Clinton: Bush Should Skip Olympic Ceremony
Democratic Hopeful Calls On President To Boycott Opening Ceremony Over Chinese Policy In Tibet And Sudan
-
Play CBS Video Video Olympic Protests In Paris "CBS News RAW": Demonstrators in Paris hung a banner depicting the Olympic rings as handcuffs from the Notre Dame cathedral, as part of an effort to disrupt the city's portion of the Olympic torch relay.
-
Video Torch Put Out Amid Protest "CBS News Raw": French officials extinguish the Olympic torch for a second time in Paris and escort it onto a bus for safety as protestors boo and chant "Tibet."
-
Video 'Free Tibet' On The Golden Gate "CBS News RAW": In advance of the Olympic torch relay's San Francisco stop, protestors draped "Free Tibet" posters from a side span on the iconic Golden Gate Bridge.
-
Photos Olympic Torch Odyssey There have been some bumps in the road as the torch makes its way from Olympia to Beijing.
-
Photo Essay Hillary Clinton A look at a life and career full of firsts.
The Democratic presidential candidate said a boycott of the opening ceremonies by Bush would underscore U.S. concerns about the recent unrest in Tibet and questions about China's relationship with Sudan.
"I think that President Bush should decide not to attend the opening ceremonies unless and until the Chinese do what the world is calling for them to do, which is to end the oppression in Tibet and give back religious and cultural freedom to the Tibetans and do more to help the world end the genocide in Sudan," Clinton told CBS News' The Early Show. "We need to put that pressure on the government of China, and I thing that President Bush should do that, and I hope that he will."
Her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, Barack Obama, said recently that he was conflicted about whether the U.S. should fully participate.
President Bush has said he will attend the Olympics because it is a sporting event, not a political event.
White House spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters Monday that his position had not changed, nor had the administration's concerns about China's human rights record.
"We have never been afraid to express those views either directly by the president or the president's senior advisers when they travel to China and publicly," Fratto said.
The political debate over China's hosting role is rapidly overtaking the sports-themed torch ceremonies around the globe.
As CBS News' Fernando Suarez, who is traveling with the Clinton campaign, notes in the "From The Road" blog, Clinton voiced her concern over the current political situation in Tibet two weeks ago. At a press conference in Greensburg, Pa., Clinton called the current political situation in Tibet "deeply troubling,” but stopped short of calling for a boycott, saying, “Let’s wait on that, I don’t have an opinion about that.”
In Paris on Monday, organizers canceled the final leg of the traditional torch run through the city. In the face of chaotic protests and repeated attempts to douse the torch, organizers snuffed out the torch and put it aboard a bus in a humiliating concession to protesters decrying China's human rights record.
Worried officials extinguished the torch and placed it on the bus five times throughout the day as protesters tried to grab the torch and block the relay. At least two activists got almost an arm's length away before they were seized by police.
Another protester threw water at the torch but failed to put it out before being taken away.
The disturbances in Paris follow similar efforts in London Sunday, where the torch was run through another gauntlet of protesters.
Clinton's announcement comes as her campaign tries to recover from jettisoning its chief campaign strategist this weekend over his involvement with a Colombia free trade deal she opposes.
Rival Obama said in a TV interview earlier this month that he was "of two minds" when it came to full U.S. participation in the Olympics.
"On the one hand, I think that what has happened in Tibet, China's support for the Sudanese government in Darfur, is a real problem," he said, before adding: "I am hesitant to make the Olympics a site of political protest because I think it's partly about bringing the world together."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, among other U.S. lawmakers, has suggested Bush should consider staying away from the opening ceremony following China's crackdown on protesters in Tibet.
©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- I agree with Hillary . . .Bush should stay home. The only thing we should be supporting are the athletes. Until the athletes start competing for medals, ignore the rest of it . . .all it does is help the Communist Chinese.
- Reply to this comment
- " until the Chinese do what the world is calling for them to do."
And what the world say about the war in Iraq? The Chinese just want to keep their country unite, you american are tearing others country apart, killing the innocent and children, create chaos. so you think you have the right to say that. Who should do what? - Reply to this comment
- Trust me, people. The Nanny State knows what is best for you.
Posted by JT_Lancer at 07:59 PM : Apr 08, 2008
The Bill Clinton presidency of two terms was nowhere near what any reasonable person would call a nanny state and that''s the only pertinent comparison we can use to evaluate a possible Hillary presidency or role in the next administration. The GWB presidency however is without any doubt corrupt, disastrous and devoid of any shred of decency. In the matter of controling information, and deciding what the people should know, GWB is in a league by himself throwing in the toilet Democratic traditions of openness in government.
Conducting illegal and quiet surveillance of emails and phone conversations of citizens, the practice of censorship in tax-payer funded websites, using government agencies and officials to deny global warming, refusal to release information in response to Congressional requests, putting out lies, lies and more lies before and after start of Iraq war, are just a few examples that come to mind. - Reply to this comment
- I respect the President for supporting our athletes sent to represent the people of the US. Hilary would turn it into a political event, what a goober. I think the US Prez belongs there as evidence of our countrys pride in our team. Can you imagine how the US team would feel if he didn''''t attend?
Posted by nottellin1 at 11:47 PM : Apr 08, 2008
Set an olympic record for jumping for joy? - Reply to this comment
- I respect the President for supporting our athletes sent to represent the people of the US. Hilary would turn it into a political event, what a goober. I think the US Prez belongs there as evidence of our countrys pride in our team. Can you imagine how the US team would feel if he didn''t attend?
- Reply to this comment
- Ok guess I have to relog in..Oh well stuff happens!
- Reply to this comment
- CBS wow love the double post or triple post to get ratings ..lord your making me gag..newcomers!!! beware they post from story.. to story to get reaction. oh boy new story. your all nuts that is why your reporters.. and people believe you. I''am truely laughing out loud.
- Reply to this comment
- This is about sports NOT Politics....wow I amazed how many people work for the Olympics are not going to be present because of polticis.
- Reply to this comment
- We must STOP free trade NOW!
We CANNOT allow peaceful Americans to voluntarily exchange goods and services for mutual benefit!
Americans should only be allowed to buy the goods and services that the politicians allow them to buy.
At government approved prices.
Of course, if its not good for you, Americans should not be allowed to buy it at all.
Trans fats? No way.
Cigarettes and alcohol? Not a chance.
Obesity-inducing fast food? Forget it.
Trust me, people. The Nanny State knows what is best for you.
Let us take away the heavy burden of decision-making in your life.
Let us decide what is best for you.
I''m Hillary Clinton and I approve this message. - Reply to this comment
- I don''t thing we nor anyone else should be politicizing the Olympics. Its a shame we do it but we do it non the less.
I seem to recall Dimwitocrat President Carter boycotting the Olympics. We sent no teams at all.
Nobody missed us nor gave a damm. What a waste of athletes training and good will. - Reply to this comment
- If we **** off China they may not loan the United States any more money. How sad is that!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- After what China has done to this country, I feel we should ban the Olympics altogether, But no, Bush doesn''t care, no back bone when it comes to his people, Only what the shrub wants every time.When will it be a more perfect time to let China know when they are trying to show the world who they are, France has the right idea this time.
- Reply to this comment
- http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/is-hillarys-muc.html
Well, I''ll be damned. Turns out Clinton told the hospital insurance company story right in the first place!
Good for Hillary!
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 06:54 PM : Apr 07, 2008
Excellent research, Rowdy. I suspected this was the case. There''s even a YouTube video of the deputy sheriff telling Hillary the story, just like she retold it. But those ever-lying Hillary-haters will bash her for it still. - Reply to this comment
- EUREKA!!!! It turns out HRC DID actually sign a pledge agreeing not only to not campaign in Mi and FL but also agreeing to NOT seat the delegates. She signed it in the fall of 07.
http://www.democraticunderground.
com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&addr
ess=385x115322
Now, of course she wants to renege, because what has occurred does not favor her. Sounds like someone just wants to cheat..er I mean... win..any way she can even if it means breaking her SIGNED pledge. So much for what that woman promises-- Hillary will lie, break promises, backstab or do anything to suit herself--NOT the country--but Hillary does it FOR Hillary, whenever following the rules or the law is not convenient. - Reply to this comment
- Sorry about the mis spelled word above; it should by Olympics.
- Reply to this comment
- The persistent weakness of American liberalism is its fixation with rights and procedures at any cost to efficiency and common sense. Democrats'' reluctance to push Clinton out of the race is the perfect expression of that delicate sensibility
- Reply to this comment
- "Bill Clinton: Give China Most Favored Nation trading status, forget human rights abuses." Posted by gkc99
Sorry, gkc99, but China got Most Favored Nation status back in 1980! You can''t blame Bill Clinton for everything! I do admit is makes no sense for China to have MFN status, while we still have an embargo against Cuba! - Reply to this comment
- I seem to recall that Bill Clinton gave away to China all of America''s industrial and military technology. Now that they have all that, what good will it do to boycott the opening ceremonies of the Olypics?
- Reply to this comment
- I am far from being a Bush supporter, but this is his call and his alone. Hillary Clinton needs to back off now! She is politically posturing to gain press. The Olympics in my view should never be used for political gain, they are about bringing the world together, in peace, if even for a few days.
- Reply to this comment
- skyk-Geez, I thought I was still entitled to an opion on the issues. And, just to keep you on task, this is about hill and her ridiculous call for Bush to boycott the Olympics. Seems to me that with the close relationship the clinton''s have had with the chi coms, taking their money and all, why, it''s almost hypicritcal. That''s my take.Your comment, inane and makes no sense at all. See, Bush isn''t running again.
Also, what happened to all the talk, communicate and interact with other nations to settle our differences? Why, it seems like the Olympics would be a great venue to do just that, don''t you think??
By the way, the Chinese have been in Tibet for years and now it''s an issue. Seems like it''s been pretty much ignored except for a few "free tibet" bumper stickers. Say, how did clinton handle this??? - Reply to this comment





