Jailed Ex Gov. To Be Released For Appeal
Court Approves Release Of Don Siegelman While He Appeals Bribery Conviction
-
Play CBS Video
Video
The Prosecution of Siegelman
Don Siegelman was a successful Democrat in the Republican state of Alabama when he was convicted of bribery in a case that has been criticized by Democrats and Republicans. Scott Pelley reports.
-
Video
Pelley's Reporter's Notebook
Scott Pelley discusses his "60 Minutes" report on the controversy surrounding the trial of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman who is serving prison time after being convicted on corruption charges.
-
Photo
Former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman arrives at the Federal Courthouse in Montgomery, Ala., Thursday, June 28, 2007. Siegelman is serving more than seven years in a Louisiana prison following a corruption conviction in 2006. (AP Photo/Dave Martin)
-
Interactive
End Of The Rove
President Bush's longtime friend and political mastermind Karl Rove resigns.
-
Interactive
Political Scandals
Politics can be a strange and dirty business. Check out some of the biggest missteps and mishaps in recent history.
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Thursday that Siegelman has met the legal standard necessary to allow him to be free from prison while he seeks to show he was wrongly convicted.
The former Democratic governor is serving a sentence of more than seven years for six bribery-related counts and one obstruction count. He began serving the term last June.
Earlier on Thursday, the House Judiciary Committee asked the Justice Department to temporarily release Siegelman from prison in early May to testify before Congress about possible political influence over his prosecution.
A spokeswoman for the committee said Siegelman would travel to Washington under guard of the U.S. Marshals Service. She said Committee Chairman John Conyers, a Michigan Democrat, believes Siegelman could provide important information about Justice Department practices under President Bush.
"The chairman has determined it would be appropriate to hear from Mr. Siegelman himself and believes he would have a lot to add to the committee's investigation into selective prosecution," spokeswoman Melanie Roussell said.
The Justice Department had no immediate comment.
Democrats last year began reviewing Siegelman's 2006 corruption conviction as part of a broader investigation into allegations of political meddling in Justice affairs by the Bush administration.
Justice and the federal prosecutors who handled the prosecution have denied any political influence, emphasizing that Siegelman was convicted by a jury. But critics, including about 50 former state attorneys general, have called for a review and said the case raises a number of questions.
The effort gained momentum after a Republican lawyer who had volunteered for Siegelman's re-election opponent - current Republican Gov. Bob Riley - said she overheard conversations suggesting that former White House adviser Karl Rove was talking with Justice officials about Siegelman's prosecution.
Last month, "60 Minutes" reported that a key witness against Siegelman said that prosecutors met with him some 70 times and had him repeatedly write out his testimony because they were frustrated with his recollection of events.
Siegelman was elected governor in 1998 and served one term before narrowly losing re-election to Riley in 2002, as reports of corruption investigations clouded Siegelman's administration.
Siegelman was originally indicted in 2004 on charges of conspiring to rig bids on state Medicaid contracts. Prosecutors dropped the case, however, after a judge ruled there was insufficient evidence to support key charges.
Siegelman was indicted again a year later in a separate bribery and corruption case.
In June 2006, he was convicted on six bribery-related and one obstruction of justice charge. He began serving his sentence last June.
Siegelman was accused of appointing then-HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy to an important hospital regulatory board in exchange for Scrushy arranging $500,000 in disguised contributions to Siegelman's campaign for a statewide lottery. Siegelman was also convicted of a separate obstruction of justice charge concerning $9,200 he received from a former lobbyist to help with the purchase of a motorcycle.
A member of Siegelman's defense team, which is working on his appeal, said Thursday the former governor already has agreed to testify to Congress.
"They seem to think it's critical to straighten out the Justice Department to have him shed whatever light he can," attorney Vince Kilborn said. "He's delighted to cooperate. There are no restrictions on questions they can ask him."
©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 CommentsGood luck neo cons the nightmare begins and it will not end for a long time.
This was just one more case of the Bu$h administration using the Justice Department as a political arm of the Republican party.
There is little doubt that Karl Rove instigated the Justice Dept''s multiple investigations of Siegelman. The legal case consisted of a biased legal system, trumped-up charges and coached witnesses. The Republican judge was known to have a grudge against Siegelman. You can find numerous stories about the federal prosecutor''s agenda against the Democrats. She was also angry about having botched a previous prosecution of Siegelman which was thrown out of court. Watch the 60 Minutes piece for more details.
The Republicans will try to prevent Siegelman from testifying before Congress. We must not let them win.
...another Republican dirty trick. Have we no laws to protect us?
Posted by rudy654 at 03:51 PM : Mar 27, 2008
He can''t claim Executive Privilege unless Dumbya was involved - and if he does .... it''s no longer Repugs controlling congress. This inquiry will result in a new crop of convicted Repugs and i was just wondering *** with the silence from Repugs - There''s been no news since Jim Clark, Murkowski and Ward. I just knew Repugs could never dissapoint, it''s in their nature. Cheers!
This is disgusting. I can''t believe that our Justice System has been so corrupted that it''s been turned into a Republican "Just Us" system.
