Mike Gravel Switches To Libertarian Party

Long-shot presidential candidate Mike Gravel told supporters Wednesday he is leaving the Democratic Party to join the Libertarian Party.

Gravel, a former Democratic senator from Alaska, said in an e-mail that the Democratic Party "no longer represents my vision for our great country."

"It is a party that continues to sustain war, the military-industrial complex and imperialism - all of which I find anathema to my views," he said in the e-mail in which he also asked supporters for campaign donations.

Gravel, 77, has been excluded from recent Democratic debates because he failed to meet fundraising or polling thresholds.

"I look forward to advancing my presidential candidacy within the Libertarian Party, which is considerably closer to my values, my foreign policy views and my domestic views," he said.

Gravel left the Senate in 1981 after losing the 1980 Democratic primary. An outspoken critic of the Vietnam War, he was among the first Democrats to speak out against the war in Iraq while others supported the president.

He announced his bid for the presidency on April 17, 2006.

[oldhacks]

WHAT IS WITH THE PICTURE YOU USED CBS???

IM SO TIRED OF THIS *** CNN DOES THE SAME THING JUST SHOWS PICTURES OF HIM THAT ARE OBVIOUSLY NOT SHOWING HIM IN HIS BEST LIGHT WHILE YOU SHOW HILLARY LOOKING LIKE A BEAUTY QUEEN!!!

CHANGE THE PICTURE RIGHT NOW YOU WORTHLESS PHONY CROOKED CORPORATE SELL OUT ***!

[cfin5]

I find what Gavel has done is very interesting. It is a wise move! Hope he does well because all I want is the best American to win the Presidency. Not a NEOLIB or NEOCON please! In my conversations with folks his name comes up from time to time favorably with angry dems disgusted with the two they have now. Reps aren''t any happier with McCain at all. Going Libertarian could be the niche he needed.

[rowdytexan2]

I liked Obama''s speeches, they are very entertaining. But in the course of the campaign, I see the disconnect between Obama''s speeches and what he does. Anyway, I hope the voters would try to look deeper into his scant record, and see for themselves.

Anyway, I agree with the first post that Clinton seems to be the uniter in this campaign. I am not a white person, and I like her. If you look at the racial divides, one cannot help but conclude that it is Clinton who transcends racial barriers. Obama has the 90% of the black votes, but Clinton has the majority of everybody else, e.g. Hispanics, whites, asians, etc.

Many see Obama as a symbol, and I can''t blame others voting because of a symbol. Unfortunately, the government has to be run, and I would rather have somebody who knows that.

I think the media has been largely unfair to Clinton, and now that the media is scrutinizing Obama more, Obama supporters are claiming racism. Ferraro''s observation is right on, and whether Ferraro is with the Clinton campaign or not, that what she said remains to be true.

Posted by: CPCook | March 18, 2008 03:27 PM

Well said!

[b-easy63]

ONCE AGAIN....Obama may find himself in hot water--not for something he did, but for who he knows. Those Rezko indictments are sure to heat up and spill over and cause damage!!

Unfortunately for Hillary--she can''''''''t catch a break, soon to potentially break in the news is the story before the California appeals court which could DeLay her candidacy for good. this time evidence shows that Hillary (HERSELF ONCE AGAIN)was involved. At issue is a 250K donation made to her senatorial campaign. Her staff said she had no knowledge of it, so she was not roped into the scandal when her campaign mgr faced charges of hiding that money from the IRS.

Unfortunately VIDEO may again place Hill in deep doo, doo. It seems there is a video tape recording her discussing the fund raiser with the donors (on it, she talks about who would be there and what they will do) this means she performed what is known as a direct campaign request. donations from donors for that kind of request are limited to 25K. Since the donation was for 250K, that would be considered campaign fraud.

Woe is Hillary and Damnnnn those videos and tape recordings that make being a great liar so hard to keep up these days!!! ROTFLMAO.

Maybe Hill should quit, before she finds herself in court this time, with no way to hide her hand in shady dealings. Here''''''''s the Link: http://www.usjf.net/modules.php?op=modlo

ad&name=News&file=article&sid=344

[gunownerdan]

Dirty democrats and rotten republicans will destroy America - IF WE LET THEM.

[creeper00]

So long, Mike. Don''t let the door hit you on the way out.

[reddy991]

You keep hanging on to the "Libertarian Party" fantasy.
we know who "really" controller. check it at the site named www.40plusconnect.com

[blkpresident]

Providence,

Vote smart. You have three choices left: a girl, an OLD man or Obama. Please make your vote count.

[zertrat]

Now i think about it:
Republicans don''t argue the logic of their position because they KNOW there is none and they reject folks with logic as elitist. And they are in the business of building fake mammaries (superficially attractive things) everywhere they can.

Democrats have logic but they end up spending it against the foolish positions of the Republicans and Libertarians, thereby making their response illogical. Like honking with geese. And they cannot believe that everything they see isn''t a real mammary, because they like em.

[zertrat]

Libertarians can be defined as "people who have not thought through the logic of their position because there is none." Supporting libertarian positions is like saying you are attracted to Brittney''s mammaries without knowing they are fake.