Setback For Dan Rather Lawsuit Against CBS
Judge Dismisses Portions Of Ex-News Anchor's Suit But Rather's Attorney Says Central Claims Remain Intact
-
Photo
Former CBS News anchor Dan Rather and CBS President Leslie Moonves. (CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Dan Rather
A look at the career of the legendary newsman and his work on some of the world's biggest stories.
- Stories
- Dan Rather Sues CBS For $70M
Judicial Hearing Officer Ira Gammerman on Thursday allowed the lawsuit to go forward, but struck down the parts of the suit that name Viacom Chairman Sumner Redstone, CBS President Leslie Moonves and former CBS News President Andrew Heyward.
A lawyer for the defendants, lead outside counsel James Quinn, said the judge's ruling eliminated Rather's core complaints of fraud and breach of good faith and fair dealing.
The lawyer said it was hard to see how the ex-anchor's assertion of a conspiracy between CBS and the Bush administration "will have any traction going forward."
Dan Rather's lawyer, Martin Gold, forcefully disagreed with the defense's characterization of today's motion.
"It's not a setback at all," Gold told CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. "The biggest shock that I had was when I read Jim Quinn's statement…in which he said that it was a great victory for them and all that's left is a garden variety contract dispute, those were his words, and that's just nonsense."
Gold told Cohen that he still planned on deposing all three of the individuals whose names were eliminated from the complaint: Redstone, Moonves and Heyward.
"They were the people who acted on behalf of the company," Gold said, "Corporations act by human beings. Those are some of the major people who functioned on behalf of the company and they have to be deposed."
Listen to CBS' interview with Dan Rather's attorney, Martin Gold.
CBS said in a statement: "We are gratified that the court has dismissed the majority of Mr. Rather’s claims, including the spurious claims against Mr. Redstone, Mr. Moonves and Mr. Heyward. With respect to the few remaining claims, relevant to his contract, there are no facts to support them and we expect them to be dismissed when the discovery process is complete.”
Rather's last months at CBS News were clouded by a disputed story on President Bush's Vietnam-era military service. Rather says his employers made him a "scapegoat" to placate the White House after questions arose about the story.
Quinn told CBS News' legal analyst Andrew Cohen that the contract issue left relates to "whether or not we 'benched' him and whether he had sufficient time on 60 Minutes and 60 Minutes II after he stepped down as the anchorperson."
"We obviously say we gave him all the time in the world," says Quinn.Listen to CBS' interview with defense attorney James Quinn.
Rather narrated the September 2004 report that claimed President Bush skirted some of his duties during his National Guard service and that a commander felt pressured to sugarcoat Bush's record. He maintains the story was true.
But an independent review for the network determined the story was neither fair nor accurate. CBS fired a producer for airing it, and three news executives resigned.
Viacom Inc. is CBS's former parent company.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 111 CommentsI bet.
http://korlapundit.blogspot.com/2004/09/fake-but-accurate.html
http://korlapundit.blogspot.com/2004/09/fake-but-accurate.html
i am inclined to believe dan rather before george bush or anyone associated with him..
The man is a jerk but he''s been around so long they can''t get rid of him. Sound familiar?
Dan Rather is now experiencing what many "regular Americans" have had to endure when going before these "jurists."
Posted by KgeCrxmt
Notice the name of your similarly ignorant cohort -LibH8er, not to mention demslie, librweak and any other number of brain dead rightists. I understand these next nine months will see the end of your dream dynasty, but please fall off the edge of the earth with a little dignity.
Posted by bobnjersey at 03:37 PM : Apr 10, 2008"
And you are a pathological ignoramus. You continue spewing the leftist talking points, ingore the facts, and blindly follow your leaders like a good little lemming.
BTW, look at the ''cream of the crop'' that your party has picked as candidates. An unqualified buffoon and a pathological liar. You have nothing to brag about.
You pathetic, ignorant, Liberal, kool-aid drinking, dumbarse.
Think about it, they are very well suited for each other.
It is obvious Rather was trying to benefit the Democratic Party by trading on and risking the good name of his employer. To paraphrase the words of a former Democratic Mayor of Chicago, he should have had the decency to "sit down and shut up."
I am heartbroken that this happened to him - but I bet the story was true and that there was some way to make it look as though it was not true.
I was always very fond of Dan and even more respect for him after reading the book above. He had high standards and worked very hard for what he accomplished.
I do miss him very much and wish that he were back on CBS. I like Katie but she is not Dan.
I don''t know all of the details - but I wish him the best.
Lets look at this. Burkett gets swindled by a mystery man with bogus documents. He is inclined to believe them, gives them to Mapes and Rather both of which apparently are inclined to believe them.
There are many possibilities, but it would be nice for Burkett and Mapes to publicly apologize for this sordid affair.
Cheers,
Rob
[Posted by DemWatcher at 04:29 PM : Apr 10, 2008]
who''s my leader? do i need a leader ... or are you just projecting your own perspective on others? how are determining my pathalogical status? are you a psychologist?
[BTW, look at the ''''cream of the crop'''' that your party has picked as candidates. An unqualified buffoon and a pathological liar. You have nothing to brag about.]
are any of them illiterate sociopaths?
Down there in Texas you can''t even find a copy of the U.S. Constitution! Keep looking.
Whether the document Rather reported on was or was not a forgery had nothing do with the fact that Bush and his apologists have never fully explained his absence from duty.
Given his silver spoon upbringing, his sociopathic behavior and that by all accounts he was nothing but a crude drunken frat boy for most of his life it is hardly surprising that he would shirk his military service as well.
There is no dispute about this.
All i asked is: AM I TOO OLD TO BE DAN RATHER''S PRODUCTION ASSISTANT..
well YES i am i am a male and over 40...he hired a young chicky-poo
come on Dan sue me for libel you can''t win because you know this is true.
station is proof that Dan Rather''s assertions were, and still are, correct.
The Little Decider got Drunk, snorted a bag of coke, and couldn''t report to the Flight Surgeon for his physical, ''cause even Poppy would have had a hard time covering up medical documentation.
Face it, Shrub is a Coward, Traitor, and now sadly, a War Criminal. Nuff said....
We all understand you''re mentally challenged, no need to repeat your mindless, inane, spew....
And yes, the little twit was too liquored up, and/or drugged up to take the physical!
So what did Poppa Bush do? Cleaned the little bustward up and sold him to the Neocons for their stoolie! And people bought this scam not once, but twice!
Fools!
Down there in Texas you can''''t even find a copy of the U.S. Constitution! Keep looking.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by SMITTY448 at 05:28 PM : Apr 10, 2008
You can''t find his driver''s license history either, cuz he was charged with DUI!
Bush is intelligent. He holds masters from Harvard AND Yale and a better GP then Clinton ever dreamed of.
Bush stands for something and does not bow to political pressure of the moment. He is going to introduce freedom and end repression in the middle east despite all of you pansy''s.
Bush is honest. You know it and, being vile yourself, despise him for it.
These truths will transcend your best efforts. Deal with it.
Dan Rather is to Liberal Media Bias what Charlton Hesston was to the NRA.
You have to understand that in LiberalWorld, it''s not the EVIDENCE of the charge that matters, it''s the SERIOUSNESS of the charges that matter.
Facts be dammned.
That also explains why Dan Blather could knowingly used forged documents against Pres Bush.
It''s not the Real World, it''s LiberalWorld.
THere''s a HUGE difference.
DUH ?? At least Katie is down to earth... Wink wink
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 111 Comments