BAGHDAD, April 16, 2008

Defeat Of Al Qaeda Close, Iraqi PM Says

Optimistic Comment Follows Day Of Bombings That Killed Nearly 60 People

    • Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki Photo

      Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki  (AP)

    • Residents look at Iraqi security forces inspecting area after a parked car bomb exploded in downtown Baghdad, Tuesday, April 15, 2008. Photo

      Residents look at Iraqi security forces inspecting area after a parked car bomb exploded in downtown Baghdad, Tuesday, April 15, 2008.  (AP Photo/Hadi Mizban)

    • Young Iraqi children look through a hole caused by an airstrike in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City in Baghdad, Tuesday, April 15, 2008. Photo

      Young Iraqi children look through a hole caused by an airstrike in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City in Baghdad, Tuesday, April 15, 2008.  (AP Photo/Karim Kadim)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Photo Essay Week In Iraq Photos

    A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.

  • Interactive Iraq: 5 Years At War

    Five years after the U.S.-led invasion, the war wears on.

(CBS/AP)  A day after nearly 60 people died in a series of bombings in four cities in northern and central Iraq that were blamed on al Qaeda, the country's prime minister claimed Iraq would soon defeat the terrorist group.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki voiced optimism Wednesday that his government would conquer al Qaeda in Iraq. "We are today more confident than any time before that we are close to the point where we can declare victory against al Qaeda ... and its allies," he said Wednesday in an address to the European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium.

The deadly bombings struck directly at U.S. claims that the Sunni insurgency is waning and being replaced by Shiite militia violence as a major threat.

Also Wednesday, an unmanned U.S. drone fired two Hellfire missiles at militants attacking Iraqi soldiers in a Shiite militia stronghold in the southern city of Basra, killing four of the gunmen, the military said.

In Baghdad, clashes between U.S.-backed Iraqi troops and Shiite militiamen in the Sadr City district killed two men and injured 18 other people, police said Wednesday.

The airstrike in Basra occurred about 1 a.m. after militiamen attacked an Iraqi army patrol with rocket-propelled grenades on the eastern side of the Hayaniyah district, the U.S. military said. A vehicle suspected of containing more weapons and ammunition also was destroyed.

The area has seen some of the fiercest fighting since a government offensive against the militias in Basra began March 25.

In Sadr City, a police officer said those injured in gunbattles Tuesday included three women and three children. Sadr City is a stronghold of the Mahdi Army militia of anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. It is also home to an estimated 2.5 million Shiites.

The officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said sporadic shooting was still going on and it was too dangerous to venture out on the streets.

The ferocity of the Shiite militia response to the government crackdown has surprised Iraqi security forces - which are dominated by Shiites - raising doubts about whether the Iraqis could handle an all-out war without U.S. help.

The New York Times reported that an 80-strong company of Iraqi soldiers abandoned their positions Tuesday night in Sadr City, leaving a crucial stretch of road undefended for hours despite pleas by American soldiers in the area for them to stay.

The Iraqi company leader, who was identified as Maj. Sattar, and his troops complained that they were short of ammunition and overall poorly equipped to battle the militias and had no means to communicate directly with the U.S. troops positioned behind them, according to the newspaper.

It added that an elite Iraqi unit was rushed in and began to fight its way north with the help of the Americans.

The report comes just days after the government fired most of the 1,300 soldiers and policemen who had deserted or refused to fight during its offensive against Shiite militants in Basra last month.

The U.S. military said the New York Times report was factual and the Baghdad command would address the issue.

Lt. Col. Steve Stover, a military spokesman in Baghdad, called it "a snapshot of one area where U.S. soldiers are in close support of their Iraqi counterparts" and stressed that it is a new army and Iraqi soldiers and national police are taking casualties daily in fighting in other areas.

"This is one company-sized unit, part of a recently formed Iraqi army battalion," Stover said, adding that 65 other Iraqi battalions were operating in Baghdad with "varying degrees of experience and capability."

"The older units are able to conduct independent counterinsurgency operations and others obviously need more work, better leadership and more experience," he said in an e-mailed statement.

In other developments:

  • The U.S. military has released Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein after holding him for more than two years. Hussein was handed over to AP colleagues on Wednesday in Baghdad. The U.S. military accused Hussein of links to insurgents. But an Iraqi judicial panel this month dismissed all allegations against Hussein and ordered his release. A U.S. military statement on Monday said Hussein is no longer considered a threat.

  • A mortar shell slammed into a house in eastern Baghdad, killing at least three civilians and wounding three others, police said.

  • Gunmen also opened fire on a minibus near Muqdadiyah, 60 miles north of Baghdad, killing 2 women and wounding 3 men, police said.

  • The U.S. military said two Marines were killed by a roadside bomb in western Anbar province. The statement said the blast occurred on Sunday while their vehicle was under attack by enemy fighters. The two deaths raise to at least 4,036 the number of U.S. military members who have died since the war started in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

  • The Iraqi government said 33,121 detainees have been released since a general amnesty went into effect in February. Spokesman Abdul-Sattar al-Berqdar said judicial reviews of thousands of other cases were continuing. He said that so far the reviews had identified 9,726 detainees who would not be released because they did not fall within the amnesty.

    © MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam

    Add a Comment See all 106 Comments
    by quetzal0666 April 16, 2008 9:27 AM PDT
    LOL.. who is he kidding,
    all the killings going on and he''s sitting in the Green zone claiming victory!
    Reply to this comment
    by pollroller1 April 16, 2008 9:34 AM PDT
    Al Qaeda will soon be defeated. And then Nouri al-Maliki woke up. What a wonderful dream he was having when that bomb blast woke him out of a sound sleep.
    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
    What? He can''t be serious.....the fight isn''t even with them.....the fight is a struggle for political power between Kurds, Sunnis, and Shias....He''s simply a pawn for the USA. Al-Sadr probably has more sway with more elements of current Iraqis.
    Reply to this comment
    by walt1944-2009 April 16, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
    It has been learned that the prime minister of Iraq claims that Al Qeada will be defeated BY IRAQ soon.

    This, while 60 Iraqis were killed in attacks in 4 seperate cities the day before.

    In making his statement, the Iraqi prime minister has demonstrated that he has been studying American politics and learned the same things that American politicians have, one of them being to deny reality and live in a dream world; something the Great Emperor Bush II and the neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans have been doing for the past 8 years!

    The Nazis in Nazi Germany did that too, and refused to accept reality, until it was too late!!!!

    SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
    sig heil. (more of the same) McCain!!!

    Reply to this comment
    by samthetvcat April 16, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
    "The ferocity of the Shiite militia response to the government crackdown has surprised Iraqi security forces - which are dominated by Shiites - raising doubts about whether the Iraqis could handle an all-out war without U.S. help."

    ''Could'' or ''WOULD'' . . . that NYT article said many of those Iraqi troops come from that neighborhood and talk to the ''militias'' by cell phone during the fighting.

    So basically, our military is asking people to shoot at their neighbors while they ''oversee'' the fight in the name of democracy? That''s the kind of catch-22 that''s going to make the history books as a prime cause for why this war was unwinnable . . .
    Reply to this comment
    by samthetvcat April 16, 2008 9:47 AM PDT
    PS Also, isn''t the reason they''re invading this neighborhood so they can keep the green zone safe? So what''s even worse is that our military is asking Iraqi solders to shoot at their own friends and family so that Americans can be safe . . .
    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 April 16, 2008 9:51 AM PDT
    Well, I like what Cheney said you can''t do anything about America as long as he is in charge.

    So America if you vote Republican next election DO NOT COMPLAIN.
    Reply to this comment
    by jetlizhan April 16, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
    this would be wonderful if it were true - sadly, i just don''t believe it.
    Reply to this comment
    by shawnp1968 April 16, 2008 9:59 AM PDT
    This ranks right up there with the "dodging sniper fire" comment as one of the most delusional statements EVER made by a polititian.

