April 9, 2008

Does Mumps Vaccine Fade By College Years?

Study: Waning Immunity, Other Factors Caused 2006 Mumps Outbreak

  • Play CBS Video Video Mumps Outbreak Worries Parents

    Amid reports that mumps vaccinations are only 90 percent effective, authorities say recent outbreaks would be worse if vaccinations were not standardized. Dr. Jon LaPook reports.

  • Drake University student Mandi McClue, left, gets a mumps immunization shot from Polk County Health nurse Lori Parsons, right, during a clinic at the university student health center, Wednesday, April 26, 2006, in Des Moines, Iowa. Photo

    Drake University student Mandi McClue, left, gets a mumps immunization shot from Polk County Health nurse Lori Parsons, right, during a clinic at the university student health center, Wednesday, April 26, 2006, in Des Moines, Iowa.  (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

(AP)  Most of the college students who got the mumps in a big outbreak in 2006 had received the recommended two vaccine shots, according to a study that raises questions about whether a new vaccine or another booster shot is needed.

The outbreak was the biggest in the U.S. since shortly before states began requiring a second shot for youngsters in 1990.

Nearly 6,600 people became sick with the mumps, mostly in eight Midwest states including Nebraska, and the hardest-hit group was college students ages 18 to 24. Of those in that group who knew whether they had been vaccinated, 84 percent had had two mumps shots, according to the study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state health departments.

That "two-dose vaccine failure" startled public health experts, who hadn't expected immunity to wane so soon - if at all.

The mumps virus involved was a relatively new strain in the U.S., not the one targeted by the vaccine, although there's evidence from outbreaks elsewhere the shots work well against the new strain.

The researchers, reporting in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine, note the virus likely came from travelers or students from the United Kingdom, where mumps shots are voluntary and there was a much larger mumps outbreak of the same strain. Many countries don't vaccinate against mumps, so future cases brought from overseas are likely.

"If there's another outbreak, we would evaluate the potential benefit of a third dose to control the outbreak," said researcher Dr. Jane Seward, deputy director of the CDC's viral diseases division.

Mumps is spread by respiratory secretions and saliva among people in close contact, making college students particularly susceptible. Students' sharing of drinks and utensils, and sexual activity, probably increased their exposure.

Mumps causes fever and swollen salivary glands in the cheeks. Before the vaccine, complications such as deafness, viral meningitis and testicle inflammation, which can cause sterility, were common and there were a couple million U.S. cases a year.

The only U.S. vaccine, made by Whitehouse Station, N.J.-based Merck & Co., hasn't been changed since its introduction in 1967 and there are no plans to change it, said Barbara Kuter, Merck's executive director of pediatric affairs.

Over 500 million doses have been sold since the 1970s, when it was put in the combination measles-mumps-rubella shot.

Dr. John Bradley, a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics committee on infectious diseases, said his group is talking about possible changes to the vaccine recommendations schedule with CDC and other health agencies.

Now two shots are recommended, one at 12 to 15 months and the other at age 4 to 6.

It might not be cost effective to give everyone a third shot, but it should be considered for college students, said Dr. Stephen Marcella, an epidemiologist at University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey's School of Public Health.

Dr. William Schaffner, head of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, said what's need is a longer-lasting shot.

"It's clear that over time, immunity wanes somewhat," he said. "We need a better vaccine."

Seward said other CDC studies on the 2006 outbreak found two mumps shots protected about 85 percent of people from the new strain - not quite enough to prevent spread even with the nearly 90 percent vaccination rate at the time.

The outbreak was in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, South Dakota and Wisconsin.




© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from Health

Add a Comment
by cyberus-2009 April 9, 2008 9:00 PM PDT
Rather than spending millions researching a "better vaccine" why not put that money towards re-vaccinating college students, and adding a meningitis vaccine to the list so we can stop having outbreaks and death in at least one college a year.
Reply to this comment
by tucano2 April 9, 2008 11:22 PM PDT
The only thing Merck''s MMR vaccine actually does is deafen thousands of American children each and every year. If that is not child abuse of the worst sort we do not know what is.
Reply to this comment
by lucasnico April 9, 2008 11:52 PM PDT
MyOpinion.......mercury was not removed from vaccines until 2002, if indeed it is the MMR you refer to.... and some of those vaccines were still around two years later.
Mercury is still used in the flu vaccine.
While I don''t rely on articles like this for education, I also don''t rely on idiot posts like yours.
Reply to this comment
by lloydbest1 April 9, 2008 11:56 PM PDT
Vaccinations are not permanent. Neither is the immunity you get when you have had a case early in childhood.
I got the mumps in both cheeks at the age of 4. It was pretty painful as I recall. But not nearly as painful as the second case I got at 17 involving the only other place a male can get them. Ouch!
Reply to this comment
by aheadofcrowd April 10, 2008 12:18 AM PDT
As crazy as this sounds, there have never been long-term studies on vaccines. The short term studies have nearly all been tainted by Big Pharma money to twist the truth about effectiveness and safety. So how confident are you in vaccinating your child again?
Reply to this comment
by lambofgoth April 10, 2008 6:45 AM PDT
So how confident are you in vaccinating your child again?-Aheadofcrowd. Very. Any idea how many children those diseases killed prior to vaccinations?
Reply to this comment
by lucasnico April 10, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
Myopinion....you could not be more wrong. Because it''s on the internet does make it true. Thimerosal was allowed in California vaccines until 2002, and shelved, as in "in use" through 2004...... you clearly show your ignorance and lack of education and absolutely poor parenting skills....God help your children.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 April 10, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
I was vaccinated as a child. I''m still around and dong fine well over 29 years later (no, I will not tell you how many over 29). Long-term study complete.
Reply to this comment
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs