WASHINGTON, April 9, 2008

Middle Class Feeling The Financial Squeeze

Study: More Middle-Class Americans Say They Aren't Better Off Than They Were 5 Years Ago

  • Photo

     (CBS/AP)

  • Interactive Eye On The Economy

    In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.

  • Interactive The Nation We Live In

    Who are Americans and what do they do? A comprehensive look at our economic, sociological and racial breakdown.

(AP)  Growing numbers of middle-class Americans say they aren't better off than they were five years ago, reflecting economic pressures amid growing debt, a study released Wednesday shows.

Their short-term assessment of personal progress, according to the study, is the worst it's been in nearly half a century.

The survey by the Pew Research Center, a Washington-based organization, paints a mixed picture for the 53 percent of adults in the country who define themselves as "middle class," with household incomes ranging from below $40,000 to more than $100,000.

It found that a majority of Americans said they haven't progressed in the last five years. One in four, or 25 percent, said their economic situation had not improved, while 31 percent said they had fallen backward. Those numbers together are the highest since the survey question was first asked in 1964. Among the middle class, 54 percent said they had made no progress (26 percent) or fallen back (28 percent).

Asked about their financial experiences in the past year, 53 percent of middle-class people said they had to cut spending because money was tight. About one in five said they had trouble getting or paying for medical care, while 10 percent reported they had been laid off or otherwise lost their jobs.

Looking ahead to the coming year, half of the middle class surveyed said they expected to have to cut more spending. Among those employed, one in four, or 25 percent, expressed worries that they would be laid off, that their job would be outsourced or that their employer would relocate in the coming year, while 26 percent were concerned that they would see cuts in salary or health benefits.

Middle-class prosperity overall also lagged compared with richer Americans. From 1983 to 2004, the median net worth of upper-income families - defined as households with annual incomes above 150 percent of the median - grew by 123 percent, while the median net worth of middle-income families rose by just 29 percent.

At the same time, most middle-class people remained upbeat when asked to measure their progress over a longer timeframe, although their level of optimism lagged behind their richer counterparts. Two-thirds, or 67 percent, of middle-class Americans say their standard of living is better than the one their parents enjoyed at the age they are now.

In contrast, 80 percent of richer people said they exceeded their parents' standard of living. Among the lower class, only 49 percent reported better conditions.

"It's been a lousy run for the American economy and people feel it," said Paul Taylor, director of Pew's Social & Demographic Trends project and lead author of the study. He noted that people's pessimism largely tracks annual median household income, which has seen little gain in recent years. Middle-class people also may be disproportionately feeling the pinch because they tend to borrow more heavily against their homes to support their lifestyles, Taylor said.

"Still, over a span of a generation, it's been a pretty good run, even as there are some recent pressures that I think people are feeling," he said.

The Pew poll involved telephone interviews with 2,413 adults, conducted from Jan. 24 to Feb. 19. The margin of sampling error was 2.5 percentage points.

Among the other findings:

  • Nearly eight in 10 of all people, or 79 percent, said they believe it has become more difficult compared with five years ago for the middle class to maintain their standard of living, up from 65 percent in 1986.

  • Among the middle class, no consensus existed on who was to blame for their economic problems. Twenty-six percent blamed the government, 15 percent faulted the price of oil and 11 percent said the people themselves were responsible. Others faulted foreign competition and private corporations for economic woes.

  • Some demographic groups have improved their income status between 1970 and 2006, while others saw declines. Among the winners were seniors ages 65 and older, blacks, native-born Hispanics and married adults. Losers included young adults (ages 18 to 29), the unmarried, foreign-born Hispanics and people with a high-school education or less.


    © MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    Video and Galleries from U.S.

    Add a Comment See all 95 Comments
    by shanev137 April 9, 2008 9:52 PM PDT
    Another shocking, hard-hitting article.

    Gee, who could have ever predicted this.

    This also just in:

    water is wet
    heat is hot
    and snow is cold
    Reply to this comment
    by timdgrim April 9, 2008 9:55 PM PDT
    Oh..there''s still a middle class. And $40 thousand to over $100 thousand is a pretty wide range! I must be in the servant range.
    Reply to this comment
    by bgwinnett April 9, 2008 10:04 PM PDT
    Hey but even though you lost your job to some Indian, can''''t pay for healthcare etc etc, don''''t worry! Bush says that $600 he borrowed from China to give to you will fix everything!

    Posted by mortal3 at 09:55 PM : Apr 09, 2008

    You wisely know that, hoping the "Economic stimulus" will revitalize the economy is the same as, expecting to be woken up by one cup of coffee after downing two bottles of bourbon.
    Reply to this comment
    by timdgrim April 9, 2008 10:14 PM PDT
    Hurry with that $600 stimulus...that guy on the record gas prices picture on this site needs it to fill up his Stupid Unnecessary Vehicle.
    Reply to this comment
    by jjarden April 9, 2008 10:36 PM PDT
    It''''s OVER Folks...The American "Dream" is DEAD...it ain''''t coming back...the world has changed, and America has changed with it...the only direction now is DOWN. Sorry...It''''s Reality...Study and learn what is going out there...there are plenty of books and articles on the subject by the experts who study this stuff...Social Scientists...Economists...etc. The American people think that things are going to turn around and America is going to get back it''''s former "Greatness" as an economic powerhouse. They think that Obama, or Hillary, or Mcain are going to SAVE Them. It ain''''t gonna happen. As the Asian countries increase their standard of living, the American standard of living is in decline.

    It''''s OVER...Get used to it...and just solely focus on your Health, Family, Friends, Intellect(READ...READ...READ!), and go Cold-Turkey and give up on this MORONIC POP CULTURE. Do Not participate in it...Do Not pay attention to it.
    Reply to this comment
    by ontheleft April 9, 2008 10:38 PM PDT
    ''Two-thirds, or 67 percent, of middle-class Americans say their standard of living is better than the one their parents enjoyed at the age they are now''

    I''m surprised the figure is that high. I have four siblings and not one of us (all with college degrees) is better off than our parents were at the same age. I only wish I could afford to buy a house as nice as the one I grew up in.
    Reply to this comment
    by idnnsg April 9, 2008 10:58 PM PDT
    shanev137 asks, "Gee, who could have ever predicted this"?

    Who?

    The very same people who saw through Bush''s lies when he said we have to "preemptively" attack Iraq to "save" us from the terrorists. The people who saw through Cuntoleeza Rice''s "mushroom cloud" warnings. The people who didn''t buy the WMD stories. The people who could count the number of Iraqis on those airplanes on 9/11. The people who just laughed their a$$es off when the little dictator donned a flight jacket, "landed a jet" on an aircraft carrier with a big banner saying "Mission Accomplished", and declared "major combat operations are over". Etc, etc.

    Bush failed at every single business he ran. He claimed to be the "MBA Prezdent", but we all knew he was just a skirt chasing, drunken cheerleeder who got his daddy''s friends to do his schoolwork.

    Only the truly, desperately blind and ignorant did not forsee the reign of Bush leading to financial disaster and moral ruin.
    Reply to this comment
    by cattlekate April 9, 2008 11:16 PM PDT
    I am really struggling.

    I am struggling so much I am tempted to not vote for anyone who isn''t talking about how corporate profits are privatized and yet their losses are socialized.

    The most interesting thing about our inflation tax is how the "Federal" Reserve is so much more concerned about a Depression than inflation, their interest rate is now almost down to ZERO.

    And yet our credit card rates are shooting up to around 20 percent, and without any trigger from payers like late payments and without any justification. And we have no recourse, thanks to the Bankruptcy Bill.



    Reply to this comment
    by cbsblogger April 9, 2008 11:42 PM PDT
    cattlekate....good point.

    Our country is not a democracy, it is now a corporatocracy where our taxes and policies of government are spent with one purpose.....to help corporations and Wall St make money.

    This wouldn''t be such a bad policy if US corporations were still producing in the USA (and not China) and if CEO compensation was held to a realistic premium to average workers as it was 25 years ago. Instead the CEO class has been successfully lobbying for the raping and pillaging of taxpayers, workers and shareholders.

    Not to be derogatory to women, but the US corporate and Wall St financial manipulators need to be severely *** slapped via government policy for the next 20 years. That might begin to get things back to the point where working Americans are once again sharing in the wealth of America.
    Reply to this comment
    by cbsblogger April 9, 2008 11:52 PM PDT
    The American Dream .....George Carlin, interesting and definitely worth a watch.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ4SSvVbhLw

    (Copy/paste)

    It''s called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.


    Reply to this comment
    by truthspeake2 April 9, 2008 11:56 PM PDT
    America is going the way of the Roman Empire thanks to greed and arrogance. RIP America!
    Reply to this comment
    by brianbwb-2009 April 10, 2008 1:56 AM PDT
    From a related story that illustrates the disinformation re economics by the media;

    "In this year''s survey, only 16.8 percent correctly answered that stocks likely would offer the higher growth over 18 years of saving for a child''s education, while 37.3 percent thought a U.S. savings bond - one of the most conservative investments - would offer the highest growth."

    Now who says that the choice of stocks over bonds is a "correct" answer? Only a stock broker would make such promises. I am sure that those millions of people that held Enron, or World com, Countrywide, or Bear Stearns stock wish right now that they had bought bonds instead.
    Reply to this comment
    by rhs648 April 10, 2008 2:11 AM PDT
    Not to be derogatory to women, but the US corporate and Wall St financial manipulators need to be severely *** slapped via government policy for the next 20 years. That might begin to get things back to the point where working Americans are once again sharing in the wealth of America.

    Posted by CBSBlogger

    What makes you feel that working Americans are entititled to share the wealth? They are just as you describe, working Americans. If they want to share the wealth, let them become the owners. It is entrepreneurs, business people, and investors who go out and create the wealth. Working people tend to put in their time, rush home, watch football, drink themselves into a stupor, and start all over again on Monday morning. These are not the people who risk capital and work seven days each week, and put in 80 hours per week. Beimg a business owner, it meant 20 years with no vacations, working day and night, and giving up a lot of good times. Now that my businrss is successful, I can enjoy the vacations, nice cars, and nice homes. Compare the two. Who earned the right to share the wealth?
    Reply to this comment
    by rhs648 April 10, 2008 2:13 AM PDT
    correction

    Not to be derogatory to women, but the US corporate and Wall St financial manipulators need to be severely *** slapped via government policy for the next 20 years. That might begin to get things back to the point where working Americans are once again sharing in the wealth of America.

    Posted by CBSBlogger

    What makes you feel that working Americans are entititled to share the wealth? They are just as you describe, working Americans. If they want to share the wealth, let them become the owners. It is entrepreneurs, business people, and investors who go out and create the wealth. Working people tend to put in their time, rush home, watch football, drink themselves into a stupor, and start all over again on Monday morning. These are not the people who risk capital and work seven days each week, and put in 80 hours per week. Beimg a business owner, it meant 20 years with no vacations, working day and night, and giving up a lot of good times. Now that my business is successful, I can enjoy the vacations, nice cars, and nice homes. Compare the two. Who earned the right to share the wealth?
    Reply to this comment
    by mikekleber April 10, 2008 3:05 AM PDT
    The truly sad part is thye US is losing its middle class, and China is gaining a middle class.

    Isn''t this why our founding fathers started our country ? ?
    Reply to this comment
    by jjarden April 10, 2008 4:05 AM PDT
    rhs648,

    You make a very good case...and I too used to be a hard-core, "Invisible-Hand," "Every-Man-for-Himself," Ayn Rand Capitalist...but one thing you''re doing is stereotyping "Working Americans" AND "Business Owners." There are PLENTY of working americans who DO NOT do as you suggest ("rush home, watch football, drink themselves into a stupor) and PLENTY of Business Owners who are Struggling to make ends meet.
    The Question is this...WHAT TYPE of "Capitalism" do we want? Do we want a "Productive Capitalism" where there is a sharing of the wealth between the owners and employees, and where the owners like Henry Ford KNEW that he had to PAY his workers well in order for them to BUY...OR do we want (what we have now) a "Finance Capitalism" where "Clever" people make OBSCENE Amounts of Money for VERY LITTLE work, and one where the "Middle Class" is destroyed and where the Owners and the "CLEVER" reap ALL the Profits...a "Winner-Take-ALL" situation...or as one enlightened CEO recently said..."A Capitalism where Grandmothers in the Mid-West have to eat Catfood so that 25 year-old Investement Bankers can drive their Porsches around Manhattan."

    Is the Latter scenario, what we presently have, REALLY what we want? Is it REALLY good for America?

    Think About it.
    Reply to this comment
    by termtex01 April 10, 2008 5:27 AM PDT
    If your making $40,000 to over $100,000 a year, and you''re having trouble financially, what the heck are you spending all that money on? You are making from $19 to over $50 an hour and you can''t make ends meet?

    Sounds more like stupid spending habits than anything else.
    Reply to this comment
    by termtex01 April 10, 2008 5:32 AM PDT
    "Posted by lastdance61"

    Well, if a tenth of your so-called accusations that the government is a Nazi regime were true, you''d already have had your IP investigated to locate you, you''d have been detained, questioned, and afterwards your body left out in the middle of a forest somewhere.

    Well, at least there is some good that could come from your accusations, if they were true in the slightest.
    Reply to this comment
    by dowjones20k April 10, 2008 5:36 AM PDT
    Interesting how many of our fellow Americans live in a "dream". It is not the dream we read about and hear the media blab about ..

    It is the nightmare that Americans have created for themselves by having chmapgne taste on a beer budget. And still we see the banks & credit card companies sending out all the garbage ...

    No wonder our college/high schoolers have no idea about finances ... their parents dont either ... so monkey see monkey do ..

    The US is in deep Doo DOO .. & until we begin to reward saving instead of borrowing ... we will continue to print money we dont have & be OWNED by foreign countries.

    Stop the madness ... live within your means !!
    Reply to this comment
    by skyk-2009 April 10, 2008 6:00 AM PDT
    Interesting how many of our fellow Americans live in a "dream". It is not the dream we read about and hear the media blab about ..

    It is the nightmare that Americans have created for themselves by having chmapgne taste on a beer budget. And still we see the banks & credit card companies sending out all the garbage ...

    No wonder our college/high schoolers have no idea about finances ... their parents dont either ... so monkey see monkey do ..

    The US is in deep Doo DOO .. & until we begin to reward saving instead of borrowing ... we will continue to print money we dont have & be OWNED by foreign countries.

    Stop the madness ... live within your means !!


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted by dowjones20k at 05:36 AM : Apr 10, 2008
    + report abuse

    You are making excuses for the problem. How does that solve anything. It''s not the PEOPLE who are at fault here. When they aren''t GAINING that means our STANDARD of LIVING isn''t moving UPWARD. You know like CEO Salaries?? When the Republican''s started this "Trickle Down" economics we had the highest standard of living in the world. Today we''re just trying to stay out of Third World Status because we are DEAD LAST amoung the G-7 nations. That''s the fault of Working American''s??
    Reply to this comment
    by slim1h2o April 10, 2008 6:27 AM PDT
    Posted by dowjones20k at 05:36 AM : Apr 10, 2008

    That''s the most moronic statement I have ever seen on these posts. And I''ve seen alot them.

    Skyk,,, I agree!
    Reply to this comment
    by slim1h2o April 10, 2008 6:27 AM PDT
    Posted by dowjones20k at 05:36 AM : Apr 10, 2008

    That''s the most moronic statement I have ever seen on these posts. And I''ve seen alot them.

    Skyk,,, I agree!
    Reply to this comment
    by dsr57 April 10, 2008 6:40 AM PDT
    If your making $40,000 to over $100,000 a year, and you''''re having trouble financially, what the heck are you spending all that money on? You are making from $19 to over $50 an hour and you can''''t make ends meet?

    Sounds more like stupid spending habits than anything else

    Posted by TheGateway1

    ----------------------------------------------------
    That really depends on where you live Smartguy.

    If you live in armpit alabama or North Dakota then yeah, I agree with you, BUT try living in Maryland or New York on that. ... It''s really not that easy
    Reply to this comment
    by babooph April 10, 2008 6:49 AM PDT
    With the Islamic oil fortune,Chinese profit fortune,so much of it invested in the States,no need to worry about them damaging their own property.Our military may just have to be used in a new mission against rebellion in what had been a middle class.
    Reply to this comment
    by naucoming4u April 10, 2008 7:07 AM PDT
    If your making $40,000 to over $100,000 a year, and you''''re having trouble financially, what the heck are you spending all that money on? You are making from $19 to over $50 an hour and you can''''t make ends meet?

    Sounds more like stupid spending habits than anything else.

    Posted by TheGateway1 at 05:27 AM : Apr 10, 2008
    ...........

    In places like the San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, Washington DC, New York, and Boston metro areas (as well as many others I haven''t listed) the $40k to $100k income levels break down like this:

    $40k = Poverty or near poverty living
    $100k = Middle Class living

    AND THAT''S IF YOU DON''T HAVE CHILDREN!

    Add children to that equation and the income levels needs to increase by at least 30% or more just to afford the extra people you have to support.

    The wealthy, in their gated golf-club communities, will never be able to understand the plight of the middle class in this 21st century. When you can look at gas prices, while driving a luxury SUV, and not even flinch...

    ...then talking about or even trying to understand the challenges and lives of middle class Americans is just... well... IMPOSSIBLE... if not foolish.
    Reply to this comment
    by naucoming4u April 10, 2008 7:12 AM PDT
    For the past 7 years, the direction of middle class living has been clearly downward, and it may take years, if not multiple presidential administrations to reverse that trend.

    That is assuming the next presidential administration(s) has a heart for the middle class and puts their needs in a top priority.
    Reply to this comment
    by slim1h2o April 10, 2008 7:15 AM PDT
    Posted by NAUcoming4U at 07:07 AM : Apr 10, 2008

    I agree,,,rents in N.Y. city can run as high as 2.000 to 4.000 a month. And food,,If you grab a basic sandwich,,that can 5.00, by itself.
    Reply to this comment
    by naucoming4u April 10, 2008 7:16 AM PDT
    He''''d support rape and murder if Nancy Pelosi came out against it....

    Posted by FloydZepp at 07:10 AM : Apr 10, 2008
    ................

    Actually, he does... and she is.

    Gateway 1 clearly supports the Iraq war and Nancy Pelosi is clearly against it.

    Nothing says "rape and murder" more than the U.S. involvement in Iraq.
    Reply to this comment
    by Gary Kempf April 10, 2008 7:20 AM PDT
    For the past 7 years, the direction of middle class living has been clearly downward, and it may take years, if not multiple presidential administrations to reverse that trend.

    That is assuming the next presidential administration(s) has a heart for the middle class and puts their needs in a top priority.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted by NAUcoming4U at 07:12 AM : Apr 10,

    Good point...
    Reply to this comment
    by naucoming4u April 10, 2008 7:22 AM PDT
    Posted by NAUcoming4U at 07:07 AM : Apr 10, 2008

    I agree,,,rents in N.Y. city can run as high as 2.000 to 4.000 a month. And food,,If you grab a basic sandwich,,that can 5.00, by itself.

    Posted by slim1h2o at 07:15 AM : Apr 10, 2008
    ...........

    Yes, I live in the San Fran area, and I am speaking from experience as well.

