Olympics Chief: Games Facing "Crisis"
Officials Struggling To Find The Joy, U.N. Chief Says He Won't Make Opening Ceremonies
-
-
Photo
International Olympic Committee President Jacques Rogge listens to a question at a press conference in Beijing Thursday April 10, 2008. (AP Photo/Greg Baker)
-
Photo
A protester holds a Tibetan flag in front of a Chinese flag held by China supporter Albert Xing as they wait for the Olympic torch, in San Francisco on Wednesday, April 9, 2008. (AP Photo/Jakub Mosur)
-
Photo
Olympic torch runners, in red, hand off the Olympic flame as they are surrounded by security before running with the Olympic torch in San Francisco, Wednesday, April 9, 2008. (AP Photo/George Nikitin)
-
Photo
Protesters march up Michigan Ave. towards the Chinese Consulate protesting against China's policies on Tibet in Chicago, Wednesday, April 9, 2008. The march coincided with the Olympic torch relay taking place in San Francisco. (AP)
-
Photo
Runner carries the Olympic torch in San Francisco. (KPIX)
-
-
Play CBS Video
Video
S.F. Torch Relay Shortened
Protestors turned out to voice both opposition and support for the Olympic torch in San Francisco, where the threat of protests forced organizers to shorten the relay route. Bill Whitaker reports.
-
Video
Protests Mar Olympic Legacy
Katie Couric speaks with Olympic historian David Wallechinsky about the legacy of the Olympic torch relay and what the effect of recent protests will have on the summer games in Beijing.
-
Video
Torch Protests Flare In U.S.
San Francisco becomes the latest stage for protests over China's human rights practices as the Olympic torch is slated to makes its way through the Bay Area. Bill Whitaker reports.
-
Photos
Olympic Torch Odyssey
There have been some bumps in the road as the torch makes its way from Olympia to Beijing.
-
Photo Essay
Torch Tempest Hits S.F.
Olympic torch and accompanying protests arrive in San Francisco.
Four months before the opening of what was supposed to be the grandest Olympics in history, the head of the International Olympic Committee is using words that convey anything but a sense of joyous enthusiasm.
The protest-marred Olympic torch relay and international criticism of China's policies on Tibet, Darfur and human rights have turned the Beijing Games into one of the most politically charged in recent history and presented the IOC with one of its toughest tests since the boycott era of the 1970s and '80s.
"It is a crisis, there is no doubt about that," IOC President Jacques Rogge said Thursday. "But the IOC has weathered many bigger storms."
At the same time, Rogge called on China to respect its "moral engagement" to improve human rights and to fulfill promises of greater media freedom. He also reaffirmed the right of free speech for athletes at the Beijing Games.
A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman responded that IOC officials support adhering to the Olympic Charter and "not bringing any irrelevant political factors into the Beijing Olympics."
"I hope the IOC officials will continue to adhere to the principles set by the Olympic charter," Jiang Yu said.
At the United Nations, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has told China's government that he may not attend the August's opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics because of scheduling issues, spokeswoman Marie Okabe said in a news conference.
Asked later whether Ban would not be attending the Olympics, spokeswoman Okabe said, "Yes. That's correct."
Rogge spoke in Beijing just hours after the completion of the torch relay in San Francisco, where the route was shortened and the flame diverted to prevent disruptions by massive crowds of anti-China protesters.
Rogge's use of the word "crisis" to describe the torch relay and the Beijing buildup came as a surprise. The Belgian orthopedic surgeon's comments usually are measured and low-key.
He cited previous crises - the attack on Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics and the boycotts of the 1976, 1980 and 1984 Games.
"The history of the Olympic Games is fraught by a lot of challenges," Rogge said. "This is a challenge but you cannot compare to what we had in the past."
British IOC member Craig Reedie believes the worst is over.
"I hope that we are through it now," he said. "I think the furor that has affected the torch in London, Paris and to some extent in San Francisco will now die down. ... But it is fair to say that this kind of political protest is a new experience for the IOC and we have all found it extremely uncomfortable."
After the chaos caused by pro-Tibet demonstrators during torch relays in London and Paris, IOC officials were relieved the North American leg passed without any injuries.
"Fortunately, the situation was better in San Francisco," Rogge said. "It was, however, not the joyous party that we had wished it to be.
"Athletes in many countries are in disarray and we need to reassure them," he added. "Our major responsibility is to offer them the games they deserve. ... We have 120 days to achieve this."
Earlier in the week, IOC officials had contemplated possibly cutting short the international leg of the relay, but Rogge said Thursday that was not an option.
"This scenario is definitely not on the agenda," he said. "We are studying together with (Beijing organizers) to improve the torch relay, but there is no scenario of either interrupting or bringing (the torch) back directly to Beijing."
There is no scenario of either interrupting or bringing (the torch) back directly to Beijing.
IOC President Jacques RoggeAlready, the head of the committee organizing the torch run in Indonesia said the route will be significantly shortened because of Chinese concerns it might attract pro-Tibet protests.
Hong Kong Chief Secretary for Administration Henry Tang said officials may tweak the torch relay route to ensure order when the flame arrives April 30. He said 3,000 police will be deployed.
The flame will be carried through Buenos Aires, Argentina, on Friday, with a dozen other countries still to come. The relay also is expected to face demonstrations in New Delhi, India, which has a substantial Tibetan population, and possibly elsewhere on its 21-stop tour before arriving in mainland China on May 4. The Olympics begin Aug. 8.
Rogge, who has come under pressure from critics to speak out on China, was asked whether he had second thoughts about awarding the games to Beijing seven years ago.
"I've said that it is very easy with hindsight to criticize the decision," he said. "It's easy to say now that this was not a wise and a sound decision."
But Rogge insisted Beijing had "clearly the best bid" and offered the strong pull of taking the Olympics to a country with one-fifth of the world's population.
"That was the reasoning for awarding the bid to Beijing."
When Beijing was seeking the games, Rogge noted, Chinese officials said the Olympics would help advance social change, including human rights. He called that a "moral engagement" and stressed there was no "contractual promise whatsoever" on human rights in the official host city contract.
"I would definitely ask China to respect this moral engagement," Rogge said, in one of his most pointed comments on the subject.
Rogge reported having "very frank and open discussions" with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao on a range of Olympic issues Wednesday. He declined to elaborate.
Rogge insisted that "a number of important points have been met" on human rights, including a new Chinese law enacted in 2007 that removed many restrictions on foreign journalists. But he said the law had not been fully implemented and he was urging Chinese officials to do so "as soon as possible."
Rogge refused to be drawn on the prospect of top world leaders snubbing the Beijing opening ceremony. Besides Ban, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and German Chancellor Angela Merkel will not be attending the opening, and French President Nicolas Sarkozy is considering staying away. U.S. Democratic presidential candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton have called on President Bush to boycott the ceremony.
"Politicians have to make their decisions themselves," Rogge said. "The IOC will not intervene in this matter."
Rogge sought to reassure athletes that they are free to express their political opinions - as long as they do so away from official Olympic venues in Beijing.
Rogge said free expression has been enshrined in the Olympic Charter for more than 40 years as a "basic human right." However, the charter also forbids any "demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda" in any Olympic sites or venues.
"I'm very clear on the fact that athletes have ample opportunities to express themselves without hindrance, but just by respecting the sacred environment of the Olympic village, the Olympic venues the podium and so forth," he said.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 56 CommentsNow, go ahead and take that whole vision and shred it, and ruin it, and flush it down the toilet because of some stupid politics.
Makes you want to be an Olympian, doesn''t it.
Posted by shanev137
___________________
Do you think the people in China suffering the human rights abuses think that the politics are stupid?
oh gosh, those stupid protesters are ruining everything. Why can''t those dam people quit exercising their freedom of speech and let us all ignore the human rights abuses. Whey don''t they pick up guns instead?
YOU ARE AN IDIOT
Set this right by launching them into space.
The IOC knew what China was before they sold out and put the games there. China isnt the fault here.. yes they are horrible, but they havent changed... insetad they were rewarded with the games.
Cancel the games in China, and hold them in NY. Yes, thats right. NY can handle the sudden need (okay it wont be perfect, but ut can be done).
but can''t pay teachers and nurses a decent wage. Something is wrong with this picture.
I married a Chinese woman five years ago. I brought her into the USA legally from mainland China. She and her daughter are the sweetest two women you could ever imagine or hope to meet. I have made two trips to China and look forward to returning next year. The people there treated me very well, almost royally.
It is not the majority of the people who should suffer because of different views caused by the few in the government. And if the Olympics are boycotted it is the general population that will suffer not the government officials.
I married a Chinese woman five years ago. I brought her into the USA legally from mainland China. She and her daughter are the sweetest two women you could ever imagine or hope to meet. I have made two trips to China and look forward to returning next year. The people there treated me very well, almost royally.
It is not the majority of the people who should suffer because of different views caused by the few in the government. And if the Olympics are boycotted it is the general population that will suffer not the government officials.
Oh yes, I know that by boycotting the Olympics we will be sending a message to the government that the world doesn''t appreciate what you are doing. The government doesn''t hear except what they want to hear. The same message was attempted by OBL on 9-11 and look at what has resulted from that message.
Unless the games are held in a Far Left Liberal Country, In which case we can all go to sleep out of boredom.
Posted by omnibus66
You can count on that.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Who would want to see it, academic Olympics? Most people need some kind of action for entertainment value
Officials Struggling To Find The Joy, U.N. Chief Says He Won''t Make Opening Ceremonies..
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Unless you please the Far Left 100% then they will make world wide peace events a pain in the backside for everyone that might want to enjoy seeing others at their best. Does not matter if it is the Olympics for some other event. The liberal left will try to interrupt the enjoyment of the event by most others.
Their agenda most come first.
The coming Olympics have their political tasks, as well as their thrilling events. It can not be avoided.
The Chinese, as a people, do NOT like to lose face. When they applied for and won the bid, I''m sure they were thinking it was a great honor. And, to be able to show off their new found industrial capability and new buildings would be a huge plus.
I don''t believe they realized that it could also give them a black eye in the international community. The government is use to mandating changes "for the peoples good". Well, they don''t get to do that in the international community !
That''s why the Olympics are doing their political task.
HELLO! We are talking about a country that abuses ALL living creatures, not just humans. They kill dogs, beat them to death on the street. They are cruel to animals. They shove pipes down pigs throats and pour gallons of sewer water down them to fatten them up before slaughter. Just the thought of this makes me sick to my stomach.
They poisoned OUR pets. They are poisoning our children with the lead that they use in products. The food that comes from there is filled with major bacteria.
Could someone please tell me WHY the Olympics are being held there to begin with?
I feel bad for the Chinese people but something has to be done to stop this.
This is the time and place for the WORLD to show resistance. They need to be shown that they can''t get away with the things they are doing.
They need to be shown that we will not accept their mistreatment of people, animals and we will not accept their contaminated products.
Canada is now fining companies 1 million dollars if they bring in any contaminated products from China. Maybe this is what the U.S. should be doing.
Adolf Hitler and his Nazis had the olympics in 1936 and China is not as bad as they were.
Please, don''t confuse the police state with the actual common people in China. Every day people in China are just like you and me. Friendly, helpful, and just human. The dog beating in Wenjou, was by police, and HORRIBLE.
I can''t speak to the situation on the pigs. But, would raw sewage fatten them, or kill them ?
LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION
Sadly, they chose to run the event in the cesspool known as ''''China'''' - bad decision from day one.
Posted by DaVicar2 at 09:51 AM : Apr 11, 2008
Yup, really bad decision in going with China to host the games. But, that was the decision of the IOC so I don''t have any sympathy for what they are going through now. My four-year old could have seen this coming.
I can agree with this whole heartedly, if you are talking about their government''s policies. From what I saw, they have a terrible polution problem. In Xian, Shangihai and Beijing - the air was unfit to breath. It has got to be the same as smoking !
True, but is that because the Chinese government is more draconian, or possibly our police are more efficient, or their culture has honor in it that ours lacks. Several possibilities exist past these, but what would be the point you are making ?
BUSH AND CHENEY AND THEIR ISRAELI NEOCONS SHOULD BE TRIED FOR WAR CRIMES FOR THE IRAQ WAR...
IF AMERICA COULD HAVE GOTTEN THE REPUBLICANS OUT OF MENS BATHROOM STALLS, OFF HOOKERS, OR LITTLE PAIGE BOYS LONG ENOUGH FOR THE PAST 8 YEARS THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN WAR CRIMES TRIALS LONG AGO FOR IRAQ!
AMERICA STAND UP OR SHUT UP!
Brutal things happens everywhere in different forms. Even in this country it is not uncommon to hear dogs are abandoned by their owners, and dogs are killed in animal shelters.
Brutal things happens everywhere in different forms. Even in this country it is not uncommon to hear dogs are abandoned by their owners, and dogs are killed in animal shelters.
Posted by erasmus6 at 11:05 AM : Apr 11, 2008
Maybe this will help.
Today''s election took place by secret ballot, and delegates of the Olympic committee declined to reveal how they voted. Beijing appeared to receive broad international support beyond the developing nations where it has gained favor by building sports stadiums over the years. Sandra Baldwin, the president of the United States Olympic Committee, said she was ''''O.K. with Beijing.''''
''''I think the Olympics should supersede politics,'''' she added. ''''It''s the greatest peacetime event in the world.''''
It was clear, however, said Frangois Carrard, the executive director of the I.O.C., that delegates faced one overriding political issue with regard to Beijing: human rights.
''''Some people say, because of serious human rights issues, ''We close the door and say no,'' '''' Mr. Carrard said. ''''The other way is to bet on openness. Bet on the fact that in the coming seven years, openness, progress and development in many areas will be such that the situation will be improved. We are taking the bet that seven years from now we will see many changes.''''
Part 1
''''I think it will have a major impact in China, and on the whole, a positive impact, in the sense of giving them a high incentive for moderate conduct both internationally and domestically in the years ahead,'''' said Dr. Kissinger, who was not eligible to participate in the voting.
Delegates said they believed an Olympics in China might have an impact similar to the one in South Korea after the Games were awarded to Seoul for 1988. Those Games assisted in transforming South Korea from a military dictatorship to a democracy. Some cautioned, however, that the committee should not overestimate the effect it could have on China''s internal affairs.
http://tinyurl.com/59jj84
Part 2
Ever had your human rights violated? Didn''t think so now shut the he11 up!~
Adolf Hitler and his Nazis had the olympics in 1936 and China is not as bad as they were.
Posted by gunownerdan
Isn%u2019t there an internet blog rule that states %u201Cwhenever Hitler or Nazi%u2019s are mentioned to prove a point%u201D it%u2019s time to end the conversation?
If you watch Chinese movies, notice they are always fundamentally about "China", never about humanity. "China" itself is a creation of the communist government, about 1/2 the land area of the modern state is inhabited by non-Chinese, really just victims of the Han people and their insane cult.
They are cut off, they are isolated, they are utterly self-absorbed and dangerous to the world. They have numclear weapons, they are getting more crazy every year.
We don''t need to feed these people''s insanity with a big Olympics where they glory in themselves in an indulgent fashion. Really, there is no Western country as xenophobic and racist as China, not close in the modern age, so we are not understanding the danger here.
Posted by SharnCedar at 05:09 PM : Apr 11, 2008
No western country has been around as long as China either, they go back about 5,000 years and we in America are only a mere 232 years old.
I know it wasn''t the common people, I am not blaming them.
"I can''''t speak to the situation on the pigs. But, would raw sewage fatten them, or kill them ? "
They said it was to help fatten them, just before they slaughtered them. If it killed them, I doubt they would care.
No, it wasn''t. I think it was because there had been a few cases of rabies and the police went around and started beating all the dogs to death. They were beating them right in front of their owners. I mean haven''t they heard of rabies shots?
''''I think it will have a major impact in China, and on the whole, a positive impact..."
Let''s hope.:)
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 56 Comments