Philly School Candy Ban Gets High Grades
Child Obesity Rates Reduced By Half Versus Schools Without Program Pushing Nutrition
-
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive Diet And Nutrition Are you eating right? See the government's guidelines, calculate your body mass index and quiz yourself on healthy food choices.
What have they got to show for it?
The number of kids who got fat during the two-year experiment was half the number of kids who got fat in schools that didn't make those efforts.
“It's a really dramatic effect from a public health point of view. That's the good news,” said Gary Foster, director of the Center for Obesity Research and Education at Temple University. He is also the lead author of the Philadelphia schools study being published Monday in the April issue of Pediatrics.
The bad news: There were still plenty of new overweight kids in the five schools - over 7 percent of them became overweight compared to the 15 percent in the schools that didn't make changes.
“That signals to me that we have lots more work to do,” said Foster.
Schools are ideal settings for programs that target childhood obesity, the researchers noted. Children spend long hours each day at schools and eat lunch and often breakfast at school. But school-based programs have had mixed results.
The Philadelphia study put to the test a program developed by the Food Trust, a local nonprofit which works to improve access to affordable, healthy food. Ten schools enrolled in the government-funded study in 2002, and half made the changes.
It's a really dramatic effect from a public health point of view. That's the good news.
Gary Foster, director of the Center for Obesity Research and Education at Temple UniversityThe 1,349 students in the study were in grades four to six. At the start, about 40 percent were overweight or obese. Many received free or subsidized meals.
For the study, changes were made to the food in vending machines or the cafeteria in five of the schools. Juice, water and low-fat milk replaced sodas. Snacks had to meet limits for fat, salt and sugar. Students who ate healthy snacks got raffle tickets to win prizes such as bikes and jump ropes.
“We found when you give children healthy choices, they pick them,” said Grace McGinley, school nurse at Francis Hopkinson School, one of the test schools.
Staff and students had lessons on good nutrition. The message was reinforced in other subjects: food labels were used to help teach fractions. And parents were also enlisted: a fundraiser successfully substituted fruit salad for baked goods, said another of the researchers, Sandy Sherman, the Food Trust's director of nutrition education.
She said the children were also urged to exercise at activity stations during recess. They were measured and weighed periodically and surveyed about food and exercise.
After two years, besides fewer new overweight children, the overall number of overweight students at the five schools dropped about 10 percent to 15 percent. At the no-change schools, the number of overweight children rose a quarter to 20 percent.
There was no difference between school groups in new obese students (6 percent) or the overall number of obese (about 25 percent). Obese children probably benefit more from individually targeted efforts, Foster said.
Mike Prelip of the UCLA School of Public Health said the study design was rigorous and the results interesting.
“One intervention usually won't work for everyone,” he said. “That's why it's good to have multiple approaches.”
The researchers said their findings suggest such programs should start earlier, include gym classes and food sources outside school. Temple University and the Food Trust are now working with corner stores to get them to offer more cutup fruits and vegetables, water, and single-serving snacks. Sherman said they found that local students spend about $2 a day buying snacks that average 600 calories.
Last week, a group of fourth-graders at Fairhill School graded their corner stores during a nutrition class. Crystal Hernandez, 10, said her local store got the top green score while 9-year-old Gabrielle Hudnell's store got a cautionary yellow.
“My mom buys healthy foods now,” said Gabrielle. “We have three packs of strawberries, grapes and bananas.”
Their favorite snack? Well, potato chips. “I get the little bag,” Crystal was quick to add.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- I brought my lunch and I had peanut butter and jelly pretty much every day because it was the only thing I would eat and chocolate or strawberry milk in my thermos and maybe some chips or candy once in a while for a treat. But we were outside every day after school playing. Also during recess at school we were jumping rope, playing ball, etc. there was no need for gym class which I never had in grade school and I was perfectly okay and so were the vast majority of kids.
We have all sorts of bad snacks here in the office in our cafe, but plenty of good ones too, there is no need to change them to all heathy *** because if I want something bad, well then I''ll just go across the street to the deli and buy it. - Reply to this comment
- This is what it takes to get kids healthy? Must be a bunch of idiot parents in this country unable to teach their kids what fresh, healthy food is (perhaps except extremely poor families or low education). I brought my lunch throughout all my years in school because the food they had was terrifying and it didn''t take a genius to figure this out. It was way cheaper, too.
Sorry, but I blame parents--not just the schools'' bad food. We had a large vegetable garden when I was a kid and froze/canned much of the stuff we couldn''t eat in season. I was a skinny, vegetarian athlete. Still am.
Don''t get me wrong...it''s good this is working. It''s just too bad this is what it takes. Parents must be morons today and they''re now raising lazy, moron kids. - Reply to this comment
- 1959 school lunch: Brunswick stew; green beans, graham cracker (1/2) with peanut butter. Canned peaches. Milk. Or you brought your lunch. Period. No soda, no water (unless you were allergic to milk). I sound like a fuddy-duddy, don''t I?
- Reply to this comment
- These schools and their kids did an excellent job. I think someone should bring them all out for Banana Splits as a reward!
- Reply to this comment
- I don''t see kids with a fraction of the muscle tone we had as kids. Too much TV and not enough protein? Isn''t there any Health Stores that could put sales booths in Schools giving kids a healthy alternative at a cheaper price? Kids need nutrition when growing,.....but it seems the Health Education Pervs can''t get their minds off of the condoms and such.
- Reply to this comment
- I think every board of education in the country should look at programs like this. There are no harmful side effects from doing this.
- Reply to this comment
- Way to go.
All schools should do this.
I also wonder why work places don''t do something like this.
Less health problems. Less rise in insurance rates.
Hospitals, clinics, and doctor offices should really be doing this. It would help to promote better health and every little bit helps. - Reply to this comment




