February 19, 2009 10:26 AM

Senate Leaders Act To Ease Housing Crisis

(CBS/AP)  Momentum built Wednesday for a bipartisan Senate bill designed to ease the slumping housing market and help millions of families threatened by foreclosure, though economists are skeptical that it will help much.

The scaled-back proposal released by Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky contains an amalgam of ideas aimed at boosting demand for housing and helping homeowners saddled with subprime mortgages avoid foreclosure.

The plan contains $4 billion in grants to local governments to buy and refurbish foreclosed homes, new authority for states to issue bonds to be used to refinance subprime mortgages and a $7,000 tax credit for people buying new homes or properties in foreclosure.

"It is a robust package," Reid said. "This is good news for the American people."

CBS News correspondent Wyatt Andrews reports that both parties in Congress are taking heat over their inaction - letting average Americans absorb the loss of their homes, while losses at Bear Stearns, $29 billion worth, were being absorbed by the Fed.

"Wall Street has been helped, now its time to help Main Street," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y.

But economists across the political spectrum were skeptical that the measure would have much practical effect to ease the wrenching crisis in the housing market and the wave of foreclosures spreading across the country.

"They're good steps, but they're small steps and certainly not big enough steps to solve the problem," said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com. "I don't think it's going to be enough to solve the housing problem, at least not in 2008."

Economist Peter Morici tells Andrews the package is underwhelming - but says Congress has to start somewhere.

"They see the need to stop the decline in housing prices and they also need to do political damage control," Morici says.

Meanwhile, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke appeared before Congress Wednesday with a blunt message. Recession is possible, he said, and fixing the slump in home prices has to be a priority.

While supporters said the Senate measure would boost demand for housing, help people refinance adjustable-rate mortgages and help communities beset with abandoned homes, many economists cautioned that the measure's benefits would be modest - and would help banks and homebuilders while doing hardly anything for people facing foreclosure.

Reid did not release details, but staff aides described a bill containing elements Democrats have touted for weeks.

The measure also contains a provision dropped from February's stimulus measure that would permit homebuilders and other money-losing businesses to reclaim previously paid taxes, new disclosure requirements aimed at preventing unsophisticated borrowers from being duped by mortgage brokers, and additional money to provide counseling to people threatened with foreclosure and help them in negotiating with their lenders.

Republicans forced Democrats to drop efforts that Zandi and other economists said might have proven more effective in alleviating the crisis, including a controversial plan opposed by banks and their GOP allies to change bankruptcy laws to help borrowers trapped in subprime mortgages keep their homes.

Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., was also forced to leave out of the bill a plan to have the Federal Housing Administration guarantee perhaps $400 billion worth of refinanced loans if lenders reduce loan amounts to reflect reduced home values.

Republicans won a scaled-back version of a plan by Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., to provide a tax credit to people buying foreclosed or newly built homes. Isakson sought $15,000 in tax credits spread over three years - aimed at boosting demand in the slumping housing market - but GOP negotiators settled for a $7,000 credit awarded over two years.

Liberals and conservative economists alike questioned the merits of the idea, however, saying it would have relatively little effect on demand and that to the extent it would lift demand it would boost sales for banks who made bad loans and homebuilders who built homes despite signs that the market was slowing.

"There's ample incentive to buy foreclosed homes," said conservative economist William Niskanen, chairman of the CATO institute.

"Basically, you're giving money to builders that overbuilt and banks that issued bad loans," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. "It's giving money to the villains in this story."

Economists also questioned how effective it would be to have local governments buy and refurbish foreclosed homes. Advocates of the idea say it would stabilize neighborhoods and protect home values.

The measure will contain a broader rewrite of the FHA that reduces down payments on FHA-insured loans and raises the dollar limit on mortgages that FHA can insure.

The most costly element of the bill would allow homebuilders and other companies that are presently losing money to reclaim taxes paid up to four years ago instead of the two-year period currently permitted. Critics say the idea doesn't have anything to do with the housing crisis and that it would have little stimulative effect on the economy.

Altogether, the tax provisions in the measure would cost $10.8 billion over the next decade, though the short-term costs are considerably higher.

"These tax provisions will keep property values up, keep folks in their homes, and keep businesses afloat," said Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont.


© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by sgtrds April 3, 2008 8:15 PM EDT
I''''m not saying these people have a right to your tax money. I''''m saying don''''t stand around on the safe, dry shore and root for them to drown. You, too, may need a lifeline someday.

Posted by menmotoscutr at 04:56 PM : Apr 03, 2008

Absolutely. One of the major responsibilities of government is to provide a safety net for the average citizen. That''s why we have programs such as unemployment insurance and Social Security. It is in everyone''s best interests to keep anyone from slipping into poverty where taking care of them is much more expensive in costs for crime prevention and prison.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds April 3, 2008 8:11 PM EDT
The idea that "Bear Sterns" was bailed out is just bunk. The "owners" of Bear Sterns lost $17B in common stock value - me included. The Chairman lost nearly $1B (that is billion) in stock value when he sold most of his stock last week.

Posted by donbl1 at 07:40 PM : Apr 02, 2008

So he walks away with only a few hundred million instead of a billion. Wha Wha Wha. I feel so sorry for him. Let''s hold a cake walk or a raffle for him since I''m sure he lost his house in the bailout.
Reply to this comment
by choiceshaveconsequences April 3, 2008 7:56 PM EDT
"Why again should my tax dollars be used to bailout the greedy and stupid people?"-----Because you need it. I have a hard time believing that any of you are so honest that you would resist the temptation of obtaining something for nothing at the best or something for less at the worst. Are you sure you always pay retail? That is what greed is, is it not? As for stupidity; we are all stupid on some subject. What''s yours? I''m not saying these people have a right to your tax money. I''m saying don''t stand around on the safe, dry shore and root for them to drown. You, too, may need a lifeline someday.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet April 3, 2008 11:51 AM EDT
What ever you want to call it...it''''s still a government bailout for the greedy and stupid people.

Why again should my tax dollars be used to bailout the greedy and stupid people?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by shanev137 at 02:46 AM : Apr 03, 2008
+ report abuse

What it''s going to cost to "bail out" these folks who, if the Fascist hadn''t changed the Bankruptcy Laws, wouldn''t have a problem is a drop in the bucket to what it''s going to cost to bail out the Banks who gave them the money!! What we really need is 4 more years of the most INCOMPETENT, CORRUPT Government this nation has ever had. Talk about failure!! "Trickle Down" is a complete failure but the Republican''s can''t seem to get that message... three times we''ve tried it and three times it''s failed and McSame want''s to keep it up!! ROFLMAO ANYONE who would vote for these freaks needs their heads examined. Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by ov442 April 3, 2008 11:51 AM EDT
"The plan contains $4 billion in grants to local governments to buy and refurbish foreclosed homes, new authority for states to issue bonds to be used to refinance subprime mortgages and a $7,000 tax credit for people buying new homes or properties in foreclosure. "
---- Nothing for people in foreclosure here. Just help for people who already have money and good credit.

"Basically, you''re giving money to builders that overbuilt & banks that issued bad loans," said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic & Policy Research. "It''s giving money to the villains in this story."

-- yep.

"The most costly element of the bill would allow homebuilders & other companies that are presently losing money to reclaim taxes paid up to 4 years ago instead of the 2-year period currently permitted. Critics say the idea doesn''t have anything to do with the housing crisis & it would have little stimulative effect on the economy."
---- that''ll PAD the bottom line for those folks, & wont do a *** thing for the economy or those that need it.
Businesses, Dont Hire People unless they have Business enough to require it. Tax Breaks just hand them new cash for the owners.
Reply to this comment
by Gary Kempf April 3, 2008 9:16 AM EDT
Home prices need to drop back into the realm of reality. Supporting artificially high prices are what lead to this mess. Only those that lost there jobs should receive some kind of aid. Those that bought to flip, Tough, suffer through your greed.... If you can''t qualify for a conventional loan, you don''t qualify to purchase a home. Paying for a home is a responsibility, owning a home requires planning, saving, qualifying.... It is not up to the rest of us to stop you from loosing something you knew you couldn''t pay for to begin with....
Reply to this comment
by shanev137 April 3, 2008 5:46 AM EDT
What ever you want to call it...it''s still a government bailout for the greedy and stupid people.

Why again should my tax dollars be used to bailout the greedy and stupid people?
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 April 3, 2008 5:14 AM EDT
"These tax provisions will keep property values up, keep folks in their homes, and keep businesses afloat," said Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont."

Property values need to come down, not stay up. the price is already beyond the means of the average wage earner.

It will not keep folks in their homes, those who become homeless are more often those whose jobs get outsourced to slave labor countries. The subprime crisis was the logical result of trying to artificially prop up the value of overpriced real estate, on the backs of those who can not afford to be the props.

Businesses that use sound business practices don''t need help to stay afloat, those that use shady practices should be allowed to fail.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey April 3, 2008 1:58 AM EDT
[The plan contains $4 billion in grants to local governments to buy and refurbish foreclosed homes, new authority for states to issue bonds to be used to refinance subprime mortgages and a $7,000 tax credit for people buying new homes or properties in foreclosure. "It is a robust package," Reid said. "This is good news for the American people." ]

where''s this money coming from? oh ... that''s right ... from the pile of money we don''t actually have.
Reply to this comment
by lizardbate April 3, 2008 1:07 AM EDT
Well, once again, and as always, our elected representatives are looking out for the rich, screw the everyday peasant citizens!!!!!! Steel money from the poor and give it to the rich establishment. What''s new about the establishment. Analysts are already saying this plan will not work, but these idiots will vote it in and sell it like they have done us all a big favor!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook