April 17, 2008
Democratic Debate's Winner: McCain?
The Nation: Obama, Clinton Event Offered No Clear Victor, Except For Right-Wing Talking Points
-
Play CBS Video Video Democrats Grilled In Philly The atmosphere was tense in the last debate between Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as each candidate was pressed to explain recent controversies. Dean Reynolds reports.
-
Video Obama Grilled At Debate Barack Obama was in the hot seat, grilled over his preacher and patriotism at a televised debate that drew criticism for dividing an already fragmented Democratic party. Dean Reynolds reports.
-
Photo Essay John McCain Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?
-
Timeline Democratic Campaign Trail Notable events in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.
And the winner of the 21st debate of the Democratic presidential race is...
Right-Wing Talking Points.
At a moment when even John McCain agrees that the American economy is in a recession, when the U.S. trade deficit is breaking records, when the vice president and the secretary of state stand accused of organizing torture parties in Washington, when the president has gotten us bogged down in two foreign quagmires, and when official gaming of globalization has stirred up food riots around the world, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton spent most of the last debate before the critical Pennsylvania primary trying to out-FOX one another.
Instead of engaging in a needed discussion about economic issues - especially the trade policies that are devastating the Keystone State and so much of the rest of the country - the Democratic contenders sounded as if they were reading outtakes from a particularly lame Bill O'Reilly program.
To be fair, this was not entirely the fault of the candidates. The line of questioning from ABC "News" personalities Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos - Wednesday night's moderators, who pummeled Obama for most of the night - almost made a viewer long for a long-winded intervention by the CNN's self-absorbed but reasonably serious Wolf Blitzer. And the questions from viewers appeared to have been selected with the purpose of raising doubts about whether these people may be spending just a little too much time listening to Rush Limbaugh.
There were, of course, inquiries about the Rev, Jeremiah Wright Jr., including a demand that Obama explain whether he thinks an ex-Marine who raised legitimate questions about U.S. foreign policy should be considered "patriotic." Clinton made a bad moment worse by bringing up Hamas and Minister Louis Farrakhan in an obvious attempt to link Wright - and by extension Obama - to groups and individuals who do not get an especially free ride in U.S. media.
Clinton's trip to Bosnia was revisited, as was a comment she made 16 years ago about baking cookies.
Obama got asked why he does not wear a flag pin.
And both candidates were prodded by millionaire media personalities to talk about "elitism."
But the absolute low point of a debate that rarely left the low road came when former Clinton aide Stephanopoulos asked Obama about his meetings with Bill Ayers, a 1960s Weather Underground radical who went on to become a college professor.
Obama said he did not think he should be held to account for something someone he knows did "40 years ago when I was 8 years old."
Then, sounding more like Sean Hannity than a former anti-war activist from the '60s, Clinton said, "I also believe that Senator Obama served on a board with Mr. Ayers for a period of time, the Woods Foundation, which was a paid directorship position. And if I'm not mistaken, that relationship with Mr. Ayers on this board continued after 9/11 and after (Ayers') reported comments, which were deeply hurtful to people in New York, and I would hope to every American, because they were published on 9/11, and he said that he was just sorry they hadn't done more... I know Senator Obama is a good man, and I respect him greatly. But I think this is an issue that certainly the Republicans will be raising."
Remarkably, Obama went down the Hannity hole with Clinton, complaining that Clinton's husband, when he served as president, "pardoned or commuted the sentences of two members of the Weather Underground, which I think is a slightly more significant act than me serving on a board with somebody for actions that he did 40 years ago."
This was an ugly, unilluminating debate that neglected meaningful concerns because so much time was spent introducing what had been the silly side issues of the far right to the mainstream discourse. It was especially rough on Obama. But there was no winner, expect, perhaps, John McCain.
By John Nichols
Reprinted with permission from The Nation.
| If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns |

The secrets of tennis legend 




- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 48 CommentsA special woman?
There''s the women I''d have s*x with,
and there''s the women I''d wanna have s*x with,
and there''s the women I have s*x with.
And then there''s you.
Tim McLaughlin
Until 1:00 AM.
Did anyone wake up Mclame to tell him he won the debate?
If/when they wake him up straighten him out about the sunni/shiite guys.
He may have forgotten.
Just like Hilter was promoted by Joseph Gobbels, this Obama guy is being promoted in much the same manner, mass propaganda campaigns by his fellow admirers in our elite liberal press.
This isn''''t exactly the "separation" that our Founding Fathers wanted between our "press and state".
We need major reforms within our "free left-wing press".
No question about it........ask Saturday Night Live
ps. The Nation is a member of the Pro-Obama movement too...........like I had to tell everyone that.
Really sad indeed.........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 04:57 PM : Apr 18, 2008
John McSame should take care of his wifes drug problem before he goes after the bad guys.
You are obviously a true wacko. The institution you must be posting from should unplug your internet cable.
You''re redeemed. No wild-eyed liberal. Just left of center politically. You were in the service. We share that in common. Look, the point is that McCain is NOT Bush, and is NOT guilty by association. Joining him at the hip with failed Bush policies is liberal crazy-talking points. Republicans view him as a maverick, and aren''t sure what to make of him. But like us, he is a true patriot. His service to our country has gone far beyond what you and I could possibly imagine. His character and strength have been tested to the limit. Politically, he is moderate. If joined to the hip with anyone, it''s Joe Lieberman! McCain''s policies will be much different from Bush''s. Regarding Bush, we''re tired of mindless liberal Bush-bashing mantras. On terrorism, remember he''s kept us safe every day since 9/11. It''s no accident. If there is blame for 9/11, look at what Hillary and Bill didn''t do during their co-presidency to prevent 9/11 and get Osama off the streets when it was easy. On Iraq, re-read the news stories leading up to the invasion. There was strong bi-partisan support, including Hillary%u2019s. Hussein snookered the world into thinking he had bad things hidden. Bush%u2019s post-invasion tactics were opposed by McCain. We''d already be out if McCain had had his way. Whether or not we should have gone into Iraq, we DO owe it to the good Iraqi people to stay and help them recover. Cut and run is irresponsible retreat from our moral obligation to them.
IF BEING TRIFFLIN IS A WINNER - THEN HILL-DA-BEAST WON
IF BEING A LIER IS A WINNER - THEN HILL-DA-BEAST WON
IF BEING A SCAPEGOAT FOR A LIER IS A WINNER - THEN ABC WON
I am very assured Mrs.Obama loves her country very much,as her husband does/she will make a Fine First Lady...a refreshing new face that will accomplish alot...for many.
McCain 2008!!!
McCain 2008!!!
McCain 2008!!!
;)
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 48 Comments