April 14, 2008

Obama Shows Unexpected Pugnacity

Politico: Candidate Has Displayed Uncanny Ability To Fight Back When Attacked

  • Play CBS Video Video Obama Blasts Clinton's Actions

    "CBS News RAW": Sen. Barack Obama blasts rival Sen. Hillary Clinton for campaigning for free trade agreements and then calling him "out of touch" with American workers.

  • Video Obama's Foot Tastes Bitter

    Senators Hillary Clinton and John McCain force Sen. Barack Obama to defend his 'elitist' remarks, but their attacks receive mixed reactions. Dean Reynolds reports.

  • Video Clinton Ad Pounces On Obama

    Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign throws Obama's "bitter" comments back at him in a new ad, hoping it will help maintain her lead in Pennsylvania. Dean Reynolds reports.

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

  • Timeline Democratic Campaign Trail

    Notable events in the race for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

(The Politico)  This story was written by Avi Zenilman and Ben Smith.


Senator Barack Obama’s instantly infamous remarks on how small-town Americans “cling” to their faith, their guns, and their xenophobia began drawing attention around 3:30 p.m. Friday.

Obama’s aides went into radio silence, rebuffing requests to explain or respond while his rivals attacked him. At 6:30, his campaign put out a statement that, instead of explaining his words, threw the criticism back at his rivals. Then, just before 9:00 that evening, the candidate himself responded during a speech in Terre Haute, Indiana, with an attack of his own, expressing incredulity that his rivals had called him “out of touch.”

“Out of touch? Out of touch? I mean, John McCain - it took him three tries to finally figure out that the home foreclosure crisis was a problem,” he said, while also criticizing Hillary Clinton for her vote on to make declaring personal bankruptcy harder.

“She says I’m out of touch?”

The response was signature Obama: Attack first, sort out the details later, if at all. No apology, no immediate regret, just a sharp counterattack. For a candidate sometimes mocked for being too soft to win a political fistfight, he has shown an uncanny ability to take a punch, and then rear back and deliver one in return.

When Obama responds this way, it leaves him open to charges that he's undermining his so-called politics of hope. But, showing remarkable dexterity, he has a knack for using these flare-ups to pivot back to the central theme of his candidacy: that politics is broken, and he knows how to change it.

Obama, it turns out, has been a devout observer of a philosophy future President Bill Clinton laid out as far back as 1981.

"When someone is beating you over the head with a hammer, don't sit there and take it,” then-Governor Clinton told Time Magazine. “Take out a meat cleaver and cut off their hand.”

Many Democrats believe their two most recent nominees, Al Gore and John Kerry, ignored that rule, and they are loath to nominate another candidate susceptible to being portrayed as weak. So Obama and his inner political circle - strategist David Axelrod and campaign manager David Plouffe - have observed it religiously, dispelling an early perception that the candidate would wilt under fire from Clinton or Republicans.

Instead, when under attack, the candidate rarely acknowledges any fault - for such a move would offer critics an opening. In the case of his San Francisco remarks, perhaps the worst gaffe of his career, he conceded Saturday only that “if I worded things in a way that made people offended, I deeply regret that.”

Obama’s unexpected pugnacity also extends to include personal responses to tactical assaults, a level of sparring often left to spokespeople.

The examples are many, but the pattern first began to take shape last summer after a debate in South Carolina at which Obama said he would personally meet foreign dictators.

The remark appeared to be a slip, and in the spin room after the debate, Obama’s chief strategist, David Axelrod, tried to explain it away.

But the next day, Clinton told the Quad City Times, an Iowa daily, that Obama had been “naïve and irresponsible” to offer meetings, an attack reported on the paper’s website. That afternoon, Obama himself placed a call to the reporter who wrote the story.

It was Clinton, he said, who had been “irresponsible and naïve” to vote to authorize the war in Iraq. And he embraced his promise to meet the hostile leaders, casting Clinton’s reluctance - a line his campaign continued to amplify throughout the fall - as similar to the Bush administration’s stance.

Obama has eagerly pursued other attacks. He memorably mocked Clinton for finding evidence of untoward ambition in his elementary school writings. When Clinton called to “tur up the heat” on the Republicans, Obama suggested “more light” instead.

In late February, reporters traveling with Obama in Ohio learned - before the story hit the wires or the blogs - from Obama’s staff that McCain had accused the Illinois senator of ignorance of the presence of Al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq.

Obama, taking the stage at Ohio State University minutes later, responded with vigor.

