ANCHORAGE, Alaska, March 23, 2008

Alaska Fishing Boat Sinks, Killing Four

Search Continues For One Missing Crew Member, 42 Others Were Rescued

  • The Alaska Ranger is seen at a port in Dutch Harbor, Jan. 2006. The Coast Guard said four crew members died on March 23, 2008, and another was missing after the 184-foot Alaska Ranger began sinking in high seas off Alaska's Aleutian Islands.

    The Alaska Ranger is seen at a port in Dutch Harbor, Jan. 2006. The Coast Guard said four crew members died on March 23, 2008, and another was missing after the 184-foot Alaska Ranger began sinking in high seas off Alaska's Aleutian Islands.  (AP Photo/Jim Paulin)

  • Interactive Tragedy At Sea

    Some of the worst and most notorious sea disasters, plus noteworthy accidents on U.S. rivers and lakes.

(AP)  Four crew members died Sunday and another was missing after a Seattle-based fishing boat sank in high seas off Alaska's Aleutian Islands, the Coast Guard said.

The dead were among 47 crew members who abandoned ship after the 184-foot Alaska Ranger developed problems. Forty-two crew members were recovered safely, but a search was continuing for the missing person, said Chief Petty Officer Barry Lane.

The vessel started taking on water shortly before 3 a.m. after losing control of its rudder 120 miles west of Dutch Harbor, which is on Unalaska Island. Seas with up to 8-foot waves and 25-knot winds were reported at the time of the sinking, Lane said. The Coast Guard is investigating the cause of the accident, he said.

State environmental regulators were notified that the ship was carrying 145,000 gallons of diesel when it sank in deep seas, according to Leslie Pearson, emergency response manager for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.

A Coast Guard C-130 crew reported an oil sheen that covered an area of a quarter mile by a half mile, Coast Guard spokesman Ray Dwyer said. Because of the strong winds, however, any cleanup effort is unlikely, although those conditions would disperse a spill much more quickly than calm weather, Pearson said.

Some of those on board the Alaska Ranger were heading to Dutch Harbor in the doomed vessel's sister ship, the Alaska Warrior, with arrival expected around midnight or early Monday. The vessel took part in the rescue operation along with two Coast Guard helicopters that were used to pluck crew members from life rafts, Lane said.

Other survivors were on board the Coast Guard cutter Munro, which remained at the scene to search for the missing crew member. Lane said the names of the dead would not be released until notification of next of kin.

A C-130 also remained to help search for the missing crew member.

Coast Guard Lt. Eric Eggan said it was unknown how or when the four died.

Chuck Harvey, a harbor officer on duty in Dutch Harbor, said his office was notified by the Coast Guard to clear a dock for its arrival. The Coast Guard also told harbor officials to have an ambulance ready, but didn't specify the degree or nature of any injuries, Harvey said.

"I figure there's quite a bit of hypothermia going on," he said.

The Alaska Ranger is owned by Seattle-based Fishing Company of Alaska. A man who answered the company's phone Sunday afternoon declined to identify himself or comment. He said no one else was available to comment.

"Today, they're all pretty much tied up," he said.

Coast Guard Petty Officer Levi Read said the company had sent an insurance adjuster to Dutch Harbor.

In December, an engine fire damaged the Alaska Patriot, a trawler owned by the company, while it was docked near Dutch Harbor.

No one was hurt. Roger Deffendall, fire captain with the Unalaska Department of Public Safety, told radio station KIAL that a crew member extinguished the worst of the fire before he and the rest of the crew fled the ship.

The Fishing Company of Alaska was among entities slapped with a $254,500 civil penalty and permit sanctions in 2006 in connection with the fishing vessel Alaska Juris, a catcher-processor fishing vessel managed by the Seattle company. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fisheries Service said the company — as well as the boat's owner, o rd5

Alaska Juris Inc., and its captains — committed numerous violations, such as tampering with or destroying equipment used by industry observers and failing to provide observers a safe work area.

The captains, Alaska Juris and the Fishing Company of Alaska each were assessed a portion of the penalty.

Federal officials said the charges stemmed from a multiyear investigation that documented a range of violations, including keeping inaccurate information on required reports and fishing contrary to seasonal closures.


© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by keithle1 March 26, 2008 6:13 AM EDT
How many people would work that hard if it wasn''t for a big paycheck at the end of it?
Reply to this comment
by blindley2-2009 March 26, 2008 2:56 AM EDT
I would venture to guess that the suggestions towards safety and regarding greed are based equally in ignorance and good intentions. Fishing is not a safe job. If you want a safe job, serve the fish planks as they reach your local restaurant. Those vessels are kept as safe as they can be, whether by physical plant or by evacuation regimen. On a lighter note, fishing vessels can resemble floating turkish prisons, but I have personally been employed on the vessel in question, the f/v AK Ranger, and can assure you that they keep their ships as safe as they can. The only time I''ve seen someone put themselves at risk is when coming in from shore leave ;) or when they just plain weren''t paying attention. Even then, the crew is made certain to be aware of emergency procedures, and that is what kept the other 42 safe (along with the efforts of the coast guard and the AK Warrior). Perishing at sea is not a comforting thing to consider, and we should pause a bit longer to think of the crew and their families. I need to place a disclaimer here, I do not speak on behalf of FCA nor have I been asked to coment, I just thought someone who knows something of the particulars of the job and especially of the company should chime in, to balance out the comments.
Reply to this comment
by hillary4us March 24, 2008 2:55 AM EDT
The answer to your question AnvilofSteel, is GREED! It would cost money to outfit the ships with these safety mechanisms which cuts into profits. GREED!
Reply to this comment
by anvilofsteel March 24, 2008 1:21 AM EDT
why dont they install emergency separation equipment so the captain of a sinking vessel can press a button and the tanks will seal off like a modular component to prevent leaks? they must not require large ships to have anything like that because they are always worried about leaks from sinkings.
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: