LONDON, April 1, 2008

Archaeologists Dig For Clues At Stonehenge

Hopes High With New Technology For 1st Excavation At 5,000-Year-Old Site In Decades

  • Archaeology students Steve Bush, right, and Sam Ferguson, left, sieve through earth amongst the stones at Stonehenge, England, Monday, March 31, 2008.

    Archaeology students Steve Bush, right, and Sam Ferguson, left, sieve through earth amongst the stones at Stonehenge, England, Monday, March 31, 2008.  (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

  • Fast Facts United Kingdom

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(AP)  Some of England's most sacred soil has been disturbed for the first time in more than four decades as archeologists try to solve the enduring riddle of Stonehenge: When and why was the prehistoric monument built?

The excavation project, that started Monday and is set to last until April 11, is designed to unearth materials that can be used to establish a firm date for when the first, mysterious set of bluestones was put in place at Stonehenge, one of Britain's best known and least understood landmarks.

The UNESCO World Heritage site, a favorite with visitors the world over, has become popular with Druids, neo-Pagans and New Agers who attach mystical significance to the strangely-shaped circle of stones, but there remains great debate about the actual purpose of the structure.

The dig will be led by Timothy Darvill, a leading Stonehenge scholar from Bournemouth University, and Geoffrey Wainwright, President of the Society of Antiquaries.

Both experts have worked to pinpoint the site in the Preseli Mountains in south Wales where the bluestones came from. They will be able to compare the samples found in Wales to those at Stonehenge on the Salisbury Plain.

"The excavation will date the arrival of the bluestones following their 153 mile journey from Preseli to Salisbury Plain and contribute to our definition of the society which undertook such an ambitious project." Wainright said. "We will be able to say not only why, but when the first stone monument was built."

Scientists believe that the bluestones were put in place about 2600 B.C. and removed 200 years later, but they concede the date is only an approximation at best.

Darvill said the excavation marks the first opportunity to bring the power of modern scientific archaeology to bear on a problem that has taxed the minds of so many experts since medieval times: Why were the bluestones so important to have warranted bringing them from so far away?

The excavation goal is to find remnants of the original bluestones, or related materials, that can be subjected to modern radiocarbon dating techniques to establish a more precise timeline for the construction of Stonehenge, said Dave Batchelor, an archaeologist with English Heritage, which oversees the Stonehenge site.

Quote

We could get an absolute blank or we could get something magnificent or we could get something in between.

Dave Batchelor, English Heritage
"We have to find the material that will give us a good date," he said. "That's where the luck comes in. We could get an absolute blank or we could get something magnificent or we could get something in between."

He said bluestones actually have an "inky, bluey, black" appearance and come only from the Preseli Mountains in South Wales.

It is hoped that fixing the date of the start of construction with more precision will allow scientists to finally grasp how and why the monument was built.

They also may learn more about how the stones were transported. Research shows the bluestones, weighing an estimated five tons apiece, may have been dragged from the mountains in south Wales to the sea, put on huge rafts, and floated up the River Avon.

Archeologists believe that before the bluestones were put in place, Stonehenge consisted of a circle of wooden posts and timbers built in approximately 3100 B.C.

The research that began Monday with the digging of a trench marks the first time ground inside the inner stone circle has been excavated since 1964. The area, revered as a powerful link to England's pagan past, is so sensitive that Cabinet approval was needed before the work could begin.

Renee Fok, a spokeswoman with English Heritage, said the project was okayed only after experts were convinced of its potential value. She said the project represents "the logical next step" after the two professors located the source of the bluestones in Wales.

"It's the culmination of their work, it makes sense to go back to the stone circle and get a date," she said.

"We want to strike a balance. We want the best research, but we can't just say go ahead and dig as you like, it's a very fragile area. Even the Druids are happy with this project, we've spoken to them and they don't object."

She said tourists will be able to visit Stonehenge as usual and will also be able to watch live video coverage of the excavation in special tents at the site.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by thgdriver April 3, 2008 4:45 PM EDT
We were told in school that it was a devise that they used to tell time.

Posted by conbuck1

Yeah, right! I wanna see somebody put that on their wrist.
Reply to this comment
by conbuck1 April 3, 2008 4:12 AM EDT
We were told in school that it was a devise that they used to tell time.
Reply to this comment
by swwils April 2, 2008 7:17 PM EDT
Those Archaeologist need to be digging for oil.Stone Henge is cool but if there isn''t a trillion barrels of oil underneath it then really who gives a s.h.i.t.
Reply to this comment
by veteran72 April 2, 2008 1:26 AM EDT
I''m not saying I''m old or anything, but I remember when they put that thing up.....I lived near there and with all that construction going on, it naturally drew the youngsters, and I was constantly yelling out the window, "You kids get off of my lawn"!!!....young whippersnappers and rapscallions,...........
Reply to this comment
by aztecdakota April 1, 2008 11:38 PM EDT
Does this take a genious? It was a fort, fortress, on high ground, barricades between the uprights. Constructed to protect the people in that area from attacks from others. AND, they did a *** good job building. Oh, obvious it had a roof, at one time. Anyone out there in the archeological or military, or construction business? It was a *** good defensive location. and strong.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver April 1, 2008 5:02 PM EDT
Scientists believe that the bluestones were put in place about 2600 B.C. and removed 200 years later, but they concede the date is only an approximation at best.

Obviously, the guy who wrote that had his brain removed some time ago too.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug April 1, 2008 5:01 PM EDT

When I was a kid growing up, the old man down the
street had a bumper sticker on his car that read:
"Stonehenge-The Happiest Place on Earth"
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver April 1, 2008 4:52 PM EDT
Its round, right? Flying saucers are round, right? Obviously it''s an airport for flying saucers. Stevie Wonder could see it.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver April 1, 2008 4:45 PM EDT
Whats with the bright orange vests? Are they near a highway where thousands of these rocks are being hauled by?
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver April 1, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
There was a writers strike, nothing new was on the television so they put up this rock circle for something to do.
Reply to this comment
by talkingham April 1, 2008 3:44 PM EDT

"Scientists believe that the bluestones were put in place about 2600 B.C. and removed 200 years later, but they concede the date is only an approximation at best."--

That sentence is just wrong, send the article back to edit.

I can''t remember if there was a Xena episode about the construction of Stonehenge. It probably would have just a good a chance of being right about how and why they were built as a couple of self-important archeologists who like to dig things up, put them in a warehouse and hide them fromt he public after the public foots the bill- and of course they''ll claim the glory of figuring it all out, like Columbus "discovered" America.

They will say it is an astronomy based ceremonial center. Actually the entire site is much larger than the stone circles and in the design of the site looks very much like the layout of many native aemrican ceremonial centers.
Reply to this comment
by drputt45 April 1, 2008 2:56 PM EDT
It reminds me of some of the highway projects around here that run out of money and sit there for years. Looks like the ancients had the same problem and never finished the cloverleaf.
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage April 1, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
Good luck, Stonehenge archeologists.
It''ll be interesting to see what you conclude.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug April 1, 2008 2:08 PM EDT

Stonehenge was built on the concept that archeologists
will scratch their heads and dig anywhere.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 April 1, 2008 1:45 PM EDT
The purpose of Stonehenge was to provide the leaders of the time with extra shade because a period of global warming was causing uncomfortably warm weather. The warming was blamed on the flatulence of the Eurasian elk Alces alces (moose) which was driven to extinction in England by 1,500 BC.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug April 1, 2008 11:56 AM EDT

When and why was the prehistoric monument built?

prehistoric?
Now what does that mean?

I believe what happened is that they dragged these stones for 153 miles then someone asked, "Why are we dragging thse stones so far?"

Everyone looked at the guy and wondered the same thing.

At that point they all stood the stones up to make it appear there was a purpose in what they were doing
then they all went home
wondering why they had dragged these stones so far
Reply to this comment
by briannorwood April 1, 2008 11:35 AM EDT
"Scientists believe that the bluestones were put in place about 2600 B.C. and removed 200 years later, but they concede the date is only an approximation at best."

Does anybody know what this means?
Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Poll: Rush Most Influential Conservative

    (203 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: