April 18, 2008

Why Do They Dress That Way?

Polygamist Sect's Women Wear 19th Century-Style, Drab Dresses, And Hair Up

    • Members of Eldorado, Texas polygamist sect Photo

      Members of Eldorado, Texas polygamist sect  (CBS/EARLY SHOW)

    • Carol Jessop on <i><b>The Early Show</i></b> Friday Photo

      Carol Jessop on The Early Show Friday  (CBS/EARLY SHOW)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Play CBS Video Video Pioneer Dress For Polygamists?

    Former FLDS member and author Carolyn Jessop explains to Julie Chen the restrictions behind the style of polygamists' wives dress and what the women are taught about their body.

  • Photo Essay Separation Anxiety

    Some mothers in polygamist sect separated from children as part of abuse investigation.

  • Photo Essay Polygamist Compound Raid

    Secret calls from alleged abuse victim lead to raid of religious sect's compound.

(CBS)  The women in the polygamy sect in western Texas that's at the center of the storm involving child sex abuse allegations dress in a distinctive way -- in drab, 19th century pioneer-style outfits, and with their hair up, in braids and buns.

What's the thinking behind such garb?

On The Early Show Friday, Carolyn Jessop, a former member of such a sect and author of the book, "Escape," explained it.

She was born into polygamy, got married at 18 and had eight children with her husband, who was 32 years her senior. She escaped polygamy with her kids in 2003 at the age of 35, citing extreme emotional and physical abuse by her husband.

Many experts say the polygamist women's attire is restricted as much as it is because, if all the women dress the same, there's nothing individual about any of them, and they're just part of a whole. Others say polygamist women are made to adhere to dress codes to exert control over everything in their lives.

Clothing and hairstyles actually vary from sect-to-sect among polygamists. The one in Texas requires women to wear pastel prairie dresses modeled after 19th century Mormons. Most of them wear their hair in a loose braid and are covered from their neck down to their feet by the long dresses.

Jessop told co-anchor Julie Chen, "It's a style that's evolved over generations, actually," Jessop said. "This clothing started being restricted after the 1953 raid (on a polygamist compound in Colorado City, Ariz.). And at first, it was just that women couldn't wear pants any longer and they had to wear a dress or a skirt that was a certain length, and long sleeves and no low necks. Their hair had to be combed on top of the head. It couldn't be left hanging. Then, every five or six years, there would be another restriction added. And eventually, the restrictions just were so limited that there's only about one pattern that you can make a dress out of and there's only a few colors, pastel colors, that you can use. No prints, no plaids, nothing with flowers. And then the hairstyle is just another situation that's evolved over time."

The polygamist women, Jessop noted, have "limited" say in the way they dress: "You have so many limitations on what you're allowed to do, and then, if you want to do something different than the standard hairstyle, then you may get away with it, and you may not. But one thing is it's going to have to meet standards. And the standards are, your hair has to be up. It can't be loose and it can't be hanging."

Why?

"That's been forever. That was something they started way before I was born. The concept is that, if you're trying to entice a man -- it's sexual to leave your hair hanging."

Chen wondered, "Does this all fall under the category of not letting women have a voice or any individuality or a way to express themselves?"

"Oh, yes, absolutely," replied Jessop. "It also sets you apart from society. You can't go shopping without everybody staring at you. When I went to college, you know, I didn't fit in. I was obviously different. It's a way to keep the women separated from everyone else so that -- and it also does affect your individuality and, you know, you're not allowed free expression as far as what you're allowed to wear."

Asked if, when they go out in public and see how other women dress, there's ever any griping among polygamist women who want to look more like non-polygamists, Jessop responded, "Well, I just remember as a little girl, we were taught that to wear something like shorts, that was immodest, or to wear something with short sleeves was immodest, or a low neck where you could actually see a cleavage -- that was just considered just as immoral as you could be. I remember, as a little girl, being in the car with my mother and other children and a lady walked by and she was not wearing very much. And everybody was like, 'Oh, she's wicked, look what she's doing!' It was more something where, if people dress different than what we were accustomed to, it was a kind of like a shock to our system. We were taught that we were supposed to cover our bodies and God wanted our bodies covered. So, we were taught to look down on people who put on shorts and short sleeves."

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Video and Galleries from The Early Show

Add a Comment See all 40 Comments
by susieq_13 April 18, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
Their dresses look comfy, but I sure wouldn''t want to dress that way. Ick!
Reply to this comment
by staycalm April 18, 2008 10:45 AM PDT
Sounds quite similar to Muslims. Just curious though, why doesn''t anyone write about the clothing of Hasidic Jews. It is just as restrictive, especially for the men and boys. I also don''t think the dresses are drab. I actually think there is something pretty about them, especially compared to the *** *** style of our generation of women and girls. It''s getting sickening just to look at American women. So many are either trashy or fat. Having said that, this mormon sect is very much a cult that practices extreme mind control over the women and, as such, is illegal and immoral but we should be taking a look at Muslims in America as well and make sure they aren''t doing the same thing.
Reply to this comment
by wlmrtpatriot April 18, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
So when did a dress code begin within the U.S.?
They obviously don''t want to dress like any of us either.
I suppose The Pentacostals will be chosen next?
Reply to this comment
by heewah2000 April 18, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
Part 1

I''m a member of the LDS church (not the FLDS-perish the thought!). And, by the way, we don''t practice polygamy-haven''t for a century).

Back to the subject at hand. The only way this polygamist sect could get these women to conform to such a narrow standard of dress is through sequestering and indoctrinating them--which they have over generations of time. If they had any access to free thought, free choice, or free communion with the human race this conformist style of dress simply wouldn''t be a part of their reality. I''m sure I''m not the only one who has compared their pioneer outfits with the burqas Muslim women have been taught/forced to wear for centuries in countries where men and women fear sexually arousing the men (Read "Infidel" by Ayaan Hirsi Ali) And men are controlling what these polygamist women wear, how they "style" their hair, what they''re allowed to say and think, and when they will get married (even if it violates common rules of human decency). But what a RUSH for these polygamist men to have so much control over their women! Nevertheless, these women are undoubtedly taught to "submit" to their husbands-by their husbands(Period. End of story.)no matter WHAT they are being told to do.(Bible concepts are easy to twist if you''re twisted.)





Reply to this comment
by heewah2000 April 18, 2008 11:39 AM PDT
Part 2

As a free-thinking, free-choosing member of the LDS church, I have access to every idea, philosophy and belief I can get my hungry hands on. I passionately love the library and book stores where I can study the ideas/beliefs of others, and incorporate into my life those concepts I deem will make me a better, healthier, more loving/contributing person. And THAT''S what should be motivating the human race--and the men and women tragically trapped in any twisted polygamist sect-LOVE-not FEAR-LOVE and SERVICE to their fellowman. If these women truly loved the people with whom they come in contact, they wouldn''t fear someone who dresses less modestly than they do-they would LOVE them-no matter what!

Anyway, that''s my take on things. Happy to hear yours!
Reply to this comment
by perm3800 April 18, 2008 11:56 AM PDT
The Amish have similar restrictions on clothing, both for men and women and children, because they are trying to reduce the opportunity for vanity and for one person feeling ''superior'' to another. In effect, by reducing certain opportunities for self-expression, they are ''helping'' you to avoid the near ocassion of sin. Should we collect up all the Amish children because their parents won''t let them dress like Brittany Spears?
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 18, 2008 12:01 PM PDT
That line of dress code fits the mormons as well. What wearing the hair down is sexxual...never heard of shch a thing..My mormon foster mother forced mormonism on me against my will..I told her to shove the dress up her asre. Their dress code sucked..I cover my person as I sunburn..I horrifed at the skin the ladies show in public...the naked belly..I Can''t find clothes to fit me right..I will say this they are out of place in their granny dress. They can becoming by wearing a pretty blouse and skirt..I am small breasted and there are garments I can''t wear . I believe covering the body. the byu dress code in mormon so that will give ye the idea of what is/not worn..I am ex lds..
Reply to this comment
by pleiku1 April 18, 2008 12:34 PM PDT
Conservative Muslims have similar dress code. It suppresses individuality and free thinking. If taken one step further, lock up a person in a cage and control his every action and that person will go to heaven for sure. Guaranteed.
Reply to this comment
by misssuzq April 18, 2008 1:13 PM PDT

Dressing this way sure makes the little girls more appealing to the scumbag rapists.
Reply to this comment
by mellen64 April 18, 2008 1:19 PM PDT
I was raised a strict Catholic & was educated in Catholic schools where the nuns/sisters taught some of the same "modesty" rules pertaining to dress & behaviors. It took me years as an adult to get comfortable wearing sleeveless blouses/dresses in the heat of summer because of the thorough indoctrination I received throughout my childhood & adolescents.I still remember wearing those hot uniforms (blazers & all)in the humid 90 degree heat of New England weather, also designed to wipe out any individual identity. I''ll never forget the leg inspections & scoldings if, God forbid, we ever dared to go bare legged (sans nylons). Fanatical, unhealthy-minded religious control freaks have been around for centuries folks.
Reply to this comment
by godofredo29 April 18, 2008 1:20 PM PDT
And, guys in business suits? What does that say?
Reply to this comment
by chriss696 April 18, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
they make them dress like that because they''re sick perverts!
Reply to this comment
by valentin73 April 18, 2008 1:33 PM PDT
OK, LET ME SEE IF I HAVE IT RIGHT, A WOMAN IS NOT SUPPOSED TO "ENTICE" THE MEN, YET THEY (MEN) CAN BE ALLOWED TO HAVE FOUR OR FIVE WIVES..............DRESSES AND ALL........AND HAVE CHILDREN FROM EACH THE WIVES (SEXUAL PROCREATION).....BUT IT IS SEXUAL TO HAVE HAIR DANGLING. HHHHMMMMMMM, DO I HAVE IT RIGHT??????
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 18, 2008 3:07 PM PDT
I am from Maine. I was in high school newport,,the teacher felt my skirt that were below the knee out of place..I went to class in pants..I was not allowed to wear anything that went against the mormon drees code..I was not a mormon but had to atted their meetings..I asked what is their dress code and I was handed a byu flyer on it..it is on the net now..did look it up..It has not changed much..I can understand the reason why..alot of it makes sense..I am old..I can see the reason why..As a ex mormon I really had no problem with the knee cut off limit..The covering of the under wear..the baggy /skin showing ones could not abide by it..I have shorts that go to my knee..thanks to the male baggy cut..they fit my female body..to the knee.
Reply to this comment
by eggy1620 April 18, 2008 3:37 PM PDT
Sounds like the Borg. We are the FLDS. Resistance is futile.
Reply to this comment
by eggy1620 April 18, 2008 3:42 PM PDT
Carol Jessop does not look half bad a gal who has an uncle/dad.
Reply to this comment
by mjvw2 April 18, 2008 4:00 PM PDT
Why Do They Dress That Way?


They grew up in California?
Reply to this comment
by wakeup60 April 18, 2008 5:39 PM PDT
What a Mess!!!! How in the Hell is anyone going to be able to fix any of this??? I don''t get any of it! A never ending circle of wrong!!! Where do these people get all their money to first of all build all those huge buildings and how do they support themselves? In the name of RELIGION???? These children/how are they going to fix this?
Reply to this comment
by bb19631 April 18, 2008 6:02 PM PDT
The Amish and Dutch wear the same type of clothes for religious reasons, they don''t practice this sick polyigamy ***. It seems to me these women have no self esteem. If they would be allowed to have an education these men would not get away with this *****. Baby making factories, at the tax payers expense. Horse ***.
Reply to this comment
by highthis April 18, 2008 7:04 PM PDT
These people don''t understand that when the first man and woman were naked. Then I would question about them, becasue what is the deal about skin. We as people in this country seen porn or people we went out with naked. There no point why we need to worry about showing skin. If god made us different and had Adam and Eve naked when they saw each other than why we can''t see everyone that we should that god see''s as us. There rules about having kids and age. It sounds like you have a no choice for what kind of women you can marry, or have ***. We as people need to understand that we have a choice to dress and look. People look different or same, but people have the choice to pick what kind of shirt they want to wear. Does it matter a girl wearing a tan top and showing. No it is not, because our country said to the people that you have the choice to wear anything you want on private or pulbic. But a church ruling a life, I think that you can''t think for yourself, because I can make my own choice who can go out with, get married and have ***, wearing clothing, eat, work, think, and choose to have my own house. That what the country we have and we love our country for freedom. I don''t like limits on my personal things or my personal life. I beleive in god and what he does, but control people, then join the nazis or the Russains. They may want you for there church and rape there women. Even join Hitler''s group and him in hell for gay time.
Reply to this comment
by jfbyc3 April 18, 2008 10:26 PM PDT
There is probaly some guy out cheating on his wife right now almost everywhere. (not polygamy though)
I don''t agree with any of this but its none of my business. I think the modest dress is far superior to the *** style we have adopted for most modern U.S. culture. There was a time when all women and men were dressed in less revealing ways. I don''t think anyone forced them into doing it. We have been brain washed into thinking *** more revealing is better. Is it?
Let''s get the Muslims next, just to make it fair.
Reply to this comment
by emygrl April 19, 2008 1:21 AM PDT
If God intended man to have multiple wives why didn''t He make more than 1 woman in the beginning? The Bible clearly commands us against having more than one spouse. Don''t ask me how these people can believe in the same God I believe in and so totally miss this command. My heart goes out to these people. It makes me sick to see anyone so confident that they are right when really they are being so deceived.

And by the way I happen to know that Amish and Mennonites dress the way they do because they believe the Bible commands us to dress modestly and this is the way they have decided to do it. This is a Mennonite speaking, by the way. To tell you the truth I am very thankful I have been raised the way I have been. I feel I have been protected from a lot of harmful things. Now I don''t believe that everyone has to be Mennonite to get to heaven. I believe there are other ways to dress modestly...anyway enough for the sermon. Gotta run...
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 April 19, 2008 3:19 AM PDT
The irony and hypocrisy of forcing them to cover up, only to force them into sexxx as soon as puberty hits--so why exactly do the men enforce a modesty they have no intention of respecting?

This cult was/is a pedophile''s or sexual abuser or physical abuser/control freaks--dream.
Reply to this comment
by citizenjane April 19, 2008 8:02 AM PDT
If this media and court frenzy helps one girl or woman break free from these damaging beliefs, I am all for it.
Reply to this comment
by honestabe8 April 19, 2008 9:28 AM PDT
The hottest look around...in 1871.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 April 19, 2008 9:36 AM PDT
The Bible clearly commands us against having more than one spouse. Don''''t ask me how these people can believe in the same God I believe in and so totally miss this command.
Posted by emygrl at 01:21 AM : Apr 19, 2008
Cite your sources. I remember NOTHING in the Bible about only one spouse. I remember Thou shalt not commit adultery. I can recall no passage commanding men to take only one wife.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 April 19, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
"You can''t go shopping without everybody staring at you"

Happens to lots of people.

I''m sorry people look. We like to pride ourselves as saying we like diversity and individuality. In reality, we do not.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 April 19, 2008 11:25 AM PDT
As for the context, it may not be what you''re thinking... depends on what you''re thinking, but it''s not going to be as simplistic reasoning as you might otherwise think...
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales April 19, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
Did you hear about the girls who all dressed like the designers in New York recommended...in Cosmo and all the teenage wet crotch magazines? Most of them got STRs, married and divorced several times and raised up generations of ''cool kids'' who know all about Britainy Spears and ''whatever''...''whatever''...the kid is in the dumpster...have you seen my crack pipe?

The pictures of these women jolt the eye...they are packaged differently....is there, perhaps, more to them than meets the eye?

The Amish dress differently and live differently as well...Autism is unknown...they work hard and have lots to show for it...I don''t think you will find many Cosmo subscribers among them...
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 April 19, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
You can dress modestly. Who cares. Knock youself out. Just don''t fornicate with 13-year-old girls.
Reply to this comment
by cpaide April 19, 2008 1:28 PM PDT
why you not arrest this filthy pope and put him in the rodeo arena in texas with the lustful old mormans men, and free this poor humble clean mormans womens and children?
Reply to this comment
by quetzal0666 April 19, 2008 1:59 PM PDT
Thanks God for Separation of Church and State,

this is a microcosm of Christianity gone haywire....
Reply to this comment
by cpaide April 19, 2008 3:30 PM PDT
i understand your ignorance and fear and bigotry, that is for certain. may you can go to my country where your high attitude is more suitable.

you love to talk of this tolerance but you have none for anyone who does not think as you. you love to talk of this freedoms but you have lost them because of your ignorance.

your are led around by the nose like animals by this filthy pope and filthy president bush and you will not admit it to yourself that you have no moral value or standards, so you are pointing at this nice clean mormans when you should be pointing at your own nasty little childrens who are having $ex and getting pregnant, taking this drugs, laughing at your face and you can do nothing for fear of this social workers charging you with "abuse."

and so you are jealous of this mormans and want them to be miserable as you are.

i pity you.
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe April 19, 2008 5:04 PM PDT
I would hardly call those dresses drab! Who wrote this stupid junk. Bright pastel colors and flowing dresses are hardly drab. They may be a bit dowdy but honestly cut these gals a break!
Reply to this comment
by michellem99-2009 April 19, 2008 5:28 PM PDT
This issue has made me think..I was sheltered from the bad of this world..I am aware there are persons who cove the body as to not draw unwant attn from men..I think there are becoming outfits of today that do just that..hard to find..the main reason to cover the body is it is right..a person came to visit and it was hot out and the first thing he tried to do is remove his shirt..not here I said..I told him yer brother always wear a shirt/t shirt..
MissSuZQ the men want to see skin not a fully clothed woman.It is the rapists that will abuse ladies and their control they exersise over the female/s. Men think of one thing their pen*is.
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe April 19, 2008 6:24 PM PDT
Are we now to attack Amish for their dress and Indian women in Sarees? Cut these women a break! Its better than the ******** todays teens wear!
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe April 19, 2008 11:16 PM PDT
According to the AP, a CDC study found that 1 in 4 teen girls, aged 14 to 19, has a sexually transmitted disease in the USA. The infection rate among those who have ever had *** was 40%. Hmmmmm maybe all girls should cover up and wear long dresses I am thinking!
Reply to this comment
by rwm2_2000 April 20, 2008 11:32 AM PDT
The gov''t is using the tv to brainwash us into thinking however they think we should think. These folks are truly religious IMO and deserve to be left alone. Our gov''t has killed enough of these religious folks. Every few years they are trying to cause harm to them. Call or Email UR CONGRESSMEN NOW! Tell Them U want them to protect our Constitutional rights. That request may seem strange to folks but our Gov''t is imfringeing on our Constitutional Rights by taking our DNA as well as trying to shoot down innocent folks trying to believe as they wish to believe. The gov''t is collecting DNA from prisoners right now as well as from these kids. When they are done with these they will find someway to get our DNA collected. And if folks let the prisoners lose their Constitutional rights we''ll all eventually lose ours. Once our rights are lost there is NOTHING to stop the gov''t from selling our body parts. WE MUST PROTECT OURS AND OTHERS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OR LOSE THEM. Our President has already declared the constitution as just another &&&& sheet of paper. CALL OR EMAIL UR CONGRESSMEN TODAY AND LET HIM KNOW U WANT HIM TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION NOW...I HAVE!
Reply to this comment
by cpaide April 21, 2008 12:01 AM PDT
ha, and there is still NOTHING good proof and evidence of ANYTHING of this allegations made by the KLK (krazy lesbians kult) social workers, but clean good proof of this false police reports by that 30-year-old woman who is saying she is 16-year-old girl who is raped by nasty old mormans, but this 50-year-old man is living in arizona--not in texas! do not believe what this KLK is telling you!
Reply to this comment
by mjvw2 April 21, 2008 2:29 PM PDT
Why Do They Dress That Way?

They''re from California? Don''t know; just a guess
Reply to this comment
See all 40 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs