China Demands Apology From CNN
Commentator Jack Cafferty Called Leaders "Goons And Thugs"
-
(CBS/AP/iStockPhoto)
-
Photo Essay Paris Protests Douse Torch Olympic torch extinguished at least three times amid Anti-China protests.
-
Fast Facts China Learn about the people, economy and history.
- Stories
- China Investment An Open Book?
It was the latest flare-up after Beijing accused Western media of bias in its reporting following violent protests in the Tibetan capital of Lhasa last month. U.S.-based CNN has been singled out by Chinese who say overseas news outlets are smearing China.
The comments reflect Cafferty's "ignorance and ... hostility" toward China, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said.
"We are shocked and strongly condemn the vicious remarks by Cafferty," ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said. "We solemnly request CNN and Cafferty himself take back the malicious remarks and apologize to the Chinese people."
The famously curmudgeonly Cafferty made the remarks during an appearance on "The Situation Room" that aired April 9, according to a transcript posted on the CNN Web site.
He was speaking about the U.S. trade deficit with China when he said, according to the transcript, "We continue to import their junk with the lead paint on them and the poisoned pet food and export, you know, jobs to places where you can pay workers a dollar a month to turn out the stuff that we're buying from Wal-Mart."
"So I think our relationship with China has certainly changed," he continued. "I think they're basically the same bunch of goons and thugs they've been for the last 50 years."
Network spokeswoman Edie Emery at CNN headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, responded to a request for comment by pointing out a clarification Cafferty made Monday on "The Situation Room."
On his comment about the goons and thugs, "I was referring to the Chinese government, and not to Chinese people or to Chinese-Americans," he said on the program.
A CNN spokesman in Hong Kong said in an e-mail he did not have immediate comment on the Foreign Ministry's demand for an apology.
Chinese at home and abroad have denounced Western media for what it said was slanted reports about the unrest in Tibet. They say the news outlets have unjustly criticized Beijing in its crackdown, ignoring the region's history of feudalism under the Dalai Lama and its economic development under communist rule.
Numerous Web postings, YouTube videos and Facebook groups have criticized the Tibet news coverage, including a Web site called anti-cnn.com, which was set up especially to point out alleged media bias.
©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 12
- next
See all 240 CommentsPosted by leftyintexas at 03:36 PM : Apr 17, 2008
Why everything you said are true, everything you disagreed are propaganda? You act liking a real communist.
Posted by Keithle1 at 04:45 AM : Ap
Communism has deaded. China is a capitalism, Even the the Communist Party Leaders do not talk about communism anymore. Everybody talks about money and the social welfare system is even worse than USA''s. The number of times I heard the name "Communism" one day in US media are more than one month in Chinese media.
Posted by MoonFace6 at 05:40 PM : Apr 16, 2008
Why don''t you just tell me what FACTS you have that the Dalai Lama has harmed anything? I''m not buying ANY PROPAGANDA you are selling. You TELL me, What has he done wrong? So far, nothing but Communist propaganda.
No one is moving to China to live. USA has to put up huge fences to stop people getting in. We must be doing something right.
Communism is dying. Its days are numbered. There is no future in Communism. No one with a brain takes it seriously.
"Don''''t give groundless ***. Give facts!!!"
-- Give up man. They do not need it at all.
-- Here is why (take it as a joke):
Human right fighters are just like some well designed but incomplete colons of other good human beings (droids). Their program is not complete (it never meant be) and they only react to the magic phrase, human rights. They are only programmed to one function, i.e., to hate "human right offenders" without the need to understand the complete meaning of "human rights". When their operator (the media specifically) tells them somebody is the worst human right offender (no solid prove needed), they react as what they are programmed for. The first step would be bashing and smearing. The second step, when their operator tells them it is time, would be really going in and help at all costs (at the others of course). The good example is Iraq where they helped 500,000 civilians (a lot of them children) to gain freedom by sending them to the heaven with bombs. Of course, they do not mind being rewarded modestly with the whole Iraqi oil reserve as a compansation to their heroic "sacrifices". As for Tibet, time is not now yet though the cost of 14 people''s lives is already spent.
No offence, Americans. If you are offended, it certainly was not my intention hurt you. By the way, I learnt this from CNN.
"Your government kills people who believe in something different than they do. And you and your government wonder why people around the world are upset and dislike you? Please, honestly is murdering people who think differently the best way to win friends?"
--- I was not preparing to post but I have to say I can not refrain myself from doing so after seeing your comments. I lived in China for the first 30 years and lived in Canada for 12 years. I did see the Chinese government opressing people (myself and my family a victim too). But I have yet to see a single instance when it committed the kind of killing you said, except when the 1950 violent uprising of course. I guess your exile Tibetan friends told you many cases. But I have yet to see a single picture or video compared to the 4 young girls who were burnt to death publicly. And I have yet to see you even show some sympathy to them. So this is a good way to make friends?
--- It might got you by surprise. We actually did thank the Americans for their support in WWII even though you are not the biggest supporter (I will give this to the Soviet Union). If you go to China and asking people like my age, 35+, almost everybody knows General "Chan Nade" (unfortunately, I do not know his Enlish name) of the US airforce and General Stevey. We are all actually gratefull for their help. As the part, there would be no China, I simply can not agree with you. I may say that without China holding off 1 million Janpanese Army, the outcome of the war might not be what it is today. I may also say that without the Soviet Union, there is probably no Europe and maybe not even a USA. The American''s problem is that they only remembers two things: 1. They did somebody a favor, they remember it all the time and they think they have the right to demand the helped be permanently gratfull to them no matter what the the USA do to them. 2. Somebody (like Al Quada) hurt them, they then play as the most innocent victims and demand the whole world to side with them. Anything they do to hurt others they just easily forget about it. Sadly.
chinologo,sorry I forgot the link.
Look at what those Chinese has done!!!
Otherwise why so many chinese guys are angry about this.
I guess US give them an offer they can''t refuse. I still haven''t looked up the other 47 states. But i am sure i will find something. To say United States start fighting the *** because it intended to help China is not completely ludicrous, but distorting the facts in the least. It is a known fact and taught in schools in US that America got into the World War II because Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese. It might have indirectly helped China. What you are saying is almost as if the wolf attacked the coyotes to protect the lamb. In addition, US lost all credits if any when they supported the Korean War where once again it has no business being there in the first place, just like Vietnam and Iraq. All the scenarios you mentioned that Chinese territory would have fallen to ***''s hand is hypothetical and there is no way for anyone to know. All i can say is that the Chinese civilization has been in existence for over 5000 years, and there is a reason for that. Unlike other Asian countries such as Japan and Korea where US still maintain military bases, China has always been able to fend off the invaders.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 12
- next
See all 240 Comments