What is this criminal going to say? Of course he is going to say it was politically motivated even though the feds have witnesses.
I guess a federal judge and jury are unimportant to this Democratic House. politics are only what is important.
Shame on them.
Only ten months left of Tony Soprano in the White House.
First, there is an error in the story: "narrowly losing re-election to Riley in 2002". Siegelman won the election when the ballots were counted. The Republicans found thousands of new votes for Riley after the democratic election judges went home for the night.
That''s right only "Wascaly Webulicans" steal elections right. Betcha don''t know or even care what happened in the Govenors race in Washington State in 2004. The Rebublican candidate, Dino Rossi, won the election by 3000 votes, a slim enough margin to enact an automatic recount. The recount was done, and he still won by over 2000 votes. But the Democrat wanted a hand recount. No problem. The hand recount was done, and the Rebublican still won, this time with a larger margin. The secretary of state (a democrat) would not certify the election. The law dictated that with two recounts, the election would have to be certified. The Dems decided to sue(big surprise) to get yet another hand recount, but this time only the predominately Democrat counties of King, Peirce, and Snohomish.( they learned well from Florida 2000)After this recount the Democrat won by less than 200 votes,by the way almost 1500 ballots were "found" in a King county polling place, and the election was certified, by the Dem secretary of state, big surprise. As this situation drug out it was found that over 1000 ballots were either cast by dead people, people who voted twice, or people not eligble to vote.
The Republican decided to fight this, but was shot down by the Attorney General(another Dem). His statement was that unless he witnessed voter fraud first hand, it did not exist. By the way, he was one of the AG''s fired by Gonzales for not performing his duties, which was within Gonzales'' right as AG, but was demonized by you lib''s and the press for just doing his job.
Now with a Dem controlled state we went from a budget surplus to a deficite of 8 billion dollars. But you probably did not know any of this because it got little attention by the media. Had the roles been reversed it would have been a lead story for weeks, and the "evil election stealing Rebuplicans" would have been the mantra by the hypocritical left.
So saveUS2008, take the plank out of your eye before you accuse others of having a sliver in theirs
-----------------
Posted by stevex47 at 04:16 PM : Mar 27, 2008
Get real, the pardon list in January 2009 is going to be the size of a major metropolitan phone book. Many people who have not been charged with anything will be given pardons for unspecified crimes. That is the only way GWB can protect his legacy.
donbl1
Dear partisan moron with your head up your backside...actually read the article and watch the video.
What is this criminal going to say? Of course he is going to say it was politically motivated even though the feds have witnesses.
I guess a federal judge and jury are unimportant to this Democratic House. politics are only what is important.
Shame on them.
Posted by donbl1 at 04:30 PM : Mar 27, 2008
Pure politics on the part of the Republicans. Even Republican state attorneys say this should be looked at closer. Witness tampering on the part of the Department of Justice.
You''re wrong. I want every election to be fairly administered regardless of which party wins.
I also want the Justice Dept to be independent, not politically biased. I want the executive branch to be held accountable when they break the law, regardless of which party is in office.
I love politics. However, the law and the administration of the law must be apolitical. Otherwise our democracy is worth nothing.
Posted by ByeNeocons
Please don''t insult Tony. He''d make a much better pres than the current 1/3 of one that we have!!
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) -- A federal appeals court has approved the release of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman on bond while he appeals his bribery conviction.
No crime was even committed by the governor. This a political lynching. Our justice system should not be used as a political arm of the Republicon party.
The effort gained momentum after a Republican lawyer who had volunteered for Siegelman''s re-election opponent - current Republican Gov. Bob Riley - said she overheard conversations suggesting that former White House adviser Karl Rove was talking with Justice officials about Siegelman''s prosecution.
Last month, "60 Minutes" reported that a key witness against Siegelman said that prosecutors met with him some 70 times and had him repeatedly write out his testimony because they were frustrated with his recollection of events.
MORE REPUBLICAN CORRUPTION
REVIEW 9/11
REVIEW 9/11
Good Lord...just when you think the Bush administration and the GOP have reached the bottom you learn more about them that makes them all the more loathesome.
evangelical war against humanity
I''ll take a stab at it. Dems don''t steal elections like the GOP does, they win them by accurate vote counting. It''s refreshing to see all the big money Republi-cons defeated by simple (small "d") democracy.
bretster:
I''''ll take a stab at it. Dems don''''t steal elections like the GOP does, they win them by accurate vote counting. It''''s refreshing to see all the big money Republi-cons defeated by simple (small "d") democracy.
So gce65, you either a) did not read the posts (both of them)b) read the posts but are too ignorant to understand what happened. or c) are just so partisan that you can never admit your party ever does anything wrong. Which is it? all three.
bretster:
I''''ll take a stab at it. Dems don''''t steal elections like the GOP does, they win them by accurate vote counting. It''''s refreshing to see all the big money Republi-cons defeated by simple (small "d") democracy.
So gce65, you either a) did not read the posts (both of them)b) read the posts but are too ignorant to understand what happened. or c) are just so partisan that you can never admit your party ever does anything wrong. Which is it? all three.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 Comments