Going Green Makes Neighbors See Red
California Homeowners Duke It Out In Court Over Trees That Block Solar Panels
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Showdown Of Green Homeowners
Two California homeowners are warring over two environmental causes that can't exist without the other. Ben Tracy reports.
-
Photo
In the battle between the redwoods and the solar panels, the owner of the trees ended up in hot water. (CBS)
-
Interactive
Eye On The Environment
Find out how global warming, air pollution and alternative forms of energy impact our world.
"Solar power is very important, not only to me, but to the environment," Vargas said.
Unfortunately for him, nature got in his way, CBS News correspondent Ben Tracy reports.
"The trees are beautiful," said Vargas' neighbor, Richard Treanor. "Those solar panels are not."
Treanor lives across the fence. He's all for the environment - and even drives a hybrid car. Ten years ago he planted several redwoods to provide a little privacy.
Now they have his neighbor seeing red.
"He called us over the fence one day and said, 'I am going to be installing solar panels and therefore you have to take your trees down,'" Treanor said.
The problem was that the trees would block the sun, reducing power to the panels. So the neighbors went to court.
"It was an all-out assault on all of our trees," Treanor said.
As it turns out, the law was on the side of the sun.
The California solar shade act requires homeowners to keep their trees from shading more than 10 percent of their neighbors' solar panels between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.
The experts determined that 15 percent of the solar panels were being blocked by the neighbors' trees. That meant the trees were in violation and the neighbors that own them … were criminals.
"We were convicted of one count of violation of the California Solar Shade Act," Treanor said.
By court order, Treanor had to give on of his offending trees a shave. With solar panels are now big business in California, legal experts say fights over them are just getting started.
"As solar panels become more cost-effective, you are going to see more and more disputes between homeowners of this nature," said Buzz Williams of Stanford University. "Hopefully what you won't see are disputes in criminal courts."
"Reasonable people who both care for the environment should be able to find a resolution here," Vargas said.
But that would require an inconvenient truce.
MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- National Mall Showing Its Age
- Fans Clamor for Jackson Memorial Tickets
- America's First Conservationist



However, it is frustrating to see some of the stuff put out there by our neighbor. Like... "Reasonable people who both care for the environment should be able to find a resolution here". You would have to have been in mediation with us to appreciate that one! We found out first hand that to Mr. Vargas "reasonable" meant to chop down ALL of our trees! Period.
The DA didn''t disclose that he was going after only 4 of our trees until our third court appearance. All we have ever wanted was some spirit of conciliation. It cost us $38,000, but we found it in Judge Kumli.
Thanks again... Rich Treanor
If you were born in California, I sympathize with you. If you moved there on your own, you deserve it. You knew what you were getting into.
Cut down a neighbor''s tree!