McCain: Dems Making Empty Promises On Iraq
Presumptive GOP Nominee Says Obama's, Clinton's Plans Indicate "Failure Of Leadership"
-
Play CBS Video Video McCain Comments On Iraq "CBS News RAW": Despite recent waves of insurgent violence, John McCain insisted the U.S. troop surge had drastically reduced violence in Iraq, allowing "for a return to something approaching normal."
-
Video Forecast On Iraq CBS Chief Foreign Correspondent Lara Logan, Nancy Youssef of the McClatchy Newspapers, and the Washington Post's Rajiv Chandrasekaran speak with Bob Schieffer about the current state of Iraq.
-
-
Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., delivers a speech at the National World War I Museum Monday, April 7, 2008, in Kansas City, Mo. (AP)
-
Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., speaks to reporters aboard the campaign airplane in route from Phoenix, Ariz. to Kansas City, Mo. Sunday, April 6, 2008. (AP)
-
-
Photo Essay John McCain Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?
-
Interactive Iraq: 5 Years At War Five years after the U.S.-led invasion, the war wears on.
Democrat Barack Obama said the failure rests with McCain's support for an open-ended occupation of Iraq.
Addressing the Veterans of Foreign Wars, McCain criticized Obama and Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and insisted that last year's U.S. troop buildup in Iraq brought a glimmer of "something approaching normal" there, despite a recent outbreak of heavy fighting and a U.S. death toll that has surpassed 4,000.
"I do not believe that anyone should make promises as a candidate for president that they cannot keep if elected," McCain told the crowd.
"To promise a withdrawal of our forces from Iraq, regardless of the calamitous consequences to the Iraqi people, our most vital interests, and the future of the Middle East, is the height of irresponsibility," he said. "It is a failure of leadership."
McCain, the presidential nominee-in-waiting, is closely tied to the unpopular, 5-year-old war. McCain was a vocal advocate of the troop increase strategy eventually adopted by President Bush, and is seeking to convince people the strategy is working. He also argued that Iraq will need more money and aid for reconstruction.
Clinton and Obama, still battling for the Democratic presidential nomination, dispute the claims of success, arguing the war has failed to make the United States safer. On Monday, Obama used McCain's own words against him.
"It's a failure of leadership to support an open-ended occupation of Iraq that has failed to press Iraq's leaders to reconcile, badly overstretched our military, put a strain on our military families, set back our ability to lead the world, and made the American people less safe," Obama said.
Debate will intensify this week as Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker testify to Congress. Clouding their testimony is fighting that erupted late last month as U.S.-trained Iraqi forces attempted to oust Shiite militias from Basra in southern Iraq.
CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs notes that McCain is in part trying to set the parameters of the debate this week on Iraq.
“Iraq will be a centerpiece of the presidential campaign this week and McCain is laying the groundwork for his argument,” Ververs said. “As a primary supporter of the surge strategy, McCain will probably benefit or be harmed depending on how Americans perceive the situation on the ground. But he has to bet that enough questions can be raised about the aftermath of any timed withdrawal to make voters think twice about that option.”
For his part, McCain suggested the Democrats' promise to withdraw troops was motivated by ambition rather than honesty.
People deserve a candid assessment of progress in Iraq as well as of the serious difficulties that remain and of the consequences of hasty withdrawal, McCain said.
McCain warned against the swift withdrawal of troops advocated by Obama and Clinton, saying Iraq could quickly become a terrorist haven.
"These likely consequences of America's failure in Iraq would, almost certainly, require us to return to Iraq or draw us into a wider and far costlier war," the Arizona senator said.
He highlighted a sharp drop in violence in recent months in his speech to the VFW at the National World War I Museum. From June 2007 until last month, when McCain visited Iraq, violence, he said, fell by 90 percent, and deaths of civilians and coalition forces fell by 70 percent.
"The dramatic reduction in violence has opened the way for a return to something approaching normal political and economic life for the average Iraqi," McCain said.
Despite the positive numbers he cited, 2007 - the year of the troop buildup - was the deadliest yet.
McCain insisted he could rally support from the majority of Americans - even though, according to public opinion surveys, they believe the war is going badly and the troop buildup has not helped.
"If we are honest about the opportunities and the risks, I believe they will have the patience to allow us the time necessary to obtain our objectives," McCain said.