"John McCain thought that he could make a clever point," said Obama. "I have some news for John McCain. And that is that there was no such thing as al-Qaida in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade Iraq.”

More recently, when faced with the incendiary video of his former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright attacking Clinton, followed by more video of the minister’s criticism of American, Obama eschewed the counterattacks. But nevertheless he hewed to a familiar course: no apology, no concession of wrongdoing. His position was that he hadn’t been in the pews for Wright’s reported controversial statements.

Obama’s immediate responses, the campaign quickly decided, were insufficient. And so just six days later Obama sought to cast the issue in his own terms with a major speech on the easier aspect of Wright’s words to address, race, while ignoring Wright’s anti-American comments.

But the most recent flap over his remarks about small-town Pennsylvanians represented a return to form as he moved first to attack Clinton and McCain.

Then came what seemed to a departure. In a slow-motion roll-out that may have slightly prolonged the story, Obama tiptoed up to an apology, before returning to his comfort zone. On Sunday evening, with particular glee, he turned to Clinton’s discussion of her childhood hunting.

"She's running around talking about how this is an insult to sportsmen, how she values the Second Amendment, she's talking like she's Annie Oakley!” he said at a stop in Pennsylvania. “Hillary Clinton's out there like she's on the duck blind every Sunday, she's packin' a six shooter! C'mon! She knows better. That's some politics being played by Hillary Clinton. I want to see that picture of her out there in the duck blinds.”

By Avi Zenilman and Ben Smith
Copyright 2008 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Add a Comment See all 967 Comments
by truth-hurts April 16, 2008 10:32 PM EDT
Barack Obama is a black racist MAXIST!!! Recruited by Tony Rezko before he even got out of College. Tony Rezko is now on trial for corruption.
Reply to this comment
by truth-hurts April 16, 2008 10:30 PM EDT
Obama is a BLACK RACIST!!!
Reply to this comment
by taddles-2009 April 16, 2008 6:52 PM EDT
"The Clinton''''s you would think would be a shoe in. They are responsible or at least presided over the best economy and peacetime in anyones life time including John McCain''''s.

Posted by Spinster2 at 12:06 PM : Apr 16, 2008"


The Clinton''s?!? First off we are looking at voting for Hillary Clinton not Bill. Second, the only thing Hillary did during the 8 years bill was President was chair the Clinton Health care reform which failed miserably.

The rest of her "job" as first lady included ZERO foreign policy experience, ZERO international defense experience and ZERO economic policy experience. For at least 6 of the 8 years she lived at the Whitehouse her duties consisted primarily of overseeing the Whitehouse laundry service.
Reply to this comment
by taddles-2009 April 16, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
" THE DEMOCRATS ARE TOO AFRAID TO GO TO WAR.
Posted by mahalapril at 11:34 AM : Apr 16, 2008"


You''re not from here are you.
Reply to this comment
by taddles-2009 April 16, 2008 6:45 PM EDT
"Just a few, but there so much, Unless you follow him most people do not catch it all.

Obama is not the one.

Posted by seah5 at 10:51 AM : Apr 16, 2008"


You don''t follow him, you make $iht up and post Republican talking points you heard on FOX. Your information is false and you have nothing original to say.
Reply to this comment
by taddles-2009 April 16, 2008 6:42 PM EDT
"And weres Halliburton''''s maine Office not hear in the
USA no they moved I wonder why

Posted by popstom1 at 01:41 PM : Apr 16, 2008"



Spell checker is your friend, not your enemy.
Reply to this comment
by popstom1 April 16, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
And weres Halliburton''s maine Office not hear in the
USA no they moved I wonder why
Reply to this comment
by popstom1 April 16, 2008 4:38 PM EDT
To the people of Pennsylania I know you won''t by
this guy this Obama who looks down his nose and
says look at all the suckers The guy is a slime
Reply to this comment
by xburks April 16, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
To the people of Pennsylvania:

Please do not be fooled by the Clinton%u2019s political tactics and lies. They ran with this "bitter issue" to take the spot light off Bill Clinton''s lies about Hillary%u2019s and Chelsea%u2019s lies, about Bosnia. All three lied for each other and all three were caught in their lies!

Once again, to the Clinton supporters, are you happy about gas prices, foreclosures, healthcare cost, unemployment, the war in Iraq and the list goes on and on, especially under the Bush Administration. . . .how can you not be bitter about American falling economy and the government hasn%u2019t done a thing to help you? Only the rich, like the Clintons, who made over a $100 million dollars in the last 8 years, are happy. Out-of-touch? Please, the Clintons are not and have not lived from pay check-to-pay check, like most Americans . . . so who''s really out-of-touch?
Reply to this comment
by spinster2 April 16, 2008 3:06 PM EDT
There is NOTHING that will change the Obama supporters minds. The blacks like him because he''s black and the kids like him because he''s new and hip while the sensative far left liberal elitiist have a strong sense of slavery guilt because they live in all white neighborhoods and their kids go to all white schools. Obama gives them a black canidate how sounds like he''s white and is sympathetic to their causes.

The Clinton''s you would think would be a shoe in. They are responsible or at least presided over the best economy and peacetime in anyones life time including John McCain''s. Bill had the usual affairs that all of our great presidents have had but job prefromance wise, they delivered.
Reply to this comment
by oneopinion April 16, 2008 2:55 PM EDT
... THE AMERICANS IN THE U.S. EMBASSY IN IRAN HOSTAGES.PRES. BUSH WILL ACTUALLY PRE-EMPTIVELY ATTACK THE ENEMIES AND BRING THE WAR TO THE TERRORISTS NATION OR BASES WHEREVER THEY ARE AND THUS PROTECT THE AMERICANS IN THE U.S. MAINLAND.

Posted by mahalapril at 11:34 AM : Apr 16, 2008

Wow, do you honestly think the United States can afford to preemptively strike every country that might pose a risk? We''re going broke now. Well, not all of us. It''s a been a financial boon to the VP''s former employer. This entire fiasco is about lining pockets not protecting one single American hair. Wake up, please. We''ll never elect smart politicians until we become an educated society.
Reply to this comment
by mahalapril April 16, 2008 2:34 PM EDT
THE DEMOCRATS ARE TOO AFRAID TO GO TO WAR.HOW ABOUT THE AL-QAEDA FROM AFGHANISTAN WHO MASSACRED THE CIVILIANS IN 9/11? WE DID NOT ATTACK THEM BUT THEY STILL ATTACKED US.THE DEMOCRATS WOULD NOT GO TO WAR EVEN IF WE HAVE CONSTANT ATTACKS ON THE U.S. MAINLAND. IF OBAMA WAS THE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT IN 9/11 HE WOULD JUST TALK TO TERRORISTS.LET HIM TALK TO AL-QAEDA AND HE WILL BE BEHEADED.ANY DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT WILL BE A THREAT TO OUR LIVES AND SECURITY.THE BEST DEFENSE IS OFFENSE. PRESIDENT BUSH ATTACKED PRE -EMPTIVELY THE TERRORISTS IN AFGHANISTAN.BLAME SADDAM HUSSIEN FOR THE IRAQ WAR.HE HAD NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AT THAT TIME BUT HE REFUSED TO LET THE WMD INSPECTORS SEARCH. SADDAM HAD TOO MANY WARNINGS ABOUT WMD.IRAN IS PLAYING THE SAME GAME BUT THESE UNCIVILIZED PEOPLE ARE MORE DANGEROUS BECAUSE THEY ARE ALREADY TESTING TO INCREASE THE RANGE OF THEIR MISSILES. I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THEY WILL DEVELOPE A NUCLEAR BOMB SECRETLY AND USE AGAINST US.TO HIGHLIGHT THEIR DISREGARD FOR INTERNATIONAL LAWS REMEMBER THAT THEY OCCUPIED AND MADE THE AMERICANS IN THE U.S. EMBASSY IN IRAN HOSTAGES.PRES. BUSH WILL ACTUALLY PRE-EMPTIVELY ATTACK THE ENEMIES AND BRING THE WAR TO THE TERRORISTS NATION OR BASES WHEREVER THEY ARE AND THUS PROTECT THE AMERICANS IN THE U.S. MAINLAND.
Reply to this comment
by seah5 April 16, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
cont.

he might of slipped up with the bitter comment,still it was an insult. but when he came back and Tried to convince everyone by saying "Yes You are Bitter'' Was elitist. and more Obama logic If he says your bitter you better be bitter.

He loves twisting facts, telling half truths and blaming everyone for everything.

McCain said we could be in iraq 100 years. Obama ran around telling everyone, McCain said we will be at war with iraq for 100 years. It is an Obama lie since he added to the statement.

he runs around telling everyone that everything wrong in their lives is the governments fault points fingers at bush, hillary and McCain, Wait......He is the government too. Obama is more at fault than most, his
voting record is mostly Present, which says, I am here and I do not care. He did not care to do anything for the people or fix any problems.

Just a few, but there so much, Unless you follow him most people do not catch it all.

Obama is not the one.
Reply to this comment
by seah5 April 16, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
Rezko - He has lied about him at least 7-8 times

First he said he did not know him, then that grew, and grew and grew until he was a friend for 18 years.

Rezko who was broke, helped Obama buy a house, he used money he borrowed from aucci a Muslim living in england at the moment.

Resko - Donate 20k, then it was 60k, then finally the grand totally after all the lies, was 250k More of Aucci''s money or money from the retirement board.

Ayers - He did not know him, they it was he knew him in college, Then he was a professor at the same college Obama lectured at. Then obama was to his house. (Bomber washington DC, says he would do it again)

Wright - He said, he was his mentor, confidant, best friend of 20 years, married him, spiritual guide, baptized his daughters. He bounce all his political decisions off of him.

Wright - first he never heard him say anything controversial in church, then he came back and said I did hear wright say controversial stuff in church.

Wright now - is like a old uncle, was his pastor use t be his spiritual guide.

The American People were upset hearing someone God *** America.... Obama Called Americans racist for that.

Here I thought Standing up for America against someone Damning it was Patriotic....

Not so in Obama logic.

Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 April 16, 2008 1:43 PM EDT
RowdyTexan2 gives Texans a bad name. I''''d like to let the readers out there know that we are not all hateful, uninformed bigots.

-Feminists for Obama ''''08!-



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by TXcourtney at 10:31 AM : Apr 16, 2008

All you people have is Obama''s racist shill game! Give me a break!
Reply to this comment
by txcourtney April 16, 2008 1:31 PM EDT
RowdyTexan2 gives Texans a bad name. I''d like to let the readers out there know that we are not all hateful, uninformed bigots.

-Feminists for Obama ''08!-
Reply to this comment
by ladyoamerica April 16, 2008 1:19 PM EDT
I think that if there is any doubt about your loyalties to America, any doubt about your love for America then you shouldn''t even be considered to be America''s president. Having seen Obamas preachers "sermon" it is completely unacceptable. I was supporting Obama but after having seen that and knowing that he was mentored by that same preacher, I am no longer comfortable with having him as President of The United States of America! You shouldn''t even be considered once such a public display of disdain for America is shown. Truly, think about it, if you were running for president of the USA, wouldn''t you deny believing what your pastor has said but not really since you had been mentoring under him for 20 years! I want John Kerry back in this race.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 April 16, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
So I am correct then. You don''''t know what an authoritative source is. Apparently you believe everything on the internet. I am no longer going to take anything you say seriously. A word to the wise: If you want people to take you seriously you should be able to support your statements with legitimate information and do so using proper grammar. You sound ignorant. Take an English class.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by mpgeglia2 at 10:09 AM : Apr 16, 2008

No, you are not correct. You have sat here all morning and spewed your krap without providing one source! Not one!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 April 16, 2008 1:16 PM EDT
$193 million %u2014 and counting

The episode underscores the pitfalls confronting a candidate who rails against special interests while raising $193 million and counting %u2014 the most of any presidential campaign. Obama''s fundraising tests the limits of his claim that he is independent of Washington''s influence industry because he doesn''t take money from federal lobbyists and PACs.

Other examples that strain against that claim:

%u2022Obama holds fundraisers at law firms that lobby in Washington. Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor confirmed the campaign held five fundraisers at New York and Boston offices of three firms that lobby, including Greenberg Traurig, whose lobbying clients include gambling and handgun interests.

lol, here''s one from USA Today...quit profoundly trouncing his lies about have no ties to special interest and lobbyists, go read it.
Reply to this comment
by mpgeglia2 April 16, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
So I am correct then. You don''t know what an authoritative source is. Apparently you believe everything on the internet. I am no longer going to take anything you say seriously. A word to the wise: If you want people to take you seriously you should be able to support your statements with legitimate information and do so using proper grammar. You sound ignorant. Take an English class.
Reply to this comment
See all 967 Comments

60 Minutes

The secrets of tennis legend Andre Agassi; the growing threat of cyber wars; and more.
Read More

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

    Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

  • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

    Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

    Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

  • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

    The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

  • Orlando Office Shooting Orlando Office Shooting

    A Gunman Opens Fire at the Offices of an Engineering Firm Where He Once Worked

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: