CBS/AP/ February 11, 2009, 3:06 PM

Bail Set In Videotaped Fla. Teen Beating

Anthony Riccio, center, work with fellow traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange Friday, June 1, 2012. Stocks fell sharply Friday after the release of a dismal report on job creation in the United States. Stocks fell sharply Friday after the release of a dismal report on job creation in the United States. The Dow Jones industrial average dropped more than 200 points, erasing what was left of its gain for the year. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)

Anthony Riccio, center, work with fellow traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange Friday, June 1, 2012. Stocks fell sharply Friday after the release of a dismal report on job creation in the United States. Stocks fell sharply Friday after the release of a dismal report on job creation in the United States. The Dow Jones industrial average dropped more than 200 points, erasing what was left of its gain for the year. (AP Photo/Richard Drew) / Richard Drew

Eight teens accused of taking part in the notorious videotaped beating of another central Florida teen are being held on bond.

A judge set bail Friday for each at $30,000 during their first appearance.

The Polk County state attorney's office says seven of the teens will be tried as adults. The youngest of them is 14. The eighth person is 18-years-old and considered an adult by state law.

They face kidnapping and misdemeanor battery charges. Three also face a felony charge of witness tampering.

Being charged as an adult carries with it much stiffer penalties, possibly including up to life in prison on the kidnapping charges. Facing charges of battery, false imprisonment and kidnapping are Mercades Nichols, 17, Brittini Hardcastle, 17, April Cooper, 14, Cara Murphy, 16, Britney Mayes, 17, Kayla Hassell, 15, Zachary Ashley, 17, and Stephen Schumaker, 18. The two boys are accused of acting as lookouts outside the house in which the beating took place on March 30.

A judge has issued a gag order requiring everyone involved in the case to keep their mouths shut.

The video has been viewed widely on national TV and the Internet. It's not clear who originally posted the video on the Internet, but portions of the video were released by the sheriff's office and posted on CBS affiliate WTSP-TV.

In an interview on The Early Show Wednesday, the victim's father, Patrick Lindsay, said the teens' motivation for the attack was to produce a video that would become popular on YouTube, a video-sharing Web site. To watch that interview, .

"There was talk about apparently after the fact, apparently there's other students that knew that they were going to post this just for the thrill of everyone to see it," the victim's mother, Talisa Lindsay, told CBS News' The Early Show. "Which is just outrageous."

"I think that there ought to be laws enacted and legislation put in place to protect our children from the internet," added the victim's father, "we can't be with our children 24 hours a day."

The shocking nature of a video of this kind does not mean YouTube or any other media company should get the blame, legally or ethically, for the attack, media experts said Friday.

In fact, they have a duty to share the video, said Kelly McBride, the ethics group leader at the Poynter Institute journalism think tank in St. Petersburg, Fla.

"The fact that the video was shot because they were seeking publicity was secondary," McBride said. "A crime was committed in our community, and if there's a videotape of it, I want some information. That video was incredibly revealing. It told more truth about what happened than any other form of reporting could have told."

Those who blame YouTube or news organizations should blame themselves first, said Steve Jones, a communications professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

"The public is culpable as well because they are paying attention," he said. "There is no medium that forces them to pay attention."

While the Florida beating was never actually posted on YouTube, CBS News correspondent Daniel Sieberg reports that a search on the site reveals multiple videos of young girls fighting each other. Many have been there for several months or longer.

"Young people harassing and bullying one another has been going on since the beginning of time," says CBS News technology consultant Larry Magid, "but the fact that it can now be distributed internationally via the internet is one more incentive."

A recent Pew Internet survey found that one in three online teens have experienced some form of cyberbullying with girls more likely to become victims, reports Sieberg.

YouTube, owned by Google Inc., declined to comment on the video, but said its general policies call for the removal of clips that show someone getting "hurt, attacked or humiliated."

In a statement to CBS News, YouTube says inappropriate content can be removed "within minutes" if it violates guidelines, however it's pretty much up to the users to police the site and reject such violent behavior.

From a legal standpoint, YouTube and other online service providers are largely exempt from liability because of a 1996 anti-pornography law. One provision says Internet service providers are not considered publishers simply because they retransmit information provided by their users or other sources.

Federal courts have applied that broadly to cover not just Internet access providers, but also video-sharing sites, message boards and other online services.

Even without that provision, there doesn't appear to be anything illegal about the video, said John Morris, senior counsel with the Center for Democracy and Technology, a civil-liberties group in Washington, D.C.

"There is no legal reason this video cannot be shown. It is obviously distasteful, abhorrent what the teenagers did to the victim, but it doesn't really make sense (to ask), 'Should YouTube have taken it down?"' Morris said.

Even if there were a claim of illegality, he said, the courts should be the ones deciding, not YouTube.

"Many of those assertions are really very difficult, legal determinations that YouTube has no ability to make," Morris said. "Really, YouTube is not in a position to be a traffic cop."

The videotaped beating released on Monday by the Polk County Sheriff's Office was just one of five fights filmed over a period of 30 minutes. At one point the victim's head is slammed into a bedroom wall and she's knocked unconscious. Investigators say the beating happened in Lakeland, Fla. while the victim was spending time at a friend's house during spring break.
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
57 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mailladee says:
While I watch the video it became very sad to see. Here are teen girls vicously attack one female with a lot of rage. But when they all appear in court they all tried to betrayed like they were the victims. The most distrubing is that this was video tape and the victim was unable to defend herself. And they were all able to get out on bail. This was a plan attack, but when you look at "JENA6" which was not plan it was an reaction off of hatred it seems their attack was more severe in the laws eyes, there was even a charge with attempt murder. So what do you think these girls had in mind since it was well plan and tape??????????
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ranger1948 says:
michellem99
The girl was taken to a hospital for her injuris. When a crime victim is brought to a hospital it is policy to call the police. This isn''t a simple matter of breaking the rules so we have to ground the kids for a week. They committed serious felonies and now will answer for them. That is what the laws of this country were meant to do, protect the majority from those who will not abide by the rules of society.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michellem99-2009 says:
Yes went to hell.we are seeing it today..them children are taught that in the home are they not..I heard the term lazy parenting when I was a high schooler and I was a blind punk..Yep..I was forever sent to the office..why I had no rules to live by..Is that the case with the kids..money and prisom for them..What the hell will they learn..nothing...A teacher cared about me and we did things as she wanted me to talk .I was too scared too. I CAN TELL YE THEM YHEM CHILDREN WOULD LEARN TO RESPECT AS THAT IS EARNT..Whet I see is bad parenting..their parents were raised the same way..I am ashamed of America. I am aware they have cameras every where and that is no reason to pick on a girl who had no chanch to fight back. Ye gave them punks what they wanted..FAME..Don''t blame you tube or who ever..I am 53..Where were the grown ups who should have stopped it..Yellow belled to call the the pigs..when it could have been handled right there..Mum/Dad,it is yer duty and if they visit yer home the sames rules go for all..Computer in family room where ye can keep an eye on its user..WAKE UP..
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
michellem99-2009 says:
I know the mind of a bully and if anyone is the blame here is their PARENTS/CARETAKERS..People ...ye know Adults..GROWN UPS..OF AGE. That means legal age. I knew I could THEY could not raise a PAW to my person why I was a girl..I ran with it..however teacher did try control me..I did not care as life was hopeless as the abuse in the foster home..I felt safer at school. I shut down..We need to fix it. When the govt got in the business of breaking up families and telling the parents what they can/can''t do is when things whet to hell.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kwajmi says:
I read on another news website that April Cooper, while at her bail hearing, was snickering and holding back laughter while bail was being set. I think the judge should have denied bail and sent her little butt back to jail to await the actual hearing. Maybe then they all will stop snickering/laughing at this serious crime. Also one of the boys was complaining that his family was getting threats...too bad. He should have stopped what was going on, not be a look out.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gunownerdan says:
Someone call Jerry Springer.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ranger1948 says:
I never watched Dr Phil anyway. I always thought he was an idiot.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jenny567 says:
Their parents think that it''s unfair to try their kids as adult??? Well, in this case I think maybe "eye for eye" would be a fair solution. Save tax payer money too.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dug323 says:
Shame on CBS for broadcasting the Quack Phil show who bailed out one of the criminals responsible for this heinous act. Did you ever consider what message this sends to the poor young girl who was beaten.

The best thing we can do to send a message to this quack that passes himself off as helpful and compassionate is to boycott his pompous show and especially all the sponsors that support his show. I for one will record his show each day and play it in fast-forward to the commercials to identify the sponsors - then never purchase anything from the companies that support such a self-righteous exploitive quack. I hope they get the message that this is just unacceptable - period! This is as vile as the Dog the Bounty Hunter debacle. The resolution should be equivalent - banned from the air so they can''t continue to pollute society.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
b-easy63 says:
It seems sleazy Dr. Phil has got involved and bailed one of the girls out so she could be on his show. When the media found out, they claimed it was a mistake to bail Nichols out and that they now, will not go along with a show about the beating. bet Oprah is kicking herself at least three times a day for elevating this very obvious sleazebag opportunist and lying scum to star status. LOL
reply
See all 57 Comments