WASHINGTON, April 10, 2008

Will Bush Boycott Beijing Ceremonies?

White House Elusive On President's Plans As Calls Increase For Him To Skip Olympic Opener

    • A protester holds a Tibetan flag in front of a Chinese flag held by China supporter Albert Xing as they wait for the Olympic torch, in San Francisco on Wednesday, April 9, 2008.

      A protester holds a Tibetan flag in front of a Chinese flag held by China supporter Albert Xing as they wait for the Olympic torch, in San Francisco on Wednesday, April 9, 2008.  (AP Photo/Jakub Mosur)

    • Olympic torch runners, in red, hand off the Olympic flame as they are surrounded by security before running with the Olympic torch in San Francisco, Wednesday, April 9, 2008.

      Olympic torch runners, in red, hand off the Olympic flame as they are surrounded by security before running with the Olympic torch in San Francisco, Wednesday, April 9, 2008.  (AP Photo/George Nikitin)

    • Protesters march up Michigan Ave. towards the Chinese Consulate protesting against China's policies on Tibet in Chicago, Wednesday, April 9, 2008. The march coincided with the Olympic torch relay taking place in San Francisco.

      Protesters march up Michigan Ave. towards the Chinese Consulate protesting against China's policies on Tibet in Chicago, Wednesday, April 9, 2008. The march coincided with the Olympic torch relay taking place in San Francisco.  (AP)

    • Runner carries the Olympic torch in San Francisco.

      Runner carries the Olympic torch in San Francisco.  (KPIX)

    • Tsering Plton, 62, from Chicago, listens to a speaker during a protest against China's policies on Tibet in Chicago, Wednesday, April 9, 2008. The march to the Chinese embassy and protest coincided with the Olympic torch relay taking place in San Francisco.

      Tsering Plton, 62, from Chicago, listens to a speaker during a protest against China's policies on Tibet in Chicago, Wednesday, April 9, 2008. The march to the Chinese embassy and protest coincided with the Olympic torch relay taking place in San Francisco.  (AP)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Play CBS Video Video Eye To Eye: Olympic History

    "Only On The Web": Katie Couric speaks with Olympic historian David Wallechinsky about the legacy of the Olympic torch relay and how the IOC might react to the protests leading up the Beijing games.

  • Video S.F. Torch Relay Shortened

    Protestors turned out to voice both opposition and support for the Olympic torch in San Francisco, where the threat of protests forced organizers to shorten the relay route. Bill Whitaker reports.

  • Video Protests Mar Olympic Legacy

    Katie Couric speaks with Olympic historian David Wallechinsky about the legacy of the Olympic torch relay and what the effect of recent protests will have on the summer games in Beijing.

  • Photos Olympic Torch Odyssey

    There have been some bumps in the road as the torch makes its way from Olympia to Beijing.

  • Photo Essay Torch Tempest Hits S.F.

    Olympic torch and accompanying protests arrive in San Francisco.

  • Timeline Tibet Unrest

    A look at recent unrest in Tibet and western China and some of the history behind it.

(CBS/AP)  The White House has been eager to separate politics from sports in discussing the Beijing Olympics, but it has not ruled out the possibility that President Bush will skip the opening ceremonies this August.

Critics of China say that Mr. Bush avoiding the event would be a powerful sign of international anger over China's violent response to demonstrating Buddhist monks in Tibet. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown's spokeswoman said Wednesday that Brown will not attend the opening ceremony.

Over two days, White House press secretary Dana Perino has faced questions about Mr. Bush's attendance at the opening gala for games that China hopes to use as a showcase of its rising economic and political power. She says Mr. Bush will go to the Olympics. But, pressed by reporters on whether she could say whether he will attend the opening ceremony, Perino said Wednesday, "I cannot."

She says the reason is not uncommon: "I'm not trying to signal anything by saying that; I don't have the president's schedule. It is way too far in advance for us to announce the president's schedule."

Perino said Mr. Bush "has been very clear that he believes that the right thing for him to do is to continue to press the Chinese on a range of issues, from human rights and democracy, political speech freedoms and religious tolerance, and to do that publicly and privately, before, during and after the Olympics."

Democratic U.S. Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert Byrd and Robert Menendez sent Mr. Bush a letter Wednesday saying that the crackdown in Tibet "should be unacceptable to anyone who believes in basic human freedoms."

"We believe that your attendance at the opening ceremonies, rightly or not, would send the implicit message to the world that the United State condones the intolerance that has been demonstrated by these actions of the Chinese government," the letter said.

Barack Obama, Clinton's rival for the Democratic nomination, joined the chorus later Wednesday, calling for the president to boycott the opening ceremonies.

His campaign issued a statement in which, for the first time, he urged Mr. Bush to boycott the festivities.

Meanwhile, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution criticizing China for its crackdown on protesters in Tibet and urging Beijing to hold direct talks with the Dalai Lama, the exiled Tibetan religious leader, on the future of the region.

The resolution also demanded that China release Tibetans imprisoned for participating in peaceful demonstrations and allow international monitors and journalists unfettered access to the Tibet Autonomous Region and other Tibetan areas of China. It passed 413 to 1.

A similar resolution has been introduced in the Senate. Both say the opening of further Chinese diplomatic missions in the United States should be contingent on Beijing allowing the United States to establish an office in Lhasa, Tibet's capital.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told lawmakers Wednesday that the United States is looking at the possibility of a U.S. consulate in Tibet. She said the United States has urged China to allow more U.S. diplomats into the region, saying access granted by China so far was not good enough.

"The United States," she added, "has been very active in making the case to the Chinese that they are going to be better off to deal with moderate forces on Tibet like the Dalai Lama; that they should open dialogue with him."

Protesters around the world are trying to link China's poor human rights record to the staging of the Olympics. Demonstrations about Tibet have been held along the path of the Olympic torch in Paris, London and, on Wednesday, San Francisco.

China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu condemned the House resolution, saying it "chooses to remain silent on the violence involved in beating, smashing up properties, looting and arson in Lhasa and the Dalai clique who premeditated and organized the criminal act of violence."

The Dalai Lama, who fled Tibet after a failed uprising in 1959 but remains the religious and cultural leader of many Tibetans, has said that he wants greater autonomy for the remote mountain region but is not seeking independence.

Speaking in Japan Thursday, the exiled spiritual leader said, he supports China's hosting of the Summer Olympics, but insisted nobody had the right to tell protesters demanding freedom for Tibet "to shut up."

"We are not anti-Chinese. Right from the beginning, we supported the Olympic Games," he told reporters on a stopover on a trip to Seattle, where he was to attend a conference. "I really feel very sad the government demonizes me. I am just a human, I am not a demon."

He said the demonstrators had the right to their opinions, though he called for nonviolence.

"The expression of their feelings is up to them," he said. "Nobody has the right to tell them to shut up. One of the problems in Tibet is that there is no freedom of speech."

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 55 Comments
by glock4me April 12, 2008 2:47 PM EDT
If he goes, he''ll be criticized for turning his back on the people of Tibet and having a "soft spot" for torture.

If he doesn''t go, then people will criticize him for not engaging the rest of the world (cowboy diplomacy, etc.)

I''m pretty sure that if we didn''t invade Iraq that the dems would be complaining that Sadam was still in power and that Bush/Cheney let him stay in power so they could make money from oil.

You *** people have driven all of the good people away from politics and look at what we''ve got left... just look at them... Clinton, Obama, and McCain!!!

Are you happy now?!?

I wonder if Abe Lincoln would have just sold out an become an ambulance-chasing lawyer in this environment.
Reply to this comment
by jonesforch April 11, 2008 1:23 AM EDT
This about sports not poltics.
Reply to this comment
by ajmarine1 April 11, 2008 12:02 AM EDT
1
Reply to this comment
by heraldtkel April 10, 2008 11:52 PM EDT
Who''s worse, Bush or China? www.theoandavirus.com
Reply to this comment
by liberalme April 10, 2008 7:07 PM EDT
joyous88-look up diane feinstien and her war profiteering hubby, go ahead, look it up.
You are so hateful.Just what are you joyous about??

Posted by Xlib at 02:47 PM : Apr 10, 2008

Being a liberal, this certainly had me ticked off when I heard how much money Feinsteins husband has made on Iraq--those who life in Calif need to get her and Pelosi OUT of office---we need people in OUR gevernment that work for US not for their own selfish profits.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica April 10, 2008 6:37 PM EDT
Considering that Bush has taken so much from the Chinese governments play book with his lies and deceit, a complete turn away from the human rights guaranteed by the Constitution; it is most likely that GW will schmooze with his Chinese pals at the Olympic opening ceremonies. Birds of a feather flock together.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 April 10, 2008 6:15 PM EDT
Will Bush Boycott Beijing Ceremonies?

neo cons say something your king is in trouble again.

