U.S. Wins Over NATO On Missile Defense

Endorsement A Victory For Bush; Russia Remains Opposed To Weapons System

(CBS/AP)  President Bush won NATO's endorsement Thursday for his plan to build a missile defense system in Europe over Russian objections. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice called it a "breakthrough agreement" for the military alliance.

"Now it is clearly understood in the alliance that the challenges of the 21st century, the threats of the 21st century, make it necessary to have missile defense that can defend the countries of Europe," Rice told reporters at the NATO summit.

Progress on missile defense represented perhaps the biggest boon to Mr. Bush from the NATO summit. Russia has fiercely opposed it.

Rice also noted that NATO has "also asked Russia to stop its criticism of the alliance effort and to join in the cooperative efforts that have been offered to it by the United States."

A NATO statement calls on the alliance to explore ways in which the planned U.S. project, to be based in Poland and the Czech Republic, can be linked with future missile shields elsewhere. It says leaders should come up with recommendations to be considered at their next meeting in 2009.

The U.S. plan calls for 10 interceptor missiles based in Poland and a tracking radar site in the Czech Republic.

At a news conference in Bucharest on the sidelines of the NATO summit, Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg announced that negotiations with the Americans have been successfully completed and that a deal would be signed in early May.

The Poles have yet to agree to the plan, but in Warsaw on Thursday, talks picked up between Polish and U.S. officials about it.

The backing from NATO and the announcement with the Czechs provides Mr. Bush with a powerful leg up in his negotiations with Moscow over the issue.

Mr. Bush is seeing Russian President Vladimir Putin twice this week - during the summit and Sunday in Sochi, Russia. White House officials have talked optimistically in recent days that the weekend meeting could break the missile defense logjam.

"I think we can probably look for a deal" by the time Mr. Bush and his counterpart President Vladimir Putin hold their bilateral meeting this weekend, reports b>CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante.

Rice said she was hopeful that Mr. Bush and Putin would agree on a broad framework for cooperation between the countries, but it was still unclear whether they would reach a deal on missile defense. The administration has worked to allay Russian leaders' fears that the system is a threat to them.

"We hope that we can move beyond that to an understanding that we will all have an interest in cooperation on missile defense," Rice said. "But we will see."

On Afghanistan, Mr. Bush did win a commitment of more troops to Afghanistan's most dangerous areas, although his national security adviser acknowledged more needs to be done.

"We are not at the level of what at this point in time our commanders looking forward say we need and that's why we said more to do," Stephen Hadley said at the briefing with Rice.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said France will send as many as 1,000 troops to the eastern part of the country, freeing up some U.S. forces to move to the south. Canada had threatened to pull its soldiers out of the volatile south, the front line in the fight against a resurgent Taliban and al Qaeda forces, unless it received 1,000 reinforcements from another ally.

On NATO expansion, Mr. Bush did suffer a setback in his drive to have the alliance include Ukraine and Georgia, two former Soviet republics.

"NATO's door must remain open to other nations in Europe that share our love for liberty and demonstrate a commitment to reform and seek to strengthen their ties with the trans-Atlantic community," Mr. Bush said in brief remarks at an alliance meeting. "We must give other nations seeking membership a full and fair hearing."

Fellow NATO leaders, fearing a clash with Moscow, rejected Mr. Bush's appeal to allow the countries to get on a path toward membership. But Hadley said the president plans to make a new pitch before he leaves office in January. The United States expects to raise the matter at a meeting of NATO foreign minister in December, Hadley said.

The president expressed regret that NATO also declined to offer full membership at this meeting to Macedonia. The invitation was blocked by Greece, which says the country's name implies a territorial claim to a northern region of Greece, also called Macedonia.

"Macedonia's made difficult reforms at home," Mr. Bush said. "It is making major contributions to NATO missions abroad. The name issue needs to be resolved quickly so that Macedonia can be welcomed into NATO as soon as possible."

Albania and Croatia were invited to join the alliance, now currently at 26 members.

Progress on missile defense represented perhaps the biggest boon to Bush from the summit. NATO leaders were adopting a statement that "ballistic missile proliferation poses an increasing threat to allied forces, territory and populations" and that the U.S.-led system would help protect allies.

The statement calls on all NATO members to explore ways in which the planned U.S. project can be linked with future missile shields elsewhere The plan calls for 10 interceptor missiles based in Poland and a tracking radar site in the Czech Republic.

Russia charges the intent of the system would be to weaken its nuclear deterrent capabilities and upset the balance of power in Europe. Mr. Bush has denied that, saying the facilities are designed to protect Europe against a potential missile attack - or even just nuclear blackmail - by Iran. The dispute has become heated at times, with confrontational, Cold War-style rhetoric from Moscow.

