July 16, 2009 10:51 AM

1,300 Iraqis Fired For Refusing To Fight

(AP)  The Iraqi government has dismissed about 1,300 soldiers and policemen who deserted or refused to fight during last month's offensive against Shiite militias and criminal gangs in Basra, officials said Sunday.

Interior Ministry spokesman Maj. Gen. Abdul-Karim Khalaf said 921 police and soldiers were fired in Basra. They included 37 senior police officers ranging in rank from lieutenant colonel to brigadier general.

The others were dismissed in Kut, one of the Shiite cities where the fight had spread.

Last month, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki ordered the security forces to confront armed groups in Basra, Iraq's second largest city.

But they met fierce resistance and the attack quickly ground to a halt as fighting flared across the Shiite south and Baghdad.

Since then, government officials have revealed that about 1,000 members of the security forces - including an entire infantry battalion - had mutinied, on some cases handing over vehicles and weapons to the militias.

The majority of Iraqi soldiers and police are Shiites.

Speaking in Basra, Khalaf said those dismissed included 421 police officers and 500 soldiers who had not returned to duty in the southern port city and would be tried by military courts.

"Some of them were sympathetic with these lawbreakers, some refused to (go into) battle for political or national or sectarian or religious reasons," Khalaf said.

But he said that those who returned in coming days and could prove they had been prevented from doing so by the militias would be reinstated.

In Kut, a senior police officer said 400 local policemen have been sacked for refusing orders to combat the militias, including the Mahdi Army of anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

The officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said the Interior Ministry in Baghdad had ordered the policemen removed from duty on Saturday.

Although fighting in Basra eased in late March, security operations are continuing.

Fighting in Baghdad's Sadr City, a stronghold of al-Sadr's militia, has been ongoing for the past two weeks. Fresh clashes were reported Sunday and at least two rockets or mortar rounds were fired at the capital's Green Zone, which houses diplomatic missions and much of Iraq's government.

A senior military commander said Sunday that Iraqi forces in Basra were expanding their sweep of six neighborhoods, with army and police cordoning off the areas while searching for illegal weapons, ammunition and criminal elements.

Lt. Gen. Mohan al-Fireji said the operation, which started on Saturday, had netted significant amounts of weapons, roadside bombs and drugs. He said a large number of suspects had been detained, but he provided no figures.

Al-Sadr, who is believed to be in Iran, repeated on Saturday his demand for American soldiers to leave the country and urged his fighters not to target fellow Iraqis "unless they are helping the (U.S.) occupation."

Despite the strident rhetoric, however, there were signs that al-Sadr was trying to calm his militia to avoid all-out war with the Americans. Al-Sadr is also under pressure from al-Maliki, also a Shiite, to disband the Mahdi Army or face a ban from politics.

Meanwhile, an Apache helicopter accidentally destroyed a U.S. Humvee in eastern Baghdad when a Hellfire missile missed its target and struck the armored vehicle instead, the military said Sunday.

Two U.S. soldiers and three Iraqi civilians were injured in the incident on Saturday, the statement said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 138 Comments
by wardoglrs April 15, 2008 1:42 AM EDT
See McCant was right its all under control...Look to
Dr Ron Paul and wake up people enough is enough. Poor killing the poor in war. "Return to the constitution"
Before its to late.
Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 April 14, 2008 7:33 PM EDT
nancy_naive
If it includes george then i am all fo it
Reply to this comment
by ioweign April 14, 2008 7:27 PM EDT
nancy_naive
What is a AWOL TANG pilot ?

Posted by ranger1948 at 04:12 PM : Apr 14, 2008

AWOL = Absent WithOut Leave
TANG = Texas Air National Guard

AWOL TANG = George W. Bush

Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 April 14, 2008 7:12 PM EDT
nancy_naive
What is a AWOL TANG pilot ?
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales April 14, 2008 3:55 PM EDT
It may soon be time for hundreds of thousands of US servicemen to refuse to fight against Iraqi freedom and come home.

The Demopublican Regime and its lying war does not support democracy...they backed Samoza...Batista... Marcos...Pinochet...the Shah...among others...
Reply to this comment
by usbrit-2009 April 14, 2008 3:15 PM EDT
Remember Saddam''s much vaunted, much feared (by the press) Republican Guard and so hard it will be to get into Baghdad with them fighting to the last man? Well they all disappeared PDQ when GIJoe showed up on the doorstep didn''t they. Having disbanded the Iraqi military, how can we expect regular US trained soldiers to fight when the Republican Guard left their posts? The logic escapes me.
Reply to this comment
by swwils April 14, 2008 2:17 PM EDT
Man,what do they think that we(AMERICANS)are going to do everything for them?This is a prime example why most Americans want us to bring home our military.They need to stand up,or just sit down, and let another dictator worse than Saddam take over.If we roll out that is exactly what will happen to Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 April 14, 2008 2:11 PM EDT
pfd572
I still say the bottom line is they signed up. They knew the situation. If they weren''t willing to do the job they should not have signd up. Iraq is a no win situation for the U.S. They were fighting before we came and will be fighting long after we leave. My daughter is there and they are supposed to train their police. She said they will not listen and do not want to learn. They do not want us there. This was a civil matter and should have been left to the Iraqui people to resovle.
Reply to this comment
by pfd572 April 14, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
ranger: These were Shiite Muslim soldiers being asked to fire on other Shiites. Not only does it have to be a blow to moral that the invading army is telling you who to attack, but to be asked to attack someone who believes they are fighting for you must be agony. They could be your family and friends. Muslims first and foremost identify with Islam first, not their country. Ask an American who he is and his first answer will be ''an American'', as a Muslim the same question and his first answer will be ''Muslim''. Faith is first and attacking someone of your own sect is a grave sin. So before we condemn these men, perhaps we should try and understand why they refused. Executing them as deserters could be the worse possible response to their actions. Can you morally ask someone to commit a mortal sin, even in a war?
Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 April 14, 2008 1:14 PM EDT
Rhe GATEWAY 1
vERY INTERESTING AND INFORMATIVE. i STILL LIKE POETIC JUSTICE FOR THE TERRORISTS AND HOPE MY VERSION PREVAILS.
Reply to this comment
See all 138 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook