New Terror Warnings Over Pakistan Border
CIA Chief, Taliban Agree: Al Qaeda Stronger Than Ever In Region; Threat To West Is Real
-
CIA director Gen. Michael Hayden appears during the taping of "Meet the Press'" Sunday, March 30, 2008, at the NBC studios in Washington. (AP Photo/"Meet the Press")
-
Play CBS Video Video Pakistan's Power Fragmented The defeat of Gen. Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan's tumultuous general election casts uncertainty over Pakistan's role in America's war on terror. Mark Phillips reports.
-
Special Report War On Terror Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.
-
Fast Facts Pakistan Learn about the people, economy and history.
The situation in the border region between Afghanistan and Pakistan where al Qaeda has established a safe haven presents a "clear and present danger" to the West, the CIA director said Sunday.
Michael Hayden cited the belief by intelligence agencies that Osama bin Laden is hiding there in arguing that the U.S. has an interest in targeting the border region. If there were another terrorist attack against Americans, Hayden said, it would most certainly originate from that region.
"It's very clear to us that al Qaeda has been able for the past 18 months or so to establish a safe haven along the Afghan-Pakistan border area that they have not enjoyed before, and that they're bringing in operatives into the region for training," he said.
Hayden added that those operatives "wouldn't attract your attention if they were going through the customs line at Dulles (airport, outside Washington) with you when you're coming back to the United States - who look Western."
Adding weight to Hayden's remarks were claims made Sunday by a Taliban subcommander, who told CBS News that his organization and al Qaeda are now operating more militant training camps in Pakistan's border tribal region than ever before.
The subcommander, who spoke to CBS News on the condition that he not be identified because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said some 4,000 Taliban fighters were about to be moved from the camps in Pakistan across the border into Afghanistan.
He also said that al Qaeda is running a number of "special camps" for extremists who are destined to be sent to Western countries to wage attacks there.
The subcommander would not say where the militants were from, or which countries they were training to target, but recent videos posted on jihadist Internet forums show trainees speaking European languages. Five French nationals are currently on trial in Paris, accused of funneling young Muslims from the suburbs to fight against American troops in Iraq.
Included in the 4,000 Taliban militants destined to try and cross the border to wage attacks in Afghanistan, according to the subcommander, are "about three-dozen (suicide) vest makers and explosive device experts will start making it into different Afghan regions this year."
He said al Qaeda "played a great part" in increasing the technical and combat skill levels of the thousands of jihadists who traveled to the Pakistan camps. Though many are from Pakistan themselves, others came from country's across the Muslim world to join the fight, the subcommander said.
The situation on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border presents clear and present danger to Afghanistan, Pakistan, the West in general and United States in particular.
CIA Director Michael HaydenAccording to Anas, the new technology includes more sophisticated roadside bombs, RPGs and attack techniques. He said the Taliban was going to focus on isolating Kabul, along with rest of the south and southeast of the country - and cutting off U.S. and Afghan government supply lines from inside Pakistan. Some parts of Afghanistan are too difficult to reach by road from inside the country.
A statement attributed to Taliban senior commander Mullah Bradar early last week also threatened more attacks this spring using new techniques. Bradar also warned that Afghans working with the government would be targeted.
Washington has sought reassurance that Pakistan's new coalition government will keep the pressure on extremist groups using the country's lawless northwest frontier as a springboard for attacks in Afghanistan and beyond.
Over the weekend, Pakistan's new prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, pledged to make the fight against terrorism his top priority. But he said peace talks and aid programs could be more effective than weapons in fighting militancy in tribal areas along the Afghan border. It was the new government's latest rebuke of President Pervez Musharraf's military tactics, which many Pakistanis believe have led to a spike in domestic attacks.
On Sunday, Hayden declined to comment on reports that the U.S. might be escalating unilateral strikes against al Qaeda members and fighters operating in Pakistan's tribal areas out of concern that the pro-Western Musharraf's influence might be waning. Hayden only would say that Pakistan's cooperation in the past has been crucial to U.S. efforts to stem terrorism there.
"The situation on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border presents clear and present danger to Afghanistan, Pakistan, the West in general and United States in particular," he said. "Operationally, we are turning every effort to capture or kill that leadership from the top to the bottom."
