WASHINGTON, March 24, 2008

Carville Won't Apologize For Judas Remark

Clinton Adviser Compared Bill Richardson To Judas

  • Hillary Rodham Clinton adviser James Carville is refusing to apologize for comparing New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson to Judas.

    Hillary Rodham Clinton adviser James Carville is refusing to apologize for comparing New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson to Judas.  (AP)

  • Photo Essay Hillary Clinton

    A look at a life and career full of firsts.

  • Photo Essay Barack Obama

    A look at the life and meteoric rise of the president-elect.

(AP)  Hillary Rodham Clinton adviser James Carville is refusing to apologize for comparing New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson to Judas.

Carville made the comparison to The New York Times after Richardson, once a member of former President Bill Clinton's Cabinet, endorsed Clinton rival Barack Obama last week for the Democratic presidential nomination. Carville called it an "act of betrayal," and pointed out that it came around Holy Week.

"Mr. Richardson's endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out (Jesus) for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic," he said.

Richardson told "Fox News Sunday" over the weekend that he wouldn't respond by getting "in the gutter like that."

"That's typical of many of the people around Senator Clinton," Richardson said on Fox. "They think they have a sense of entitlement to the presidency."

Carville told CNN on Monday that Richardson had committed an "egregious act" and he intended to make a sharp response to it.

"I wanted to use a very strong metaphor to make my point," Carville told CNN. "I doubt if Governor Richardson and I will be particularly close in the future."

Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson told reporters Monday that he didn't agree with Carville's comment.

"If I had said it, I would apologize," Wolfson said. "I did not say it, and if I had I would, but that's up to him."

Richardson served as ambassador to the United Nations and energy secretary during the Clinton administration.

©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Add a Comment See all 158 Comments
by ksh1022 March 26, 2008 5:15 AM EDT
At least Carville is loyal to the Clintons unlike most black voters and Bill Richardson.
Reply to this comment
by obamasgranny March 26, 2008 2:53 AM EDT
"I''m just not trying to be cute. I just have felt that an endorsement by me, I don''t think it is that significant," Richardson said.

Good point Bill!!

NOBAMA 08
Reply to this comment
by tbweb March 26, 2008 1:12 AM EDT
James Carville is to the Democratic Party what Yoda is to Star Wars! Carville orchestrated 2 Clinton White House victories and they are his prized products so there is much affection there on both sides, I don''t agree he is a Clinton puppet, more like a mutual admiration society. If Carville calls Richardson Judas then Judas he is, but its still a comment that should have been made in private, not public! I hope if his wife Mary Matalin is reading this she reaches over and smack him upside his ball head for me! :)
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch March 25, 2008 9:07 PM EDT
A close look at the stain on the back of Carville blue pant reads: "Owned by Clintons''''"....and Carville happily agrees with that.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by moeen1000 at 05:52 PM : Mar 25, 2008
+ report abuse

Amen he was lieing about his boss the former president until the president called him off. He''s owned and operated by bill and hillary. Its amazing that we can''t see the puppet strings
Reply to this comment
by moeen1000 March 25, 2008 8:52 PM EDT
A close look at the stain on the back of Carville blue pant reads: "Owned by Clintons''"....and Carville happily agrees with that.
Reply to this comment
by parachutepol March 25, 2008 8:00 PM EDT
Look at the end of the day, Carville can use his freedom of speech, and be a picture of how Clinton sees her campaign going without saying a word. You better think again. And yes dirty politics does entitle you to become president. (Smile)
Reply to this comment
by concorde5 March 25, 2008 7:10 PM EDT
This is just another sign that the Hillary camp is desperate. Richardson is a stand-up guy who had the courtesy to call Hillary the day before and let her know that he was going to endorse Obama and why. She should have had the balls to tell him what she thinks right then when she had him on the phone. Instead her campaign starts insulting the guy after the fact. Just tasteless on Hillary''s part. She really will do anything to win.

Hillary it''s time to give up.
Reply to this comment
by dnsallday March 25, 2008 6:37 PM EDT
Who cares what he says?
Reply to this comment
by latinovoter1 March 25, 2008 6:24 PM EDT
Carville Is So OLD SCHOOL, Just like Hillary, Bill, Mccain, Ferraro, Rendell, Feinstein, Limbaugh, *** Morris, ect. ect.

This election is about OLD SCHOOL VS. NEW SCHOOL.

And the latter will prevail.
Reply to this comment
by liberalvet March 25, 2008 6:14 PM EDT
Whoever gets the nomination, the other half will have to hold their nose and vote for the other one, or else have McCain. It''''s that simple.

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 02:17 PM : Mar 25, 2008

Rowdy,

I would say we agree on 95% of issues out here....we just happen to feel different about the Democratic candidates, thats good....that is what makes the process great. It is good to read your post below and I could not agree more. I will vote for Hillary if she is nominated, as I do not want to see McSame in the White House. I just hope that when the Democratic Primaries are over all democrats will feel the same.
Reply to this comment
by obamasgranny March 25, 2008 5:52 PM EDT
"I''''''''m just not trying to be cute. I just have felt that an endorsement by me, I don''''''''t think it is that significant," Richardson said.

Good point Bill!!

NOBAMA 08
Reply to this comment
by hissteps4u March 25, 2008 5:32 PM EDT
Carville is a Pompous rear end as usual and Clinton is using him just for that purpose. If she were fair and righteous she would repudiate his words.

He is a dirty trickster with a Mouth that the Grand Canyon could fit within.

It is all about the end result without consideration for the truth.

Do they feel slighted? Sure they do they figured Richardson was a shoe in because he was an appointee from the Clinton White House years. How wrong they were!

It is exactly these kinds of things and Entitlement of the Clinton which is and shows her arrogance. Being a Wife does not make a President be!

She needs to run along back to New York and hang her head and go into obscurity quickly.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 25, 2008 5:17 PM EDT
Whoever gets the nomination, the other half will have to hold their nose and vote for the other one, or else have McCain. It''s that simple.
Reply to this comment
by tucano2 March 25, 2008 5:14 PM EDT
As usual Mr. Carville is right on. Mr. Richardson has no loyalty to the USA either as evidenced by his welcoming attitude towards Illegal Aliens provided they are mestizos.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 25, 2008 5:12 PM EDT
I will agree that the core Democratic base supports Hillary. They support status quo and do not want to see change. That is why progressive thinking Democrats have left the Clinton bandwagon. We want more than the same wrapped in a different paper. In addition Independants support Obama far more than Hillary. If Hillary gets the nomination the Independants will either vote McSame or not at all. Either way Hillary loses and McSame gives us 4 more years of GWB rule.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by LiberalVet at 01:49 PM : Mar 25, 2008

Progressive sounds like another buzz word that doesn''t mean krap. Obama stands for exactly the same. He commits politics as usual, he steals all his plans from Hillary, he votes the same as Hillary. So what''s he going to change? What the hell does he represent that''s different?

A buzz word you want to call progressive means change?
Reply to this comment
by socrates392 March 25, 2008 5:03 PM EDT
Carville is such a vile little man. And Hillary claims that Obama is running a negative campaign!
Ha, that''s a hoot!
Reply to this comment
by liberalvet March 25, 2008 4:49 PM EDT
Well SOME of the democrat, not all by even half. There''''s still half the democrats out here that are applauding James Carville''''s personal loyalty and think Richardson, all warm and fuzzy, jumped on the racial bandwagon like a chicken on a junebug.

Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 01:34 PM : Mar 25, 2008

I will agree that the core Democratic base supports Hillary. They support status quo and do not want to see change. That is why progressive thinking Democrats have left the Clinton bandwagon. We want more than the same wrapped in a different paper. In addition Independants support Obama far more than Hillary. If Hillary gets the nomination the Independants will either vote McSame or not at all. Either way Hillary loses and McSame gives us 4 more years of GWB rule.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 25, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
So Richardson realized what so many Democrats and Independants have, which is that Hillary is not the best candidate, and for that the Clinton campaign goes into smear factor on a major scale. Again they show thier true desire to rule no matter what the cost. Wake up America, we have endured 7 years of just ath type of thinking, we do not need another 4.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by LiberalVet at 01:31 PM : Mar 25, 2008

Well SOME of the democrat, not all by even half. There''s still half the democrats out here that are applauding James Carville''s personal loyalty and think Richardson, all warm and fuzzy, jumped on the racial bandwagon like a chicken on a junebug.
Reply to this comment
by elizabethbj March 25, 2008 4:32 PM EDT
People are starting to remember all the lies, misrepresentations, evasiveness of the Clinton years and how it continues now with how they have run a very negative campaign. I guess the chickens are now coming home to roost.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 25, 2008 4:31 PM EDT
Carville is getting paid alot of money to say what he said. This shows you the arrogance of the Clinton (Bill and Hill) campaign.

So now people can''''t make personal decisions anymore? The Clintons always want to change the rules.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ElizabethBJ at 01:28 PM : Mar 25, 2008

As will Richardson will be getting a lot of money out of Obama. Pro''bly more so.

Richardson is now old news, done deal, and he did it to himself.
Reply to this comment
See all 158 Comments

60 Minutes

The secrets of tennis legend Andre Agassi; the growing threat of cyber wars; and more.
Read More

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    Jimmy Fallon, Robert De Niro, Alicia Keys, Eva Longoria Parker, Jon Voight, Tom Hanks and More

  • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

    Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

  • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

    Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

    Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

  • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

    The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: