Haditha Charges Against Marine Dropped
Lance Corporal Was Accused Of Involuntary Manslaughter In 2005 Iraq Killings
-
Photo
Marine Lance Cpl. Stephen B. Tatum arrives for his Article 32 Investigation Hearing at Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base in San Diego County Monday, July 16, 2007. The Marine Corps dropped all charges against Tatum on Friday, March 28, 2008. (AP Photo/Denis Poroy)
-
Interactive
Iraq: 5 Years At War
Five years after the U.S.-led invasion, the war wears on.
-
Interactive
Military 101
Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.
The case against Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum, 26, of Edmond, Okla., was dropped as jury selection was about to begin for his court-martial.
The government has been seeking Tatum's testimony against the squad leader, Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich of Meriden, Conn.
In February, Tatum received an order to testify against Wuterich and an unrequested immunity order that said anything to which he testified would not be used against him in his court-martial. On Friday, a new immunity order was issued along with the dismissal of charges.
In addition to two counts of involuntary manslaughter, Tatum had been charged with reckless endangerment and aggravated assault.
Tatum's attorney, Jack Zimmerman, said there was no agreement with the government before the dismissal.
"Absolutely, there is no deal," he said.
Zimmerman said Tatum would testify if called as a witness in future trials but that he would testify as a neutral witness, not a government witness.
Camp Pendleton spokesman Lt. Col. Sean Gibson said the dismissal was signed by Lt. Gen. Samuel Helland.
The case stemmed from a squad's assault in response to a roadside bombing of a convoy that killed one Marine and wounded two others.
The government says Wuterich and another Marine shot five men at the scene and the squad leader then ordered his men to clear homes with grenades and gunfire, killing unarmed civilians.
Wuterich faces nine counts of voluntary manslaughter, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and obstruction of justice. There is no date set for Wuterich's court-martial.
Wuterich's civilian defense attorney, Neal Puckett, contended that the Tatum dismissal showed the government has a poor case against his client.
"I think it's a further demonstration of how weak the government's case has become. Of the four Marines who fired weapons that day only one still faces charges," Puckett said.
Four enlisted Marines were initially charged with murder and four officers were charged with failing to investigate the deaths. Over time the case has shrunk, including removal of all murder charges.
Tatum was the third enlisted Marine to have all charged dismissed. Only two officers remain charged.
The highest-ranking defendant is Lt. Col. Jeffrey R. Chessani of Rangley, Colo., commander of the Camp Pendleton-based 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment at the time of the Nov. 19, 2005, Haditha killings.
Chessani, accused of dereliction of duty and violation of a lawful order, has said he didn't order a formal investigation because he believed the deaths resulted from lawful combat.
©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam
- Latest in Iraq After Saddam
- Bombs Claim 50 in Iraq
- Biden Meets with Key U.S. Leaders in Iraq
- Senate Investigates Blackwater Subsidiary



not in the rigged Pro U.S. System....
This kid still has zits.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by kyanna1 at 05:46 PM : Mar 28, 2008
-I''d rather say the opposite. We always hated them, and always demonized them, as thieves, Alibabas and SINbads...
plus GOD BLESS AMERICA and the MARINES
Posted by creeper00 at 07:50 PM : Mar 28, 2008
+ report abuse
*********
wanna support terrorists??? become a liberal
(((and these are suppose to be the people who ''are just looking after the best interest of the our american soldiers)))
I would bet a million dollars 99% of all anti-war liberals dont give a sh*t about our soldiers when they demand withdrawal from middle east.
This is a war zone. Remember??? Some of these kids are too young to be over there. How many of us would have done the same thing? Our marines are human beings, and some of them are very scared.
This did happen in our country-9/11!!!
Never forget!!
That''s not an excuse for murder, even in a war zone.
Marines are expected to conduct themselves according the the rules of war (the Hague and Geneva Conventions) and the UCMJ.
To act otherwise makes us the terrorists.
Posted by Libsrweak
You''d lose. But to make sure I''ll ask my son the next time he calls from Iraq (he''s a Navy Corpsman).
Conservative Republicans who send other people''s children to fight their illegal wars with substandard equipment and who endlessly wave the flag but make no sacrifice themselves (like you pal) are the real military haters.
Given that Bush is a coward and draft dodger himself (like most of the Republican leadership) this isn''t surprising.
You are a disgrace to the human race and know nothing about the military or law. It is fact that the rules of evidence in a court martial are much more lenient to be prosecuted with. You do not have to prove as well as you would in a civilian trial. The Marine Corps dropped the charges so i believe this makes the man innocent. Unless you were there you have no idea what those marines went thru that day seeing their buddies killed and wounded.i fought so everyone has a right to their opinion and the right to voice it, in your case i think i made a mistake to fight for that right. You insult every soldier and every vet who has served.
Posted by Libsrweak at 10:09 PM : Mar 28, 2008
Well putting the military in Iraq really shows how much the present Administration thinks of the military.
White House: 3.5 percent pay hike unnecessary
By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday May 16, 2007 17:34:13 EDT
Troops don''t need bigger pay raises, White House budget officials said Wednesday in a statement of administration policy laying out objections to the House version of the 2008 defense authorization bill.
The Bush administration had asked for a 3 percent military raise for Jan. 1, 2008, enough to match last year''s average pay increase in the private sector. The House Armed Services Committee recommends a 3.5 percent pay increase for 2008, and increases in 2009 through 2012 that also are 0.5 percentage point greater than private-sector pay raises.
The slightly bigger military raises are intended to reduce the gap between military and civilian pay that stands at about 3.9 percent today. Under the bill, HR 1585, the pay gap would be reduced to 1.4 percent after the Jan. 1, 2012, pay increase.
Bush budget officials said the administration "strongly opposes" both the 3.5 percent raise for 2008 and the follow-on increases, calling extra pay increases "unnecessary."
And where does it say that theyare allowed to chop off heads of political prisoners on television in the geneva convention ?
Bush broke international law and the laws of our constitution when he invaded Iraq. Our constitution says we will not interfere with the internal workings of a foreign govt. This was an Iraqi matter and should have ben handled by the Iraqui''s, not us.
In this case, its a loyalty that seems to have been reinforced by the act of blowing the heads of Iraqi women together.
The issue here is the charges were dropped because the Marine Corps did not feel they could get a conviction. Therefore under our laws this man is presumed innocent. And who says those women were innocent. The terrorists use women to blow themselves up and fight against our American troops all the time.
Will Bush/Cheney frown upon you and complain to your corporate board members? Maybe restrict your access to "unnamed administration sources?" You COWARDS!
What did you report 40 years ago in Viet Nam, that a few unlawful killings took place in Mi Lai?
No one. That''s why murder works.
I don''t understand your last comment about that is why murder works.
I always wonder why when someone makes a comment they have to be sarcastic or beligerant. I fought for the right of everyone to have an opinion and to voice it, even you. I do not care for any of the three choices we have to choose from, just like in the last election. That is why i had my daughter to talk to the soldiers in her unit to see who they wanted to be their new Commander in Chief. I have always been supportive of our troops even though i an against th war in Iraq. I have also always been loyal to my country. So remember you can voice your opinion because of the soldiers we have today and the ones including me from the past.
Calley was a scapegoat at Mi Lai. Were the killings unjust ? I do not know i wasn''t there. I know it was a typical story where our troopswould go in and help a village then have them turn on our troops because they were actually communists. What would you have done in Calleys place ? He had seen his men continuously killed by people they had helped. They searched the village and found caches of hidden weapons for the VC. Maybe he lost it and had them killed. Maybe he was following orders like he testified he was. Maybe he figured that if he made an example out of these traitors that it would do some good in the war effort. I wouldn''t try to second guess any man in a combat situation. Noone knows for sure except him and anyone else that was there that day.
You kill the witnesses, then you get to define them however you want. One way of looking at it is: the only mistake those soldiers made that day was letting witnesses live. Cuz those witnesses have been pretty universal in condemning what they saw.
Of course, they were Iraqi...
-
by ranger1948
March 30, 2008 11:47 AM PDT
- ubrew12
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 44 CommentsThanks for the clarification. However with the results of the case now it looks like those witnesses must have lacked credibility.