what a joke you are.
Reply to this comment
by xlib April 10, 2008 5:47 PM EDT
joyous88-look up diane feinstien and her war profiteering hubby, go ahead, look it up.
You are so hateful.Just what are you joyous about??
Reply to this comment
by xlib April 10, 2008 5:46 PM EDT
Uh, curse-as for the illegals getting licenses, don''t think it was Bush. See, here in the nanny state of NY we had a hooker loving, crusader, I''m cleaning up NY state governor who tried to jam that down our throat.
And, by the way, madame clinton got caught when russert (dem shill) had the nerve to ask her her stand on illegals getting licenses.
Reply to this comment
by xlib April 10, 2008 5:44 PM EDT
Another question to pose-"Why did the clinton administration sell weapons technology to China in 1996?" Or,how about, just HOW much money have the Chinese donated to the clinton''s over the years?
I see tons of inane answers to the question posed in this non story and it''s been running for a few days. How about some of you dems answer mine.
mascarponi-where are the thousands of FBI files on average Americans held by the clintons. Some of us haven''t forgotten that little bit of skulduggery (neat word)
Reply to this comment
by xlib April 10, 2008 5:44 PM EDT
Another question to pose-"Why did the clinton administration sell weapons technology to China in 1996?" Or,how about, just HOW much money have the Chinese donated to the clinton''s over the years?
I see tons of inane answers to the question posed in this non story and it''s been running for a few days. How about some of you dems answer mine.
mascarponi-where are the thousands of FBI files on average Americans held by the clintons. Some of us haven''t forgotten that little bit of skulduggery (neat word)
Reply to this comment
by wrj001 April 10, 2008 5:24 PM EDT
How does a President who has, by his own actions, been directly involved with butchering tens of thousands of innocent people, many being under 18 years of age, condemn another leader of human right violations and yet not be exposed in his own country for the crimes against humanity that He and his Administration have committed? Answer: With a compliant media i.e. A propaganda machine tacitly controlled by the respective Government in power.
Reply to this comment
by yankeerebel7 April 10, 2008 5:09 PM EDT
"republicon are the new american fascists,

greed driven fascists

WAR PROFITEERS AND

WAR MONGERS"


LOL You should probably learn the definition of fascism before posting it all over online message boards. Also, using cute little made up words like "republicon" doesn''t make you sound very clever or original. It does nothing to help get your point across because at it''s heart, it''s on par with grade school name calling.

What junior college did you attend?
Reply to this comment
by lumberjack65 April 10, 2008 5:07 PM EDT
with all the unrest in the world, let him go, we might get lucky.
Reply to this comment
by byeneocons April 10, 2008 5:01 PM EDT
How can Bush boycott China? He owes them millions of dollars he borrowed since the beginning of his failed administration. It would be rude to ignore your own banker.
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 April 10, 2008 4:59 PM EDT
WHAT ABOUT THE 18% THAT STILL SUPPORT THIS CRIMINAL

ADMINISTRATION

WHAT KIND OF SOUL LESS GOD LESS BUBBA''s MUST THEY

BE

WAR MONGERS = REPUBLICONS
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 April 10, 2008 4:58 PM EDT
republicon are the new american fascists,

greed driven fascists

WAR PROFITEERS AND

WAR MONGERS
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 April 10, 2008 4:56 PM EDT

Will the little criminal miss an opportunity to be

treated like little King George?

Sure he will!
Reply to this comment
by yankeerebel7 April 10, 2008 4:49 PM EDT
Well here come all the Bush Haters and their same old predictable talking points...always the same non-sensical diatribes, never even reading the story at hand.

*yawn*
Reply to this comment
by demslie April 10, 2008 4:22 PM EDT
These "sleep" workers are not bad people but they are not respected by the the conservative talk show host they listen to. In fact, if a government program is proposed that would best help people who do sleep work, the conservative talk show host scream "Socilism", yet they do nothing when billions of tax dollars are used to save vipers live Bear Sterns.

Posted by SHURCH4TRUTH

Cindy Sheehan insisted that the American Troops were too stupid to understand how they were being manipulated by the Government. Liberal Atheists tell us that Christians are too stupid to understand how they are being manipulated by the Church. The DNC tells us that Republicans are too stupid to understand how they are being manipulated by their party. A central theme of Liberal Elitist Democrats seems to be that everyone who does not think in lockstep with them is stupid. Maybe that%u2019s the reason that even liberal CBS polls show McCain in ahead of Obama and Hillary. It must be all those stupid American voters that are too stupid to understand how much better off they would be with the Self Indulgent Self Anointed Self Absorbed Pompous Arrogant Angry Elitist Atheist Anything Sexxxuall Democrats.
Reply to this comment
See all 55 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: