BAGHDAD, April 13, 2008

1,300 Iraqis Fired For Refusing To Fight

Iraqi Police, Army Members Dismissed After Deserting In Face Of Basra Militias Last Month

  • A Mahdi Army fighter controls a road in Basra, Iraq, March 29, 2008. Following last month's offensive, in which many Iraqi police and soldiers refused to fight against Shiite militia. Thirteen hundred Iraqi forces members have since been fired. Photo

    A Mahdi Army fighter controls a road in Basra, Iraq, March 29, 2008. Following last month's offensive, in which many Iraqi police and soldiers refused to fight against Shiite militia. Thirteen hundred Iraqi forces members have since been fired.  (AP Photo/Nabil al-Jurani)

  • Photo Essay Week In Iraq Photos

    A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.

  • Interactive Iraq: 5 Years At War

    Five years after the U.S.-led invasion, the war wears on.

(AP)  The Iraqi government has dismissed about 1,300 soldiers and policemen who deserted or refused to fight during last month's offensive against Shiite militias and criminal gangs in Basra, officials said Sunday.

Interior Ministry spokesman Maj. Gen. Abdul-Karim Khalaf said 921 police and soldiers were fired in Basra. They included 37 senior police officers ranging in rank from lieutenant colonel to brigadier general.

The others were dismissed in Kut, one of the Shiite cities where the fight had spread.

Last month, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki ordered the security forces to confront armed groups in Basra, Iraq's second largest city.

But they met fierce resistance and the attack quickly ground to a halt as fighting flared across the Shiite south and Baghdad.

Since then, government officials have revealed that about 1,000 members of the security forces - including an entire infantry battalion - had mutinied, on some cases handing over vehicles and weapons to the militias.

The majority of Iraqi soldiers and police are Shiites.

Speaking in Basra, Khalaf said those dismissed included 421 police officers and 500 soldiers who had not returned to duty in the southern port city and would be tried by military courts.

"Some of them were sympathetic with these lawbreakers, some refused to (go into) battle for political or national or sectarian or religious reasons," Khalaf said.

But he said that those who returned in coming days and could prove they had been prevented from doing so by the militias would be reinstated.

In Kut, a senior police officer said 400 local policemen have been sacked for refusing orders to combat the militias, including the Mahdi Army of anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

The officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said the Interior Ministry in Baghdad had ordered the policemen removed from duty on Saturday.

Although fighting in Basra eased in late March, security operations are continuing.

Fighting in Baghdad's Sadr City, a stronghold of al-Sadr's militia, has been ongoing for the past two weeks. Fresh clashes were reported Sunday and at least two rockets or mortar rounds were fired at the capital's Green Zone, which houses diplomatic missions and much of Iraq's government.

A senior military commander said Sunday that Iraqi forces in Basra were expanding their sweep of six neighborhoods, with army and police cordoning off the areas while searching for illegal weapons, ammunition and criminal elements.

Lt. Gen. Mohan al-Fireji said the operation, which started on Saturday, had netted significant amounts of weapons, roadside bombs and drugs. He said a large number of suspects had been detained, but he provided no figures.

Al-Sadr, who is believed to be in Iran, repeated on Saturday his demand for American soldiers to leave the country and urged his fighters not to target fellow Iraqis "unless they are helping the (U.S.) occupation."

Despite the strident rhetoric, however, there were signs that al-Sadr was trying to calm his militia to avoid all-out war with the Americans. Al-Sadr is also under pressure from al-Maliki, also a Shiite, to disband the Mahdi Army or face a ban from politics.

Meanwhile, an Apache helicopter accidentally destroyed a U.S. Humvee in eastern Baghdad when a Hellfire missile missed its target and struck the armored vehicle instead, the military said Sunday.

Two U.S. soldiers and three Iraqi civilians were injured in the incident on Saturday, the statement said.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam

Add a Comment See all 139 Comments
by inventagod April 13, 2008 11:39 AM PDT

Wow.
Maybe we should just leave.
Now.
Reply to this comment
by ponco seno April 13, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
They realized at the end of the day, they are all brothers, why kill each other.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 April 13, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
1,300 Iraqis Fired For Refusing To Fight
Iraqi Police, Army Members Dismissed After Deserting In Face Of Basra Militias Last Month




And we can''t leave until the Iraqi military stands up for itself?

I guess were mired there forever at this rate. Or if McSame gets elected.
Reply to this comment
by ioweign April 13, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
Didn''t then LT. GENERAL Petraeus have the assigment to train all these freedom loving people how to defend themselves ?

Didn''t Petraeus even write an OP-ED piece to the Washington Post on how well things were going training these freedom loving people?

From the looks of this recent development with the Iraqi army, we maybe lucky Petraeus wasn''t involved in training our soldiers and Marines...

Reply to this comment
by tbweb April 13, 2008 12:20 PM PDT
Its time for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to plot a solution against anti-American Shiite Cleric Muqtada al-Sadr who has vowed the U.S. is his permanent enemy! Muqtada al-Sadr is not political opposition in the traditional sense the West is accustomed to, Muqtada al-Sadr''s political opposition has an armed and active militant element to it designed to overthrow the government if he does not like whats going on! Iraq will never realize success as long as Muqtada al-Sadr aided by Irans Pres. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is allowed to be actively disruptive and anti-government is a context bordering on treason which is punishable by death!
Reply to this comment
by nodemotwit April 13, 2008 12:24 PM PDT
The firings are very justified, but they still need jobs, and w/o jobs they will likely become employed in the al-Sadr thug patrol.

However, what is really criminal is the fact that billions of Iraqi dollars currently sit in US banks, untouched, dollars which could be employing Iraqis in building their infrastructure (hospital, schools, power grids, water, sewage, etc). This would get the Iraqi people behind their government (assuming the latter is instrumental in allocating and spending those monies in a manner similar to that described above) and remove their support from the fanatical theocratic thugs vying for power. Then the US can exit with a reasonably good conscious, rather than dropping Iraq on a particular date (per the liberal platform, even if that data happens to fall in mid-stream of the required effort) regardless of the consequences.
Reply to this comment
by king77shaw April 13, 2008 12:28 PM PDT
how many billions of US taxpayer dollars did this desertion cost ?
Reply to this comment
by inventagod April 13, 2008 12:32 PM PDT

...and if our troops refused, the Pentagoons would throw them in prison, maybe torture them...

Hmmm, who are the real baddies?
Reply to this comment
by ioweign April 13, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
The Iraqi government has dismissed about 1,300 soldiers and policemen who deserted or refused to fight during last month''s offensive against Shiite militias and criminal gangs in Basra, officials said Sunday.

@@@@

soldiers and policemen who deserted or refused to fight


Do you think that they may have read about Bush and his Texas Air National guard days and Cheney and his 5 deferments and this is a case of monkey see, monkey do...


Reply to this comment
by cfin5 April 13, 2008 12:47 PM PDT
They got off easy here. They don''t need those kind around anyhow. All they wanted was a paycheck, not what they promised to do to earn it. That''s a really bad mark on your record in a time when public trust is of utmost importance......Since I''m on the subject, shouldn''t our Senators and House members be "dismissed" (FIRED) for not showing up to do something so easy to do as VOTING??? OBAMA and some others never seem to mind why they''re there in the first place and I''d say if you docked them for NO-SHOW, they''d throw a carpet ripping tantrum on the floor in broad daylight. And isn''t it these same people who say we need taxed more to help out the lazy leechin'' SOCIALISTS? About had enough of those sloths.
Reply to this comment
by grim56z April 13, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
Al Mazri plans a holocaust of American Soldiers at the hands of his Al Qada Fighters. It makes better sense to attack rather than suffer decimation. AQI should be hunted and killed. Showing them mercy is weak and addle.
Reply to this comment
by middleman8 April 13, 2008 12:56 PM PDT
Why should these people fight against their own fellow countrymen? In the states they would be labled "Benidict Arnolds " if they fought against the american people. Good for them they are not helping the invader.
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall April 13, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
The Iraqi government has dismissed about 1,300 soldiers and policemen who deserted or refused to fight "


LOL what an amazing coincidence JUST as bush'' regime plans to stop the troop drawdown!
Like I said before, time to DUMP these idiots and let em fall flat on their azzes and whatever happens there happens, time to cut the apron strings.


"Didn''''t then LT. GENERAL Petraeus have the assigment to train all these freedom loving people how to defend themselves ?

Didn''''t Petraeus even write an OP-ED piece to the Washington Post on how well things were going training these freedom loving people?"

He DID, things are going SO well over there as you know!!

Reply to this comment
by truth832-2009 April 13, 2008 1:17 PM PDT
Would the american soldier be allowed to be fired if he chose not to fight! The toll taken on the american soldier is inestimable; yet, the hate in the heart of those who continue to back this war blinds the people! It is time to accept the new consciousness for the salvation of the earth. Otherwise, it is too late!
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 1:57 PM PDT
dumbshun: mmmmm. It''s McCain by the way. ha
Reply to this comment
by popstom1 April 13, 2008 2:00 PM PDT
We don''t need too be here F- those people they stab
our guy in the back as soon they turn around there
NOT WORTH ONE AMERICAN
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim April 13, 2008 2:01 PM PDT
Since Sadr spends most of his time in Iran, he is an ''outsider''. The Iraqi army should be better since it was able to do a voluntary purge of the riffraff.
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim April 13, 2008 2:03 PM PDT
It could be a lot worse. We could be drilling in ANWAR and offshore, building nuclear power plants,etc. but no let us be dependent on Mideast oil.
Reply to this comment
by popstom1 April 13, 2008 2:06 PM PDT
Dumb F- Iraq We leave let them do what they have been
for over 2000 years killing each outher and come back
open a gas staion or would like The USA bankrupted
they would
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 2:11 PM PDT
I wonder why we had to start a civil war in Iraq in the first place. There were no connections between the 9/11 terrorists and Iraq. Not one hijacker was from Iraq, but several were from ally countries, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. We went after the wrong people now you have Shiites and Suni Muslims fighting each other in a Holy War. I admit I don''t understand the hatred between the two Muslim sects. It so much like the wars between the two Christian sects Protestant and Catholic. Unfortunately, bush/cheney have left our military to fight not a war against terrorism, but to fight in a religious civil war. I can''t see either side compromising, there is too much hatred and accusations of heresy on all sides. Now Iran is fueling the fight. Just the fallout bush/cheney and friends hoped for, now they feel they have cause to invade Iran. (OIL?) Terrorism is real, but we have stoked the anger beyond comprehension since 9/11. Why we didn''t use intelligence (sic) to prevent more attacks on the US, instead of sacrificing more than 4,000 in Iraq. Shiite will not attack Shiite, Suni will not attack Suni.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
1,300 Iraqis Fired For Refusing To Fight --- We should do the same for our own Young College Republicans & Bush Lovers
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 2:15 PM PDT
downstream: that is no answer. No more nuclear power plants with a ''shelf life'', and the hazardous nightmare a decommissioned plant leaves. No more drilling in areas that will negatively impact the environment we are leaving our children. We need to produce renewable resources, etc. Your answer is just another problem.
Reply to this comment
by tibu987 April 13, 2008 2:18 PM PDT
H_ll, if they don''t want to fight for their country why in the h-ll should we.

Enough, out now. Let them settle their own religious/cultural/ethnic/civil/oil "war".
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 2:18 PM PDT
j-whitman: the privileged will always find a way out of serving in the military if they want. Seems the only time they serve is if they plan on running for public office and want to use the veteran card. Now bush kind of blew it, considering his service was to to be flyboy and party right here at home.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 2:19 PM PDT
Israel refuses to fight in both Iraq & Afhaganistan -- Let''s fire them
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 2:21 PM PDT
pfd572,,,, Bushed, Bush the flyboy also refused to fight in Viet Nam
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 2:25 PM PDT
Muslims are most closely identified with their faith. If you ask someone from the US what they are and they will almost always answer ''American'', not their religion. Ask a Muslim what they are and they will answer ''Muslim'', not their country. It is so personal they will never fight against someone of their own sect. This religious civil war will never end, only possible solution is to have separate states, without the mistakes on the India/Pakistan division. Understanding that the division of India into Hindu and Islam countries hasn''t worked very well, hopefully people have learned something from their errors.
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 2:27 PM PDT
j-whitman: my point, exactly. But he can SAY he is a veteran. We just laugh at him when he does.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 2:30 PM PDT
dumbshun,,,, Just another major reason to support Obama
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 2:31 PM PDT
dumbshun: A lot of ifs in your statement. With the repeated refusal of other nations and the UN to take a position and help in stabilizing the region, how do you propose to make that happen?
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim April 13, 2008 2:34 PM PDT
To pfd572: I am glad to finally hear from someone who visits ANWAR to admire it. The hazardous nuclear waste could be stored except for politics. BY the way nuclear waste can be radioactive for hundreds or thousands of years, unlike the new energy saving light bulbs whose mercury will be toxic forever.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
dumbshun,,,,, Funny you commenting about Compounding a Mistake ----- McCain is another Bush on foreign policy, we don''t neeed "More of the Same" McCain

Now That Would Be "Compounding the Problem" -- With a 24 year part of the problem
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 2:42 PM PDT
No doubt about it, bush/cheney love the idea of one-party nation. Their contempt for the average American is palpable. They haven''t just rumpled the Constitution, they have butchered it. And until the Americans'' that understand this get angry enough, get really scared of them succeeding and DO something, they will continue for the next 280 plus days to get it closer to a fact. They already will leave office retaining more power and control then any other past administration. What they have done to the American people: The destruction of the Bill of Rights, lying and inciting a civil war in Iraq, the bankrupting of America, private military funded by the government, oil oil oil riches getting richer, using fear and distortion to control citizens, etc. etc. etc. etc., is all criminal. They must pay for their actions.
Reply to this comment
by guadalcanal3 April 13, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
To j-whitman...Israel does not fight in Iraq and Afghanistan for a lot of reasons :#1...They are already fighting a war in their own country...#2...They do not have a large enough population to send troops abroad (they barely have enough to defend their own country)...They are already fighting Hamas and Hezbollah...and..last but not least...Israel has absolutely no desire to conquer or to dominate other lands and other peoples...they just want to live in their little tiny sliver of land called Israel..in peace...and be left alone...the same cannot be said of the Arabs and Persians.
Reply to this comment
by xraytwonine April 13, 2008 2:46 PM PDT
isnt it obvious by now that these people don''t care for levi''s jeans, cadallics, ipods, a house two cars and two kids...a perfect christian community..... look, they just want to believe in whatever they hell they like to without dying or get tortured... just give them some hardcore weapons, like what we did for the Talibans... Iraqis don''t need democracy, they need guns, rockets, high tech defensive weaponary to save guard their home and beliefs, thats all.
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 2:56 PM PDT
I don''t believe you can justify one HUGE hazard by pointing out another. We can prevent further contamination from nuclear power and nuclear waste by not building anymore. The hazardous nuclear waste disposal underground is incredibly unstable. There are legitimate proposals for alternative fuels, but the oil industry, with help from the Republicans in Congress and the White House (their friends and financial benefactors), have successfully lobbied against any progress/implementation. No more environmentally hazardous drilling or nuclear power plants. No more wars for oil.
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 13, 2008 3:01 PM PDT
dumbshun: the bush/cheney duo have angered so many countries and destroyed all the good will and support we had prior to their administration. The only ally we have left is Great Britain, a second world nation. Its going to take years and delicate diplomacy to get our former allies and the UN to even listen to us again.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 3:02 PM PDT
Your republicans created another Iraq in the Horn of Africa -- America does not need "More of the Same"

Bush & McBush only creates more global instability
Reply to this comment
by singingrick April 13, 2008 3:03 PM PDT


And this is "conservatives" idea of success in Iraq. I guess as long as Halliburton and Exxon are profiting off of this, they''ll be staying the course.


Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 3:03 PM PDT
Horn of Africa, Another Iraq

http://www.newsweek.com/id/131836
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 3:04 PM PDT
dumbshun,,,,, McBush is Bush''s ''Rubber Stamp''
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 3:07 PM PDT
dumbshun,,,,, McCain is the dude who tells you there is no end to Iraq & has no exit plan,,, How can you tell us he would have won the war in 4 years ???
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 3:18 PM PDT
dumbshun,,,, How old are you ?? Old enough to enlist ??
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales April 13, 2008 3:20 PM PDT
Considering how few of the 35,000 troops reported being sent to deal with Basra were probably ordered to engage in operations, this probably represents a considerable percentage...as jobs are scarce...these men made a considerable sacrifice NOT to fight their fellow Iraqis.

It makes no sense whatsoever for Shias to kill each other for the pleasure of the Occupation. Maliki''s days are numbered.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 3:21 PM PDT
dumbshun,,,, I''m 59 & retired Navy. --- Afraid to answer ??? Don''t tell me you''re not American enough to enlist.
Reply to this comment
by hermitdave April 13, 2008 3:28 PM PDT
This AL-SADR guy is not going along with the Neo-Con plan. For some reason he wants his country back. Heck he might not even want the western oil companies to have control of Iraq oil. I bet he don''t even like the new big BUSH PALACE in the green zone. That is the trouble with illegal take overs of countries. There are always people who cause trouble by their willingness to fight for their country.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 3:29 PM PDT
dumbshun,,,,, You call other American''s un-American & you won''t even serve your country in War Time --- We have young people from foreign countries serving in our military who have trouble speaking English or writting it --- They are fighting for the privilage of citizenship

You won''t even enlist to defend your own citizenship & the freedom''s it provides.
Reply to this comment
by glock4me April 13, 2008 3:36 PM PDT
Afraid to fight... didn''t anyone tell them about the 72-virgin deal in the benefits package?!?
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 13, 2008 3:39 PM PDT
Glock4me,,, There''s probably a good reason why they are virgins in the 1st place, nobody would have them.
Reply to this comment
by blackwater66-2009 April 13, 2008 3:42 PM PDT
These are more likely insurgents who infiltrated the ranks, as it were. Who is friendly and who is not, that is the most difficult mission we have over here to deal with everyday.

Vote John McCain to help us succeed in our mission.

Stay the course !!!
Reply to this comment
See all 139 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs