental rights to my 6 years old Phoenix Villamizar in a Miami Juvenile Court. This mess was caused by corrupted, Lt Firefigther Eduardo Gomez of Fire Rescue No-3,of Miami,and his friends in the Miami Police Department.I was given as part of the discovery a document"Arrest/Affidavit" written by arresting Police officer Steven Machado(4455.Then Machado made a second false report to the Department of Childrens and Families(DCF) where he comitted perjury to have me lost my son Phoenix Villamizar in family Court and convicted of L&L charges made by Lt, Gomes4s apt, managers.ARREST/AFFIDAVITT was hidden by the State Attorneys Office from my defense lawyers and re-appeared a few weeks while waiting deportation.I lost my civil rights because Judge Jerald Klein had me "Baker Acted" due charges%
- Reply to this comment
- How long will Mr. Logan be free, before he''s arrested for a new crime ?
- Reply to this comment
- i left out a few words,
Any Prosecutor who knowingly sends an innocent man to jail, should be charged with a felony and disbarred.. - Reply to this comment
- the Laws Should be Changed, so that any prosecutor who knowingly sends a man to jail shoud be charged with a Felony!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- """The well connected do not sit on death row, ever!!!!!"""
Well ... there''s Scott Peterson. - Reply to this comment
- What about the attorneys who withheld the information due to attorney-client privilege. Will they be held accountable? Or will the legal system ignore the fact that they withheld evidence? But more importantly, do they really care?
- Reply to this comment
- By that token then the Duke guy who was falsely accused of rape was partially responsible because he had attacked a gay person----
Posted by whatithink at 03:48 PM
If what you said is true then yes he was. He did something that caused the police to take a closer look him. Over all, the Duke students had no criminal records especially concerning rape. This caused people the question the charges. So having no criminal record helped them beat the charges. In Logan''s case he had a history of armed robbery. This worked against him. I''m glad he is getting out and he should be allowed to sue anyone he wants. But I still say he bares some responsibility because he had a criminal record for armed robbery. If he had never committed the first crime. The police would have never picked him up to begin with. - Reply to this comment
- Who will be held be responsible for this wrongful imprisonment of an innocent man for 26 years? Not the State. Not the prosecutors.
Unlike the private sector, the State and its minions are rarely held responsible for its actions.
If a private citizen held someone against their will for 26 years, they would certainly be held accountable for their actions.
Yet, no punishment will be meted out to the state prosecutors whose arguments led to this man''s imprisonment, as they are never held responsible for their ''mistakes''. - Reply to this comment
- Also, here is a quote from The Oregonian:
Alton Logan had his run-ins with police, too. By age 28, he had served time for armed robbery. "There was a lot of gang banging, running with the wrong people," his brother explains. "That''s what got him in trouble. He caught a case with another guy and got caught up." - Reply to this comment
- Here is the link to the story about his felony record. He brother is talking about it. You will have to scroll down the page because the top of the page is blank. You might want to copy and paste it into a word doc and then click on the link...easier that way if this doesn''t come across as a hyperlink.
http://www.theskanner.com/index.php?action=arteml&artid=6279&PHPSESSID=5e0a699e1c175f00573ce243bbdf5e46 - Reply to this comment
- Fact is we have all done something wrong and the Chicago police department has also. The original poster said something about "mistakes" made. Several police officers in the same Chicago area were recently indicted for torturing hundreds of men into confessing crimes during the same period. I''''m not sure these were innocent mistakes.
----
Posted by whatithink at 03:48 PM :
No, No,
I have NEVER done anything that would cause the police to suspect me of committing an armed robbery.
You will find that almost all people who have been sent to prison for something they did not do have had a past criminal history. They would have never been a suspect in the case if they had not broken the law in the past. Your chances of being picked up for something you did not do are almost zero if you have no criminal history. A simple life rule is to not invite the police or justice system into your life by committing a crime. I hope we could all agree on that?? :-) - Reply to this comment
- Flajoe1,
By that token then the Duke guy who was falsely accused of rape was partially responsible because he had attacked a gay person previously or all of them were partially responsible for having the women in the house in the first place. However, these have never come up as a reason to blame them and shouldn''t have.
Fact is we have all done something wrong and the Chicago police department has also. The original poster said something about "mistakes" made. Several police officers in the same Chicago area were recently indicted for torturing hundreds of men into confessing crimes during the same period. I''m not sure these were innocent mistakes. - Reply to this comment
- The prosecuters only wished he could have been put on death row and murdered by the State before their own corrupt incompetence was exposed.
- Reply to this comment
- What site did you find that information? I tried to do a search but came up empty.
----
Posted by whatithink at 03:39 PM
heres the link
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/renee_mitchell/index.ssf?/base/news/120831631513130.xml&coll=7
It was on page 2 - Reply to this comment
- Justice is not served by arresting people not involved in a case.
----
Posted by whatithink at 03:15 PM
You are correct innocent people should not go to prison we all agree on that.
But the original post that started this thread stated he does bare some responsibly for his situation. If he had never committed a crime to begin with he would not have been on the police radar. The fact is he did match the description; he did have a history of arm robbery that%u2019s what made him a suspect. If you never want to be picked up for suspicion of armed robbery you should have never committed an armed robbery in the first place.
Those two lawyers are s c u m for not coming forward when they found out he was innocent. Even if it was the legal thing to do it was still WRONG! - Reply to this comment
- Flajoe1,
What site did you find that information? I tried to do a search but came up empty. - Reply to this comment
- Flajoe1,
Thanks. I found nothing on him having any other convictions and read someone had tipped the police to his name. Anyway, I agree with the other poster that said we are not living in Nazi Germany. You should only do time for crimes you have actually committed and once you have done time for that crime, you have paid your debt to society. Justice is not served by arresting people not involved in a case. - Reply to this comment
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."