    Reply to this comment
    by bigot3 April 16, 2008 10:11 AM PDT
    Has anyone suggested organizaing a "Neighborhood Watch" in Baghdad? Hey, I bet it would work wonders and probablynot cost more than just a few million in well placed hands! Pure genius!
    Reply to this comment
    by colonieny April 16, 2008 10:18 AM PDT


    Obviously we are fighting the bad guys, and are winning.
    To leave would be a diastrous mistake. We have to kill those roaches anywhere we can.

    Islamic Fascists eat their young with bombs. Think what would like to do to ours.
    Reply to this comment
    by libsrweak April 16, 2008 10:19 AM PDT
    Defeat Of Al Qaeda Close, Iraqi PM Says...

    According to Bush, that happened last year sometime.

    Oh well.

    Posted by Nancy_Naive at 10:08 AM : Apr 16, 2008
    + report abuse

    ******

    well according to the DNC and the liberal masses, there is no winning against al queda so might as well surrender..
    Reply to this comment
    by ramos937 April 16, 2008 10:19 AM PDT
    The New York Times reported that an 80-strong company of Iraqi soldiers abandoned their positions Tuesday night in Sadr City, leaving a crucial stretch of road undefended for hours despite pleas by American soldiers in the area for them to stay.

    The Iraqi company leader, who was identified as Maj. Sattar, and his troops complained that they were short of ammunition and overall poorly equipped to battle the militias and had no means to communicate directly with the U.S. troops positioned behind them, according to the newspaper.
    _____________________________________

    Remember the IRAQ Inspector General report? It said that as a result of wide spread corruption, the above has always been a problem.

    If anybody believes this statement by Maliki, I have an ocean front bridge in AZ I want to sell them.
    Reply to this comment
    by hotpaulie April 16, 2008 10:22 AM PDT
    Thats great...Thats really great...the defeat of al qaeda is "close". What does he mean by "close"?
    Reply to this comment
    by clestes-2009 April 16, 2008 10:22 AM PDT
    Sounds a lot like the Cheney remark of "they are in their death throes".

    I wonder what Iraq al-Maliki is in?? al-queda is about as close to being finished as shrub''s president approval rating to reach over 50%!

    NONE-EXISTANT!
    Reply to this comment
    by libsrweak April 16, 2008 10:23 AM PDT
    So, are these TRIBAL level mean old Muslims gonna hop in their boats, invade America and make you grow a beard?

    They really frighten you simple folk don''''t they? HAHAHAHA!!!!

    Posted by FloydZepp at 10:19 AM : Apr 16, 2008
    + report abuse

    ***********

    and if it does..what are you going to do about it??
    Reply to this comment
    by libsrweak April 16, 2008 10:24 AM PDT
    Posted by FloydZepp at 10:20 AM : Apr 16, 2008
    + report abuse

    ******
    you DO NOT HAVE ANY CONCEPT of the type of warfare we are engaged in
    Reply to this comment
    by newsjunky5 April 16, 2008 10:25 AM PDT
    How do you say, "The insurgency is in its last throes"
    in Arabic?
    Reply to this comment
    by newsjunky5 April 16, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
    We''re going after the wrong people. Bush, who sides with big industry, and opposes pollution controls, declared a "War on Terra" not a "War on Terror" Listen closely next time.
    Reply to this comment
    by libsrweak April 16, 2008 10:33 AM PDT
    Posted by FloydZepp at 10:28 AM : Apr 16, 2008
    + report abuse

    ******

    then your dumb arse should know that there would be no grand INVASION...its gradual change in your lifestyle using terrorist threats to make it happen..

    the same way they are doing in europe..
    Reply to this comment
    by libsrweak April 16, 2008 10:35 AM PDT
    Posted by FloydZepp at 10:25 AM : Apr 16, 2008
    + report abuse

    **********

    you just got way too comfortable with your freedom..
    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
    Obviously we are fighting the bad guys, and are winning.
    To leave would be a diastrous mistake. We have to kill those roaches anywhere we can.

