No Secret Service Protection For McCain
Washington Post: GOP Candidate Must Request Such Protection And Has Not Done So
-
Photo
Republican presidential candidate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, signs an autograph after delivering a speech at the Cecil Field FCCJ Aviation Hanger 14 in Jacksonville, Fla., Thursday, April 3, 2008, during his Service to America campaign tour. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)
-
Photo Essay
John McCain
Some call him a hero, some a maverick. Will Americans call him Mr. President?
-
Timeline
McCain's Quest
Mileposts in the Arizona senator's race for the GOP nomination and the presidency.
Weeks after clinching the Republican presidential nomination, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) still has no Secret Service protection and has not requested it, the head of the agency told Congress yesterday.
Director Mark Sullivan said the Secret Service does not provide agents, metal detectors, vehicles or other security measures to candidates until they ask for them. McCain's Democratic rivals, Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Hillary Rodham Clinton have round-the-clock Secret Service coverage.
"Statutorily he is not required to take protection," Sullivan said of McCain, in response to several questions from Rep. Ciro D. Rodriguez (D-Tex.) and Rep. Harold Rogers (R-Ky.). "As far as an actual request, we have not gotten one. We have no involvement at this point."
Rodriguez said he assumed that McCain's status as the presumptive Republican nominee required enhanced security and was surprised that McCain is allowed to campaign in large crowds without Secret Service protection.
"I just assumed that even if someone doesn't ask, that there are certain other levels of protection that are out there," said Rodriguez, who attended yesterday's hearing of the House Appropriations subcommittee on homeland security. "I just assumed that we would normally just do that automatically. . . . He's the nominee of the Republican Party, and we ought to have some levels of protection."
Obama began receiving protection in May 2007, 18 months before the election. Clinton already had protection because she is a former first lady.
Steve Schmidt, a senior McCain adviser, would not discuss the senator's security measures. Another top McCain aide said the campaign is "very unhappy" with Sullivan and wishes "he would have asked to answer [the lawmakers' questions] in a closed session."
White House spokesman Tony Fratto also declined to comment, saying: "We will let the Secret Service answer those questions. They obviously take their protective mission seriously." Jim Mackin, a Secret Service spokesman, declined to comment on why Sullivan made the disclosure in a public hearing.
McCain's choice not to request Secret Service protection has been mentioned on some blogs and was the subject of an article in the Arizona Republic newspaper. But it has not been reported by most news organizations, in part because of requests from his aides not to draw attention to the situation.
McCain does have private bodyguards who accompany him to events. When he travels on charter planes, reporters and staffers are screened by private security each time they board.
On one recent flight in Mississippi, a bomb-sniffing dog swept through the press bus before reporters were allowed to board McCain's Jet Blue charter.
But that level of security pales in comparison with the protection at Clinton and Obama campaign events, where Secret Service agents always are very visible, shadowing the Democratic candidates even when they are at rope lines with voters.
McCain, a former Navy pilot who spent 5 1/2 years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam, has long nurtured a tough-guy image. He has derided the Secret Service protection as "a waste of taxpayer money" and proudly proclaimed that he would reject the enhanced security as long as he could.
"It's my intention, if we win this nomination, to reject Secret Service. . . . Why do I need it?" he told reporters in mid-November, as he campaigned in New Hampshire. "The day that the Secret Service can assure me that if we're driving in the motorcade and there's a guy on a rooftop with a rifle, that they can stop that guy, then I'll say 'fine,' " he said. "But the day they tell me, 'Well, we can't guarantee it,' then, fine, I'll take my chances."
Former Secret Service agent Andrew O'Connell, who helped protect Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, said McCain is taking an unnecessary risk.
"I don't think it's a wise move," said O'Connell, now a managing director of Fortress Global Investigations, a New York-based security firm. "John McCain may believe that he's not as polarizing a figure as Hillary or Obama, but that's not the point. . . . The primary motivator of would-be assassins is not the dislike of the candidate. It's wanting to go out in a big way and make a name for yourself."
Once a candidate is elected president, he or she has no choice but to accept Secret Service protection. Until then, it must be requested. Since it became clear that McCain would be the GOP nominee, his advisers have become increasingly concerned about his safety and have urged reporters not to mention the lack of Secret Service protection.
Once a candidate requests protection, the decision about whether he will receive it falls to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. Chertoff is aided by a five-member advisory panel that includes the House speaker and minority leader, the Senate majority and minority leaders and an at-large member, who this year is the House sergeant-at-arms.
To be eligible, candidates must reach certain thresholds in fundraising and in the polls, and must belong to recognized political parties, Sullivan told lawmakers.
The Secret Service is spending about $38,000 per candidate per day, Sullivan said, and at the height of campaign season later this year expects to spend $44,000 per candidate each day. The agency has protected candidates at more than 1,000 campaign venues and has put 550,000 people through magnetometers and metal detectors, he said.
In a remarkably active election campaign, the Secret Service's budget for candidate protection is $85.3 million for fiscal 2008. For fiscal 2009, which begins Oct. 1, it is $41 million.
"This is going to be the costliest campaign in the Secret Service's history," said Rep. David E. Price (D-N.C.), the subcommittee chairman.
Washington Post Staff researcher Rena Kirsch contributed to this report.
By Michael D. Shear and Christopher Lee
© 2008 The Washington Post Company




- 1
- 2
- next
See all 61 CommentsI was more comfortable assuming that he had S.S. protection. The one thing the country doesn''t need now is another crackpot trying to make a political statement and/or attempt for attention with a gun and the media shouldn''t be planting the seeds of dementia in their heads!
Besides, he doesn''t need FBI protection. I''m sure he has his own.
Nobody from the left or center---politically---will attack him because they don''t expect him to win!
If he is attacked, it''ll be from the far-right because he doesn''t "truly" believe in their agenda!
Ironically, if it happens, it''ll come from ''his own people''!
He doesn''t need the Secret Service to protect him. :cP
Stay the course as GW would have !!
I was more comfortable assuming that he had S.S. protection. The one thing the country doesn''''t need now is another crackpot trying to make a political statement and/or attempt for attention with a gun and the media shouldn''''t be planting the seeds of dementia in their heads!
Posted by realpatriot1
Never knew a lefty that could keep a secret. Ask Leaky Leahy.
lolll...maybe McCain feels that the people with both the big money - the ones who could afford to finance an effective assassination attempt - and the morality to go forward with such an attempt are in his corner, and so there is no need.
--------------------------
Posted by watcher269 at 11:15 AM : Apr 04, 2008
It is flatly illegal for the militay to provide security in US territory, except on US militay bases, so it is not true. He does get protection frrom the military while in Iraq, but that is true of any high Government official.
He has to pay for security thru donations or his wife can pay for it.
I''m sorry you haven''t figured it out yet from the fawning coverage of McCain he is a media darling - the one the vapid, insipid, childish press corps wants to be our next president. That "liberal" media rooting for the Republican (again).
It is nothing but incompetence that McCain''s staff hasn''t requested protection and is a good indication of the incompetence McCain himself will bring to the office. We don''t need 4 more years of a doofus presidency.
It''s not the presses job to whisper campaign tips to McCain BTW, but I''m sure they did and his staff ignored it and that explains this article.
Now that its out there, I think McCain is a bad *** and its quite a statement. Even though I''m not sure if I''m for him or Obama yet I hope the man is ok and no sicko''s try anything stupid.
I bet part of his rational is that he is universally liked even by the dems.
Neocon Fascist Nazis throughout the country are worried that some liberal "fruitcake" might attempt to "take out" the Great Pretender, which would throw the neocon world into chaos bordering on SANITY!
It is suspected, however, that "Bagdad John" is getting his protection from "other sources" some candidates named being the military (Delta Force, Navy Seals, Green Berets, etc.) or even that the "Rambo" mercenaries of Blackwater are providing it.
Whoever is providing it, there is little doubt that McCain would walk around "unprotected" despite his "tough guy" persona. Anyone who would need 1,000 fully armed troops and 5 heliocopters to protect him in the "friendly confines" of the Bagdad bazaars would have to have a small army surrounding him wherever he goes.
Just try to speak to him or shake his hand the next time "Bagdad John" visits you (if ever!) and see what happens!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!
sig heil, more of the same McCain!!!!
.....McCain shows that he doesn''t believe in big govt paying for every little thing..
...just to rile up all the radical liberals....
"Now that its out there, I think McCain is a bad *** and its quite a statement"
Yeah, the statement is that Republicans drool over that Jack Bauer schtick - even though it''s complete nonsense and campaign fluff. McCain isn''t a "bada$$", he''s almost 72. He''s an old man and he''s not kicking anyone''s "a$$".
"I bet part of his rational is that he is universally liked even by the dems"
Uh, guess again. McCain is universally disliked by "dems" and other thinking people. McCain is an empty suit with no ideas of his own and the natural successor to the miserable failure and war-monger Bush. Do you like economic collapse and 100 year of war? Then vote McCain.