Mr. Bush essentially has rejected Russia's suggestion that the U.S. substitute an early warning radar in Azerbaijan for the Europe-based system. But U.S. officials have been working to come up with a list of concessions and assurances that could resolve Moscow's fears, such as offering to let Russia share in the information the system collects and promising not to activate it without a verifiable threat.

[quetzal0666]

NATO is Obsolete,
the old Cold War is over, but SHRUB just started the new one.
we will arm the old soviet blocks, and mid game those same guns will be used against us,
SHRUB is the Biggest Prolifilator of Nuclear materials and balistic missile technology,
Singlehandedly he has become the biggest arms dealer in the world....
someting else to add to his bloodstained conscience or lack thereof.

[ubrew12]

BaghdadsHere said: "Thats another Bushs victory and you leftwinger from demoncrats party dont applaud him."
It may not seem like a victory to you when the Russians preemptively launch their missiles against us for fear that in a few years they''ll be contained by our missile defense systems, and incapable of retaliation from our own strike. Bush is playing high-stakes gamesmanship here, with YOUR life.

[j-whitman]

BAGHDAD %u2014 More than 1,000 Iraqi soldiers and policemen either refused to fight or simply abandoned their posts during the inconclusive assault against Shiite militias in Basra last week, a senior Iraqi government official said Thursday. Iraqi military officials said the group included dozens of officers, including at least two senior field commanders in the battle.

The desertions in the heat of a major battle cast fresh doubt on the effectiveness of the American-trained Iraqi security forces. The White House has conditioned further withdrawals of American troops on the readiness of the Iraqi military and police.

[j-whitman]

BaghdadsHere,,,, What we need is Troops, Support, Equipment & Billions per month to do the job Bush can''t.

Admiral Mullen the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff says, we don''t have them now & won''t in the near future, they are tied up in Iraq.

[j-whitman]

BaghdadsHere,,,, Tell me, who needs them & for what enemy ? Themselves ??? ---- It don''t work without Russia being on board. ------- The only winner here at all is the Defense Incdustry

[baghdadshere]

U.S. Wins Over NATO On Missile Defense

Thats another Bushs victory and you leftwinger from demoncrats party dont applaud him.

[hungry1968]

How is it that when a person questions the wisdom - or lack of -and the cost of our apparently failed foreign policy, that the person is labeled a terrorist, America hater and accused of being allied with the enemy. That''''s so bizzare, irrational and illogical.

Posted by iCi2i at 04:18 PM : Apr 03, 2008





Because when confronted with logic and reason, they don''t know how to respond. They can''t say, "Well I see your point, but here''s my point of view...."

They have to resort to name calling, accusations of being a terrorist or a terrorist supporter, hating America, hating the troops, etc, etc.

It''s bizarre and illogical, because they get it from Fox News. Hannity, O''Reilly, and fat Rush Limbaugh, make their money by name calling, accusations of terror support, hating America, etc, etc.

Their followers in these boards aren''t smart enough to logically put forth their OWN point of view, so they have to resort to the tactics of their heroes.

It''s both sad and more than just a little pathetic.

[dennishart4]

We posted the few Soviet live webcams. Looks like a military buildup to us. www.theoandavirus.com

[ioweign]

IOWEIGN,,,Dont be idiot. The US pays for each barrel of oil we need. Nobody is stealing the Iraqi oil and nobody pays in cash as much as the US pays per barrel of oil, thats why HUGO CHAVEZ doesnt stop shipping oil to us despite his communist ideology.

Posted by BaghdadsHere at 04:51 PM : Apr 03, 2008

I am not talking about oil. It was your Freudian slip.
Wasn''t the Iraqi oil suppose to pay for this mess??

Daily import averages in thousands of barrels...

2071 Canada
1598 Venezuela
1571 Mexico
1511 Saudi Arabia
669 United Kingdom
590 Nigeria
409 Norway
402 Angola
380 Iraq
321 Virgin Islands

Any surprises?

The top 5 countries supply the US with 61% of our import needs.

The top 10 countries supply the US with 78% of our import needs.

Total daily imports is around 12,000,000 barrels.

Data taken from the US Department of Energy...

http://www.eia.doe.gov/

[ioweign]

after all you should be fluent in arabic by now...i am sure you started learning it sept 12, 2001

Posted by jamesm12341 at 04:46 PM : Apr 03, 2008

If I did, I would have been quite ahead of the the fact and the FBI can always use the help...