Aug. 17, 2008

The Lost Leonardo Da Vinci

An Art Detective's Quest To Find A Lost Leonardo Da Vinci Masterpiece

  • Play CBS Video Video The Lost Leonardo

    The Leonardo DaVinci masterpiece, The Battle of Anghiari, is thought to be lost forever, but an art detective thinks he has solved the mystery of the missing mural. Morley Safer reports.

    • This is what

      This is what "The Battle of Anghiari" by Leonardo da Vinci is believed to look like.  (CBS)

    • Maurizio Seracini

      Maurizio Seracini  (CBS)

    Previous slide Next slide
(CBS)  This segment was originally broadcast on Apr. 20, 2008. It was updated on Aug. 14, 2008.

In the art world, there is perhaps no mystery more enduring than the fate of a lost masterpiece by Leonardo da Vinci, the greatest mind of the Renaissance. It was an immense unfinished mural known as "The Battle of Anghiari." For centuries, it has been assumed the work was destroyed, painted over or simply faded away long ago.

Now, after three decades of battling skepticism and bureaucratic resistance, an art detective named Maurizio Seracini believes he's close to solving the Leonardo mystery. As correspondent Morley Safer reported in April, Seracini suspects the mural hasn't been lost at all, but is right where it’s always been - for 500 hundred years.



"We are searching for the number one work of art by Leonardo. It was considered the masterpiece of the Renaissance," Seracini tells Safer.

We know roughly what "The Battle of Anghiari" looked like from fragments of Leonardo's sketches and copies made by his admirers before the mural disappeared. It celebrated a victory by Florence over Milan - a furious tangle of men and horses frozen in the fever of war. The painting was in its time, at the beginning of the 16th century, something to behold.

"We have diaries, for example, of people seeing and being in admiration of the horses of Leonardo," Seracini says.

The people came to the Palazzo Vecchio, the town hall of Florence. The city is ground zero of the Italian Renaissance, the rebirth of ideas and the arts in the 15th and 16th centuries that brought Europe out of the Dark Ages. Here, in the shadow of Dante, Machiavelli, and of Leonardo himself, Seracini searches for the "The Battle of Anghiari" using 21st century technology that can peer through paint, through stone walls, even through history.

"You simply have to go beyond what your eyesight can do," Seracini explains.

He believes the mural is on the east wall of the palazzo in the "Hall of 500," which was the seat of government five centuries ago. There, Seracini works on an enormous scaffold. To drop anything could be disastrous: standing right below is a priceless statue by Michelangelo. He is convinced Leonardo's mural lies protected behind an immense painting, which was done by the artist and architect Giorgio Vasari when he remodeled the palazzo in the mid-16th century, 50 years after Leonardo.

Seracini believes the Leonardo mural is on a second wall behind Vasari’s painting, separated from it by a small air gap, which appeared on a radar scan. Of the six Vasari murals in the room, only the one has an air pocket behind it.

"Why would you have an air gap just there?" Seracini asks. "Other than you don't want to place a wall directly in contact with Leonardo's mural because you don't want to ruin it, you want to damage it. He left just that air gap enough so that today we can have this masterpiece."

Continued



Produced by David Browning
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by nothappyatall April 22, 2008 5:39 AM EDT
Why isn''''t there anyone as great as him today?

Posted by jh6379"

Different era, people today love cheap and trashey because in a couple of years they toss it and buy something else. You couldnt even find someone willing to spend 4 years painting a ceiling laying on their back on a scaffold for the equiv of maybe $1 an hour today!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sistine_Chapel_ceiling

Reply to this comment
by calmmm April 21, 2008 11:21 PM EDT
Wow -- I just did some research about API -- Advanced Photonix. They''re THE world leader in terahertz research and have already sold scanners to NASA to non-destructively test the foam on the shuttle. They''re rumored to have test units with HUGE companies like Glaxo, and every day someone is coming up with a new application for non-ionizing T-Rays that can see through material like an XRAY yet cause no damage to the human cell.

This is an incredible find!!
Reply to this comment
by calmmm April 21, 2008 11:20 PM EDT
Wow -- I just did some research about API -- Advanced Photonix. They''re THE world leader in terahertz research and have already sold scanners to NASA to non-destructively test the foam on the shuttle. They''re rumored to have test units with HUGE companies like Glaxo, and every day someone is coming up with a new application for non-ionizing T-Rays that can see through material like an XRAY yet cause no damage to the human cell.

This is an incredible find!!
Reply to this comment
by randyjk-2009 April 21, 2008 10:53 PM EDT
I think that the poster bobincolor is / has developed a ahem, reputation in the message board world. Come clean Bob, come clean...
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver April 21, 2008 10:11 PM EDT
Maybe Nobama''s plan for change can finally be found back there. LOL.
Reply to this comment
by bobincolor April 21, 2008 9:11 PM EDT
Randy, you oh so right about the company with sticker "api". Their Thq machine would give results with vivid colors, maybe even find the grail back there.
Reply to this comment
by randyjk-2009 April 21, 2008 8:41 PM EDT
too bad the story didn''t mention the real cutting-edge technology in this arena which is terahertz. Picometrix a subsidiary of Advanced Photonix, (the company that sold a scanner to NASA to examine the foam on the space shuttle) is the world leader.
http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=6300
Reply to this comment
by ham9875 April 21, 2008 4:08 PM EDT
Amen. Hurry up with the surgical camera, remove a section from the exterior, etc. What is this Geraldo/Capone vault build-up?
Reply to this comment
by ham9875 April 21, 2008 4:03 PM EDT
Surgical camera? Why didn''t Morley Safer or anyone suggest just using a surgical camera to examine the old wall???
Reply to this comment
by cmp271 April 21, 2008 3:32 PM EDT
This will be a great find. Then how to uncover it. Michelangelo''s work is to be revered, he was a true artist. What we have today are just artists messing around as kindergartners.

One wonders who he was to be able to "see" the future. He lived in a time when it was not acceptable, yet as an artist he could draw these things. Makes one wonder!

Shame on the uneducated American''s who are boorish in their taste and do not have any type of class. go play with your playdoh and paint by number sets.
Reply to this comment
by usbrit-2009 April 21, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
Who cares! Anyone who would say this is worth money is an idiot. Art sucks, especially this *** these old painters did. What a waste of time and a guys whole life.

Posted by shafteriffic

Here''s a great example of why Europeans in general think Americans are rude, crude and clueless.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 April 21, 2008 2:24 PM EDT
Wait till ''Dan Brown'' gets hold of this one, The Da Vinci code will be reborn
Reply to this comment
by shafteriffic April 21, 2008 1:49 PM EDT
Who cares! Anyone who would say this is worth money is an idiot. Art sucks, especially this *** these old painters did. What a waste of time and a guys whole life.
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall April 21, 2008 12:10 PM EDT
I wonder ''''why'''' it was covered to begin with. It seems to run contrary to the Medici, to the age and the location to obscure even an unfinished piece.


Posted by sincityq

Assuming its there, any number of reasons, political, severe damage, was barely started and then stopped, or even to hide/protect it against damage during some conflict and then forgotten.
Reply to this comment
by newsterl April 21, 2008 5:04 AM EDT
Lastly, I might suggest this "scanning" and photographing can cause more damage than a 3mm hole in an obscure top corner if any LIGHT is used in the process- remember- light destroys pigments, paints, paper and a lot of stuff, last thing you want a painting, photo, prints etc exposed to is any kind of light, high intensity or otherwise.
Reply to this comment
by newsterl April 21, 2008 5:02 AM EDT
"A lot of these comments reflect the ignorance Americans have about the value of art and historical things in general. He cant drill a hole in a painting that is only 50 years newer than this Da Vinci, its just as valuable a painting as the one under it."

Im hardly ignorant of art, Im an artist and antique collector, no one was suggesting they drill a hole large enough through the center of it to drive a truck through! a 3 mm dia hole on a MURAL SIZED painting they need a scaffold to reach is hardly going to ruin the painting.

"As for the *** with the acrobat nets and moving the statue, I think the author of the story was merely giving you an idea as to how high the scaffolding was.
Posted by spadeisspade"

You insult the guy for his concern? easiest way to deal with this is don''t carry anything like hammers, crowbars or bricks up on the scaffold to begin with.

Reply to this comment
by spadeisspade April 21, 2008 4:06 AM EDT
A lot of these comments reflect the ignorance Americans have about the value of art and historical things in general. He can''t drill a hole in a painting that is only 50 years newer than this Da Vinci, it''s just as valuable a painting as the one under it.

As for the *** with the acrobat nets and moving the statue, I think the author of the story was merely giving you an idea as to how high the scaffolding was.
Reply to this comment
by ssaoutcast April 21, 2008 2:01 AM EDT
As I type this, I have just viewed your story on the lost da Vinci mural. I determined to post a comment on it as soon as I heard about the precarious nature of the work: if anything is dropped, it could destroy a priceless Michelangelo statue below.

Hello? Why not move the statue out of the way temporarily? If that''s not practical, perhaps they could put up a net under the worker like the ones used by circus acrobats, to catch anything that might fall and save the artwork below. If it is, why not do both?

I can''t believe I''m the only one on this planet (or at least in your audience) who thought of these things. Granted, I haven''t read every word of every post in this blog, if that''s what you call it. But I did glance at all the ones on this page, anyway. Mostly I saw suggestions about drilling small holes in the wall, although your story talked about x-ray and/or other devices that can see through paint, which would seem to make such holes unnecessary.
Reply to this comment
by newsterl April 21, 2008 12:16 AM EDT
DaVinci''s horses are just plain *** looking, all that muscle and power!
Reply to this comment
by newsterl April 21, 2008 12:14 AM EDT
A small hole in an inconspictuous location up high would work, 3 mm may be too small, 1/4" would work and they can insert a fiber optic bore-scope and look- no camera needed.
They worry about touching this or that or drilling a tiny hole when there''s far more things to worry about- like the next earthquake that could collapse that building. Nothing lasts forever unfortunately, and at some point a quake, fire, flood or war will almost certainly damage/destroy this building and many others.
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments
60 Minutes RSS Feed