Me, I''m voting for what''s good for this country, and it''s certainly not another Bushbot
stoop as low as she has to get a story. Ethics?
Fairness? Give me a break. Its no wonder CBS is
so low in the ratings.
If Barack Obama wins the democratic nomination, I will
vote for tough guy John McCain.
Posted by awithoff
Yeah, oh right. He had no problem with the government paying off Lincoln Savings and Loan. Or Bear Stearns. Or tax cuts for the rich or tax increases for the poor. Or corporate welfare or a million other things Republicans routinely soak the government for and then mew about OTHER people''s snout in the trough.
McCain (like all Republicans) are perfectly happy spending your tax dollars on themselves. It''s what they do.
Posted by jumkey
What a crock. I wouldn''t even mind if it was intelligent, but, alas, anything coming from the left never is.
George Soros, the Devil''s Advocate, is gonna assault McCain with $350 million dollars of compaign advertising just before the election so he can get his Schwarze Kennedy into office. Leave it to this miserable, despicable Hungarian to find a loophole in the Act. Lay down with dogs R. Hussein Obama, you''re gonna wake up with fleas.
Posted by SgtRDS
You and Fiddy Cents like all great minds, think alike. Who would wanna kill the Schwarze Kennedy. The Oreo isn''t worth it.
Besides, he doesn''''t need FBI protection. I''''m sure he has his own.
Posted by mudrose at 10:51 AM : Apr 04, 2008
Muddy - it is in the Secret Service job description not the FBI.
If he can''t protect himself - how is he going to protect the US...
If you dump your first wife and marry and heiress to the Anheuser Busch fortune, you can afford your own rent-a-cops!
John Kennedy lost his life proving that.
Posted by Konabike
Your right, as president he will address them regularly.
Posted by Konabike
Your right, as president he will address them regularly.
---------------------------
Posted by thgdriver at 12:49 PM : Apr 04, 2008
Clinton, McCain, and Obama will all be back in the Senate in Nov. The winner does not take office until 20 January.
The word "your" is the possesive form of "you." The word "you''re" is a contraction for "you are."
Posted by gkc99
Your facts are wrong, Her family owns a large beer distributorship and they distribute all brands of beer including Budweiser brands. As far as I know, she, nor her family, are related to Anheuser.
Just hard working Americans that made a fortune in the beer business. You sound enviously jealous!
Reminds me of John Kerry married to money bags Heinz. She tried to buy the presidency for him, didn''t work.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by gkc99
They can all afford their own, McCain is the only one not wasting our tax dollars.
It is flatly illegal for the militay to provide security in US territory, except on US militay bases, so it is not true. He does get protection frrom the military while in Iraq, but that is true of any high Government official.
He has to pay for security thru donations or his wife can pay for it. Posted by gwagener
While you are correcting others, how about getting your own act together first!!!
Washington Post: GOP Candidate Must Request Such Protection And Has Not Done So
-Most killed (assasinated) presidents, candidates, were democrats, not republicans. The killars belonging to right wing trends or fools... all McCain''s background!
Posted by trishab4
I disagree, Lincoln was a Republican and just because Reagan and Ford (both Repubs.) were not killed, it was not because their would be killers did not try.
You have Assassinated and killers spelled wrong, I don''t give a damm but gwagener has set himself up as spell and grammar cop here. Look out!
The endless bleating about what Republicans "are" is always belied by how they act. A professed reverence for free speech is always followed by the caveat "except for expressing ideas we don''t like". Likewise freedom of religion, which is apparently only for Christians and maybe Jews (on good day). As for "fiscal responsibility" that''s the biggest laugh of all - Republicans are the biggest spenders when it comes to your tax dollars; you only have to look at the deficit, corporate welfare, pork spending and this endless war. They LOVE to spend your tax dollars on themselves.
Sorry, but all the evidence, every bit of it, shows that Republicans are corrupt and incompetent and not qualified to hold responsible positions anywhere in a free society. You wouldn''t hire a bank robber to run a bank, and you wouldn''t hire a Republican for the same reason.
so, why waste tax payers money on him.
Kerry backed Obama and slammed a knife into John Edwards back so deep its surprising he was not arrested by the secret service. LOL.
Hillary wants to send everybody''s offspring to college on my dollar. I put my kids through college the dimwitocrats can do the same.
It will be one social program after the other on my tax dollar. Who''s surprised when you listen to them say " Everything is free, even the home you could not afford in the first place".
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 61 Comments