High Court Weighs Death For Child Rapists
Case Could Determine Whether Death Penalty Extends To Crimes Beyond Murder
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Court Restores Death Penalty
The Supreme Court ruled that death by lethal injection does not qualify as torture, ending a seven-month moratorium on executions in 10 states. Wyatt Andrews reports.
-
Video
Court Upholds Lethal Injection
"Only On The Web": Reporting outside the Supreme Court, CBS News' Wyatt Andrews breaks down the justices' decision to uphold Kentucky's use of lethal injection executions.
-
Interactive
Capital Punishment
Learn about the death penalty in the United States. Check out statistics, history, famous trials and more.
-
Interactive
The Supreme Court
History, traditions and key cases, plus what it takes to get on the bench.
Arguments involving a Louisiana man's rape of his 8-year-old stepdaughter took place the same day the fractured court upheld lethal injection in the execution of condemned prisoners.
The case of Patrick Kennedy of Harvey, La., outside New Orleans represents a shift in the ongoing debate over the death penalty. In recent years, the Supreme Court has narrowed capital punishment, overturning it for murderers who are juveniles or are mentally retarded.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia made clear that it's time to consider that evolving standards appear to be heading in a new direction, at least on the subject of child rape.
Justice Stephen Breyer appeared cautious about a change.
"I'm not a moralist. I'm a judge," said Breyer. "As a judge, I look at the law. It seems for 43 years, no one has been executed but for murder."
Besides Louisiana, four other states allow executions of someone convicted of child rape. The other states - Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas - have not applied the death penalty to child rapists. Missouri, led by Gov. Matt Blunt, is considering a similar law.
Kennedy's lawyer, Jeffrey L. Fisher, told the court the death penalty for child rape under Louisiana law can be applied too easily and that not enough states have enacted the death penalty for child rape to justify the Supreme Court's support for it.
The court's past cases require the presence of aggravating facts that make a person committing a particularly heinous crime eligible for the death penalty, said Fisher.
"How would you describe a particularly heinous rape of a child under 12?" asked Scalia. "What would make it particularly heinous?"
When the defendant has engaged in previous criminal activity or when the rape took place while the defendant was committing other crimes, Fisher replied.
Fisher said that a long-standing national consensus exists against capital punishment for rape, prompting disagreement from Roberts.
The trend since 1995 has been that more and more states are passing laws imposing the death penalty, said the chief justice, pointing to the states that have followed Louisiana.
You have to ask yourself the question whether that is enough, Fisher replied.
Roberts questioned how a consensus can develop among the states if the court steps in at the outset and says a death penalty for child rape is unconstitutional.
"If you knock them down one by one, it is kind of hard to get a trend going," said Roberts.
Justice Samuel Alito asked whether the worst case of child rape that can be envisioned is still less heinous than any murder that qualified for the death penalty.
Fisher urged the justices not to take the step Louisiana is urging, saying that "once you roll the line back ... it becomes extraordinarily difficult" to figure out what crimes that do not involve the victim's death qualify for the death penalty.
Justice Anthony Kennedy pointed out that treason carries the death penalty.
On the other side of the argument from Fisher, Louisiana prosecutor Juliet Clark and Texas Solicitor General R. Ted Cruz focused on what Kennedy did.
The 43-year-old convict who raped his stepdaughter at their home in 1998 is "exquisitely culpable" and he has committed a crime that is "just unspeakable," Cruz told the court.
Clark detailed the injuries of Kennedy's stepdaughter, which required surgery, arguing that a crime of such savagery warrants Kennedy's execution.
Were those injuries permanent? asked Justice John Paul Stevens.
They were not, but such cases involve psychological injuries as well, Clark said.
In the lethal injection ruling the court issued just before the Louisiana case, Stevens said for the first time that he now believes the death penalty is unconstitutional.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Again, ranger, I must respectfully disagree, the constitution also has measures in it that were designed to prevent "the tyranny of the majority".
It is clear for example, that at least until relatively recently, the majority of Americans supported racial apartheid, but since the constitution allows for avenues of redress for the victims of apartheid, now American thought is slowly shifting to the view that apartheid is wrong, and the constitution does allow for that shift, but also protects America from a shift too far to the other pole, so the now "White" minority is protected from their own former transgressions.
I should have said "White" male minority. Excuse the typo.
There will always be cases where people who were actually innocent of the crimes charged against them were nonetheless convicted, the reasons this happens are for another topic thread, but as long as such a possibility exists, then the concept of capital punishment is unconstitutional, as it does violate human rights in an irrevocable manner.
Survivors of rape don''t need the added guilt of a death on their minds as they age - especially in the case of a relative. What they need is to know that they are suvivors and while their lives have been changed forever, they have not been ruined.
Is this guy f*cking serious? What part makes this heinous? The entire act does.
I again have to disagree with yiou. I think the white minority is now held accountabl more than ever.
I am for the death penalty for child molestors. However after reading your opinion i have to ask, how many victims agree with you ? I do respect your point of view and you sound like you are a survivor. I hope all has turned out well for you.
"Justice Samuel Alito asked whether the worst case of child rape that can be envisioned is still less heinous than any murder that qualified for the death penalty."
I never want to imagine that scenario in my my life, but I will tell you that I can definitely envision the death penalty for anyone who crosses that uncrossable line.
-
by britleah
April 18, 2008 4:23 PM PDT
- These sick people should definently get the death penalty!!! I read that he raped her in her bed and caused extensive internal injury. That is so disgusting!!!!!!! I also think that lethal injection is just way too nice for these monsters. Plus, a shotgun shell is a hell of a lot cheaper then what they are doing now. . .
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 14 Comments