    Average rent for a 1-bedroom appartment (of decent quality in a decent neighborhood)... is between $1,100 to $1,500 a month! Gas prices in this area are the highest in the country. Same with food prices.
    Reply to this comment
    by naucoming4u April 10, 2008 7:25 AM PDT
    Actually, the $1,100 to $1,500 prices that I quoted are a bargain compared to NY city, but in New York City, the use of public transportation is a lot more viable, thus there is a lot less need to own a car (with all the expenses that go with it).
    Reply to this comment
    by truthspeake2 April 10, 2008 7:29 AM PDT
    America is going the way of the Roman Empire...greed and arrogance.

    Game Over!
    Reply to this comment
    by slim1h2o April 10, 2008 7:30 AM PDT
    Posted by NAUcoming4U at 07:07 AM : Apr 10, 2008

    I don''t know when Bush is going to get it through his thick head that his policies are going to ruin us.
    Not just the middle class, but whole country.
    Who''s going to do all the work?, If the middle class has no job to go to?

    Are the rich, and nuevo rich going to work on the infrastructure? I doubt it,,they couldn''t tell the difference between a monkey wrench, and a crecent wrench!
    Reply to this comment
    by slim1h2o April 10, 2008 7:30 AM PDT
    Posted by NAUcoming4U at 07:07 AM : Apr 10, 2008

    I don''t know when Bush is going to get it through his thick head that his policies are going to ruin us.
    Not just the middle class, but whole country.
    Who''s going to do all the work?, If the middle class has no job to go to?

    Are the rich, and nuevo rich going to work on the infrastructure? I doubt it,,they couldn''t tell the difference between a monkey wrench, and a crecent wrench!
    Reply to this comment
    by naucoming4u April 10, 2008 7:40 AM PDT
    Are the rich, and nuevo rich going to work on the infrastructure? I doubt it,,they couldn''''t tell the difference between a monkey wrench, and a crecent wrench!

    Posted by slim1h2o at 07:30 AM : Apr 10, 2008
    ...........

    Well, actually I can''t tell the difference between a monkey wrench and a crecent wrench... and I''m nowhere close to being rich!

    (But I digress)

    It has been demonstrated, by various administrations and both political parties, that when the wealthy run the establishment... they have little need to ensure the advancement of those "below" them.
    Reply to this comment
    by naucoming4u April 10, 2008 7:43 AM PDT
    Well, I must go for now...

    ...but for all of us middle class folk reading this now, I will paraphrase Edward R. Murrow by saying:

    Good day, and good luck!
    Reply to this comment
    by Gary Kempf April 10, 2008 7:46 AM PDT
    It has been demonstrated, by various administrations and both political parties, that when the wealthy run the establishment... they have little need to ensure the advancement of those "below" them.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted by NAUcoming4U

    Thats because they are the ones employing the illegal immigrants. That is their answer to their perfect economic world.
    Reply to this comment
    by bgwinnett April 10, 2008 7:54 AM PDT
    Thats because they are the ones employing the illegal immigrants. That is their answer to their perfect economic world.

    Posted by navpro at 07:46 AM : Apr 10, 2008

    So true. More immigrants = GDP boost(but no GDP per capita boost, Which makes everyone better off),and lower real wage growth to help keep a lid on inflation.I expect an acceleration immigration in future.Both parties will allow it to try and maintain the illusion of a growing economy.
    Reply to this comment
    by sumarongi April 10, 2008 7:55 AM PDT
    As long as the rich can afford to go to Serendipity III in New York and buy their thousand dollar ice cream sundaes, served with leaf and flake gold garnishes and an 18k gold take home spoon, they will continue to disregard the plight of the majority of people in this country. Then they complain about the taxes they mostly don''t pay. Talk about brazen disregard of the hands that feed them.
    Reply to this comment
    by prinzowhales April 10, 2008 8:18 AM PDT
    Perhaps the ''middle class'' can put the kids to work like the poor do in other Third World countries so they can pay for Big Oil''s increased profits...Heaven, knows, we wouldn''t want them to vote the Demopublicans out and stand up like free men and destroy the Oligarchy...No, that would be "inappropriate"....

    DOWN WITH THE DEMOPUBLICAN REGIME!! TROOPS HOME NOW!!
    Reply to this comment
    by prinzowhales April 10, 2008 8:22 AM PDT
    Until the ''middle class''--that part of the working class that fancies itself a cut above--face the reality that a class war is being waged against them by the Oligarchy and stop voting for the Demopublican internationalists, things will only get worse!
    Reply to this comment
    by truth-hurts April 10, 2008 8:34 AM PDT
    Not only did Obama NOT leave Trinity Church, but in 2005 & 2006 he gave them $27,500.
    NY Times 3-26-08
    Reply to this comment
    by bgwinnett April 10, 2008 8:35 AM PDT
    America is going the way of the Roman Empire...greed and arrogance.

    Game Over!

    Posted by truthspeake2 at 07:29 AM

    You couldn''''t be more right. I fear it is true but the only answer is voting for these three idiots? GULP! We''''re in for it now.

    Posted by maxify55 at 08:26 AM : Apr 10, 2008

    No one can stop it. The die has already been cast.
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 April 10, 2008 8:44 AM PDT
    Well by the time the Democratic Congress gets through with the American people, we will be paying our mortgages and the mortgages of the slugs that couldn''t afford a house and bought into shaddy deals. The Bush tax cuts will be rolled back which will upgrade the AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax) to capture 25% of the middle class. It will be the biggest tax increase since WWII. Woopie! They will tax and spend, tax and spend, and then say it was all BUSH''s fault. And the little lackeys on the left will sit there and say YEAH, he did it.
    Reply to this comment
    by lambofgoth April 10, 2008 9:21 AM PDT
    If you voted for him... either time... you have no right to complain.
    Reply to this comment
    by ianlou April 10, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
    If you are middle class and still afloat financially, here''s my advice for staying afloat:
    1. Buy lots of tools and learn how to fix your own belongings.
    2. Never buy anything new if you can buy it used, if you need dependable transportation, buy two very used cars so you have a spare while you are fixing the other one. No car payments and "crash and Burn Insurance" can save you a ton.
    3. Never use a credit card, need credit? buy a house that costs less than you can afford and create sweat equity by fixing it up, use home equity at 6% for credit when needed and make sure the balance goes to zero periodically.
    4. Realize that if something is still working after many years, it is well made and worth owning, old quality is much better than new crapp.
    5. Make it your goal that by 60 the only bills you have are utilities and property taxes.
    6. Take satisfaction in knowing that, as a middle class American, not spending money and not running up your credit is about the only affective way you have to say "Scrrew You" to Corporate America and their bed buddies; the Federal Government.
    Reply to this comment
    by singingrick April 10, 2008 9:40 AM PDT


    mudrose

    Where do you think the money will come from to pay off the 9 trillion dollar debt and the other 3 trillion we are estimated to spend in Iraq?

    Aren''t Bush''s tax cuts and deficit spending are just a deferred tax increase with interest? Right now we borrow the money just to pay the interest on all this debt.








    Reply to this comment
    by singingrick April 10, 2008 9:42 AM PDT


    Don''t worry America. Bush and the RNC are going to send you a nice flag lapel pen in the mail.


    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 April 10, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
    It is funny but no one learns from history. They just keep repeating the mistakes.

    The Roman Empire, the French revolution, the Bolsivik revolution, and the wheel keeps turning and most people belive the rich until they have nothing left to lose.

    But there are stil those that hold on to the old ways and it keeps coming back to haunt us.
    Reply to this comment
    by estuardo40 April 10, 2008 10:02 AM PDT
    The answer isn''t who is sitting in the White House, but who sits on each board of every major corporation. It''s sad when a 90+k income isn''t enough to save for your children''s college, and still be able to save for retirement!
    Reply to this comment
    See all 95 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs