Early "Leaf" Photo Could Fetch Fortune

Sotheby's To Auction Historic Photograph; Believed To Date Back As Far As 1790

(AP)  A New York auction house is selling a primitive photograph that could be a much earlier work than originally believed. If so, it says, it would be one of the most important discoveries in the history of photography.

The work, "Leaf," to be sold at Sotheby's on April 7, is a photogenic drawing — a cameraless process in which an object is placed on silver nitrate-coated paper or leather to form a negative image.

It had previously been attributed to William Henry Fox Talbot, considered the father of photography along with Louis-Jacques-Mande Daguerre. It was thought to have been made in 1839 at what is widely accepted as the dawn of photography.

But Sotheby's says research by a leading photo expert suggests otherwise — that several early photo experimenters could be the authors, including Thomas Wedgwood, James Watt and Humphry Davy, who worked in the medium decades earlier. If that theory is true, it means the photo could have been made as early as 1790.

What it will fetch at auction is anyone's guess, said Denise Bethel, Sotheby's director of photography.

"The range is pretty wide," she said. "When we thought it was Talbot, we gave it a $100,000 to $150,000 estimate. Now with this other possibility ... it's certainly far more valuable."

Sotheby's catalog lists "Leaf" as "Photographer Unknown." But the auctioneer says an inscription of the initial "W" on the corner of the photo could point to Wedgwood or Watt as possible authors. Wedgwood died in 1805; Watt in 1819.

"Leaf" was among six similar anonymous works that were sold individually at Sotheby's London in 1984. It was purchased by a dealer for $776, and only later attributed to Talbot.

Two of the other six works are now in the J. Paul Getty Museum and one is at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

All six photogenic drawings were contained in an album belonging to Henry Bright of England whose family had a close social connection to the Wedgwoods, Watt and Davy, adding further support to the theory that "Leaf" could be by one of them, Sotheby's said.

Bethel said Sotheby's, in reevaluating the photo, was relying on the expertise of Larry J. Schaaf, a leading photo historian and Talbot expert.

She said Schaaf based his hypothesis on the "W" inscription; the photo's connection to the Bright family; and the fact that it doesn't resemble a Talbot.

The work of Wedgwood, of Wedgwood china fame, Watt and Davy was documented in their day and cited in standard histories of photography, but no examples have ever been identified, Sotheby's said.

"In the end, what is certain is perhaps the only factor that really matters in a work of art," Schaaf writes in an essay in the sale's catalog. "This image of a leaf is extraordinary. It arrests our attention as much today as it had done for at least a century and a half, and just possibly more than two centuries." last night.

[fibonacci_]

Wow, in the last few days the earliest recording has been contested and now this. Very, very cool.

[iknowbest-2009]

Yawn.

[nothappyatall]

Interesting, I''m not sure I see the connection between Wedgewood and this, he made exquisite china with the now familiar black, blue or green, and decorative overlays. I own a few pieces handed down, including 5 cameo portraits, one of which has a faint date incription.

Photography as we know it didnt really come into the hands of the general public affordable and practical till maybe the 1850''s, but it was a cumbersome affair with wet glass plates, highly toxic chemicals, exposure times measures in minutes etc.
What a shame photography and video wasnt invented 100 years earlier, image what we would have archived now and where the technology would be today.

[iknowbest-2009]

Bigger YAWN. Newster - be careful, you might chip a nail.

[jaykay3141]

Yawn??? Go learn more about photography than CoolPix. Learn more about history than what happened to Britney Spears last week. Learn more about science than that the Bushies and their right-wing cohorts don''t believe in it.

[gunownerdan]

Imagine how many of these early photographs have been thrown away as worthless trash, maybe some of them are sitting in your attic or in a box in your closet.
Now they are worth $100,000 +.
A lot of people out there have very old and valuable things and many will never even know it.

[godseyesore-2009]

Well said, JayKay3141.
It is amazing how many dolts there are these days.

[sblake63]

Yawn??? Go learn more about photography than CoolPix. Learn more about history than what happened to Britney Spears last week. Learn more about science than that the Bushies and their right-wing cohorts don''''t believe in it.


Posted by JayKay3141 at 06:00 PM : Mar 30, 2008

__________________

Lmao what a place or (artical) to find a stupid anti bush remark. Is somebody pissed because people who call them self conserative outnumber so called "free thinkers" (liberals) 3 to 1. Why not give it up folks. Were winning the battle for the hearts, mind and soul of America. Check into the stats of the rise of the "mega churchs" in america and how liberal institutions are losing members by the millions.

Stop posting on the blogs LOL.. You have already lost the "war"...