On Iraq, Hayden said it could be "years" before the central government might be able to function on its own without the aid of U.S. combat forces. Hayden said he would defer to the specific assessments of Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, and Ryan Crocker, top U.S. diplomat in Baghdad, who return to Washington next month to report to Congress.
Hayden spoke on NBC television's "Meet the Press."
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- COLONIENY--While you are in doubt as to "what" I am, I see you are not ready to even address what the former governor of Minnesota had to say about 9-11-- that it was an inside job.
Facts only confuse you and so you respond with a smear. That is the only weapon you and your ilk have when confronted with facts...facts that you have failed to even challenge. - Reply to this comment
- Hey Swwils,
The old ''Fear Factor'' game is boring for me. Use another new trick. - Reply to this comment
- To NeoCommies :Showing hypocrisy is not an argument.
- Reply to this comment
- Those crazy Al-Qaeda get their hands on one of Pakistan''s nukes and we are doomed,so we better protect those borders with all we have and can get.
- Reply to this comment
- Prinzofwhales: You are either a moral idiot, or a college professor.
Here are some things I know you believe.
All cutures are the same, ours is worse.
The US is racist country, despite so many white male and females voting and supporting Omaba for President,and so many other examples.
If we just talk to our enemies, we could all get along.
The Arab Islamic Terrorists are justified in attacking us, because of things we have done.
;;;;;There are several "story lines" to parrot back, which these people are taught in colleges by leftist teachers. No facts, just story lines.
What idiots. - Reply to this comment
- Jesse Ventura can be heard on the replay of the Alex Jones Show, first hour, at infowars.com. He''s done his homework and maintains that 9-11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!! Now, who really gives a rat''s arse what the liar Hayden has to say about anything?...Let''s see what how he is going to protect us from the terrorists who employ him!!
- Reply to this comment
- Is it any wonder that CBS is firing newsmen?--the news is covered elsewhere on the internet...at places like infowars.com, prisonplanet.com, truthnews.com...
When a former governor comes out and says that 9-11 was an inside job--IT IS NEWS!!...Just as it was news that the longest serving president of Italy since World War II said it was common knowledge within the intelligence community that 9-11 was a joint US-Israeli operation to justify the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Where is CBS? - Reply to this comment
- "COLONIENY. That''s called a "free fire zone" and resulted in My Lai, as well as the deaths on 100s of thousands of Vietnamese... and you STILL LOST!
86 43 Posted by Nancy_Naive
I love this....
This dimwit equates a "free fire zone" which is, according to the Army, "A specific designated area into which any weapon system may fire without additional coordination with the establishing headquarters" - an area not containing friendlies beyond the FEBA; with the My Lai Massacre, something perpetrated by a renegade officer, and not sanctioned by the US Army.
Then they go another step saying the "Free Fire Zone" caused 100,000s of deaths (like they really knew).
What a jail house lawyer. What a freak of far left.
BTW......... 86, 43, HIKE! is probably much better known than your pathetic 86 43.
Grow a brain, leftie. - Reply to this comment
- AND, THE FAR LEFT CAN NOT CONFRONT REAL EVIL.
- Reply to this comment
- One of the hang ups of the far left, is to show hypocrisy of some kind (US bankers backed Hitler). So what ? This is one way to deflect the issue .
- Reply to this comment
- COLONIENY--As usual for people who point to Munich, they neglect history before that point...Bankers and international finance was backing Hitler in the United States and Britain....People like the Morgan partner, Mr. Lamont, grandfather of the fellow who ran for the Senate against Liebermann, had a picture of Mussolini displayed in his office...Bush''s grandfather was a prominent Hitlerite and came within a thrice of being prosecuted under the Trading with the Enemy Act during World War II...The World War II generation learned nothing!!
Putative Islamic terrorists in the hills of Pakistan are of no concern to me. The lies of 9-11, London and Madrid, not withstanding. We financed the religious extremists there...we used them against the Yugoslavians...we used them against the Russians...we are using them to sell religious war in Iraq.
Interestingly enough, the financing of 9-11 was of no great interest to the Washington ''terror fighters''... as it led directly to the door of their creature, the ISI.
If we want to learn anything from World War II, it should be that the excuse for starting it came after Hitler used a false-flag attack to justify the invasion of Poland...just as Bushler used a false-flag attack to invade Afghanistan...Hitler had used one previously, the Reichstag Fire, to justify the diminuation of American freedoms and Constiutional rights with his Patriot Act. - Reply to this comment
- To the below naysayers: It was the lack of seriousness and resolve that got us into WWII and the greatest calamity in human history. Does anyone remember "peace in our time" by PM Chamberlain. By appeasing evil, and not doing all that you can to fight evil, in this case, taking out Islamic Terrorists in Pakistan, Europe, Gaza , Iraq and Leb, and the USA (where we have had over 50 attacks planned since 911 by Muslim terrorists)- we are setting ourselves up for more problems later. The WWII generation learned the hard way, by being isolationists, and appeasers. Like Neville Chamberlain before, what we will get in our time and the next generation, is a terrible huge war, and perhaps loss of Western Civilization, including rights for women and gayyys.
Much of this is taking root in the UK. aleady.
We have to fight to win. There are no innocent children if they will be the terrorists in 15 years. - Reply to this comment
- Omm, interesting. What happened to the 10 billions given to Pakistan President from the past 6 years to fight al Qaeda in this region ?
- Reply to this comment
- COLONIENY--Yes, we have inexhaustable resources and launching expensive air operations against targets... like poor villagers and school children will really be a cost effective...and, magically, our air power will not be degraded by all of this flight time for missions over thousands of square miles of mountainous real estate. It makes perfect Neo Con sense...we should do it!...why break the pattern?
- Reply to this comment
- The WWII generation would have known what to do.
There were no "sanctuaries" during WWII . Here is a plan. Tell everyone, that they have one week to leave, but to do so they must be processed at check points. Anyone left, is fair game for air attack. Simple ? And then anything that moves we fire bomb. When all the enemy are dead , or give up, like the Japanese did on islands, we win. - Reply to this comment
- Folks,
Yep, let''s shoot them now and claim "Mission Accomplished" for Idiot Americans to feel good. Come back in 5 years and shoot them and claim "Mission Accomplished" to just have Idiot Americans feel good once again.
For each coachroch killed, 10 more will come out of hiding to replace him until you remove the motive that feed their anger. - Reply to this comment
- Poor, dead, Osama...He has a whole list of video work to his credit that only became popular after his death...isn''t that always the way it is?
But, the very first video ''found'' in some rubble, wherein the Osama stand-in claimed to be responsible for 9-11, was proven to be a fraud. And, his videos, as opposed to Zawahiri''s, always show past footage of him...some of these flicks even contain materials from documentaries. Osama bin Dead... - Reply to this comment
- For the entire two hundred years of our existence as a nation, the Afghani-Pakistani border has not been of any concern to us...it has never been a concern to me...it is not a REAL concern now. The same tribesmen who were there for centuries are there today.
But this pant-load Hayden says it is a problem...does that make it so, or does it make Hayden to be a fool?
I believe the later to be true.
Osama bin Dead...there is no point in prowling about looking for him. Benazir Bhutto said he was dead...and from the very moment she said it...this woman who was headed, before her murder, to supplant Musharaff, was completely and utterly ignored by the propaganda machine of the Regime--from David Frost, who ignored her bombshell from the moment she dropped it--to the CBSNBCABCCNNFOX manufacturers of the Matrix...it became a non-event in the world where the ''Medium is the Message.'' - Reply to this comment
- FeelFree1: Stop being ignorant and actually read the report before making stupid remarks.
j-whitman: yes, Curveball was discredited and American intel was told the information was unreliable. They told the Bush administration in bureaucratese, ''Do whatever you want, but it%u2019s your responsibility.''
America was already coming down hard on Germany and France for not joining the invasion and the Germans didn''t want to compound the situation by not releasing information they held, but was not confirmed.
Of course, Bush ate it up and included the info in his State of the Union address and Powell''s United Nations presentation.
Politics is a lot like religion, politicians take the parts of reports (scripture) which seems to support their agendas, and the rest which doesn''t help them they do their best to ignore. - Reply to this comment
- I think Hayden is wrong. The most dangerous border is, oh let me see hold on let me pull it out of my hat. It''s Norway and uh Sweden. Yeah that''s it.
- Reply to this comment