©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 16
- next
See all 307 CommentsMccain keeps stumbling over his words about what is going on in Iraq. His age is definitely catching up with him. Don''t want him answering that phone at 3 am.
Posted by kansas1946
These troops of our volunteered for duty after 9/11. They saw a need to Defend their Country and did so. They are not victims although victimization and poverty are great pimping stories here in this wasteland of unrelenting poverty and desolation where everybody is on bread lines and living in shanties. You vision is distorted and demeaning. We are safer because the Iraqi people put Sadaam where he belonged - in Hell and we''ll be much safer when we can get the world community to tell Iran with it''s 6,000 new centifruges to stand down. Since this country now belongs to the pimps, liars, governmental lackeys and political hos, who worry more about themselves than their country, it will be very telling when over the course of the next 8 years exactly how Iran will play out on the world theatre. But you keep living in your fantasy world that all will be well if we just have tea and sympathy for the enemy.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/04/08/869803.aspx
OBAMA LINK TO HAMAS...
If Barack Obama didn%u2019t know about Abunimah%u2019s writings (and Abunimah says he did), the same as his claims of being unaware of Reverend Wright%u2019s remarks after 20 years, then Obama is not competent to be our President. Abunimah likes to lie and claim Al Awda has nothing to do with the ISM or Electronic Intifada, though plenty of evidence exists on the website the homepage at www.StoptheISM.com showing the contrary.
But Obama%u2019s association with the ISM through his church and lobbying in Chicago goes even deeper than just his past links to Al Awda and Ali Abunimah. His pastor, Jeremiah Wright, and the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, are both equally involved with the ISM.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2462
Anyone who thinks this cluster fu*ck can be won with more money and more troops is living in a fantasy world.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by vmcneal2 at 08:23 AM : Apr 08, 2008
+ report abuse
*****************************************
Amen, vmc. What make me mad is the people that are willing to sacrifice more and more brave young men and women over in that sewer, just so they don''t have to admit that Bush is an idiot and was wrong, wrong, wrong, about the whole thing. He accomplished nothing and made a huge mess.
***********************************************
Well, let''s see. Since last year, Mr. McCain has been telling us how much improvement there is, that you can stroll in the market place safely, that things are getting bakc to normal, etc., and that we could be in Iraq for 100 years.
Obama is telling us we need to get out, the sooner the better because we are not helping, we are hurting. I think I will go with the "empty" promist, thanks.
Their articles are like nothing I have read in any of the current media outlets. It is brilliant writing plus it offers a great community in which to discuss. The editor actually takes time to answer and the political humor section is awesome!!!
Check out the article %u201CWe are the puppets%u201D!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://savagepolitics.com/?p=271
In reality, Dems are almost as much to blame for the mess. As you my or may not know, over 100 Dems in Congress supported the original war authorization for the invasion of Iraq, including Ms. Clinton, who has been an outspoken advocate for the war until recently.
Likewise, Obama has advocated unilateral use of force against Pakistan (if necessary, whatever that means). Thus, he and Hillary are nearly as enthusiastic as mcCain when it comes to military adventurism abroad.
If the Dem nominee gets elected, don''t be too surprised if little changes.
The fact is that all three candidates believe in continuing the tradition of an interventionist US foreign policy.
Do you really think that obama or Clinton as pres will shut down any of the 725 military bases abroad?
Do you really think that either one will reduce the presence of US military overseas in 130 countries around the world?
Folks, there aint a dime''s worth of difference between the two parties. Both seem content to bankrupt the American citizenry and sacrifice them in order to preserve the almighty State.
http://www.democraticunderground.
com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&ad
dr
ess=385x115322
Now, of course she wants to renege, because what has occurred does not favor her. Sounds like someone just wants to cheat..er I mean... win..any way she can even if it means breaking her SIGNED pledge. So much for what that woman promises-- Hillary will lie, break promises, backstab or do anything to suit herself--NOT the country--but Hillary does it FOR Hillary, whenever following the rules or the law is not convenient.
Anyone who thinks this cluster fu*ck can be won with more money and more troops is living in a fantasy world.
Sounds like you are saying that since your brain is withered, that is leading you to think Obama is the right choice.
Vote Obama, it is the ONLY right choice.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 16
- next
See all 307 Comments