    Islamic Fascists eat their young with bombs. Think what would like to do to ours.

    Posted by ColonieNY at 10:18 AM : Apr 16, 2008


    Yeah!! Let''s get em all.....Saudis, Pakistanis, Afghanis, Kuwaitis, and the rest!!! LOL. What do you want to do?? How can you possibly do it? How can you possibly PAY for it!

    I''ll bet you''re one of those BORROW some more from China & Kuwait & Saudi Arabia and SPEND it but let''s cut taxes too??

    This policy is just fiscally and politically stupid.
    Reply to this comment
    by singingrick April 16, 2008 10:39 AM PDT


    *********. The fact of our occupation insures that Al Qaeda will have a foothold in the country as long as we do.


    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
    then your dumb arse should know that there would be no grand INVASION...its gradual change in your lifestyle using terrorist threats to make it happen.

    the same way they are doing in europe.

    Posted by libsrweak at 10:33 AM : Apr 16, 2008


    I didn''t realize that the EURO has fallen so low on the dollar....those terrorists are sure doing their work on them right now....give it up...this sounds like modern-day McCarthyism & Domino Theory....look how those turned out!
    Reply to this comment
    by samrensho April 16, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
    Sounds like Shooter and Betrayus have been talking to PM Malarkey - George''s puppet in chief. Stay the course!! Victory is in sight!! Mission (almost) Accomplished.
    Reply to this comment
    by newsjunky5 April 16, 2008 10:50 AM PDT
    "no grand INVASION...its gradual change in your lifestyle using terrorist threats to make it happen."

    "And how exactly will they do that?
    Explain their Master Plan to us. We''''re ready to hear this fascinating tale of intrigue."

    --------------------------
    First they''re going to need the cooperation of the White House.




    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 10:51 AM PDT
    Posted by jamesm12341 at 10:47 AM : Apr 16, 2008


    James, are you really 14? I saw that in a post yesterday?
    Reply to this comment
    by newsjunky5 April 16, 2008 11:10 AM PDT
    Bush et at. is the only force changing American''s lifestyle. Playing right into the terrorist''s hands. And by running a deficit to do this, we borrow money from the Saudis and other foreign banks. American taxpayers pay huge sums in interest to those foreign banks, Bush gets a favor in return for sending them the business. Only the favor in return isn''t enjoyed by the American public. The return benefit goes to private companies. Example: The Saudis want us in Iraq. They gave us a special deal on oil for that war, a better than usual price. Only the military no longer buys and delivers its own oil, Hallburton does. The price used to be below wholesale (the military uses a lot of oil) when they purchased it themselves. Now it''s above wholesale, and Halliburton has even been hauled before Congress (when it was Republican run, at that) for price gouging. Many of the Saudis fund terrorists. And Bush is holding hands with the Saudis, literally.
    But if you want to kill them (and get your own kids killed) because they "hate our freedom" or "they tried to kill my dad" -Bush than natural selection enters into it too. Kind of a dilemma for the Religious Right.
    Reply to this comment
    by jjp735i April 16, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
    Well you can tell he is a Bush puppet. al Qaeda?

    What about the other 90% of Iraqs own people who are running around killing everyone? al Qaeda is a small group in Iraq, the bigger problems are coming from Iraq''s own.
    Reply to this comment
    by bgwinnett April 16, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
    2004-5: Biggest problem in Iraq: Al-Qaeda and Insurgent bombings and kidnappings.
    2006-7: Replaced by horrible sectarian violence making the situation the worst yet.
    Summer 2007-2008: Surge and Sunni insurgents turning on Al-Qaeda quells violence, but in the respite created by this lull, the Iraqi Government has failed to stamp it''s authority on the country, achieve political consensus plus reconciliation between it''s different ethnic factions. As a result violence is on an upwards swing again irrespective of Al-Qaedas demise, this time between Shiite Militia and the Shiite led Government, the Sunnis are still biding their time.
    2009-Onwards: Failure to reach political solution despite initial success of the Surge, results in a struggle between all three main Iraqi ethnic sects for land, power and Oil fields, in anticipation of the Partitioning of Iraq into 3 states. This leads to full blown Civil War.The presence or no presence of US forces will be irrelevant, as at least 500,000 US troops would be needed to enforce order.
    Reply to this comment
    by notblue April 16, 2008 11:26 AM PDT
    The suicide bombings and militants that purposely target innocent civilians are a tiny minority of the Iraqi population. Less than 20 extremists wiped out over 3,000 innocent lives in the matter of an hour in New York city on 911. While these savages comprise a tiny percentage of the population, the unrest and carnage they produce are on large scales, this is the modern scourge facing all free nations, it''s called RADICAL ISLAMIC EXTREMISM! NO hope for peace as long as these savages need to continue their agenda of carnage to feel relevant. We need to fight this evil until it is irradicated, even in Iraq.
    Reply to this comment
    by jersupporter April 16, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
    Nice. Do you suck your father with that mouth? Posted by FloydZepp
    --------------------------------
    Another
    Great example of this imbeciles intelligence level.
    Reply to this comment
    by newsjunky5 April 16, 2008 11:30 AM PDT
    "the bigger problems are coming from Iraq''''s own."
    ------------------
    Yeah, I heard someone say, "Iraq would be a nice place, if it weren''t for the Iraqis"
    But if we were invaded, anyone who wouldn''t join a Mahdi Army-style resistance would be a traitor.

    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 11:33 AM PDT
    everyone think about the above post. another lame lib attempt at giving a worthless opinion. 90% of any countries people killing its own. would there be anyone left in the country? the above has to be the most idiotic post i have ever read on here....and there are alot of them.

    Posted by jamesm12341 at 11:27 AM : Apr 16, 2008

    Well james you also have plenty baseless ones of your own.....that''s too bad. the 14 reference before was to the illogical points that you often make on here...I thought maybe it was due to your age...apparently not.
    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
    oh my God!! you agree with the above post that 90% of iraqies are killing their own people...LOL....moron number 2 folks!!

    Posted by jamesm12341 at 11:38 AM : Apr 16, 2008


    James, you didn''t read my post very well. I don''t agree with the 90% fighting piece, just the illogical arguments that you make piece. I''d love to debate policy with you once again.....but that won''t go anywhere because you don''t actually have coherent thoughts on that one.
    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 11:50 AM PDT
    James,

    if you were 14, that was what explained your lack or actual arguments.

    What are we doing in Iraq? How about that policy question?
    Reply to this comment
    by prinzowhales April 16, 2008 12:05 PM PDT
    I wonder if the Regime will fly al Qaeda out of Iraq if they lose...the way they did in Afghanistan when the Talibani Regime fell....Would they then be known as ''Al Qaeda in Iraq out of Iraq''?
    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 12:14 PM PDT
    so idiotic it had to be posted twice

    we can''''t have al quaeda defeated now can we?

    I am convinced that libs are so depressed in their lives because they had same oppurtunities as everyone else in this country to succeed and didnt. That they have to put down anything or anyone successful. The surge is working in Iraq, they deny it. Defeat of Al Qaeda is close, they deny it. Bush was successful in life and became president, they put him down. NASCAR, whether you like it or not (i don''''t), it is successful so floydzepp puts it down. It must be a sad way to go thru life.

    everyone think about the above post. another lame lib attempt at giving a worthless opinion. 90% of any countries people killing its own. would there be anyone left in the country? the above has to be the most idiotic post i have ever read on here....and there are alot of them.

    oh my God!! moron number 2 folks!!

    I know, I know...typical response from a whiny lib in denial....hang in there

    14 illogical points i have made huh? what are they? wait..will make it simple for you...name just 3. bet you can''''t and if you can''''t i guess that makes you a bigger moron than you already been proven to be. go on ..name just 3 illogical points i have made

    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 12:14 PM PDT
    Well James, here%u2019s a collection of your posts today%u2026..lets see what we have here%u2026.started the day calling someone an idiotic (#1)%u2026..assault libs in the third post that talks about GW being successful when the story is about Al-Maliki (#2), and more name calling in all the rest (#3-continued).
    How about some policy discussion like what are we doing in Iraq?
    Reply to this comment
    by drummer94 April 16, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
    Right! Maliki knows EXACTLY what''s going on. Sheesh and....BOOM!
    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
    Thanks James! Another wonderful comment from the peanut gallery! lol

    What is your stance on the European Union? How about the role of NATO? Afghanistan policy? Military health plans & treatment? Al-Maliki''s leadership in Iraq? What is a Sunni & how are they different than Shias? Anything will suffice for conversation!! Can''t wait to hear from you...
    Reply to this comment
    by joyous88 April 16, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
    how many times do we have to hear this BS

    republiCON propaganda

    mission accomplished
    Reply to this comment
    by joyous88 April 16, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
    bush and his republicon monkeys are responsible for

    what has happened to our country

    Reagan started it and the bush crime family finished

    the ruination of america,

    we have become a third world country because of you

    mindless christian republiCONs

    want four more vote mcBushCain
    Reply to this comment
    by bgwinnett April 16, 2008 1:10 PM PDT
    Some people on this thread really need to be prepared to back their arguments up, if they are going to opine.
    Reply to this comment
    by arlt1627 April 16, 2008 1:18 PM PDT
    Some people on this thread really need to be prepared to back their arguments up, if they are going to opine.

    Posted by bgwinnett at 01:10 PM : Apr 16, 2008


    I''m ready for it!! Were you referring to anyone in particular?
    Reply to this comment
    by bgwinnett April 16, 2008 1:25 PM PDT

    I''''m ready for it!! Were you referring to anyone in particular?

    Posted by arlt1627 at 01:18 PM : Apr 16, 2008

    Not you dude floyd or joyus, the ultra right-wingers usually.Though it''s not always them.
    Reply to this comment
    by pvperson April 16, 2008 2:01 PM PDT
    You CONS slay me, over twelve years in control of the house and senate and over seven years in the white house and you all still refuse to accept blame for your actions. Everything is the fault of the liberals. Did they destroy the economy, NO. Did they invade a country on whim, NO. Did they demonstrate an almost complete incompetence and corruption of government agencies, NO. Did they usurp the constitution and bill of rights, NO. Etc, Etc, Etc. But it''s all their fault. I think you republicans should be frog marched into the street and a bullet placed in your collective brains, but we can''t do that because you don''t have any brains.
    Reply to this comment
    by joyous88 April 16, 2008 2:05 PM PDT
    when the democrats finally control the congress

    (with a veto proof majority and a democratic president)

    we will be out og Iraq, on a firm economic footing,

    and people around the world will stop calling americans

    dancing monkeys
    Reply to this comment
    by speakinup April 16, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
    "Some people on this thread really need to be prepared to back their arguments up, if they are going to opine."

    "Care to back that up? - Posted by Nancy_Naive

    bgwinnett, once you''ve been on this site a couple of times, you''ll realize the far-left has no intention of trying to validate their lies. BTW, N2, the proof is all over the CBS blog. Try using an open mind, and not your attitude of, "Don''t confuse me with the facts, I have already made up my mind."


    Let the whinning begin...
    Reply to this comment
    by speakinup April 16, 2008 2:52 PM PDT
    "Defeat Of Al Qaeda Close, Iraqi PM Says
    Optimistic Comment Follows Day Of Bombings That Killed Nearly 60 People"


    That''s nothing - we lose 40 a day to drunk drivers, and that''s in a peaceful environment.

    I wonder how many are murdered...

    So what is CBS'' point ?
    Reply to this comment
    See all 106 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs