Bush And Putin To Discuss Missile Defense
Near The End Of His Presidency, Putin Invites Bush To Meet With Him At A Black Sea Resort
-
President George Bush met with Russian President Vladimir Putin last summer at Walker's Point, the Bush family compound in Kennebunkport, Maine, July 1, 2007. (AP)
-
Fast Facts Russia Learn about the people, economy and history.
Bush is accepting Putin's invitation for a meeting in the Black Sea resort city of Sochi on April 6, to come at the end of the president's trip that starts Monday to Ukraine, Croatia and the NATO summit in Bucharest, Romania. It will likely be the last meeting between Bush and the Russian leader before Putin leaves office. Putin's successor as Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev, takes office at the beginning of May.
Bush announced the visit during a pre-trip interview with foreign journalists. He said he and Putin would discuss the missile defense system that the United States plans to base in Central Europe. It would involve 10 interceptor missiles based in Poland and a tracking radar system in the Czech Republic.
Moscow has been vehemently opposed to the idea, saying the intent is to weaken its nuclear deterrent. The United States denies that, saying the facilities are being designed to protect Europe against a potential missile attack - or even just nuclear blackmail - by Iran.
The dispute has become heated, with increasingly confrontational rhetoric coming from Moscow. But there have been signs of cooling recently and Bush told reporters that he saw an opportunity to build on that.
Talks in Moscow between high-level Russian officials and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates yielded some progress, said Stephen Hadley, Bush's national security adviser. Since those talks, Russia has made some conciliatory statements.
A Russian delegation is in Washington this week for more discussions "and continues to have some progress," Hadley said.
"Hopefully we could advance our dialogue so that at some point in time we could reach agreement on this important matter," Bush said. "The way to look at this is as a follow-up to Condi and Bob Gates' meetings."
In some ways, the meeting could be seen as a way to firm up a crucial, though faltering, relationship for the United States before Putin's departure. Though Putin has said he will switch roles to become prime minister, there are concerns in Washington about the direction Russian foreign policy might take under Medvedev at a time when Russia is a key factor in dicey issues such as containing nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
"This is an opportunity for the two leaders to meet, assess what progress has been made and see whether we can come together with a framework that can, as I said, consolidate areas where we're cooperating together, maybe resolve some outstanding issues such as missile defense and provide a platform for the relationship between the two countries going forward," Hadley said.
Bush declined to comment on what he thinks democracy will be like in Russia under Medvedev, Putin's protege and hand-picked successor. U.S. concerns about democratic backsliding in Russia were already on the rise before the Kremlin's power was enlisted to help smooth Medvedev's election.
Bush first said he had not yet met Medvedev, though the White House has said the two met once four years ago when the Russian was a government minister. Bush then said "I have yet to work with him."
He said he liked some things he heard in Medvedev's first speech and suggested he would withhold judgment on the new president's leadership until after he has dealt with him.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The secrets of tennis legend 




You know is moron for a father asked the question would you rather have Hussain back well let me see the butcher of Bagdad or the buther of Crawford.
6 and 1/2 dozen does it really matter?
- any surprise Putin reacting like this. Czech Republic used to be part of Russia''s backyard. Bush is installing such defense wares in Russia''s backyard. quite menacing...
Nothing is coming of this. Not news.
The Great Emperor will tell Putin that he has nothing to fear, that his system only works on warm, sunny days and that all his missiles will be pointed at Iran anyway.
Having dealt with the Great Emperor before, I am sure that Putin will complain about the Great Emperor''s military doing a sloppy job at handling nuclear bombs and parts for ICBM''s and he will prbably ask the Great Emperor if he needs help keeping track of his nuclear arsenal.
SIG HEIL, BUASH!!!!
sig heil (more of the same), McCain????
- by forthepeopl1 March 26, 2008 9:27 PM EDT
- Fielding questions after his speech, Paulson said that "innovation always precedes regulation in our economy" and suggested that oversight needed to catch up. OK PAULSON MY INNVATION IS TO BURN DOWN MY HOUSE,INSTEAD OF GIVEN IT TO THE SCUM BAGS THAT LIED ABOUT THE VALUE..
- Reply to this comment
See all 12 CommentsOnce again Paulson defended the government''''''''s role in coming to the aid of Bear Stearns - which has been criticized by some Democrats and others as akin to a federal bailout.
AND 100 MILLION AMERICANS ARE FACEING BANKRUPY, SO WERE IS MY BAILOUT..AND WE DIDN''''''''T LIE ABOUT THE VALUE OF OUR HOMES..THEY DID,
"Bear Stearns found itself facing bankruptcy,"
Paulson said. "The Federal Reserve acted promptly to resolve the Bear Stearns situation and avoid a disorderly wind-down. It is the job of regulators to come together to address times such as this; and we did so. Our focus was the stability and orderliness of our financial markets."
Paulson said the administration will explore ways to help struggling homeowners at risk of losing their homes. But he was cool to some of the proposals put forth by Democrats on Capitol Hill, saying that "most are not yet ready for the starting gate."
In addition, he rejected the need for a "systemwide solution" to deal with homeowners who have no equity in their home. That''''''''s when one''''''''s mortgage eclipses the value of their home.
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke recently urged lenders loans.SAYING 30 OR 40 OR EVEN 50 PERCENT REFI IS BETTER THAN A BURN DOWN HOME..