NEW YORK, March 27, 2008

Obama Proposes Homeowner Relief

Presidential Candidate Calls For Additional $30 Billion Economic Stimulus Package

  • Play CBS Video Video Obama's Foreclosure Plan

    "CBS News Raw": Speaking in New York City, Sen. Barack Obama outlines his plan to help homeowners which includes incentives for lenders to refinance, fraud prevention, and amending bankruptcy laws.

  • Video Obama's Regulatory Reform Plan

    "CBS News Raw": In a New York City speech Sen. Barack Obama lays out his core points for reforming the nation's financial institutions.

  • Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill., speaks about the economy, Thursday, March 27, 2008, in the Great Hall at Cooper Union in New York. Photo

    Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama D-Ill., speaks about the economy, Thursday, March 27, 2008, in the Great Hall at Cooper Union in New York.  (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

  • Interactive Eye On The Economy

    In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.

(AP)  Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Thursday that tougher government regulations that reflect the realities of modern finance are needed to get a grip on the U.S. economy before it gets even worse.

"We do American business - and the American people - no favors when we turn a blind eye to excessive leverage and dangerous risks," Obama said.

The presidential candidate spoke not far from Wall Street, hard hit by the mortgage meltdown and credit problems.

To fix the economy, Obama proposed relief for homeowners and an additional $30 billion stimulus package to address the nation's economic woes.

"If we can extend a hand to banks on Wall Street, we can extend a hand to Americans who are struggling," he said.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the almost candidate, introduced Obama but stopped short of an endorsement.

Bemoaning the United States' economic woes, Obama dismissed Republican rival John McCain's approach as pure hands-off. On Tuesday, McCain derided government intervention to save and reward banks or small borrowers who behave irresponsibly though he offered few immediate alternatives for fixing the country's growing housing crisis. Obama said McCain's plan "amounts to little more than watching this crisis happen."

Instead, Obama said, the next president should:

  • Expand oversight to any institution that borrows from the government.

  • Toughen capital requirements for complex financial instruments like mortgage securities.

  • Streamline regulatory agencies to end overlap and competition among regulators.

    While he laid out a half-dozen principles for closer scrutiny of the financial markets, he offered no specifics, such as which agencies should be reorganized or exactly how the government should go about peering over the shoulders of bank executives.

    Obama's Democratic rival Hillary Rodham Clinton planned a speech on the economy Thursday in Raleigh, North Carolina.

    Even before Obama finished his speech, McCain said in a statement, "there is a tendency for liberals to seek big government programs that sock it to American taxpayers while failing to solve the very real problems we face."

    The political debate comes as a new government report shows the economy nearly sputtered out at the end of the year and is probably faring even worse amid continuing housing, credit and financial crises.

    The U.S. Commerce Department reported that gross domestic product - the value of all goods and services produced in the country - increased at a feeble 0.6 percent annual rate in the October-to-December quarter. The reading - unchanged from a previous estimate a month ago - provided stark evidence of just how much the economy has weakened. In the prior quarter, the economy clocked in at a sizzling 4.9 percent growth rate.

    ©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
    Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


    Video and Galleries from Politics

    Add a Comment See all 239 Comments
    by jack3213 March 27, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
    WE ALL ARE AWARE THE CLINTONS PLAY REAL DIRTY, THAT THEY WILL DO ANYTHING TO WIN, EVEN IF IT MEANS GOING AGAINST THEIR OWN PARTY TO DO SO. OBAMA IS SIMPLY NOT QUALIFIED. BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM GOING AT IT FOR THE NEXT FOUR MONTHS THEY WILL COMPLETELY DESTROY THEIR PARTY. LET''S CELEBRATE NOW ( OR LATER) BECAUSE IT WILL SHOW ( AS TIME MOVES FORWARD) WHAT KIND OF NON- CREDIBILITY AND LACK OF EXPERIANCE THEY ACTUALLY HAVE AS COMMANDERS IN CHIEF. PATHETIC.
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 March 27, 2008 11:55 AM PDT
    Even before Obama finished his speech, McCain said in a statement, "there is a tendency for liberals to seek big government programs that sock it to American taxpayers while failing to solve the very real problems we face."

    Thank you Big Mac. Where in hell is Obama gonna get his bail out funds? The american public, that''s where. No thank you.
    Reply to this comment
    by demslie March 27, 2008 12:09 PM PDT
    And of course CBS (Communist Broadcast System) and Democrats will not tell you that OBAMA''s "PLAN" is an exact duplicate of the (OH MY GOD) Bush and Federal Reserve plan with (of course) a bunch more tossed in for Socialist programs like welfare and medicaid that has nothing to do with the Mortgage Crisis. Cheating and lies. This is the grand plan from the man who has not authored a major piece of legislation while in the Senate because he has been to busy running for more power.
    Reply to this comment
    by old300d March 27, 2008 12:11 PM PDT
    Hi Hillarygrl34 ,

    What will he do in the meetings with world leaders ?

    The meetings could last for 20 years and he would not know what they were talking about ?
    Reply to this comment
    by old300d March 27, 2008 12:13 PM PDT
    If he does not know what goes on at his chuch how in the world can he know what is going on in our country ?

    He is clueless ! ! !
    Reply to this comment
    by old300d March 27, 2008 12:14 PM PDT

    Either he is a liar or asleep at the wheel !
    Reply to this comment
    by thinkharder- March 27, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
    Good Job Obama Give away 30 Billion Dollars of our hard earn money to people who had no business buying a home they couldnt afford in the first place. People working at Mcdonalds getting a 500k loan. Thanks Obama your a real peach.

    Posted by Hillarygrl34 at 11:57 AM : Mar 27, 2008

    It''s probably more correct to cast your blame at the banks for lending to unqualified applicants in the first place. Who''s more at fault, the dealer or the user? The relationship may be symbiotic or synergistic, but the fault here lies more with the people dishing out the cash as opposed to the ones asking for a home.
    Reply to this comment
    by tbweb March 27, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
    Even before Obama finished his speech, McCain said in a statement, "there is a tendency for liberals to seek big government programs that sock it to American taxpayers while failing to solve the very real problems we face."

    Posted by mudrose at 11:55 AM : Mar 27, 2008,,,

    How can Sen. McCain say that with a straight face?, fix his mouth to say that when Pres. Bush has increased the size of government and outspent any known Democrat in history! Is Sen. McCain kidding? Pres. Bush expanded the government even creating the Dept. of Homeland Security that is anything but! The old Republican arguments are no longer valid thanks to the Bush mis-administration!
    Reply to this comment
    by kenbomc March 27, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
    McCain''s approach; "Gee, ah I don''t know. We should send that 30 billion to Iraq instead."
    Reply to this comment
    by pvperson March 27, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
    McCain''s economic plans revolve around his own way of making money. Dump your poor wife and marry a rich woman. Works every time.
    Reply to this comment
    by thinkharder- March 27, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
    Thank you Big Mac. Where in hell is Obama gonna get his bail out funds? The american public, that''''s where. No thank you.
    Posted by mudrose

    Yeah...better that money goes towards more war.
    Reply to this comment
    by serrano338 March 27, 2008 12:19 PM PDT
    Another Speech, another scandal.

    New Obama Scandal: Top Obama Adviser Could Face Legal Disbarment.

    Obama has nothing new to offer, just more words.
    Reply to this comment
    by beader59 March 27, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
    I am sure Hillary just wants the homeowners to suffer. Oh brother, are voters so naive to think he is the only one that thinks about the people. He just says things to get votes and the media is right there to publish everything he says like it is a brand new idea.
    Reply to this comment
    by ekucrew March 27, 2008 12:22 PM PDT
    Somebody check Obama''s transcripts from college! Did he even take ECON300?
    Reply to this comment
    by wendy_lady_ March 27, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
    Sounds nice, but Obama doesn''t have the experience or the balls to "get er done." Hillary does. She knows economy. She knows healthcare.
    Reply to this comment
    by thinkharder- March 27, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
    The Dems are history this election!!!!!!!!!!!
    Posted by commonsence1 at 12:22 PM : Mar 27, 2008

    HERE''S SOME MORE RASMUSSEN DATA FOR YOU FROM TODAY.

    "Rasmussen Markets data now give Obama a 78.6 % chance to win the Democratic nomination while expectations for a Clinton victory are at 19.8 %. Market data also suggests that Obama has a 47.9 % chance to become the next President. Expectations for McCain to become President are at 39.5 % while Clinton%u2019s prospects are at 13.4 %. "

    "http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll"
    Reply to this comment
    by wendy_lady_ March 27, 2008 12:27 PM PDT
    Anyone else notice that Obama just keeps repeating Hillary''s ideas?
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 March 27, 2008 12:30 PM PDT
    Thank you Big Mac. Where in hell is Obama gonna get his bail out funds? The american public, that''''''''s where. No thank you.
    Posted by mudrose

    Yeah...better that money goes towards more war.
    Posted by ThinkHarder

    We budget money for Defense. Sorry if you don''t like it. Ask you Congressman and Senator to return it along with all the other pork the stick in Omnibus Bills. Here''s another one you might want a reimbursement for -- new bill tucked way inside Omnibus Pork bill makes no further provision for fencing the borders. No matter who gets in, no more border fence whether they''d like to or not. How''s that for misappropriation of Defense?
    Reply to this comment
    by old300d March 27, 2008 12:31 PM PDT
    We could have had Mitt ! He wanted the job ! ! !

    The idea of Obama running this country in these troubled times is sad !
    Reply to this comment
    by old300d March 27, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
    Obama could not run a Pizza Hut much less our country !
    Reply to this comment
    by realpatriot1 March 27, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
    wendy_lady,

    Hillary may have the balls, I don''t know.

    She certainly doesn''t have the experience to get much of anything done. She screwed up healthcare, kissed up to Bush on Iraq, promised voting rights reform but dropped the ball,and,fought against worker and environmental protections in NAFTA.

    She did help to pass legislation on children''s health, legislation that only Bush could see as contentious.
    Reply to this comment
    by briannorwood March 27, 2008 12:33 PM PDT
    "We budget money for Defense. Sorry if you don''''t like it. " -- Mudrose

    I guess you don''t pay much attention to this stuff. If you did, you would know that the $12Billion per month Bush is spending in Iraq comes from "supplemental" spending requests. These are NOT included in the budget!
    Reply to this comment
    by kenbomc March 27, 2008 12:33 PM PDT
    Posted by commonsence1 at 12:22 PM : Mar 27, 2008;

    It''s pretty obvious the numbers are like that given the DFL doesn''t even have a nominee yet. You can''t be serious that people want another 4 years of Bush polocies.

    For those of you Mac backers wondering where Obama would get the 30 bill from, why don''t you think about why Mac supported and continues to support a war that was never needed and is funded by borrowing money from China? That war is funded on credit for us to pay off later down the road -real smart.
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 March 27, 2008 12:33 PM PDT
    Anyone else notice that Obama just keeps repeating Hillary''''s ideas?
    Posted by wendy_lady

    His writers are running out of material. He is now beginning to stutter, too. Hopefully he won''t let in another slip from his preacher''s rants. His "typical white person" speech or his preacher''s "garlic nose".
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 March 27, 2008 12:34 PM PDT
    Wall Street Journal, March 25, 2008

    "For all the Democrats'' advantages, Rep. Cole points out, Republicans hold a few of their own: The current Democratic-controlled Congress isn''t very popular, Sen. John McCain is probably the best presidential contender House Republicans could have hoped to run alongside, and lots of freshmen Democrats, who have never run for re-election, now have to do so in districts that aren''t naturally Democrat-friendly...Democrats have some problems as well. For starters, they now run a Congress that has a job approval of just 19%, which makes President Bush''s rating look almost rosy by comparison. Democrats took control of the House in 2006 by winning 31 seats that had been held by Republicans. The flip side for Democrats is that they now have 31 freshman members who have to defend those seats, in districts that previously tended to vote Republican. ''Those seats are probably going to perform in a very Republican fashion,'' Rep. Cole says...Rep. Cole ticks off a list of districts where Republicans should have a good chance to take back seats. In Florida''s 16th district, for example...leans Republican; President Bush won 54% of its vote in 2004...Such freshmen Democrats have had to make some politically difficult votes in the past two years...in particular, look for Republicans to make a year''s worth of tax-and-spend attack ads based on a House vote earlier this month on a budget resolution that called for rolling back President Bush''s tax cuts."
    Reply to this comment
    by briannorwood March 27, 2008 12:35 PM PDT
    Hillarygrl34 --

    Are you another plant from the Clinton campaign? We all know they camp out on these blogs from time to time.
    Reply to this comment
    by johnax88 March 27, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
    His idea could work.

    The government should make 30 billion directly available to home owners to pay off their rip off loans and then owe the government the loan at a percentage that will pay for the administration of the program - not make a profit.

    Nothing could be better than to keep home owners owners rather than bankrupt renters.

    It is the people''s money and we should not have to help banks make a profit while ripping off low income borrowers.

    I could not get a fixed rate loan but wow could I qualify for a higher rate loan - no problem guys.
    Reply to this comment
    by architekker-2009 March 27, 2008 12:39 PM PDT
    whites have to pay 60% taxes and blacks only pay 10%. Is that his plan? Did wright also said white governments take away thier money to make them poor?
    Reply to this comment
    by larry996-2009 March 27, 2008 12:41 PM PDT

    It is OK to let the stock market crash a little bit so that money from the stock market comes running back to housing. Increase margins for commodities and stocks to 100% down. All the speculative money going into oil futures and gold and copper futures will go into housing and oil price will crash below $60
    WAKE UP FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, HILLARY & OBAMA Have the guts to propose something which will work rather than putting 5 million homes into foreclosure in the next one year

    Reducing interest rates for banks is not helping home owners as they are not passing on these reduced rates to the general public.
    Reply to this comment
    by johnny343sc March 27, 2008 12:41 PM PDT
    UH... IT''S JUST GOING TO BE OUR TAX MONEY REDISTRIBUTED.

    WHERE ELSE ARE YOU GOING TO GET THE MONEY???

    BE STUPID- VOTE DEMOCRAT ''08

    ;)
    Reply to this comment
    by bookout2 March 27, 2008 12:41 PM PDT
    Obama? This guy is really, really scary.
    Reply to this comment
    by larry996-2009 March 27, 2008 12:41 PM PDT
    Federal Reserve has spent 800 Billion to rescue bumbling banks and investment banks since August last year and they are giving them money at 2.25%. Spend at least $200 billion for homeowners to refinance their homes at 4% fixed for 10 years both for personal homes and rental properties upto 4 units. No exceptions for poor credit. The credit scores of people has gone down because they are behind payments or they cannot refinace because banks still will not loan them money.With a leverage of 10% down, it will mean we will have actually invested $2 trillion into the housing market The housing problem will be solved in no time as the property values will reflate upwards.The worst danger is deflation and any other solution will have no effect like pushing on a string.They should not worry about the falling dollar as our exports will increase and dollar in 5 years will come roaring back. ( see Below)
    Reply to this comment
    by dante805 March 27, 2008 12:43 PM PDT
    Another massive bailout. Where does Obamakin intend to get all this money? Answer: YOU. Taxes will rise 20-40% under this Liberal. Stop running from the Label Barack. You earned it in the Illinois legislature and in Senate. Check out his votes. They are scary. He''s so liberal he should be called a Socialist.
    Reply to this comment
    by jimmyc1955 March 27, 2008 12:43 PM PDT
    The current downturn is just one of any economy''s normal cycling. We had a bubble driven by speculation on home valuations. As in any bubble, unscrupulious people rush in to make quick cash in the greedy, ill informed and desperate. The bubble bursts, a lot of hurt gets spread around and we get back to business.

    To my knowledge there is no formula to prevent irrational bubble because nobody wants to slow the gravy train down in the high profit upswing. Everybody wants to steer the train on the way down though.

    The leasons are specifically about lending practices. Some regulatory change will be needed but too much and you handicap those willing to take a risk, like starting new businesses, going back for more education and expanding your business. Too little and we could do this all again.

    Obama is trying to fix the symptoms because in an election year that is what everybody wants. McCain is correct in that there has to be some pain. It is a question of balance between the two and trying to prevent this from becoming a bigger pain.

    So most of these "economic" speaches are for vote getting - not for implementing.
    Reply to this comment
    by infidel_us March 27, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
    ''Obama Proposes Homeowner Relief''

    This bozo is too much.
    Reply to this comment
    by hypnotoad72 March 27, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
    McCain''s solution is apparently to sit back and do nothing, while blaming government for everything. (Government seems to be damned both ways and then becomes the panacea every time someone wants a bailout. Well, we started the process and I don''t believe the majority of problems are due to people mismanaging their finances.)
    Reply to this comment
    by realpatriot1 March 27, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
    nd toughening capital requirements for institutions marketing mortgage securities? Given the fact that both Bush & Clinton have their hands in the pockets of said institutions don''t hold your breath while looking.

    mudrose,

    That''s a silly argument. Are you saying that if we were attacked again that Bush would wait until Congress passed an Omnibus spending Bill to respond?

    If the rising tide of foreclosures isn''t stemmed by government and market intervention working concurrently the Tsunami will effect the entire economy and that will really play havoc on the budget.
    Reply to this comment
    by johnny343sc March 27, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
    UH... IT''''S JUST GOING TO BE OUR TAX MONEY REDISTRIBUTED.

    WHERE ELSE ARE YOU GOING TO GET THE MONEY???

    BE STUPID- VOTE DEMOCRAT ''''08

    ;)
    Reply to this comment
    by jntlw-2009 March 27, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
    Even before Obama finished his speech, McCain said in a statement, "there is a tendency for liberals to seek big government programs that sock it to American taxpayers while failing to solve the very real problems we face."
    +
    Wow what ignorance by McCain. It has been the current republican regime (Bush) that has bailed out the banks and investment banks to the tune of Hundreds of billions of dollars all at the expense of the American taxpayer and yet it has not resolved the problem. Corporate welfare in the most egregious fashion ever recorded with no resolution insight. So how is it that he sees it as the liberals who sock it to the American taxpayer? If McCain is not able to see how exactly opposit his statement is in reality - he is blind as a bat and I do not want to vote for any one who is so biasedly blind. Wow, this is unbelievable to make such a blatantly stupid statement.
    Reply to this comment
    by architekker-2009 March 27, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
    Read this: whites have to pay 60% taxes and blacks only pay 10%. Wright may have brainwahsed him and said white governments take away thier money to make them poor?
    Reply to this comment
    by jimmyc1955 March 27, 2008 12:52 PM PDT
    This isn''t about banks - though that is the easy target. Mortgage dealers are the prime culprits. They qualified the unqualified for loans there could not repay and in many cases committed fraud. The banks bought those mortgages from the dealers without properly qualifying them themselves. They repackages bundles of mortgages and sold the bundles to off load band loans along with the good loans to distribute risk. Wall street bought them on good faith and again without doing their own due diligence.

    It was all based on a simple thing - human greed. People wanted houses they knew they couldn''t afford or bought houses on speculation that the value would rise 20% in 3 years and they could resell them.

    Mortgage lenders made a profit when they sold them to the banks. Banks made a profit selling them to wall street. Wall street made a profit by bundling them and selling them as securities.

    When you can eliminate greed from the human condition you will eliminate bubbles. Calling home owners victims and banks culprits is horrifingly simplistic and won''t result in anything beneficial.

    Do you want to bail out the speculators? How about those who decided to live it up while they could with no intention of paying the mortgage on time? How do those get filtered out?

    It isn''t that easy.
    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 March 27, 2008 12:53 PM PDT
    Read this: whites have to pay 60% taxes and blacks only pay 10%. Wright may have brainwahsed him and said white governments take away thier money to make them poor?

    Posted by architekker at 12:50 PM : Mar 27, 2008

    Where did you get this fantasy?
    Reply to this comment
    by jntlw-2009 March 27, 2008 12:53 PM PDT
    Republicans are scary - look at the last 8 years and how they have destroyed America. Moderate Republicans are leaving their party in droves. I do not want any more Republicans who spend spend spend on themselves at the expense of the American Taxpayer and destroy the checks and balances set out in the Constitution, and who vote torture, and lie to get is in an endless war/quaqmire that will utimately cost us trillions of dollars, while trying to take away social security and other good social structures that help our society. Obama will be a much better president than what we have had to stomach the last eith years.
    Reply to this comment
    by beebopareebo March 27, 2008 12:53 PM PDT
    These are the inconvenient facts taht Barack Obama cannot run from:

    Considering that Sen. Obama has received $1.18 million from subprime lenders and has taken more campaign contributions from the top ten issuers of subprime loans that attack rings hollow as just words. Sen. Obama has a record of talking about standing up to special interests and then caving to their demands. Hillary has a 35-year record of standing up to special interests and delivering results.



    Obama has taken $1,180,103 from the top issuers of subprime loans. [cq.com]
    Obama received $266,907 from Lehman. [Cq.com]
    Obama received $5395 from GMAC. [Cq.com]
    Obama received $150,850 from CS First Boston . [Cq.com]
    Obama received $11,250 from Countrywide. [Cq.com]
    Obama received $9052 from Washington Mutual. [Cq.com]
    Obama received $161,850 from Citigroup. [Cq.com]
    Obama received $4600 from CBASS. [Cq.com]
    Obama received $170,050 from Morgan Stanley. [Cq.com]
    Obama received $1150 from Centex. [Cq.com]
    Obama received $351,900 from Goldman Sachs. [Cq.com]
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 March 27, 2008 12:54 PM PDT
    Read this: whites have to pay 60% taxes and blacks only pay 10%. Wright may have brainwahsed him and said white governments take away thier money to make them poor?
    Posted by architekker

    We also infected them with the HIV/AIDS virsus to kill them. We bombed Japan for the hell of it and didn''t bat an eyelash. We allow the Israelis to slaughter innocent Palestinians, never mind those rockets from Hamas and Herzbollah and Iran flying over Israel. Yep, all our chickens are coming home to roost. Preacher man says whities evil. Obama tells us we''re "typical ***** people" and the preacher man calls some of us garlic noses. Wow, don''t you hear Sharpton and Jackson denouncing these guys? The silence is deafening.
    Reply to this comment
    by architekker-2009 March 27, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
    Read this: whites have to pay 60% taxes and blacks only pay 10%. Wright may have brainwahsed him and said white governments take away thier money to make them poor?

    Posted by architekker at 12:50 PM : Mar 27, 2008

    Where did you get this fantasy?

    for twenty years he excusing white people government given problems. Hogwash!
    Reply to this comment
    by mudrose-2009 March 27, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
    Wall Street Journal, March 25, 2008

    "For all the Democrats'''' advantages, Rep. Cole points out, Republicans hold a few of their own: The current Democratic-controlled Congress isn''''t very popular, Sen. John McCain is probably the best presidential contender House Republicans could have hoped to run alongside, and lots of freshmen Democrats, who have never run for re-election, now have to do so in districts that aren''''t naturally Democrat-friendly...Democrats have some problems as well. For starters, they now run a Congress that has a job approval of just 19%, which makes President Bush''''s rating look almost rosy by comparison. Democrats took control of the House in 2006 by winning 31 seats that had been held by Republicans. The flip side for Democrats is that they now have 31 freshman members who have to defend those seats, in districts that previously tended to vote Republican. ''''Those seats are probably going to perform in a very Republican fashion,'''' Rep. Cole says...Rep. Cole ticks off a list of districts where Republicans should have a good chance to take back seats. In Florida''''s 16th district, for example...leans Republican; President Bush won 54% of its vote in 2004...Such freshmen Democrats have had to make some politically difficult votes in the past two years...in particular, look for Republicans to make a year''''s worth of tax-and-spend attack ads based on a House vote earlier this month on a budget resolution that called for rolling back President Bush''''s tax cuts."
    Reply to this comment
    by whoever1234 March 27, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
    I wonder why the headline doesn''t read OBAMA PROPOSES $30 BILLION ADDITIONAL ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS IN ATTEMPT TO BUY VOTES? I think that would be more honest.
    Reply to this comment
    by realpatriot1 March 27, 2008 1:01 PM PDT
    jntlw,

    If the Hillary-bots make good on their threat by teaming up with the Lieberman-McCain ticket and the moderate Republicans come to our side we''ll have a better party going forward. I say good riddance!
    Reply to this comment
    by jimmyc1955 March 27, 2008 1:02 PM PDT
    This type of entitlement program is rife with the potential for corruption. They always are. Welfare reform exposed the fact that a great deal of welfare money didn''t go to the poor - it went to those connected into the system and how to manipulate it.

    Every time the government creates an entitlement program -i.e gives away money - the thieves line up - this will be no different.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 239 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs