WASHINGTON, Mar. 30, 2008
Richardson: Voters Decide, Not Big Shots
Says Party Superdelegates Should Not Overrule Popular Will Of Voters In Choosing Nominee
-
Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M., says superdelegates should not overrule the wishes of primary voters. (CBS)
-
Play CBS Video Video Richardson On Obama Support In a conversation with Bob Schieffer, Gov. Bill Richardson (D-N.M.) explains his decision to endorse Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama as opposed to Hillary Clinton.
-
Video Closer Look At American Power Bob Schieffer notes that the U.S. has encountered the most success when working with others in a diplomatic situation, which could perhaps explain the current setbacks facing the War in Iraq.
-
Video Library On The Campaign Trail An up-close look at life on the road with the major presidential candidates.
He also criticized the "personal venom" of some Hillary supporters, like James Carville, who criticized Richardson for his announcement of backing Obama, saying they feel a sense of entitlement, "that the presidency is theirs.
"I think loyalty to the nation, loyalty to the party is a lot more important than personal loyalty," Richardson, D-N.M., told Face The Nation host Bob Schieffer. "I owe the Clintons a lot. I served in the president's cabinet. That loyalty is to President Clinton. That doesn't mean that I'm going to for the rest of my life be in lockstep with whatever they do."
To underscore his point, Richardson pointed out, "I ran against Senator Clinton. I was a presidential candidate."
With regard to recent suggestions on how to resolve the tight race between Clinton and Obama, a race that may come down to the party's superdelegates choosing a nominee, Richardson said a meeting of superdelegates (who could convene to make their choice known weeks before the August convention) was an "interesting" idea but should not overrule the choice made by voters.
"What you don't want is for the big shots in the party, the superdelegates, to determine the nominee," he said. "It should be voters. It should be delegates chosen according to proportionality.
"But, maybe, what can happen is some of the major party leaders like Governor Dean and Speaker Pelosi, Al Gore, John Edwards … find ways that superdelegates can have discussions, can have some kind of consensus emerging so that we don't have a bloody convention where we're weakened.”
Also appearing on the program was Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, D., who said discussions about vice-presidential options for the Democratic ticket were “getting the cart before the horse” before the remaining primaries - including Pennsylvania's - are done.
"Let's try to stay focused on the election at hand," Nutter said.
Read the full "Face the Nation" transcript here. © MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 11
- next
See all 202 Commentshttp://kennethelamb.blogspot.com/2008/02/barak-obama-questions-about-ethnic.html
lol, Richardson was a sucker! When Obama winked VP to him, he jumped ship before the primarires were over. Now Obama''s dumped him like a hot potato and is woeing Bloomberg for the VP slot now that he has the Richardson endorsement.
As I said before, poetic justice.
NOBAMA 08
NOBAMA 08
Richardson has set the standard by which all superdelegates should follow,...vote your mind (in this case ,backroom deal) and forget what your constituents say!!
I can''t wait to see the superdelegates go for Clinton,...they will say "Kerry did it!! Kennedy did it!! Richardson did it!! and I don''t want to hear any whining from the Obama-bots!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by wyzguy11 at 03:51 PM : Mar 31, 2008
No,Richardson is wrong.It is better for Obama in the long run if Hillary stays in and self destructs.Think about it,She takes the heat off him with her antics.When she loses after going all the way,the Clinton people won''t have anything to whine about,and most will still vote for Obama.We also get the added bonus of seeing Hillary as the biggest dope ever for taking it all the way.It will ruin her chance of ever being president,and may end her career as a senator.She needs to stay in until she is destroyed.Richardson and others need to shut up.
Go Hillary - Our Great White Hope.
So you go, Hillary. Run like you''ve never run before. Launch your "kitchen sink" attacks on fellow Democrats. Convince your donors to threaten Pelosi. Tell your supporters to vote Republican. Regale us with stories of your heroism Bosnia. And have your surrogates play the sexism card -- that should be good for a few votes. Don''t hold back. Simple failure is not good enough -- you need to go out in a blaze of inglorious silliness, and you seem to be making every effort to do so.
The Democratic Party can still come together -- it can come together over the smouldering remains of Hillary Clinton''s political reputation.
Go Hillary - Our Great White Hope.
You''re absolutely right! And those people asking for Hllary Clinton to step down just want an easy win for Obama instead of making him earn it!
Gov. Richardson was a fool to make a backroom bargain with Obama for the VP slot, before a nomination was made! It was the height of bad judgment. Obama has since dropped him like a hot potatoe after getting his endorsement and is now woeing Bloomberg for the VP slot! Poetic justice, what?
Sorry I feel no shame for any of my statements against a corrupt shill trying to get an easy win out of this nomination.
Well said!
8,700 people being taught anti-American separatism by Rev. Wright plus another few million who read Obama''s books that honor and speak to Rev. WRight''s teachings.
LOTS of ''em!
Richardson has acted with class, dignity and courage. Isn%u2019t it disloyalty for Carville, owing so much to the Dems, to disparage a top Democrat? How can that possibly help the Dems win, whoever the eventual nominee turns out to be?
It%u2019s revealing that some view loyalty as owed in proportion to political favors previously given. That is old-style, corrupt politics. "Who-owes-whom-what?" How about some new-style politics where we focus on what''s best for America, not what''s best for the Clintons or the party bosses? Quite frankly, we shouldn''t be focusing on what best for any particular interest group or demographic sub-group either.
No one is entitled to the Presidency. No one is entitled to a single vote. Support must be earned through character, ideas, leadership and honesty. That%u2019s why I''m an Obama supporter %u2013 it%u2019s my honest view that he%u2019s best for America in 2008.
I do not disparage anyone who has a contrary view. But shame on those who have posted venom-filled hate messages in this forum. Whoever you are, you are not helping whatever candidate you purport to endorse.
IF WE LET THEM!
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 11
- next
See all 202 Comments